Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May45
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Smaller EX-YU airports register mixed H1

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Smaller commercial airports in the former Yugoslavia registered mixed results during the first half of the year, handling 1.251.613 passengers. Jointly, they added an extra 186.874 travellers on last year. Croatia's Zadar, Pula and Rijeka benefited from an increase in operations by low cost airlines, particularly Ryanair and easyJet, while Osijek felt the effects of Wizz Air's suspension of its year-round service from Basel. The Hungarian low cost airline also impacted on Tuzla's lacklustre performance during the first quarter after it suspended several routes over the winter season, however, the airport bounced back during the second quarter and is expected to overturn its overall passengers decline in July.

AirportPassengers H1 2019Passengers H1 2018Change (%)Difference
Zadar295.316213.940▲ 38.0+ 63.376 
Tuzla271.006275.415Decrease 1.6- 4.409
Pula242.826207.503▲ 17.0+ 35.323
Niš165.658174.116Decrease 4.9- 8.458
Ohrid104.44464.109▲ 62.9+ 40.335
Banja Luka66.0358.835▲ 647.4+ 57.200
Rijeka62.20452.081▲ 19.4+ 10.123
Osijek25.90329.470Decrease 12.1- 3.567
Mostar8.48910.061Decrease 15.6- 1.572
Brač7.7378.960Decrease 13.7- 1.223
Mali Lošinj1.9952.159Decrease 7.6- 164

Niš Airport's performance was also impacted by low cost carriers during the first few months of the year, although it returned to growth from May onwards. Its figures are set to grow significantly over the coming months as Air Serbia commences twelve new routes from the city. "Traffic from Niš will continue to develop and there will be more demand and the need for more carriers", the airport said. Meanwhile, Ohrid Airport has registered passenger growth of over 60% this year with the launch of new services by Wizz Air and Eurowings, aided by charter flights from the Netherlands and Poland. It is estimated to handle over 300.000 travellers in 2019. Overall, Ohrid Airport will see the largest growth in traffic in 2019 in its 65-year history.

During the January - June period, Banja Luka added over 66.000 passengers as a result of Ryanair's operations to the city, which continued to grow this year. "The partnership we have with Ryanair is most valuable for Banja Luka at this moment, and we expect to expand this cooperation in the coming period", the airport said. The low cost airline noted it would help deliver over 135.000 customers through Banja Luka in 2019. On the other hand, Mostar Airport's figures continued to decline. Numbers are expected to pick up during the third quarter, with Eurowings upping capacity on its two routes to the city.




July 30, 2019
Banja Luka bosnia and herzegovina Brač croatia Feature Lošinj macedonia mostar Niš Ohrid Osijek Pula Results 2019 Rijeka serbia Tuzla Zadar
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    So many of them depend on LCCs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      That is the fate of small airports. Before LCCs majority of small airports have only few weekly flights of scheduled traffic and they were mostly used for charters and general aviation.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    What happened to Brac this year? It was doing so well in 2018 with many new airlines and flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      this year have no flights to luxemburg wich was great,85% l.facktor, no flights to ljubljana and bern to...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:17

      and whot aboute eurowings and his flights to brac?they need it start last year??

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:28

      "Brač Airport expects similar figures to those achieved last year. "In 2019, our plan is to maintain similar passenger numbers to last year's - around 31.000 travellers. We will focus the rest of our energy on expanding the runway and terminal. This year we plan to obtain all necessary permits with work to begin in late 2020. The new airport will be in operation in May 2021", General Manager Tonči Peović said."

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2019/03/croatian-airports-to-hit-11-million.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:11

      True, LDSB has lost 3 out of 11 destinations this summer.

      Current runway is probably still too short for A320/738 at 1760 metres, but I think up to A319/737-700 can make it even at max. weight, although one needs to consider strong winds for landings at Brac and high temperatures in summer that prolong take off distance.

      Reason that no airline operates with 150 seater birds is in my opinion that there must be one to start with it, such as EW or U2, who do own A319s or maybe even Transavia with a 737-700. Most other LCCs don't operate the smaller med sized aircrafts anymore.

