Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Onboard Aviogenex, 1986

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June41
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia to take former Rossiya jet

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Air Serbia will lease an Airbus A319 aircraft formerly operated by Rossiya Airlines and owned by financing and leasing company GE Capital Aviation Services (GECAS). According to the Russian "Avioport" portal, Rossiya Airlines has confirmed that an A319, registered EI-EZD, will soon undergo painting and a cabin retrofit prior to its delivery to Air Serbia. The jet in question was manufactured in 2006 and is almost twelve years old. The development comes as Rossiya Airlines returns five of its Airbus A320-family aircraft to lessors ahead of the 2018/19 winter season. Air Serbia has neither confirmed nor denied reports whether it will take on the A319 jet.

The aircraft is likely to replace another within the Air Serbia fleet. As reported in January, the Serbian carrier is expected to return some of its narrow-body Airbus-family jets at the end of the year as their leasing contracts expire. The airline has been tight-lipped on its future fleet plans, in particular the delivery of ten Airbus A320neos which are due to begin arriving in the fourth quarter of the year. Commenting on the aircraft, which were secured as part of a major fleet order by equity partner Etihad Airways, the Serbian President, Aleksandar Vučić, said in June he would "have to check" whether the aircraft will be delivered. The delivery of the neos to Air Serbia has been slated in between late 2018 and 2020.

The airline is also yet to address the future of its Boeing fleet, currently utilised primarily by its dedicated charter brand Aviolet. Earlier this year, Air Serbia retired two of the four B737-300s only to return one of them back to service this summer due to a record number of charter operations. Last year, Air Serbia's Chief Operations Officer, Declan Keller, said the carrier could invest in the B737 jets and thus extend their utilisation by a further four to five years. However, such a move would require a costly engine overhaul and a cabin refurbishment. Alternatively, Mr Keller noted that the airline would consider the retirement of two B737s.

August 17, 2018
Air Serbia Feature Fleet serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:06

    I hope they get serious about their fleet and do something about the old ATRs and Boeings. I guess the neos ain't coming.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      Unfortunately, not. Plus, the article says: the Serbian carrier is expected to return some of its narrow-body Airbus-family jets at the end of the year as their leasing contracts expire.
      This also gives you another idea on how significantly their fleet will be reduced.
      Just hoping that this will be temporary during the winter season because less fleet = less destinations.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:11

      Actually if you click on the linked article they are due to return two planes in total. And they already found the replacement for one.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:24

      Honestly I don't think JU needs neos at this point. It needs planes of around 100 seats and much more regional aircraft.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:27

      Agree. Focus should be on replacing and expanding regional fleet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:32

      I actually think they need a regional jet plane. Something with the capacity to seat 100 passengers. Jat and now Air Serbia never filled the void of getting rid of the DC9/B727s which were actually the backbone of their fleet. They retired all those planes over night and had no alternative planned. 100-seaters would be perfect for many routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:49

      Airbus now has C series. CS100 would be a perfect fit for ASL.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:50

      They could always wet lease CRJs from Adria.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous13:29

      With what money they would buy or lease A220 (CS100)?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous13:38

      With the same money they are now paying for A320 leases.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous22:04

      Only problem is that lease of new A220 is much bigger than A319 7 years old. You should know that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous09:41

      Hopefully they reach less scandalous leasing agreement for the new aircraft than they had for current planes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:09

    My guess is they will only find a replacement for one of the two aircraft they return. They don't need 10 A319/320s in winter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:15

      True. I think last winter they parked one aircraft.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:10

    Good news! That is a relatively young bird!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      True. Not a bad pick

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:10

    Wouldn't it have been less expensive just to extend the existing contract and not have to paint and refit the cabins on another plane?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:17

      It would indicate that the leasing terms they had for one of the existing planes wasn't very good. And everyone knows already that the leasing terms for all of their planes are poor.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:17

      Cost of repainting is not going to be paid by Air Serbia:

      https://airlinerwatch.com/rossiya-to-return-five-airbus-a319-2/

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:33

      Ok thanks, interesting

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Danijel11:49

      But there will be costs for those wich ASL returning.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  5. realan09:13

