Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May47
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Foreign carriers see mixed results in Belgrade

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
Foreign airlines register 5% passenger decline in Belgrade

The busiest foreign carriers operating flights to Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport have recorded mixed results during the first three quarters of the year as they face increased competition, which has been accompanied by a reduction in the number of operated flights. Wizz Air, which once boasted a notable presence in the Serbian capital, has seen its passenger numbers weaken. However, Montenegro Airlines, Lufthansa and Turkish Airlines all registered passenger growth on their services to Belgrade. Overall, foreign carriers handled 1.692.871 travellers on flights to and from the Serbian capital during the January - September period, down 5.2% compared to 2014. They now account for 44.9% of all passengers passing through the airport, a decrease of 5%, having been surpassed by Air Serbia which now handles 55.1% of all travellers using the airport.

Wizz Air, which has a base in Belgrade, remains the busiest foreign carrier in the city. However, its passenger numbers have been declining for over a year now, ever since the airline decided to rationalise its operations, blaming airport favouritism and hidden subsidies granted to Air Serbia. The low cost carrier welcomed 309.976 passengers on board its aircraft bound to and from Belgrade during the Q1 - Q3 period, a decrease of 5.6% compared to last year. The airline’s passenger share has now slumped to just 8.2% and has been accompanied by a further decline in the number of operated flights. However, this winter, Wizz Air has added frequencies to a select number of destinations compared to last year and will introduce its first new route from Belgrade in two years at the start of the 2016 summer season next March.

Despite reducing its operations to Belgrade, Lufthansa has continued to record growth on its services to the Serbian capital, offering passengers a more competitive fare structure. The airline handled 225.814 travellers, up 6%. In a statement earlier this August, the German airline said it expects further positive developments on the Serbian market and for passenger growth to continue despite reduced capacities. The carrier now boasts a 6% passenger share at the airport. Montenegro Airlines remains the most frequent airline in Belgrade out of all the foreign carriers and has positioned itself as the fourth busiest in the country, handling 207.625 passengers on 2.515 flights during the first six months, an increase of 2.2%. Turkish Airlines also saw its numbers improve markedly on last year, overtaking Swiss International as the fifth busiest carrier in the city.

Busiest foreign carriers at Belgrade Airport Q1 - Q3
AirlinePAXChange (%)
Wizz Air309.976▼ 5.6
Lufthansa225.814▲ 6.0
Montenegro Airlines207.625▲ 2.2
Turkish Airlines155.427▲ 14.3

Common to almost all foreign airlines is the sharp decline in the number of operated flights, with the trend expected to continue this winter as well. Scheduled year-round operators running fewer services to Belgrade during the first three quarters include Lufthansa, Wizz Air, Austrian, Turkish Airlines, Swiss International Air Lines, Alitalia, easyJet, Flydubai and Tunis Air (caused by flight cancellations as a result of the Sousse terrorist attacks). LOT Polish Airlines temporarily suspended its flights to Belgrade this summer due to restructuring, but will resume its service to Warsaw on January 2. On the other hand, foreign airlines which have boosted flights to the Serbian capital include Montenegro Airlines, Etihad Airways, Aegean Airlines, TAROM, Qatar Airways and Norwegian Air Shuttle. Meanwhile, Belavia, Aeroflot and Pegasus Airlines have operated roughly the same amount of flights as last year. Belgrade Airport handled 4.169.970 passengers over the past ten months, an increase of 4.6%.

Most frequent foreign carriers at Belgrade Airport Q1 - Q3
AirlineFlight ops.Change (%)
Montenegro Airlines2.515▲ 7.7
Lufthansa2.116▼ 6.2
Wizz Air1.983▼ 10.1
Austrian Airlines1.406▼ 16.1
Turkish Airlines1.332▼ 3.1
Swiss Int. Air Lines1.125▼ 9.1
Aeroflot1.088▼ 0.3
Alitalia590▼ 27.0
Etihad Airways558▲ 2.2
November 15, 2015
Belgrade low cost airline Results 2015 serbia Wizz Air
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:03