      But does anyone know if operations with aircraft larger than 120 seats (up to 150 for ex.?) is allowed?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:03

    I wonder what affect will Air Serbia's flights have on Nis and how many passengers they could bring.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      Strong growth, but I also feel it may results in FR or W6 cutting some routes from there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:11

      Why would FR or W6 cut some routes when JU doesn't compete with them? If anything it will impact some numbers in SKP, SOF and BEG where routes are offered from there as well.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:31

      They are competing with them. Air Serbia fly to airports 0,5 to 2 hours driving from Wizz Air and Ryanair routes that they fly from INI, and for LCC that is same catchment area.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:47

      1: Few examples: TIV, LJU, BUD - Wizz and Ryan are not serving them or nothing close to them from INI.
      2: W6 and FR could have applied for the tender but didn't
      3: W6 und FR made their living competing by flying to nearby airports. For example, Wizz competes with Lufthansa BEG-MUC by flying BEG-MEM. How is it okay when Wizz does it to others, but not okay when someone else does it to them?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous18:30

      W6 and FR could NOT apply to the tender.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Charlie20:02

      What do you mean Wizz does not fly to BUD? They are based there, so of course they could fly to INI.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous21:32

      Wizz qualified for the tender.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Charlie21:50

      Yeah, wonder why they didn't bid on that route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:04

    So it is safe to assume that BNX will overtake RJK this year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:07

      Yes but I don't think we will see any new Ryanair routes to BNX this year despite some announcements from the airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:12

      It's ok, let them improve their performance and consolidate their operations before growing. BNX can still have a 10% to 20% growth next year especially if JU keeps on adding charters flights like this year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. pozdrav iz Rijeke10:49

      Not so sure about BNX will overtake RJK. We have figures here for RJK for first 6 months only and RJK is the most seasonal airport of all in ex-yu, with numbers of flights and passengers drastically increasing during July and August, even September, when the traffic is 3 or 4 times larger compared to first half of the year. Not saying absolutely impossible, but considering RJK seasonality, very difficult BNX can make it

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:34

      Well let's see how it all plays out in the end. BNX is having solid growth in all months of the year unlike RJK, that's their advantage.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. pozdrav iz Rijeke11:42

      Exactly. BNX is on about 50.000 per 5 months which is 120.000 per year, or let's say 140.000 per year because of better LF in peak months..On the other hand, predictions for RJK for this year stand at 180.000. That's my maths. But you are right, let's wait and see :)




      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:08

    Any projection on when Zadar could hit a million passengers per year?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:13

      Well with Jet2 having already announced flight to both London and Manchester, we can assume more to follow. I would say in 2021?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:08

    What about MBX and POW? Not even in the list? Pax numbers?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      Neither of them have commercial flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:12

      Maribor had 2,000 passengers for the whole of last year (and that's when they actually had some flights). I assume they had less than 500 passengers during the first half of the year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:13

      Yes, but POW hasn't had commercial flights for a couple of years, yet they still had more passengers than some of the airports on the list last year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:37

      Maribor would fit perfectly into FR... don't know how that went wrong

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:05

      If the terrain was better and the runway long enough, I'm sure Portoroz would have had flights for many years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:16

      @9.37 are you sure?
      Maribor - Graz Airport: 60 km

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:28

      Graz has no LCC

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous18:31

      Graz has a limited Easyjet and Eurowings (only seasonal) ops.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:09

    Tuzla could again have soft winter since Wizz is suspending Vienna.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      But Billund has been upgraded to year round. So it will substitute the loss of Vienna.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:13

      I think this is pretty much it for Tuzla and it's not a bad performance. The airport will still reduce its losses and the city will be better connected with Europe, even better than Sarajevo actually.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:21

      But what happened with Tuzla's announcements how Wizz will base a third plane there when they extend the agreement which is supposed to expire in November?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:25

      My guess is that Wizz doesn't have enough planes for Tuzla now so they will be flexible. I mean look at the delays in SKP and OHD, all because of plane shortage. Also I think TZL-VIE was operate by a plane from Vienna if I am not wrong so Tuzla won't get any compesation through a new route or more frequencies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous18:34

      It is beyond strange that VIE TZL will be given up. There is incredibly much ethnic traffic.
      But I guess w6 can earn more money elsewhere. That diaspora is low yielding and will take own car or bus if flight costs more than 30 euros, they anyway are/were used to that over all the last years/decades.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:09

    Its no good depending on Lcc's. Ryanair's days are slowly coming to an end, and it will come even sooner if the Boeing 737 max doesn't get flying again soon

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      Yeah but what do these airports have as options? Not much, they have to rely on them as no one else wants to fly there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:24

      The problem is that most of these airports depend only on a single LCC which isn't good. They should do more to have at least 2 LCCs with several routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:20

      "Ryanair's days are slowly coming to an end" --> where did you get this from?

      They now operate with a record fleet size of 418 planes and have 135+75 orders for even larger 737s with then 197 seats.

