Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June39
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia sees record New York results

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Air Serbia has registered its busiest first half of the year on the Belgrade - New York service. The carrier welcomed 35.008 passenger on its flights between the two cities, eclipsing its previous record over the six-month period set in 2018 by 11%. Figures were up 39% on last year. The average cabin load factor across the first six months stood at 73.7%, up 9.4 points on last year. “The Serbian flag carrier’s results on flights between Belgrade and New York JFK were among the best achieved by a European airline”, Air Serbia said. During the January - June period, Air Serbia operated a total of 184 flight operations on the route (outbound and inbound combined) and put 47.530 seats on sale. 

September 13, 2023
Air Serbia Belgrade Newsflash Results 2023 serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous13:34

    Bravo Air Serbia 🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:23

      35 008 x 500us=17.5 milion, Around 8 mil for fuel+4 mil air plane lease, employee salaries and airport fees= gross net profit 5 mill us.....Rough estimate

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:14

      И карта за биз класу кошта само 500 долара? Карго лети за џабе? Нико не плаћа додатне услуге, други кофер итд? Занимљиво.

      Онда овај следећи анон каже да губе паре иако су зарађивали и прошле године са мање летова него ове. Брате, ово је као у цртаном филму, овакви ликови не постоје у стварности...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous08:43

      500 $ po pravcu je ok estimate...i promet je tu negde ali troskovi nisu tako jednostavni:
      -fuel blize 10 miliona
      -lease niko ne zna cenu
      -salaries moze da se izracuna
      -INSURANCE
      -OVERFLIGHT PERMISES
      -MAINTANANCE HEAVY AND LINE
      - i jos fiksnih troskova zgradeu BEG, zarade administracije, predstavnistva u New Yorku, provizije agencijama itd itd
      -udeo biznis putnika kod AS nije preveliki (ne verujem da je vise od 5-6%)
      -kargo ipak nemamo nikakve podatke
      Jednostavno ima mnogo elemenata i mi to sa ove strane ne mozemo znati.
      Radio sam u jednom delu pa znam malo vise od proseka ali svaki je avion i linija slucaj za sebe.
      Realno, tesko je napraviti pare ali je dobro imati uslugu za putnike.
      Nema mnogo malih avio kompanija u svetu koje imaju sirokotrupne avione i prave pare.
      Fact: Lufthansa koja je pre covida imala 125.000 zaposlenih nije pravila ili tesko je pravila profit.
      Mercedes sa slicnim brojem zaposlenih pravi (2022) 14.8 milijardi profita.
      Avio saobracaj nije grana privrede koja pravi novac - ona je tu da servisira gradjane, da isplati plate i ima indirektan uticaj na privredu (turizam, brzi izvoz i uvoz robe i slicno).
      Sto pre shvatimo to bice lakse svima.
      Sve najbolje!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  2. Anonymous13:52

    73% is very bad result

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:55

      It does not include 2 strongest months - July and August and therefore this is result is quite good.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:03

      According to US department of transport it is one of the highest Eload factors to/from New York by a European airline. Higher then British Airways, Lufthansa, Austrian, Air France.... The problem is that people here don't understand what averages mean. They think a route's profitability is dependent on an average load factor over six months.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:07

      yes, if you look at department of transportation numbers, Air Serbia's load factor was higher than Lufthansa, Austrian Airlines, Swiss, LOT Polish Airlines, Virgin Atlantic, Finnair, Turkish Airlines, SAS Scandinavian Airlines and ITA Airways.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:12

      When load factors on flights operated by airlines to and from Zagreb with Embraers for first six months are below 60% the results are considered excellent by commentators because it includes weakest months of the year. When Air Serbia has 73% load factor on a route during the same period operated by wide body aircraft the result is "very bad".