    Thank you for this info ex-Yu. I'm not surprised at these numbers as you now have a very strong a competitive local airline. The suspension of Lufthansa's early morning flight from Belgrade is completely understandable. Up to a year ago this flight (which is purely for transit passengers not point to point) was full with people travelling to places like Paris, Rome, Stockholm, even London. Now with much better fares and product people are simply flying with Air Serbia. Codeshares should also not be underestimated. For example people flying to places like Birmingham are now flying Air Serbia to Amsterdam and continuing on KLM codeshare flights. A

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:17

    U perspektivi bi trebalo sve LCC izmestiti sa BEG ( Batajnica, Nis ...) i ustupiti mesta konvencionalnim kompanijama AFR, BAW, CSA ...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:49

      Kako mislis "ustupiti" mesta? Kao LCC im je oduzeo mesta na BEG?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:51

      AFR, BAW i CSA su bili i dobrovoljno otišli iz BG, bez nekog izgleda da se u skorije vreme vrate, zbog nekih drugih razloga ne zbog LCC. To da tako nekoga planski izmeštate ko stoku na livadu definitivno se ne zove perspektiva.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:31

      Gluplji komentar nisam procitao odavno. Cuj izmestiti lcc? Pa da li se ti cujes? A o osvim kompanijama ce covek pre mene vec rekao, oni nemaju interes da lete za BEG

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:43

      A, šta je tačno kriterijum kada neku kompaniju proglašavamo LCCom? Koliko plaća za handling i šta traži od "dodatnih" usluga, tipa avio mostova? Bojim se da bi neka druga kompanija onda išla za BJY.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  3. Anonymous10:32

    racionalnije je od Batajnice praviti LCC hub sa relativno malim ulaganjima nego ulupati silne pare za treci terminal i drugu pistu na ANT. Beograd zasluzuje da ima dva civilna aerodroma.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ix10:38

      Po čemu zaslužuje? Koliko gradova od 1,5M stanovnika i 5M putnika godišnje imaju dva civilna aerodroma? Koja će to magija da vrati putnike Wizzu samo zato što ih je neko izmestio na Batajnicu?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:51

      Athens, a city that has 5 million living in its metropolitan area has only one airport.
      One that this year will serve 18 million passengers +.
      And you want Belgrade to build a second airport with all the surrounding infrastructure to take a share of the 5 million passengers that BEG had?
      Seriously now?
      And keep in mind that BEG is the only major airport in ex-yu that this year will not have an increase in passengers and flights compared with 2014.
      The government needs to focus all its effort in attracting more carriers and passengers in BEG, not opening up another commercial airport nearby to sabotage it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:52

      ^ The airport has 5% growth this year. Don't know how you concluded that it won't have an increase in passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:03

      The article refers to the first three quarters of the year. The last quarter sees major reduction in number of flights both from foreign airlines and ASL compared with 2014.
      If it's lucky it might end the year with a 1-2% growth.
      Compare that with the growth figures at all the other airports in ex-yu.

      But this isn't the point I am trying to make.
      I am saying that the BEG authorities and the goverment need to attract more passengers to BEG, not open up another competing airport when there is absolutely no need for it.
      BEG needs economies of scale.
      It absolutely needs to expand it's terminal space and also give incentives for the opening up of new routes and more airlines serving it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  4. Anonymous10:33

    На коју фору је Етихад повећао број летова, када од како је почео да лети за Београд лети константно једном дневно.

    Не сећам се да је уопште било додатних летова Етихада.
    Такође, контам да се у тексту помињу само путнички летови, не и карго операције

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:44

      To je 12 dodatnih letova za 9 meseci, verovatno neki posebni letovi za zaposlene i/ili delegacije ASL i EY.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:30

      &AnonymousNovember 15, 2015 at 10:33 AM
      The figures presented in the article are written down from Belgrade airport Q3 report and, yes, cargo flights are included in the counting.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:45

      Такво мешање података и уврштавање карго летова међу путничке операције је жеља да се наивном посматрачу са стране представи другачија слика него што јесте.