      There was just news that their profit in Q2/2019 was 21% weaker compared to last year, but they still managed a nice profit of +243 million EUR.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:14

    Nis ce definitivno imati naj jaci rast u drugoj polovini godine. Ne mogu da docekam rezultate. Dobar posao za Konstantina i AS.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:21

      +1

      Уз све то Ниш објављује своје резултате јако брзо што значи да нећемо дуго чекати! Пријатељ је летео Ниш-Болоња и каже да их је било око 70 путника. Ја сам искрено очекивао много мање имајући у виду да је то ипак Италија и да су јако кратко продавали карте пре почетка летова.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:38

      Bice to dobra prica.Neki letovi vec sada dostizu cenu od 200e sto znaci da su avioni prilicno puni.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:41

      Могуће да ће доћи до прекомбиновања следеће године а верујем да ће Тиват сигурно добити барем још један лет. Летови су од самог почетка пуни. Можда ЈУ одлучи да коначно крене са чартерима из Ниша.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:51

      HER and AYT could work as charters from INI, once a week or once every ten days.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:51

      Onda ce im trebati jos jedan avion :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:36

      Неће морати уколико чартере обављају са авионом из Београда, исти принцип као са Бањалуком.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:56

      Svakako ce im trebati jos jedan avion, flota im je trenutno jako nategnuta, u vecerasnjem talasu letova u Beogradu ce ostati 1 ATR i 1 B737, svi ostali su na letovima, i tako je svaki dan. Za svako sledece povecanje ce morati da se poveca flota.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous16:55

      Nece im trebati jos jedan avion ako izbace glupi BUD i mozda jos jednu destinaciju.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Charlie20:12

      BUD should be dropped in favour of two daily flights to BEG. One early morning from INI to arrive in time for first wave of departure from BEG.
      Second flight late at night, say 21:00, back to INI to collect INI bound pax from various flights throughout the day that arrive in BEG.
      Hopefully in the future there could be an afternoon flight, circa 14:00 BEG-INI, and return.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous21:14

      Stop this obsession with BUD.
      Budapest is becoming an extremely important airport in the region.
      Yes, this is the true 4 continents hub - flights to South Korea soon, China, Canada, US.
      Most importantly Caucausus and Balkan absolute coverage.
      Spain extreme coverage, UK too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous21:33

      Yes intergalactic hub.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Charlie21:51

      Who is obsessing?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous22:13

      EVERY time there is a post about INI, someone says that BUD is not performing well.
      I mean, why? This is one of Europe's most visited cities and not to mention the number of students living there , nightlife, business, culture and culinary capital.
      The airport in BUD is big, has 2 runways and has room for growth.
      So INI needs BUD, the same was as BUD needs INI. Simple.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Charlie23:54

      Hey man I agree with most of what you are saying. Budapest is a beautiful city worth visiting, especially in 'our' region. But if it is not performing well then it should be canned. Not saying to do that right away. Give the route a few months to try to mature, and if not, then it's finito for BUD.
      So I wouldn't not say that INI needs BUD. Niš can survive without an air link to Budapest. Besides, you can make the same argument for Warsaw, Moskva, Istanbul etc.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Nemjee08:18

      Budapest along with LJU are the worst performing routes out of INI. So much for that. They should have gone with 5 weekly to TIV in stead.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Charlie08:25

      Are the LFs less than 50%?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    17. Nikola08:31

      Charlie I would be cautious with trusting any anonymous here with load factors. The person who writes every single time about Budapest and Ljubljana then goes on to argue how Air Serbia should have flown across Ukraine. So be careful. I doubt he has any data.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    18. Charlie08:37

      I am also a little skeptical of trusting anonymous posts here.
      But I was thinking Nemjee might know as he usually seems to have reliable info.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    19. Nemjee09:51

      Charlie, I don't know exact numbers for the two but my guess is that it is below 50% since they are the worst performing. Best are INI and GOT.
      That said, I think LJU has a long-term chance due to a large number of Serbs from the south living and working there. Also, driving from Slovenia to Nis isn't that convenient especially now when road tolls became more expensive by 12%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    20. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:15

    OSI is a disaster. I wonder if the airport has any future with so many other airports around. All airlines cut flights there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:21

      I was hoping that Wizz was the answer to OSI's problems but that doesn't seem to have worked either :/

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:26

      LF was around 80% which wasn't bad but not great either. There is just no demand for OSI flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:15

    Zadar is doing great thanks to Ryanair. Ironic they close their base in ZAD and then grow traffic so much there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:23