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:30

      "73% is very bad result"

      Not really. But what certainly is very bad is your knowledge of aviation and your levels of jealousy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:26

      Don’t forget that cargo also have huge impact on profitability for oversea operations.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous16:02

      Bro thinks that if the LF is not 100% then there isnt profit.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous17:43

      Tbh if any, 100% LF would indicate something is not right. It'd mean either that the route needs more capacity or that the prices are too low.
      But anyways 73% out of season is a decent number. Still room for improvement, but certainly not a bad result, but this is ex yu and things need to be measured only in extremes...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous17:47

      LF does not give you clear picture. You can sell $20 round trip ticket to New York and have 100% full flights and make enormous losses.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous16:24

      Load factor is for the first 6 month only. Air Serbia had over 90% load in July and august

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Reply
  3. Anonymous13:57

    I thought the load factor was over 90%, best in Europe? What happened?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:01

      It was in January, February and March when there were fewer flights. This load factor includes SIX MONTHS in both directions. It would be really useful if people here learnt what load factor actually means.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:09

      Loads were never over 90%. You just made that up, I guess for dramatic effect. Loads hovered in the high 80s for the first 4 months of the year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Anonymous14:08

    Results are even more impressive considering Air Serbia launched flights to Chicago as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous14:19

    We want Chicago :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:34

      Talked to a guy who flew ORD-BEG recently and he said there were a lot of empty seats.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:00

      Good thing you concluded the route's overall performance on one flight by what your guy said. Experts.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:03

      He didnt mention the overall performance of the route but the single flight itself.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:08

      Most people here think that 90%+ load factor in both directions on every single flight during the year is the only indication that the route is successful. Of course, we must forget seasonality, especially on US flights, yields, cargo etc. I will just remind you that flights from Chicago to Belgrade were sold out from its launch date until August.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:23

      Why are you saying all of this?! Nobody on this comment said that the route is not profitable or not full or idk, the guy just said that on one flight there were empty seats. That doesnt make the route unprofitable and does not mean that every flight is like that. You just want to argue with people and take every single word against you. Seems like you enjoy arguing for no reason and making od mravka, slon.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous19:20

      I posted comment at 14:34 and now I regret it. It was just one observation. He is just a regular guy and I don't even know if that means flight was 85% full or 60% full. Relax. Official numbers will be released eventually.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous08:19

      Honestly, I also spoke with a friend of mine and she told me that there were many empty seats on the flight fron Chicago to Belgrade and she arrived to BEG on Aug 9th...

      I wish this route all the best but something migjt be needed to change.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous08:36

      I am sure you and your friend know the airline's financial performance on the route to conclude that something needs to change. Armchair experts who don't understand even the basics of aviation.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous09:20

      Having a lower seat load in one direction doesn’t mean it is the same in the opposite direction. Plus the amount of cargo being taken to and from. Not to mention that the route is only in its infancy. So many experts here that like to give their 2 cents in a discussion that has no basis. If you’re so smart and a genius head on over to Jiri and give him your advice. I’m sure that his proven success and knowledge will benefit from what you have to offer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. MERZ11:19

      Anonymous08:36

      Listen, I do not intend to waist my time arguing with you. I will let you grow up and mature a bit and only after that we might have some kind of conversation, only than.

      My comment was with the best intention and I truly wish all the best to YU and BEG.
      And just for the end of this pointless but needed reply to your comment, let's skip part about my knowledge of aviation industry ;)

      Cheers!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Reply
  6. Anonymous15:27

    I flew jfk to beg June 30th and flight was full according to crew announcement prior to boarding us; on the plane i didn't see empty seats in my cabin area. Flight back beg to jfk on july 8 was almost full (no crew announcemen, plan was delayed around 1 to 2 hr), maybe around 5 empty seats that i could see. They have some room to improve their product like in flight entertainment. I suggest bringing own entertainment as mine didn't work on way there (Wife's did work normal next to me) & didn't have sound coming back to jfk for both of us. Parents flew from ord on beg on the other plane from AS and their sound didn't work, so far 1 out of 6 in economy ife worked based on feedback from my family between the two a330 planes. Nonetheless, AS is a better value considering lower costs & total travel time compared to flying via a connection somewhere else. Will probably book again with AS in future

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:38

      What was the food like?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:25

      typical airline food. nothing really special.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous15:51

    Where and when has JU stated this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. EX-YU Aviation15:53

      In the September issue of their "Elevate" magazine publication.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  8. Anonymous20:45

    Russians fly now with AirSerbia home, cause they don't have many options besides Turkish Airlines. And most Russians including me prefer AirSerbia. Thank you Brothers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Zagreb Airport reopens after hours-long closure due to runway incident

Image

Wizz Air to reopen Tuzla base, launch nine new routes

Image

Air Serbia to add more aircraft, looks to 2027 for new orders

Image

Air Albania to launch Ljubljana service

Image

Belgrade Airport readies for transformation after record year

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025