Slovenia still committed to new flag carrier


The Slovenian government is still considering establishing a new national airline, almost five years after the former flag carrier, Adria Airways, declared bankruptcy. According to the State Secretary at the Slovenian Ministry for Infrastructure, Andrej Rajh, discussions regarding the formation of the new national carrier are ongoing and still on the agenda, Last July, the Slovenian Parliament’s Public Finances Oversight Commission proposed for the state to enter into a strategic partnership with an established airline in the process of forming the country’s new national carrier. Acknowledging that the process of setting up a new airline could take several years, the government has previously said it would only do so through a Public Private Partnership (PPP).

The companies Melkom and Fabce, which were commissioned last year by the Slovenian Ministry for Infrastructure to undertake a study on ways to improve the country’s air connectivity concluded that launching a new flag carrier could be economically viable. According to the study, at least 300.000 passengers from Slovenia are using alternative airports outside of the country for their travels. The study found that in case of a PPP, the national airline would break-even in its seventh year of operations. The cumulative loss in such a case would reach 35 million euros in the sixth year, and after the tenth year it would amount to 28 million euros. The authors of the study estimated the private partner would have to make an initial capital injection of at least 35 million euros, or seventy million euros in the case of a more ambitious network.

According to the study, if both the state and the private partner invested fifty million euros each, the airline would be profitable within ten years. The study further points out that in order for the airline to become profitable, it would have to have an average cabin load factor of 64%, while its fares would have to amount to at least 134 euros. It further stressed the new airline would have to be lean, commercially successful and, at least initially, conservative in its business model. The Slovenian government has noted that despite plans for a new national carrier, it will continue with its policy of subsidising foreign carriers in a bid to improve the country’s connectivity in the short-term, with a new public call to be launched soon.



Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    They should just stop with this nonsense

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      Nonsense is paying 16million in 3 years and not having a national carrier, that could be set up for 10mio

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:13

      it says in the article it will be 100 million € and non profitable for at least 10 years... and with fares minimum 134€ one way it will never reach load factor of 64% on all the routes. so yes, it is better to put a fraction of this money every few year for subsidies

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:03

      "Slovenia still committed to new flag carrier"

      My first thought was "of course, where else are they going to steal money from?" Adria was a huge free-for-all for many governments, and it was only sold after barely anything could be stolen from it. Now let's give that another try! Yupee for anyone who cannot get a doctor to see them, but they will have a NATIONAL carrier. All is well under the Alps.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:43

      @ 9:04

      Yes, for 10 x 50! Remember Adria: 50 million, 30 million, 8 million, another 25 million. It soon amounted to a quarter of a billion. Plus these foreign carriers are well known names in their respective markets, SLO's national carrier would be unknown. Slovenia as it is, is barely known outside its neighbouring countries. If you'd travel more, you'd know that.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous11:57

      I really do not understand why JU doesn't make a sister-airline to be based in Ljubljana (brand it Adria 2.0 or whatever Ljubljana likes). It would be able to expand its operations in the EU and also utilize BG as a base for inter-continental flights (as opposed to whichever other EU legacy would do so). So, instead of LJU flights automatically being forced through FRA, CDG or MUC for flights to the US/China - it would be thought BEG. It's not HUGE money, but it certainly ensures the loads are a little more secure, which enables greater expansion.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous12:13

      Place nova vlada za takvim genijem. Zasto bi Srbija finansirala Slovence koji lete iz Venecije, Klagefurta, Trsta, Graza, Zagreba?

