Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May54
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Lufthansa reclaims top spot as Slovenia’s busiest airline in 2024

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Lufthansa has reclaimed its position as Ljubljana’s and Slovenia’s busiest carrier in 2024, overtaking Turkish Airlines after losing the title to its Turkish counterpart the previous year. Turkish Airlines maintained its lead until June, but Lufthansa saw a 28.7% increase in passenger numbers, driven by the introduction of a second daily service from Munich. The German carrier also recorded the highest passenger growth in the market, adding 47.828 travellers. Lufthansa’s average cabin load factor across its two Ljubljana routes for the year stood at 80%. Despite losing the top spot, Turkish Airlines continued to perform well, increasing its passenger numbers by nearly 10%.

Ljubljana passenger performance on scheduled flights by market, 2024


Swiss and Transavia saw notable growth, adding 22.211 and 17.291 passengers, respectively, on their routes. Swiss expanded its operations to Ljubljana by 20% year-over-year, increasing capacity by 21%. In contrast, Transavia’s growth primarily stemmed from the absence of flights in early 2023, as the airline suspended its Amsterdam - Ljubljana service from February until late March of that year. Passenger numbers on Ljubljana - London flights, operated by three different carriers, remained largely stable. Growth was initially driven by British Airways, which served the Slovenian capital during the first quarter for the first time. However, numbers declined in the fourth quarter when the airline opted not to renew its winter flights. Meanwhile, Wizz Air discontinued its London Luton route in February.

Among the airlines that recently launched flights to Ljubljana, Luxair reported an average cabin load factor of 73%. Wizz Air continues to perform strongly on its Skopje–Ljubljana route, which began in September 2023, achieving a high average load factor of 95.4%. Norwegian, which entered the Slovenian market in late April last year, carried 15.623 passengers on its Copenhagen flights, with an average load factor of 78.7%. Similarly, airBaltic, which also inaugurated services to Ljubljana in April, recorded an average cabin occupancy of 83.5%. Meanwhile, Aegean Airlines' seasonal Athens service saw an average load factor of 74.4%, while Iberia's limited operations between Madrid and Ljubljana achieved a strong 86.6% occupancy.


February 16, 2025
Air Montenegro Belgrade Feature Kosovo Ljubljana low cost airline macedonia montenegro Niš Priština Results 2025 serbia Skopje slovenia tivat Wizz Air
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    Bravo Fraport!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:18

      Busiest airline in the graveyard.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:56

      Bravo Fraport 👏🏻

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:03

      Hilarious

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    Air Baltic has surpsingly good loads

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:06

      All of the new flights operated really well except for Copenhagen, but destinations like those need time to develop

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:33

      Would love to see Norwegian expand to other Nordic destinations like Stockholm or Oslo

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:03

    I don't get why Ibearia didn't extend its flights this year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:44

      they are increasing capacity

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous21:42

      with such limited operations, it’s hard to tell if there’s real demand for Madrid flights or just pent-up demand from the summer

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:12

      Iberia flights are there only with some agreement with tour operators, selling a few remaining seats via webpage. It's more regular charter around "ferragosto"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:06

    Anyone know where the JU growth came from? They didn't increase flights so loads must be much better? Did they send anything other than ATR to LJU? Maybe INI-LJU is doing better?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      They had just a few flights with Embraer. The rest was with ATR

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:13

      So that leaves us with better loads. Let's pray JU adds more flights or capacity to LJU, there is definitely room for extra growth.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:44

      JU decreased the number of available seats in ZAG but increased them in LJU.
      I beleive it is the effect of Ryanair's growth in ZAG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. EX-YU Aviation09:48

      In 2024, Air Serbia did not increase capacity in Ljubljana. In Zagreb, it increased its capacity by 12%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:51

      LOL. Loving the experts like the anonymous @9.44.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:10

    Let the seething begin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:49

      +1000

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:15

    Bravo Lufthansa group!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:42

      LHG airlines have consistently provided the most service in our region for 30 years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:33

      That's also why LJU is one of the most expensive airports to fly out of in Europe. Danke Mutti!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous22:00

