Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June18
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia outlines Europe, Middle East and long-haul plans

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Air Serbia is set to continue its network expansion this week with the launch of flights to Mykonos, soon to be followed by new services to Alghero, Tbilisi, and Geneva. Together with the recently inaugurated routes to Shanghai and Florence, the airline will have added six new destinations to its network by mid-June. Speaking to EX-YU Aviation News at the IATA Annual General Meeting & World Air Transport Summit in New Delhi, Air Serbia’s CEO Jiri Marek and General Manager Commercial and Strategy, Boško Rupić, shared insights into the carrier’s upcoming plans for Europe, the Middle East, and long-haul markets.

Upcoming summer expansion

Commenting on the carrier’s latest expansion drive, Mr Marek said, “What we learned after Covid is that leisure routes consistently perform well, and they continue to do so. So, the strong demand for our upcoming leisure destinations came as no surprise. Unfortunately, we weren’t able to secure slots in Ibiza, which is a pity as it would have been a strong performer. Mykonos, on the other hand, is doing very well. Most bookings are from individual travellers, which is a positive sign. It shows that shifting our strategy away from traditional charter destinations and toward extending seasonality is working. Sardinia [Alghero] is also performing strongly. Ideally, we would prefer to operate into Olbia, and we will continue to pursue that, as Olbia is a significantly better entry point for individual travellers”.

He added, "Tbilisi is primarily maintained as a transfer route, and we’re pleased with its performance so far. It’s still early to draw firm conclusions, as the booking window for this type of route differs from that of typical leisure destinations. With leisure routes, demand is immediate, and seats tend to sell out quickly. For more traditional routes like Tbilisi, bookings tend to come in later. Still, the first flight is already showing a load factor of around 80%, which is quite encouraging. We expect most of the bookings to come in during the final two weeks, so things are developing as expected".

Mr Rupić revealed that the airline remains committed to launching flights to Ibiza, with the route now likely to be introduced in 2026. The delay is due to slot unavailability caused by handling constraints at Ibiza Airport. “It’s a destination that sees strong point-to-point demand, along with a significant volume of transfer passenger”, he explained.

Commenting on the newly launched Florence service, Mr. Rupić said, “The ATR has proven to be an ideal aircraft for this route. Rather than increasing capacity, we see greater value in boosting frequencies. Our load factors are already exceeding 90%”.

Air Serbia summer network as of June 2025

Future expansion in Europe

Commenting on further expanding across the continent, Mr Marek said, “Looking ahead, we’ve set certain expectations by launching forty destinations. Naturally, this has generated a lot of excitement around each new route. However, I believe the next phase will be more focused on network densification”.

“That said, densifying leisure routes isn’t always feasible. In some markets, Valencia, for example, adding extra frequencies doesn’t necessarily stimulate additional demand. You simply have to accept the limitations of leisure-driven traffic. On the other hand, routes like Madrid, Barcelona and similar markets present clear opportunities for densification, and we will continue to build frequency there where demand supports it”.

Mr Marek noted the airline will continue to look at new opportunities based on market dynamics. The CEO said, “We’ll reserve some capacity for agile, opportunistic decisions, like last year’s Nice launch. A good example is also our return to Geneva. Whenever there's a strong case, we’ll bring certain destinations back into the network because we see long-term value in them. Now we’re shifting our focus toward destinations like Tbilisi, where there’s a critical mass to support both connectivity and network development. These are markets where adding flights can also help feed the broader network. That said, the number of completely new destinations we can introduce is becoming more limited. So going forward, it will be a mix: a few new launches, realistically five to six per year, combined with route densification and seasonal adjustments”.

“This winter, for example, we see some promising opportunities. Last year we already evaluated certain destinations for winter extension, but unexpected maintenance issues limited our capacity. Now, with the Embraers in the fleet, we’re seriously considering extending some routes, possibly even year-round service, where market conditions allow. Of course, as we saw recently with other airlines' adjustments, there may still be short off-periods, but the long-term potential is evident.”

Mr Rupić highlighted that the introduction of Embraer aircraft into the fleet is opening up new opportunities for the airline. The network expansion over the past two years has also allowed the carrier to reassess previously discontinued routes, such as Geneva. The airline is once again exploring destinations like Helsinki, which were unable to support larger aircraft back in 2019. “When we launch certain routes, such as those in the Caucasus region, where we’re also considering additional points, the Embraers strengthen our position”, Mr Rupić said. He added, “They allow us to test new markets with more flexibility and achieve stronger initial results, which we can then build on by upgauging to larger aircraft”.