      Delete
    7. Slav.Man10:23

      @11:57 its political block that would prevent JU from doing anything like that. even if it got government approval from the Slovenian government, it would be blocked, severely impeded by other EU politicians/ organizations. Same reason JU could not do it in BiH or Montenegro or Macedonia.
      That's why we constantly see EU airlines just stealing and blackmailing from the JUG nations for more money. like the EU LCC's that steal from BiH. opening up a base they new wouldn't work taking money and leaving. The EU will never allow a serious regional airline to grow and develop in the Jug which will challenge Lufthansa group control over the region or the other western airlines.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous11:38

      @Slav Man is unfortunately right. Post 1990s a number of airlines stepped in and took the market share from JAT. Their governments will do anything to hold on to it.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous09:03

    Could this have something to do with Cyprus Airways?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:15

      Would be strange if not. Radio silence for a whole year and suddenly when Cyprus Airways came in with a proposal there're talks about a new airline

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:03

    I watched the last years conference, and they said that the perfect scenario would be finding a 50/50 partner. And as the idea was that 50/50 would mean the other partner brings in AOC and airplanes, I think the ideal scenario here is Cyprus Airways actually offering them 2 A220, as a start, and gov paying for the staff salaries.
    Would work great, the aircraft is the right size, the AOC is there and they (cyprus) are seemingly ready to start in the winter, as two more A220 join the fleet

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      +10000000

      That's a great idea!

      Delete
  4. Anonymous09:09

    Why waste money on a national airline? The government should use just 20% of the money they would spend on establishing a national airline to attract other carriers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:27

      They are wasting it much more now and we dobt have any connectivity

      Delete
  5. Anonymous09:09

    I still have my hopes for a better future of Slovenian aviation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:48

      Then, the key people at the Ministry for Infrastructure should be replaced. Ms Bratušek appointed her own party aparatchik as the CAA director who does the job on a part time basis. She replaced a very enthusiastic aviator with a guy that has no clue about aviaition. She is blocking any development of Maribor airport until a new operator is found for which only Fraport, Vinci, TAV and the likes can apply. She does not recognize any other succesful aviation companies in Slovenia. Aviation in Slovenia is so much more than LJU and the supposed "new Adria".

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:56

      The gravediggers of Slovenian aviation are now leading Slovenia.

      Delete
  6. Anonymous09:09

    its very hard to make a new national airline with not so big population…

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:10

      Should have stayed in YU then (joking)

      Delete
  7. Anonymous09:13

    A national airline isn't just purely about profitability. Yes, it should not bleed money but a national airline is of strategic importance (which we saw during covid), it is about improving the country's connectivity, using it to improve tourism, nurturing aviation sector and related industries (which have now all been destroyed in Slovenia).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:15

      can you tell us more about which aviation idustries have been destroyed in SLO? As far as I've heard everything is booming sice 2019 except for a carrier situation...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:52

      I'm not the guy at 9:13 but flight schools have suffered a lot as simply no one wants to be a pilot anymore since there is no home based airline.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous14:16

      Also I remember lots of hotels bleeding money because of the fall in international visits

      Delete
    4. Anonymous17:51

      Which hotels? The most passengers were transfers from Macedonia and kosove?

      Delete
  8. Anonymous09:14

    I'm almost certain there will be no new national airline launched. If they decided to invest 17 million into subsidizing new routes, why would they invest in a flag carrier?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:17

      Out of those 17 million; not even one million was used after 3 tenders

      Delete
  9. Anonymous09:27

    It's a shame Amelia didn't start scheduled flights from LJU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:35

      Worth noting that Amelia has a larger fleet than Croatia Airlines and the second largest fleet in ex-Yu.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:38

      Are they profitable?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:47

      Immensely

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:55

      That's very good to hear.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous10:16

      I assume they do well since they fly PSOs for Air France.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous21:00

      JU have over 30, Airpink 22-23 it is number 2 not Amelia.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous21:40

      In which world does JU have over 30 planes?

      Delete
    8. Anonymous01:36

      Air Pink no longer exists.

      Delete
  10. Anonymous09:27

    Looking at it now, it was cheaper and easier if the government just gave Adria 50 million 5 years ago and saved the airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      Remember the EU state aid rules. It would likely be determined to be illegal later on.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:36

      And 50 million a year after, 80 million in 2022 and so on....