    Nadam se da ce iznajmljivanje ovog aviona biti pod povoljnijim uslovima nego sto je slucaj sa postojecim. Ne znam za koliko aviona istice lizing ove god.? Bilo bi pametno recimo vratiti 5 A319,uzeti ovaj iz Rusije i uvesti u flotu 2 A320 neo. Tako bi znatno smanjili troskove za zimu a na prolece expanzija i dolazak drugog A330.Toronto i Cikago moraju krenuti sto pre jer je konkurencija nemilosrdna.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous09:20

    So ASL doesn't have any plans to retire the resto of the B733 aircraft for now, interesting...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      That surprised me too. At the end of the day, this type of aircraft is extremely reliable. I think it is one of the most successful aircraft ever. Reliable bird. Remember Lufti? They used them for decades and had an excellent safe record.
      As for JU, just imagine the history they had since Jat.
      Anyway, a Max 8 upgrade won't be bad at all.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:21

    Do we know what their winter schedule is going to look like? Are there going to be any reductions? Or increases?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. realan09:25

      Realan

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:27

      It was published here that Zurich will increase from 14 to 17 weekly in winter. Not sure about anything else.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. realan09:33

      Za sada kolko se moze videti u rezervacionom sistemu otprilike isti broj letova kao prosle god. Pariz -1 Cirih+1 Prag -3(povecan kapacitet) Stokholm +1 i ne mogu da se setim a mrzi me da proveravam,jos jedna destinacija je -1.Interesantno je da je Njujork bio 5x u spicu oko nove god. pa je smanjen na 3x. Mozda je ostavljen prostor za Toronto 2x.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. realan09:36

      Cirih ide na +1. Ukinuta su 2 jutarnja polaska a dodata 3 popodnevna.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. realan09:42

      Sad sam proverio za Cirih, u spicu oko nove godine 3X dnevno!Neverovatno al tako stoji u redu letenja.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:52

      They currently have a code-share on the BEG-SOF route with FB that apparently is working quite well, which really surprises me. From what I have read they have a mix of transfer and business travellers and decent load factor.
      Last year, they used to regularly send the A319 to SOF especially on weekdays, which proves that there are business travellers on the route. I hope they consider those extra early morning flights, connecting JFK. SOF-BEG used to be 9 weekly but I believe the fleet reduction led to them cutting them to 7.
      Also, what bothers me is that FB is not launching any flights to BEG, but I think it would be tricky to fill an Embraer 190 jet (108 seats).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:53

      It's good that there are no major cuts to the network this winter. @Realan I doubt there is any chance for Toronto this winter. They would have had to announce it a long time ago. But if they do plan Toronto next year, then I expect them to announce it next month.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous14:06

      SOF codeshare with FB on what routes?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous14:34

      JU and FB both have a codeshare on the BEG-SOF route.

      https://www.airserbia.com/en/corporate/code-share-partners. I had no clue JU had codeshares with both CA and UX! Nice!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous15:44

      thats not much

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:22

    They could refresh the livery while they are at it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:24

      Why? The livery is fine and they have barely had it for 5 years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:25

      Well if this planes arrives in October it will be exactly 5 years since Air Serbia's first flight so they could do some special Etihad-Air Serbia combo livery since EY extended the partnership.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:26

      Like this https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/64/Airberlin_and_Etihad_Airways_joint_livery..jpg

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:27

      Well that turned out well.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:28

      I disagree. It's a very decent livery representing a true, legacy carrier.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:34

    Let's say JU does not get those NEOs. What happens with the 28 million USD deposit from JAT times that Etihad used for these planes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:37

      I'm wondering that too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:39

      I don't understand why Air Serbia does not come out and say what's going to happen with these planes? What is the point of keeping quiet and thinking people will forget about it?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:03

      I see no business reason for them to come out with such information.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:05

      They are still a majority state owned company, so I think they should.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:09

      Because they are probably waiting for Etihad to solve their orders/fleet puzzle first.
      Also, maybe there are still dilemmas of level of Etihad's involvement in decision made by Air Serbia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous13:34

      If they will not take all 10 A320neo, 28 million USD deposit is history, will stay in Etihad. But in same time they will be some extra penalty and that would be not cheap. 28 million will be nothing in number they would pay in the end.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:36

      The order is by Etihad, not Air Serbia. So any penalty will be paid for by Air Serbia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous22:06

      But Etihad and Air Serbia have contract about that

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:42

    Air Serbia needs ad least 3 planes this year. 2 for A320 that are return to lessor and one for 737-300 that is out of service this year.

