Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria crew on 
DC-9 (YU-AJT), 1980

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Belgrade Airport sees strongest Q1 on record

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport registered its busiest March figures by handling 558.277 passengers, representing an increase of 18.4% on the same month last year. Commercial aircraft movements were up 9.9%. During the first quarter of the year, the airport welcomed 1.609.399 travellers through its doors, an improvement of 22.5% on the same three-month period in 2023. The airport handled an additional  295.950 passengers.


Belgrade’s largest airlines by scheduled seat capacity, March 2024


April 16, 2024
Belgrade Newsflash Results 2024 serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous18:15

    In your article from 01/2024 you wrote that was offered approx 3,1 m seats in Q1 for Serbia, mostly to Belgrade... Judging by that, what is about LF in Belgrade airport???

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:21

      JU decreased capacity in Q1 because of termination of Marathon contract in February. So the capacity for q1 that was in January was irrelevant.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:58

      Can we have data-driven conversation?
      When you say decreased, decreased by how much compared to this information from Jan-24?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Nemjee19:17

      From the top of my head JU went from +35% to just +4% after they terminated the Marathon contract. The had to considerably reduce their operations to cope with the new reality.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous20:21

      We can't have a data-driven conversation as neither JU nor the airport are public companies and we do not have access to all the data they have.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous20:33

      BEG is a public company

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous23:20

      Vinci is a private company.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous05:29

      Vinci, in fact, is not a private company:

      https://www.marketwatch.com/investing/stock/dg?countrycode=fr

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous08:54

      It is irrelevant if they are a public company or not as neither are obliged to post such data on a monthly basis and why would they?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous09:53

      Folks, "public company" in English means - akcionarsko društvo.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous13:25

      I checked that link, where does it say it is not a private company? Is it government owned?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous04:43

      Not sure if you are perhaps not familiar with the meaning of term "public company" in English? Public means that a company is publicly traded on a stock market (the link above shows Vinci's stock ticker). Public == anyone can buy it. While each country has its own regulations, it is pretty universal across the board for publicly traded companies to be required by law to post data related to its business perfomance at regular intervals (usually quarterly). This is how investors can make decisions about buying/selling company's stock. So, consequently, the earlier statement about public company not being obligated to post such data is incorrect - the law requires them to post precisely that. In most countries, buying/selling based off information which is not publicly available is considered insider trading and is illegal. Hope this clarifies it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  2. Anonymous18:23

    It seems that LF is constantly improving as well, what was the capacity growth in March?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Nemjee19:16

    Very good result overall especially when you take into consideration that both JU and W6 are struggling with capacity. I already wrote that demand will be strong given the good economic environment in Serbia. Add to that Sava Centar being activated and voila.

    Air Serbia's marketshare fell to roughly 48% in March. Bad for them, good for consumers.

    Hopefully April is as good and that the E90 that started flying today helps a little bit in achieving that goal.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:45

      So NEMJEE Air Serbia LF from BEG is about 73% ? Well if it is , I think it's good result for Q1 .

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee22:13

      Could be though I wouldn't be surprised if it was higher than 73%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Nemjee19:24

    Interesting March and Q1 numbers:

    SOF: 567 267
    BEG: 558.183

    Q1

    TIA: 1.910.616
    BEG: 1.609.305
    SOF: 1 579 346

    Seems like the race between BEG and SOF will be quite tight this year. My guess is that it helps them that Ryanair isn't struggling as much as Wizz Air is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:50

      SOF always has great start of the year but BEG wins thanks to the much hated seasonality and summer peaks. TIA, on the other hand, is some new reality...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous20:23

      TIA will be booming as long as the coast remains cheap and W6 and FR continue battling it out.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous20:25

      What Q1 numbers SKG had?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous20:30

      @20:23 Coast being cheap does not make a difference in Jan-Feb-Mar

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Nemjee20:41

      Anon 20.30

      Why not the coast? You have many who visit Cyprus in winter so as to escape the cold and gloomy weather back home. Given the ongoing W6-FR war, Albania is extremely accessible with unreasonably cheap fares. Furthermore, Albania is doing its best to promote itself as a year-round destination around Europe.