      They really don't need a seasonal base there when all routes can be served with aircraft from other bases. Zadar is also benefiting from Split overcapacity. Overall a really good result.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:42

      Will ZAD overtake PUY again this year? PUY overtook them in 2018.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:33

    BNX has the potential from its catchment area to grow a lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Charlie20:13

      What do you think is the potential population of their catchment area?
      And what geographic area are you talking about?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Rodney Marinkovic09:33

    Ниш ће у овој години имати више путника него прошле године. Међутим најпроблематичнија јесте зграда за долазак и одлазак путника. Искрено, незаслужује да се назива терминал. Тешко је схватити спорост одобрења финансирања и градње терминала за минимум један милион путника годишње. Очигледно да политичари су недовољно ефикасни да бирократију и њене људе који одлучују о градњи и финансирању Нишког Аеродрома. Терминала на првом месту. Угледајте се на Терминал Аеродрома Морава Краљево. Само Нишки терминал мора бити за половину већи од Краљевачког Терминала на Морави. ✈🔆✈🔅✈☺✈🌐✈
    Са поздравом Радован. ✈🌍✈🌏✈🌎✈
    Краљево.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous09:34

    Forget Mostar. BiH should be more than happy with 3 airports. So many countries in the region, bigger in size have barely 2 international airports.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:36

      Shame on everybody that gets their relatively big salaries for stopping development of Mostar airport instead of promoting it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:38

      Despite the low level of traffic at Mostar, it amazes me that this country has 4 functioning airports and that all have international flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:42

      Yes four functional airports where all have mediocre performance.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:48

      I just read in the Bosnian news portals that Mostar will be announcing new Ryanair routes very soon :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:51

      Mostar airport's performance matches the one of its main customer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous18:35

      What main customer? Pilgrams? Diaspora?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:40

    Rijeka has been a positive surprise this summer and last, finally, after many years of disappointments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pozdrav iz Rijeke11:36

      Agree it's a bit better this year but still far far far less from its potential. RJK numbers should be at least as the ones of ZAD, PUY or TRS, with at least one year-round scheduled doubly daily connection to a major hub, non-existent at the moment, much more flights to SPU/DBV and ex-yu capitals, more LCC's in season and connections to Russia, Ukraine, Spain, France, Poland, Norway, Italy - big markets with minimum or no coverage at all

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Charlie20:16

      Does it make sense for a flight from RJK-ZAG for connecting pax? Or are the two cities too close for an air link? I think it is only about 1 1/4-1/2 hour drive to ZAG from Rijeka.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. pozdrav iz Rijeke21:09

      If OU had triple stronger network with double stronger frequencies and if ZAG were real OU hub, it would have made sense, despite the proximity. With this volume of traffic no. When I wrote about the need to have scheduled service to a major hub, by no means I meant ZAG

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Charlie21:52

      Thanks for the good explanation.
      Looking forward to seeing my family in Hreljin in a few weeks.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  16. Anonymous09:41

    Pula Airport is one of the best small airports in ex-Yu. I think they will easily achieve 750,000 passengers this year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:02

      Croatian coast is growing and growing each year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:08

      Agree with 9.41 It's the only widebody regional airport in ex-yu.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:18

      I think 1 million can be achieved by 2021.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:20

      My estimate for PUY
      2019 - 750,000
      2020 - 862,000
      2021 - 992,000

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:24

      We will see how the airport develops under a new CEO. Svemir Radmilo is leaving.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:08

      Really, Svemir?
      Hahahaa

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  17. Anonymous09:42

    Still a lot of room for improvement during winter months for all airports.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:12

      For most much room for improvement in the summer too!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  18. Anonymous09:56

    Any news about AS loads in INI?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous10:09

    Three of Bosnia´s biggest tourist spots in the proximity of Mostar airport, Mostar, Neum and Medjugorje, and this is the worst airport in the country traffic-wise?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:11

      We can tank HDZ BiH politics, where they would rather see passengers in Split and Dubrovnik, than in Mostar.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:01

      Nemaju zapadna i istocna zajedno 300000 stanovnika kakve je koristi to malo turizma?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:01

      Nobody flies for Neum. Its mostly Bosnians driving from north, and nobodys going to start a Tuzla - Mostar route, for them to take a bus or something and continue to Neum...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:42

      I don't mean to be rude but I second that. Neum is like non existent on a European map of beach/holiday destinations, in sharp contrast to any other town and area along the coast. There is also a totally different standard in HR if you compare it.