      Другим речима, кувамо клин чорбу, а у њу стављамо све што нам падне под руку, само да би деловала богатије.

      Садашњи директор Тесле има искуства у прављењу клин чорби. Прво у Јату, па сада треба да спичка и аеродром

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:30

      on je svoju epizodu odigrao po utvrdjenom scenariju. sada je na redu koncesija kao novi posao stoljeca.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:04

      Koliko god pljuvali, matematika kaze da ce ovo biti najuspesnija godina u istoriji BEG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Milivoje Rodic15:24

      Prosle godine, jedno vrijeme, dosta letova Etihada u stvari obavljala Air Serbia. Mozda zbog toga.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous15:50

      Jel vi znate samo koliko Kargo letova je EY imao ove godine i koliko je kargo porastao.
      INN-NS

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous22:14

      EY letovi su povecani jer u zimskom redu letenja EY nije leteo za BEG, vec je JU obavljao dva dnevna leta.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  5. Anonymous11:47

    Well done to Lufthansa. They are doing really well despite fewer flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:14

      Load factor and RASM is the name of the game.
      Whoever is going only after marketshare and number of flights looses big.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:35

      That would be Montenegro Airlines ....

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:10

      And Air Serbia ....

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  6. Anonymous15:01

    Drugu godinu za redom LYBE pravi najbolji rezultat u EX YU .
    Jedva cekam sledecu godinu kad ce rezultati biti najbolji u istoriji Srpskog vazduhoplovstva .
    INN-NS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:53

      * kaže se u "novijoj istoriji srpskog vazduplohlovstva"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:11

      * boga mi i u starijoj.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Rodney Marinkovic23:40

      Iskreno verujem u apslutni record vazdusne luke Nikola Tesla Beograd, da ce u 2016 godini dostignuti najveci broj putnika i kargo tereta u istoriji Srbije... ✈R✈

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous00:39

      pa zar nije sad već reKordna godina?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Rodney Marinkovic03:31

      Anon 12:39 AM,
      upravuste. Ova je do sada rekordna godina. Iduca ce kao sto rekoh oboriti record ove i svih ostalih godina, zbog rasta prvenstveno Er Srbije. Kao i ostalih promena koje sleduju. Racunajuci prosirenje kapaciteta i mogucnosti aerodrome. Iduca godina donosi i koncesiju, ali o tome drugi put. ✈R✈.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  7. Anonymous18:19

    Wizz air busiest destination is Larnaca with 20 000 passengers yearly
    But same Larnaca was not profitable destination for Air Serbia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:47

      That was an epic failure for ASL.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:28

      ASL will be back to Larnaca in summer when money is to be made in the route. Speaking of Wizz, were they profitable to LCA during winter? Not likely, so small fail for W6.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous22:47

      W6 is one of the most profitable aitlines in Europe. And now has a monopoly in LCA.
      And when JU returns to LCA it will have to deal with a strengthened and entrenched W6.
      Same situation in BUD.
      So W6 is the one who eon by driving JU out of those two routes, JU is the one ho lost

      So W6 is the winner

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Nemjee08:32

      Flew to LCA yesterday and there were 122 passengers. What surprised me was how many Bosnian and Croatian passports I saw.

      Air Serbia failed in LCA because no sane p2p passenger wanted to arrive here at 03.20 and depart at 04.20. Now, why they failed in attracting transfer ones is a whole different story. Btw before W6 launched LCA we regularly paid €350 to fly on JU.

      Wizzair has been growing here, yesterday there were three W6 birds at the airport: Vilnius, Belgrade and Warsaw.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous15:08

      JU timing was off but that can change

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous17:38

      Bosnian,Croatian,Monte Negro passengers are traveling with Wizz to LCA because of very high prices ASL/no cheap transit prices for them

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Kazakhstan’s SCAT Airlines to launch Belgrade service

Image

Air Serbia plans 32-member fleet in 2026, eyes MRO facility

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Turkish Airlines is Slovenia’s busiest in Q1, Swiss adds most passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025