      It remains to be seen to what extent they succeed in this. Right now they are riding the wave which can't and won't last forever. Tourist arrivals in January 2024 rose by 18% to 540,415. Given the horrible road infrastructure I suppose most of them arrived by air.

      If I had to bet on who will triumph in the end, I'd put my money on Ryanair.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous21:42

      Exactly, Albania will have its place in Ryanair's destination map - tourists who can't afford Spain/Portugal/Greece/Cyprus will be heading there for holidays.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Nemjee22:15

      Indeed, Albania promotes itself as an attractive yet affordable destination. However most if not all those who go there used to holiday somewhere else (Bulgaria, Egypt, Tunis...). I expect all these markets to eventually fight for these people to return. There is no unlimited number of tourists in Europe.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Slav.Man22:23

      Always possible that ryanair could take a bad turn since they are nearly an all Boeing fleet. so if Boeing gets into further trouble so will they. Their delivery of new orders is already delayed.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous23:00

      Da li je neko od vas proveo zimu u Tirani?!? Kakvo lepo vreme, kupanje, sta je ljudi vama? Nema turizma tokom zime ama bas ni malo. Dozovite se razumu.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous02:11

      Literally all flights to and from TIA are packed with diaspora. Just check the statistics of how many Albanians live in Italy and Germany and it will make sense. What tourists are you talking about when there are 10 daily flights to Milan for the diaspora? Why are we even talking about TIA on a post for BEG pax results for Q1?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Nemjee06:45

      Anon 23.00
      Чему такав примитиван коментар? Можда је боље да не учествујете у дискусији уколико ћете остављати ту врсту коментара.
      Ко је споменуо купање зими? Буквално нико није изнео такав аргумент овде. Да ли мислите да туристи који долазе на Кипар зими то чине да би се купали? Наравно да не. Албанија се рекламира као целогодишња дестинација те промовише друге активности као што је планинарење итд.

      Anon 02.11
      You have statistics over here, I wrote how many foreign tourists are visiting Albania. They are doing it primarily because it is cheap and undiscovered. Albania might have a huge diaspora but it is not enough to grow numbers to this extent. Furthermore Tirana has year-round flights to non-gasto destinations which only goes to show that tourists do go there.
      Tirana is mentioned for the same reason we mention Sofia or Thessaloniki. It is a regional airport which recently started growing rapidly overtaking even Belgrade. It remains to be seen how long this lasts.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous08:07

      Nemjee19:24 SOF: 567 267 That is for march 2023, not 24

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Nemjee08:26

      My bad, thank you for the correction. I guess they still haven't published their 2024 numbers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Reply
  5. Anonymous20:21

    Nobody was planning 10 million this year, where did that number come from?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Nemjee20:34

    Sinisa Mali said it though his statement should be taken with a grain of salt since he is a politician. Given how good Q1 numbers are, I am certain we would have hit 10 million this year if there weren't any Wizz and JU cuts.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous04:14

    These numbers are crazy. Belgrade will soon (5 years) have more passengers than all of Croatia combined. Growth like this will continue to fuel more investment into the airport and help cement Belgrade as the gateway to the region.

    Big opportunity missed by Croatia, Croatia airlines and Zagreb as they had years to try to do this themselves when Belgrade through Jat was struggling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous08:14

    Results are less then expected. Lack of few E190 do not change the numbers much. I see LZ-PLO did only 2 rotations short daily.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:17

      Less than expected? It was exactly what was expected. Read article about planned capacity growth for March. Had you read the news from Monday you would have known how many rotations LP-PLO would do on Tuesday (it was written with destinations).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee08:28

      18% passenger growth with a 9.9% growth in the number of flights is less than expected? It means that many airlines recorded better load factors on flights while many were forced to send larger planes to Belgrade.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria crew on 
DC-9 (YU-AJT), 1980

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Belgrade Airport activates new rapid exit taxiways

Image

Ljubljana Airport targets growth of over 5%, eyes new routes

Image

Montenegro to launch subsidised PSO flights

Image

IndiGo expands reach into Serbia

Image

Ryanair solidifies EX-YU dominance despite Wizz Air’s recovery

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025