Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June28
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Slovenia reviews Cyprus Airways’ Ljubljana plans

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

The Slovenian Ministry for Infrastructure has confirmed the receipt of an application from Cyprus Airways for the launch of several routes from Ljubljana. However, it highlighted that the application is incomplete and needs to be rectified before any decision can be made. The Cypriot flag carrier submitted its proposal as part of the Slovenian government’s open call for subsidies for the launch of new routes from the country. In a statement to the daily "Delo," the Ministry for Infrastructure stated, "In the fourth public tender aimed at enhancing Slovenia’s air connectivity, an application was received from Charlie Airlines, operating under the Cyprus Airways brand. The aid allocation committee has formally assessed the application and identified deficiencies that hinder a decision based on its merits. The carrier has been requested to address these shortcomings. A comprehensive review of the application and a final decision will be made following the necessary modifications."

The Slovenian government has so far held four public calls with the aim to attract new carriers to Ljubljana, yielding mixed outcomes. Luxair, airBaltic, Norwegian, and Iberia have all benefited from the aid, with the latter two to launch operations to the Slovenian capital this summer season. With fourteen million euros remaining in unallocated funds earmarked for enhancing the country’s air connectivity, Cyprus Airways could potentially secure a portion of this sum if its application proves successful. For its part, Cyprus Airways has said it is “part of our strategic plan to grow with new bases around the Mediterranean and beyond”. The carrier currently operates a fleet of two Airbus A220-300 aircraft and two A320s.

During this week's Routes Europe conference, Hermes Airports, the operator of Cyprus’ Larnaca and Paphos airports, said it was targeting flights to Ljubljana as it focuses on closing existing connectivity gaps to European capitals. Maria Kouroupi, the Director of Aviation Development, Marketing and Communication at Hermes Airports, highlighted Ljubljana as a strategic objective. Slovenia last boasted flights to Cyprus in 2007 when Adria Airways operated a total of seven roundtrips to Larnaca in July and August of that year with its Airbus A320 aircraft.



April 26, 2024
Feature Ljubljana slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    So we can expect that they will operate flights to Larnaca. Which other routes could they have applied for?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:15

      Probably some routes like Berlin, Manchester, Rome. Major cities with no flights to LJU yet that could benefit from p2p both ways

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    This would be a fantastic addition to LJU. I really hope the government gives them approval.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      The government does not need to give them any approval. As an EU carrier, they can freely start routes within EU. The talks here are whether the government will sponsor any of their costs for opening new lines.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:13

      I was referring to that and it is obvious Cyprus Airways won't do it without the subsidies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous01:45

      I think at least LCA will happen with or without subsidies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:04

    How many routes?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:06

      Depends on the approval (they applied for some routes outside EU), the guesses are around 7

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:07

      wow that's huge

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. XYZ09:10

      From Bratušek; "ciperski prevoznik je oddal namero za kar nekaj destinacij", simply from slovenian language perspective, that means that there are at least 5:

      -je oddal namero za eno destinacijo
      -je oddal namero za dve destinaciji
      -je oddal namero za tri, šti destinacije
      -je oddal namero za kar nekaj destinacij


      So in my opinion at least 5 were submited

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:55

      Let's say it is five. Which ones could they be? Larnaca is a given obviously but what other ones?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:00

      From their already existing destinations:
      -Prague
      -Rome
      -Barcelona
      -Heraklion

      From what is missing:
      -Replace Heraklion with Manchester
      -Bucharest

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous01:46

      Stockholm, Madrid, Lisbon...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:04

    From the comments of the ministry yesterday at the LJU-RIX route ceremony it seems like they are fairly certain that something will happen, mentioning active corporation between ministry and the airline, as well as "this is not all".

    Also director of marketing in Larnaca seemingly announced the route already.

    Israel situation is hurting the airline so I fully can see an A220 being stationed in Ljubljana, operating the likes of Berlin, Amsterdam, Oslo, Bucharest, Sarajevo, Barcelona, Madrid, Manchester, Prague

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:06

    I assume they would base a plane in Ljubljana?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      Yes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:07

    Manchester please.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      This guy

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:16

      Manchester didn't work and will never work as a P2P year round destination from LJU

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:41

      True only FRA works year round.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:17

      And Munich

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:55

      And Paris, Amsterdam, London, Brussels, Belgrade, Priština, Istanbul.. stop being salty.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:04

      and Skopje

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:07

    Could be a gamechanger for LJU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous01:46

      It really needs this to happen

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:08

    From a few people in Ministry I hear, that what the airline is planning is securing the rest of the money or large portion if it, to base an aircraft there. So they would practically be paid €14.000.000 to have one aircraft stationed.