      Fake news.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:25

    Seems like a good mixture of carriers- and good connectivity

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:41

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:02

      Lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:28

    Nice one.
    Also seems that TK is really hurting by late deliveries of narrow body aircraft AND Pratt issues with their NEOs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous10:19

    In another news, easyjet is currently operating daily flights between LJU and LGW in February. Presumably only for the duration of the winter holiday, but nevertheless a good development

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous10:19

    Now we see big "success" of stagnation of Flydubai in LJU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:21

      I think their numbers held up because they decreased flights to LJU this winter. Flydubai has a big issue with its fleet. It was reported here.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:21

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2024/07/flydubai-warns-of-frequency-cuts-and.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:49

      Yep. Last winter they had 11 weekly flights during some peak winter holiday weeks, right now it's still only 7 weekly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:04

      They should quickly discontinue DXB-LJU and launch DXB-SKP instead. It'll be bigger success. LOL!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:18

      @11.04 trolling hight totally unnecessarily

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  11. Anonymous10:23

    I'm a bit surprised by Aegean's loads. Would have expected better numbers considering they only flew during high season.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. Anonymous12:42

    Impressive loads for air baltic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  13. Anonymous12:45

    Swiss is the true winner in terms of additional passengers considering it is organic growth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous12:45

    TK with one route while LH with 2 routes

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous12:46

    UK numbers are really the most disappointing. From number 1 destination a few years ago.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous12:55

    After BEG , SKP is second Ex yu airport with most passengers in Slovenia. Impressive 95.4 LF on the route with 55k passengers👏Is this W6 route slowly becoming the one with most high LF from SKP ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:57

      I wonder if that is the reason why OU is reducing SKP. I am sure Wizz took a lot of passengers from them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:14

      How come wizz has 4 weekly in april from skopje to ljubljana and than again 3 weekly?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:42

      12:57 OU passengers to ZAG are mostly transfers and point to point, I will not say there is another reason other then fleet issues.
      LJU is different story , SKP passengers there mostly are people who live there , because Macedonia have big diaspora in Slovenia, and alot of students , all our students choose going to study there because of the better education system,affordable costs,small distance to home and after graduating the country giwes them secure work by European standards , instead of losing their time here in Macedonia.And that numbers of students are also huge.

      13.14 its because of their fleet issues , rotating planes and etc ....
      ..this route will be succesfull even 4-5 weekly flights but as we know they still have alot of planes grounded , so they must send the planes to other routes ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:57

      13.14. its holiday times both catholic and orthodox

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:56

      We in Slovenia welcome any Macedonians with open hands. You will feel at home here, brothers and sisters.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  17. Anonymous13:34

    The words busy and Ljubljana are somewhat contradictory.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:32

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  18. Anonymous21:32

    Turkish Airlines still growing despite losing the top spot just shows how strong their network is. Their connections via Istanbul are unbeatable for long-haul flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous21:32

    It would be interesting to compare to 2018 or 2019 to see which markets have completely recovered compared to the Adria era.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:16

      Connections in Istanbul, Frankfurt, Zurich, Brussels, Warsaw, Belgrade, and Skopje have already surpassed pre-pandemic traffic levels, while routes to Paris and Munich are also close to recovery.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:42

      No Manchester, or anywhere north of Luton.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  20. Anonymous21:40

    Wizz Air's high load factor on the Skopje route is impressive. They should consider adding more frequencies or maybe even new routes to the Balkans."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:04

      If SKP-LJU is amazing and high LF doesnt mean any other route would work the same. The demand for this route is huge and thats why it is very sucesfull.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:50

      OHD perhaps

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  21. Anonymous21:41

    Luxair at 73% load factor is a decent start, but I wonder if they’ll manage to sustain the route long-term. Luxembourg isn’t exactly a major travel destination from Slovenia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:16

      With some subsidy support they will maintain the route for the time being.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:53

      It is disappointing that they only offer point to point flight and no connections in LUX.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  22. Anonymous00:39

    It’s disappointing that British Airways didn’t continue their winter flights.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

easyJet ups Belgrade operations to fend off Air Serbia

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

Croatia Airlines holds talks with Slovenia over network expansion

Image

Montenegro to decide who takes over country’s airports next month

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025