      Delete
  11. Anonymous09:28

    Even if they decide in favor of a new airline which I doubt it will take at least until summer 2026 for it to launch, at best.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      Depends what kind of model they choose.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:36

      Not unless they partner with another airline.

      Delete
  12. Anonymous09:36

    I am pretty sure that this Cyprus Airways talks have something to do with this. It would be great, when they recieve more A220s they can station them at Lju and they fly for Slovenia airways or whatever it would be called

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous09:47

    It's a big political decision, that is for sure.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:55

      Will the EU allow it though?

      Delete
  14. Anonymous09:56

    Say they decide to launch an airline, what is going to be the concept? They will compete against Lufthansa group on the most profitable flights to Frankfurt and Munich? They will start unserved routes? They will try to be a new Adria by connecting Balkans to the West?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:03

      Good question

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:03

      They wouldn't compete against Lufthansa group. There would be more than enough space for the new airline to launch flights like Frankfurt and Munich since the routes are underserved.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:08

      They would probably start with flights to Madrid, Prague, Barcelona etc… which are unserved and also fly to Amsterdam, Copenhagen, Frankfurt…which are underserved

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:19

      Who says or based on what we can say the routes are underserved? If there were such a larger demand for those routes there would be an airline to turn this demand into a profit, but I guess there isn't?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous14:18

      Keep in mind, FRA and MUC are so profitable because of the transfer opportunities. The new airline would first need to codeshare with Lufthansa if they'd want to start these routes. Most likely, it'll be p2p demand at first

      Delete
  15. Anonymous09:56

    MELKOM = MATEJ ELJON KOM, ZERO EMPLOYEES, DIRECTOR MATEJ ELJON
    FABCE = FUNCTIONAL BLOCK OF AIRSPACE = JOINT VENTURE OF 6 ANSP (+BIH), 1 EMPLOYEE, DIRECTOR MATEJ ELJON
    Those are two companies entitled to produce feasibility study of a national carrier.
    Matej Eljon has a masters degree of electronics, use to be head of technical department in Slovenia Control, has a lot of knowledge about electrical devices, lighting systems,VORs, NDBs, DMEs..., but ZERO experience in commercial aviation, but he knows everything about it. On some other aviation portal we know the person of that potencial under nickname 'analitičar'



    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:14

      Seems legit haha

      Delete
  16. Anonymous10:14

    Really hope it happens!

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous10:14

    Slovenia needs this.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:16

      Would be nice to have an airline based in Slovenia.

      Delete
  18. Anonymous10:17

    Let's say Adria is relaunched, which routes could be started from LJU?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:27

      Morning/evening flights to EU hubs, mid rotation to Balkan destinations.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:29

      ^ That is Adria 2.0

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:09

      Berlin, Madrid, Barcelona, Amsterdam, Prague, Vienna, Bucharest, Sofia, Rome, Sarajevo, Tirana, Lisbon, Manchester, Stockholm, Oslo, Dublin…some of those probably

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:12

      Those destinations seem workable. The new Iberia flights from Madrid that last a month are an absolute joke.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous16:28

      Muc / zrh / bru are most important and they are still not recovered

      Delete
  19. Anonymous10:29

    Good luck.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:11

      Slovenia is a beautiful country and they deserve to have good national air carrier connecting Ljubljana but also Maribor to the other European cities.

      Delete
  20. Anonymous10:29

    It would be great to have a local airline back in business

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:11

      This is the best chance for locals to get new employment opportunities. So I really hope they agree to provide some funds to set up an airline.