    Let's not forget that Norwegian is being paid 500.000€ for one route, twice weekly. So just with that you can get your number of destinations

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:49

      I still think it would have been wiser to give those 14 million to Ryanair. They would have made a real difference to LJU and it would have been immediate.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:18

      Is 500k really for one route alone? 50% in airport subsidies is probably closer to 100k

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:21

      Vrednost pogodbe o sofinanciranju s prevoznikom Luxair znaša 257.960,30 evrov, s prevoznikom airBaltic 284.407,53 evrov, s prevoznikom Norwegian Air 557.518,37 evrov in s prevoznikom Iberia Airlines 18.773,70 evrov. V tem trenutku obratuje samo proga Luksemburg–Ljubljana–Luksemburg, v zvezi s katero je bilo doslej prevozniku Luxair izplačanih 31.226,90 evrov.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:22

      Ryanair is free to apply. The public funds can’t be just given.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous01:47

      This is peanuts for what Ryanair wants/gets at other airport. That's why they are not applying.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous12:39

      Vsekakor je dajanje subvencij tujim prevoznikom mnogo lažje kot nacionalnemu prevozniku. To je slovenska posebnost v svetovnem merilu!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous23:03

      Oh yeah, I forgot these airlines will fly for multiple years, not just one. At least that

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:08

    Can't wait to see what routes they plan

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:47

      I'm really interested to see how many routes are actually planned. Government says "numerous"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:09

    Ljubljana Airport could completely recover sooner rather than later.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:55

      But it's already later

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous01:48

      Exactly. Most airports in the region have recovered long ago.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:45

      Ljubljansko letališče je z izgubo nacionalnega prevoznika izgubilo tekmo v regiji in zelo verjetno nikoli več ne bo imelo vloge, ki jo je imelo pred uničenjem Adrie. Večina komentarjev so samo sanjarjenje.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:11

    Bravo Fraport!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      Yeah they really did a lot to attract Cyprus Airways... not

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:30

      Basically they had no role in attracting Norwegian, air Baltic, Iberia or Luxair.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous02:06

      Other than Aegean Fraport has not attracted a single airline since Covid. All of them came thanks to the government subsidies.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:12

    They have 8 A220 on order, when are deliveries planned?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:59

      They will get 2 A220 in 2024, so 4 in the fleet this year: https://cyprus-mail.com/2024/01/22/cyprus-airways-to-double-a220-fleet-in-2024/

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:20

      Sounds perfect - use one for home base expansion, and try opening new markets with the second

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous01:48

      I just don't get that they are betting their luck with LJU. To be honest I think there are larger and more profitable markets.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:16

    Just saying that Slovenia is added as a destination on their website ;)
    https://cyprusairways.holiday/eu/destinations/slovenia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:40

      That doesn't mean much but hope it happens.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:35

      From what you sent, it looks like LCA-LJU will start soon. Probably without subsidies, but hardly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:44

      How did you come to that conclusion

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:48

      Well the list lists all their destinations, so LJU is missing in reality. So this is a new destination.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous01:49

      Didn't they also announce Dubrovnik late last year but they never put these flights on sale.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:29

    Exciting times coming

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:39

      About time

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous01:50

      Let's hope it does not fall through like with new national airline plans.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:39

    I really hope this materializes. It could be a gamechanger for LJU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous09:40

    It will be interesting what they do if they base the A220 in Ljubljana. Especially since Cyprus Airways has an actual dedicated business class with 2x2 configuration. Would this be competitive of intra Europe routes from LJU?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:43

      I think the only reason they have that type of business class is because the A220s they got were destined for some African carrier and they actually have their cabins. I assume the upcoming A220s will be in all economy layout.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:50

      Oh didn't know that. Thanks

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:50

      Which African airline were they supposed to go to

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:52

      Air Sénégal

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:53

      The two planes took their first flights over six months ago and were due to join Air Senegal's fleet - however, due to the ongoing issues with Pratt & Whitney's GTF engines, the Senegalese carrier decided to cancel its remaining A220 orders.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous13:30

      The Air Senegal cabin in those A220 look really nice, business class seats can go to bed function, economy seats are leather with movable headrest, usb ports, tablet holders, aft toilet have windows.....
      but the engines are really bad.....

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:33

      Anyone have some pics of the cabins?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous15:46

      There are all over the internet, e.g. https://www.cbn.com.cy/article/2023/7/21/723928/cyprus-airways-welcomes-the-airbus-a220-to-its-fleet-pics/

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous19:55

      And here is the business class cabin
      https://media.licdn.com/dms/image/D4E22AQEOQIug-n5Y2A/feedshare-shrink_800/0/1697289471115?e=2147483647&v=beta&t=M_6H_Qo10Axnjaa8dr6Fl3YR7bGcviNio5KZ5LH3Yws

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous01:50

      wow looks nice

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous01:50

      But is it economical having a business like that intra Europe?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous01:51

      @Anon 13.30 how do you mean the engines are bad? The planes are flying no?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Reply
  17. Anonymous09:48

    What was Cyprus Airways' financial performance like last year?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:53

      They have not reported their financials yet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  18. Anonymous09:50

    Let's just hope it does not turn out like Lumiwings in Tuzla

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:52

      Tuzla gave them a certain sum of money and hoped that it lasts, while Slovenian tender is made in a way where Slovenia covers 50% of airport cost, so it's automatically on per-flight basis

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:57

    This would be huge! Hopefully Slo government does not screw this up. Their track record with aviation related matters is appalling.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:51