    In 2020 Air Serbia will need 6 planes, 4 A319, and 2 instead of 737-300.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:47

      Thanks for that. So they really have to start thinking about their future fleet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:58

    Instead of replacing current decent A319/320 JU fleet, I think they should give priority to the ATR.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. Anonymous09:58

    This particular aircraft has different engines from the rest of the Airbus fleet of Air Serbia. However old B737-300 have similar, but not the same engines. That might increase maintenance costs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:50

      I wonder why they chose it then. They couldn't find other planes with the same engines? Or it was a good cheap deal so they leased it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous10:29

    Their ATRs are in relatively good shape after they refurbished them to match the Airbus cabins. I think they should just replace oldest ATRs with newer ones. It's the simplest option.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous10:33

    So when will this plane arrive at Air Serbia?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:35

      November.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  15. Anonymous11:41

    The plane is in good condition so I;m happy they will lease it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous11:42

    Does anyone know the registration of the plane(s) that will be returned?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:10

      And will this plane carry the same registration as the one it replaces?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:33

      YU-API izlazi iz flote, vec sam pre par meseci najavio da ce biti vracen lizoru. Tada nisam znao da ce dobiti zamenu.
      Sada se ubrzano radi i na pronalasku 2 aviona od juna.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Eight00:05

      AFAIK, planes in Serbian register have not been reusing registrations... so next A319/320s to arrive would be APK, APL, APM, APN, etc.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  17. Anonymous11:44

    Which B737 was brought out of retirement for the summer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:46

      YU-ANI.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  18. Anonymous11:45

    Why is president of a country commenting on things what happen in airline company? I dont see other presidents doing same (for state owned airlines). Air Serbia has its own management

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:46

      Because he was directly responding to a question by a journalist at a press conference.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:18

      The fact that he of all people doesen't know if they are coming indicates that the planes are not coming.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:13

      Of course, he lies that he doesn't know. He knows that neos will not come.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous21:13

      How dare you saying His Majesty lies? LOL

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  19. Anonymous13:08

    What's the avarage age of Air Serbia's narrow body fleet?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:13

      13 yrs.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:41

      Not true, narrow body fleet is average 19,2 years old:

      A319 average 14,2 x 8 = 113,6
      A320 average 12,8 x 2 = 25,6
      737-300 average 32,4 x 4 = 129,6
      = 268,6/14
      = 19,2 average years old

      Even if you put 2 737-300 out (and they are still in registration as active planes) it is
      17,0 average years old

      A319/320 fleet is 13,9 years old.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:43

      You are right. Sorry my 13 years reffered to Airbus fleet. For some reason I thought he asked how old is the narrow body Airbus fleet. My mistake.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  20. Anonymous13:12

    It's a shame they are just replacing planes and not actually growing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:13

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  21. Putnik13:23

    Why does everyone keep claiming JU's current narrowbody fleet has expensive lease rates?
    This plane will probably cost them more than what they're paying now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:38

      I think they showed some evidence on that "Insajder" show that the current leasing arrangements are expensive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Putnik13:40

      I wouldn't be so sure, at least for the A319/320 fleet...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:42

      Please do read financial report. And you will see how expensive lease is. Everything is there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:43

      Can you give us a summary?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous18:32

      Νο.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous22:09

      31 million EUR per yearfor 2 A320, 8 A319, 1 A330 and 3 ATR72

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:45

      Gosh! That is a lot of money!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  22. Anonymous14:33

    So the aircraft in question comes with CFM engines compared to IAE engines mounted on the existing A319/A320 fleet. Probably a more sensible option as CFM are more common and probably cheaper to get. But on the other hand there's higher maintenance cost of having two engine types on a fleet of only 10 aircraft.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:36

      Don't the B737s have CFM engines?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous21:58

      Aviolet 737-300 - CFM56-3
      EI-EZD - A319 - CFM56-5B

      It is interesting. First CFM powered Airbus in AS fleet.
      Comparing to V2500 it is EPR vs. N1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  23. Anonymous14:59

    Nice move JU!