      Delete
  21. Anonymous10:29

    If launched correctly I think it could be successful.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous10:30

    The government has tried to give money to foreign airlines and it didn't produce fantastic results. Now it is time to try and get a national carrier to start flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:11

      Well they are not really great…three airlines or four if you want to count that few Iberia flight to Madrid…and for three or four tenders that really isn’t a great outcome.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:52

      If not more foreign airlines are interested in serving LJU, what do u think, does this mean for a new national carrier?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:55

      That it need to happen becouse if anybody elso won’t do it than a national carrier need to do it.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:15

      This wld be needed if no one or just 2-3 airlines wld be flying. But u hve this Summer 25 scheduled destinations with 22 airlines, plus over 50 charter destinations. Thats not great, but quite ok

      Delete
    5. Anonymous16:27

      Number of destinations does not mean a lot in aviation. Its frequencies and time of dep/arr which are more important then destination itself

      Delete
    6. Anonymous19:18

      Connections at the hubs are important and I think with up to 7 daily flts LH and LX u reach the most important cities in the world. In addition u have TK JU AF FZ with further destinations u reach. Again, not great, but quite ok. Could be worse....

      Delete
  23. Anonymous11:09

    If there is a demand Slovenia should support its own air company and not foreign

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous11:09

    I doubt the government will choose this option in the end. It is more expensive then giving subsidies for foreigners.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:10

      We can see in the yearly results what is the outcome of relying on foreign carriers. Slovenia desperately needs it's own national carrier. Still 30% below 2019 and the slowest recovery in Europe.

      Delete
  25. Anonymous11:12

    I hope it materializes.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:08

      It will only work as a money losing venture.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous01:40

      Not necessarily. With smart management it could actually work.

      Delete
  26. Anonymous11:20

    All talk and no serious plans and activity. Like always

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:58

      Slovenian aviation in a nutshell.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous01:40

      True

      Delete
  27. Anonymous11:58

    If they go for it, please bring in a professional management. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:53

      Did you say professional??We dont do that around here in Slovenian aviation

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:54

      Well Mark Anzur is running Air Montenegro

      Delete
  28. Anonymous12:08

    Hope they set up the new company on some healthy foundations and I wish it much luck in the future.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:11

      Not gonna happen

      Delete
    2. Anonymous14:34

      @12:11... Elaborate why, pls.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous18:01

      Because there are no well managed public companies in Slovenia. They simply don't exist and will never exist.

      Delete
  29. Anonymous19:22

    Elections are coming

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:39

      I really don't think a national airline is an election issue in Slovenia. On the contrary, it would probably negatively impact those advocating for it.

      Delete
  30. Anonymous21:05

    My opinion is that it's just a waste of time. This would be a good addition to the current almost recovered LJU market. If a new national carrier is established, it will serve the same destinations as LH Group and the other airlines at the airport. It will also operate long-awaited destinations such as BER, MAN, ARN, OSL, DUS, FCO, BCN, . But I think that would also be covered by someone like airBaltic, Cyprus or SkyAlps. It's just money, money is needed.... Yes, it would be good for Slovenia to have a national carrier, but I think that would be easily covered by some other already existing carrier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:35

      Exactly, it would be much cheaper to go wtih the likes of Cyprus Airways who already has talks with the government than establishing a new carrier.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous01:38

      I think that is the idea here. I am certain this renewed interest from the government in national airline is related to Cyprus Airways.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous06:28

      Lol, almost recovered trafic he said :) wake up please, we are still 30% behind on 2019.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:05

      A country with few slaves in Western Europe is normal for the resumption to be slower, don't forget the fact that about 250,000 passengers were transfers (that is, not Slovenians).

      Delete
  31. Anonymous21:21

    I can't understand this political sadness over the loss of JP! This money could then have been given to save the airline, or an auction could have been organized to attract an airline, with the conditions being - aircraft based at LJU. Anyway, Adria is gone and now the market is recovering and they keep talking about a new airline. There will come a time when Slovenia will have exceeded passenger traffic compared to 2019 and they will still be talking about a national carrier, even though the market is taken over by other airlines. Remember my words!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous01:37

      The problem is the market is recovering way to slowly and has much more potential, evident by the fact that thousands of Slovenes travel from airports in neighboring countries

      Delete
    2. Anonymous06:27

      Of course it will recover to numbers we had with JP, but while we are gonna be happy to be on same level, other airport will have already 50%+ more passengers compared to same period.

      Delete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.