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  20. Anonymous10:06

    I just noticed on this photo that they kept the old Cyprus Airways logo on the engines. Nice touch :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:14

      Their livery is really nice in general

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:26

      Love it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous01:51

      I like it too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  21. Anonymous10:15

    Would they operate flights from Slovenia under the Cyprus Airways brand or would they make up a new one?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:20

      I think they would make a new brand.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:26

      Not necessary. No need to spend money in branding. Only if they would decided to open a new company with public co-funding that would be logical.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:59

      Adria Airways brand is for sale ;)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:08

      It would be nice to have the brand of Adria Airways again.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:18

      Especially on A220!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. notLufthansa11:34

      Let me get this straight: It was major problem to cover for Adria loss; if it was managed better it would be much, much less than 16 mil they will helicopter now to anybody who is willing to fly to LJU? Bratusek is definetly an aviation gravedigger

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:36

      Once you are in EU, you (sadly) can't keep throwing away the money to your airline, and that's the problem. If Slovenia wasn't in the EU, the privatization would most probably never happened, and if it did, Adria would be bought back in 2019

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous11:37

      What are you talking about. These are official figures: Creditors of the bankrupt airline Adria Airways filed claims for a total of 151 million euros, of which the bankruptcy administrator recognised them for 87.7 million euros.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous11:40

      @10.59 Adria brand has been sold
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2021/11/adria-brand-and-trademarks-ready-to.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous01:52

      The Adria brand is no longer relevant. It has been 5 years now since it has been retired. Time to move on.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous12:57

      Adria je vsekakor imela boljši ugled v tujini (predvsem Nemčija) kot pa v delu slovenske javnosti. Sicer pa je bolje, da se ime Adria ne umaže s takimi skrpucali, ki bodo nastajali v bodoče. Adria - bilo je nekoč in nikoli več!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  22. Anonymous12:38

    I would really love to see them in Ljubljana, also if they have a Slovenian livery that would be very nice too. I vote for Adria!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:05

      5 let prepozno. Vse, kar bo sledilo, bo čuden hibrid. Ne tič ne miš.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  23. Anonymous13:01

    CY isn’t even well established in LCA with a small network while most of Cypriots prefer Aegean via ATH to travel to any destination. Y’all think CY can work in LJU?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:07

      With the correct buissnes model and tickets not being to expesive yes... otherwise it will be like Tuzla with Lumiwings

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  24. Anonymous13:43

    Glasujem za Air Slovenija

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous19:54

    This would be a very good development. Whatever the new routes are. I could see LJU reaching pre Covid passenger levels next year in this case.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:53

      And if not, when is the airport expected to reach preCovid levels?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous02:00

      2026

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:01

      Ni važno, kdaj bo doseglo 2019. V vsakem primeru bo zaostajalo za letališči v regiji.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:56

      Spet ponavljanje ene in iste laži. Komu v korist? Samo Beograd in Zagreb sta na boljšem, vsa ostala letališča v regiji so 20-30% pod številkami v 2019.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:01

      @16:56 couldn't lie more lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous17:19

      Tole sem napisal na enem drugem forumu. Vir so spletne strani posameznih letališč, z razliko z Italijo, kjer številke objavlja ENAC:

      Od okoliških letališč sta samo Zagreb (+8%) in Trst (+19%) presegla številke iz 2019. Pula je na -45%, Reka -23%, Celovec -27%, Gradec -29%.
      Pa še ostala večja letališča, ki jih Slovenci radi uporabljamo: Budimpešta -9%, Benetke -3% , Bologna +6%, Dunaj -6%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous00:08

      Pozabil si letališča v ex YU, upam, da ne namerno.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous09:41

      Namerno. Ljubljana namreč najbolj konkurira Celovcu, Trstu, Zagrebu in Gradcu, ne Banja Luki, Podgorici, Prištini, Nišu in Tuzli.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous12:13

      Najprej omeniš da sta v regiji samo Zagreb in Beograd na boljšem, nato rečeš da je še Trst in da Beograd ni več del regije. Make up your mind already.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous13:06

      Ja, omemba Beograda je bila moja napaka, ampak to ne spremeni dejstva da lažeš in zavajaš. Komu v korist? Veš le ti.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous13:42

      Izgleda da si nov na tem portalu, saj se tukaj od nekdaj omenja vsa letališča iz bivše Juge kot del regije. Tako da ti lažeš in zavajaš kako gre Ljubljani "odlično" v primerjavi z drugimi.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous14:00

      Upam, da se boš enkrat že naučil brat. Pa lep pozdrav.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous14:03

      Upam da se boš enkrat že naučil kaj je regija. Pa lep pozdrav.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Reply
  26. Anonymous19:54

    Even if they just launch Larnaca I will be happy :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:53

      It seems like that definitely happening.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Zagreb Airport reopens after hours-long closure due to runway incident

Image

Air Serbia to add more aircraft, looks to 2027 for new orders

Image

Belgrade Airport readies for transformation after record year

Image

Wizz Air to reopen Tuzla base, launch nine new routes

Image

Wizz Air to halt London - Sarajevo service

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025