Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June34
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia records solid New York figures

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Air Serbia has seen solid passenger numbers on its transatlantic flights since the launch of its New York service on June 23. According to the President of Air Serbia's Supervisory Board, Siniša Mali, the carrier handled 17.410 passengers on the Belgrade - New York - Belgrade route by the start of this week, exactly two months since the launch. The average cabin load factor stood at 79.1%. "The results are satisfactory and I hope this successful trend will continue in the future", Mr Mali said yesterday. Air Serbia maintains five weekly flights to New York with its 254-seat Airbus A330-200 aircraft, featuring eighteen seats in business class and the remaining 236 in economy.
August 24, 2016
Air Serbia Belgrade Newsflash Results 2016 serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous14:36

    Go Serbia!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous16:11

    Great news

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous16:12

    79% LF during the peak while dumping fares?

    Solid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous16:28

    Well its an "okay"-start. However with those low prices I fear they did not even earn anything during summer but must have most likely made a loss.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:30

      They said they won't make a profit by 2019 on that route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:32

      Everyone had low fares this summer. In a sense, it shows that the TATL market is competitive. Fuel prices were low (which was good point for JU to enter) but that meant that carriers could offer lower fares to compete with others, and they did. So while I agree that the prices were overall low and they probably did not make a killing, they were not dumping-level prices, just in line with market (for a nonstop flight: the bottom rock price is almost always some one-stop e.g. with LOT).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:48

      It is clear the route will be loss making for years - that goes without saying.

      But wouldn't you expect that at least in high season they would make a gain for let's say around 3 months a year? In the second year that non-loss making period should be 5 months, then 7 months in the third year and so on...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  5. Branko16:28

    Bravo Air Serbia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. JU520 BEGLAX17:02

    How was C class LF excluding non revs?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous20:52

    The results are more than satisfactory!! With such a competitive market for TATL flights and having in mind that many people bought tickets before these flights were announced, the results are above expectations!

    Greetings from Macedonia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous22:56

    It is not good result for winter. In summer if should be much more than 90%.

    So in summer we have bad winter LF and winter prices. And business class is empty. So yield is very bad.

    Not good job! They urgently have to change something if they want that route to survive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous07:29

      The route has only just started and it's been said countless times that they'll keep it up for at least a couple of years even at a loss. So quit your thinly veiled schadenfreude.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Rodney Marinkovic08:00

      Postovani Anon 7:29 AM.
      Iskreno ste odgovorili svima ''dusebriznicima''. Jednostavno najveci broj tih negativno orijentisanih ljudi upornisu u svojoj istini i neistini podjednako. Ljudi imaju pravo na svoje misljenje... Pa evo i mja podrska. Prirodno Er Srbiji. Oprostite vi koji se ne slazete. Tuff luck. Takav je zivot. Negativnim prvenstveno.
      Rodney & Aviation enthusiast Team+✈

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous08:14

      Of course anon 7:29 AM if they counting on Serbian people taxes for the covering of lose , it is not necessary to suspend anything!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous15:29

      You haters used to introduce a new nonsense every week. Now you've been stuck with the tax nonsense for months and all you do is watering this blog with crocodile tears over Serbian taxpayers who really do not need your sympathies nor they would like to be used as a weapon in your political mission. You should really try and find something new to express your endless hate that consumes you every day over and over again.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous23:11

      Now that's a politician! !!!!!! BRAVO! !!!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  9. aleksandar08:14

    79% after two months into a very competitive market, I would call that a huge success, especially with all the drama involving permit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:52

      It usually would be a great result! But JU started with high season! So it is not too good. If you consider the massive and long lasting dumping (absolutely not every airline in the market offered less than 800 EUR return in Eco in high season) it is quite a bad result to be fairly objective and honest.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  10. Aleks Popovic09:43

    Considering that the service wasn't really confirmed until most of the vfr market had already booked their flights in earlybird sales these figures even with the lower fares are actually quite good! Well done JU and looking forward to a stronger 2017 summer!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous18:54

    Mr. Mali should be busier running the City of Belgrade rather than Air Serbia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Zagreb Airport reopens after hours-long closure due to runway incident

Image

Wizz Air to reopen Tuzla base, launch nine new routes

Image

Air Serbia readies for loyalty overhaul and lounge launch amid cabin review

Image

Belgrade Airport readies for transformation after record year

Image

Air Serbia to add more aircraft, looks to 2027 for new orders

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025