      People do come to OMO for religious reasons, so does a small but increasing number of nature/activity tourists. Plus some diaspora.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  20. Anonymous10:13

    Go Zadar, go! It is with no doubt that ZAD has potential for at least 1 mill pax.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:15

      Let‘s see if PUY or ZAD will have more PAX at the end of the year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  21. Anonymous10:15

    Waiting for Kraljevo to join the list now :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:56

      Hope so :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  22. Anonymous10:17

    Great pic

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:21

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  23. Anonymous10:21

    Good results overall. Nice work from Zadar and Ohrid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  24. Anonymous10:25

    Osijek really needs to find some solution.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous10:29

    Any plans to bring another airline to Tuzla? It is not good to be do dependent on one.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:23

      They say every year how they plan to...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  26. Anonymous10:29

    Bravo EX-YU!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  27. Anonymous10:30

    BNX 692.6% WOW!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:31

      Not really surprising when the base number was so low.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:54

      Still a nice change for Banja Luka. Hope we see Ryanair grow even more.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:41

      Unfortunately Ryanair does not fly from Switzerland -
      Banja Luka - Zurich or Banja Luka - Basel would be the jackpot !!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  28. Anonymous10:31

    Good to see not just Skopje but Ohrid doing well too :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:00

      This year they will almost double the passenger numbers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:04

      The Wizz flights are having a positive impact.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:54

      Subsidized flights though. So it's not generic growth. Same case we will see in Nis.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:24

      lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  29. Anonymous10:38

    So much for Osijek's plant to increase passenger numbers by 11% this year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:59

      *plans

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:25

      Any news regarding Mali Losinj runway expansion project?

      With 900m rwy, that's all they can do to have 3 short seasonal routes with a tiny Let plane. (unless of course ECA would still be around). They need 2000m.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:27

      Apparently expansion could begin this year. But I wouldn't hold my breath
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2019/05/mali-losinj-airport-with-big-ambitions.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:54

      We can only hope the project goes ahead next year as announced!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  30. Anonymous13:06

    When is that Ryanair going to be in Mostar like they've been saying for 3 years now. Somebody tell them they will have at least one very loyal customer :) Flying into Dubrovnik or Sarajevo is tiring.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:55

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2019/05/ryanair-mostar-flights-done-deal.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  31. Anonymous14:14

    Ohrid's full potential is only being realised now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:58

      Ant plans to expand the airport in OHD?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  32. Anonymous16:20

    Results will be much better in Q3

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  33. Anonymous18:01

    Banja luka had 14,190 passengers in June. H1 total is just above 66k !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  34. Anonymous18:10

    Banja Luka has the most potential for additional flights .
    Wizz Air for example could just replicate their Tuzla network.
    I guess even Swiss would work out same it did in Nis .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:56

      I think the island airports have largest potential regarding growth in percent. But they need to finally expand airports/runways first

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  35. Anonymous21:17

    So basically, Niš will no longer be considered a small airport after the arrival of ASL.
    It will begin to directly compete with the bigger boys from the capital and the Croatian coast.
    By 2025, INI will definitely achieve 1 million passengers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pozdrav iz Rijeke22:13

      Hey hey hey hold your horses. I have absolutely nothing against INI, on the contrary, I even signed online petition few years ago for LCC 's to come, but somehow I doubt INI can continue growth in double digits as both the airport and the market have limits and limitations. And, no offence, please, I am almost sure that INI can't make it ex-yu first league, the same as RJK or OSI, or TZL, or any other ex-yu airport except BEG, ZAG, SPU, DBV, LJU, PRN and SKP

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:19

      INI will have 12 new destinations...that's big! If the current number traffic is 350,000 it will be easy to achieve 1 million.
      Besides, the new INI-SOF highway is currently under construction and will be ready by 2021, which means more passenger flow and growth.
      W6 will most likely add more routes such as LTN, BCN, GVA, BVA.
      We might see Pobeda too launching services to VKO.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Charlie23:47

      I also wouldn't put INI in the first league just yet. They gotta pay their dues first. I would include TGD though.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous08:21

      Well this year they will climb to the top of the second table. I mean if Tuzla can have 500.000 passengers then so can INI.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  36. Grox09:02

    First of all everyone should congratulate Banja Luka!
    Tremendous growth and definitely a big step forward
    From a clinically dead airport we now have a small airport that has a beautiful perspective and significance for the whole region

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Kazakhstan’s SCAT Airlines to launch Belgrade service

Image

Air Serbia plans 32-member fleet in 2026, eyes MRO facility

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Turkish Airlines is Slovenia’s busiest in Q1, Swiss adds most passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025