    By the way, they have really good fares, I am not sure why people are complaining all the time. They have to also make money somehow:

    https://www.airserbia.com/en/special-offers-best-deals-1

    I am shocked to learn that BNX-BEG RETURN is 56€ all inclusive!!!!!!!!! This is the lowest JU price I have ever seen!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:33

      They should have done the same for Budapest, wouldn't be there where it is now.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:37

      Yes but keep in mind that Air Serbia pays no handling, landing or fees at BNX. So the costs are much lower whereas they would have to pay for all of that in Budapest.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:14

      So perhaps they should keep BNX as their sole and only destination since problems arise as soon as they have to pay like everybody else.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:38

      Do you think they will face fierce competition from FR in winter? Also why is the schedule so strange? The return to BEG is quite late!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:59

      @16.14

      I didn't mean it that way but I just wanted to highlight that it is impossible for them to have fares like that to pretty much anywhere else.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Slobodan20:34

      BEG - BNX - BEG ticket were always starting from 50-ish Euros, ever since the route was relaunched.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous22:15

      Does anyone know about the LF? The prices seem to be same in September for almost all the dates...after all ZAG is also close to BNX.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  24. Anonymous17:30

    Avion koi Air Serbia namerava kupiti je dobar Airbus 319 Rossia airlinesa i koristi skoro identicne moderne mlazne motore CFM56 samo razlicita specifikacija sa postojecim avionom Boeing 737-300 classic registracije YU-ANI(AVIOLET bivsi JAT Airways-ov avion, stara makedonska registracija istog Aviona je bila Z3-AAA,veoma kratak period na taj avion je letio i jedan od najboljih makedonskih Pilota porodice Stefanovski)ekonomican i dobar avion ali ipak boeing737-600/700 ima bolje performanse.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:11

      Ne kupuju ga nego iznajmljuju

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  25. Anonymous17:51

    They could bring the aircraft to Jat tehnika and refurbish it there and put the wifi antenna on the roof.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  26. Anonymous17:53

    That's a good question. Will they install wifi on this plane? Or will they eventually start getting rid of that service toom

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  27. Anonymous20:28

    Well it's good they are replacing those expensive leases they have now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  28. Anonymous07:00

    I can imagine the extra cost for extra parts for only two airbus cfm engines + higher oil consumption consumption compaired with v2500.
    Mechanics having only Airbus course with RR engine, can not sign for airbus with CFM, so the need a few days of school to get the CFM in their lic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  29. Oleg E.10:34

    Correct solution is SSJ-100.We do financing for this type of plane

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  30. Anonymous10:48

    U periodu od 1985 do 1989 JAT je bio prva kompanija u Europi koja je kupila u to vrijeme najmodernije avione Boeing 737-300 sa ultra modernim mlaznim motorima CFM56. I u sadasnje vrijeme u 2018 godini to su moderni i kvalitetni motori.Avion registracije YU-ANI je bio najkvalitetniji u floti bivseg JAT Airways-a.Danas je u floti Aviolet aviokompanije.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  31. Anonymous17:56

    Will this aircraft get a name of a famous serbian?
    How about naming the ATRs with mountains, the A320 fleet with citys and the A330 will stay with names as this is the case with ARA?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Onboard Aviogenex, 1986

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Wizz Air to reopen Tuzla base, launch nine new routes

Image

Zagreb Airport reopens after hours-long closure due to runway incident

Image

Air Albania to launch Ljubljana service

Image

Air Serbia to add more aircraft, looks to 2027 for new orders

Image

Air Serbia readies for loyalty overhaul and lounge launch amid cabin review

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025