Middle East and North Africa

MENA region expansion "a matter of time"

Air Serbia no longer maintains operations to the Middle East and North Africa, however, Mr Marek said the region is on the airline’s radar. “It’s just a matter of time. These destinations are complex for many reasons, whether it’s airport slots, costs or overall risk. So yes, they’re definitely on our radar. However, we currently have other priorities where we see stronger profitability. That said, sooner or later, these routes will return. I can’t say exactly when, it all depends on the right opportunity. But as our Embraer fleet continues to grow, it’s also creating new possibilities and giving us more flexibility to explore such routes”, Mr Marek said.

Long-haul

YU-ARC is scheduled to return to the lessor in November 2026

The CEO described Miami as the natural next target for US expansion, though he emphasised that the route involves a number of strategic and operational complexities.

Mr Marek said, “Miami is a very logical destination - especially when paired with Toronto, even though Toronto is only seasonal. But it’s a complex decision. When you’re talking about launching routes like New York, Chicago or even China, those are, in many ways, no-brainers. In New York and Chicago, you have a solid diaspora base that provides a stable foundation of demand. Add to those domestic US connections, cargo potential, and so on, and the business case becomes fairly straightforward. China, of course, presents different dynamics, but a similar logic applies”.

“Miami, however, is different. It may be a logical market, but it’s the first destination where success would rely on combining multiple market segments - leisure, diaspora, connectivity, and possibly business travel. That naturally increases the risk. On top of that, considering the current market dynamics and volatility, it’s difficult to make long-term decisions. With long-haul routes, you typically need to announce at least eight months in advance - six months is already pushing it - just to allow enough time for effective sales and marketing”.

“Then there’s the fleet question. One of our aircraft is scheduled to be returned to the lessor in November 2026. That’s the aircraft registered as YU-ARC. To extend its lease, we’d need to invest in cabin upgrades now. At the same time, other A330s are starting to appear on the market, but until any deals are finalised, it’s difficult to commit to launching a new long-haul route without full certainty that the aircraft will be available”.

“So yes, it’s a complex decision. But I would still say Miami is the next logical step. When we’ll make that call is hard to say, sometimes we surprise even ourselves with how quickly things move”.

In the coming days, EX-YU Aviation News will bring you other topics discussed in the interview, including Air Serbia’s fleet strategy, operational results, new frequent flyer program and lounge developments.


June 06, 2025
Air Serbia Belgrade Feature serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:07

    Very interesting stuff. So it seems MIA is dependant on them finding another A330. Happy to hear Middle East routes will come back.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      Good riddence to YU-ARC.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:41

      One more proof that MIA is still not that sure as some claimed here earlier.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:56

      Toronto should be okay as it is being considered seasonal service. With or without cabin upgrade, YU-ARC will be availabe until November 2026 and that covers Toronto for next summer. By the time summer of 2027 is back, Air Serbia will have either extended ARC lease or get other A330. That's two years from now. Toronto seems more certain than Miami from fleet perspective.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:57

      From the interview, to me, it does not look like they want to extend YU-ARC leaase and that they are looking for a replacament.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:11

      Even if they replace it, Toronto would be safe for next summer, but Miami would have issues if replacement is not ready to fly by Nov 2026. It seems safer to proceed with seasonal Toronto service ahead of Miami year-round service.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous12:05

      ARC wont be extended, ARB also wont be extended as its lease runs out in cca. 2028-2029

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous12:10

      So neither ARB or ARC will get a cabin similar to ARD and ARE?
      They had even said they bought seats similar to these tow in order to standardize the cabins of the A330 fleet. What changed?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:15

      It makes no sense to reconfigure an aircraft leaving the fleet in less than a year and a half that is used exclusively as a spare. Unfortunately most people here don't realise what a big investment it is. As for ARB I would not trust everything an anonymous poster writes. They did not buy seats to reconfigure ARB and ARC (no need to make things up) but to have spare replacements for ARD and ARE. Also things change on the market. Planes that were not available before become available.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous13:17

      No, that’s not true. Marek himself said that with lease of ARD and ARE, they bought extra interior for two other A330, so they will standardize cabin. Something changed in the meantime, as it was pretty strange that ARC was not cabin retrofitted in March this year

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous13:25

      Are you crazy? Why would you retrofit a plane that will be barely flying until its lease is up in less than a year and a half. You would literally fail even in the airline tycoon game.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous13:27

      I agree with the above anonymous. It makes absolutely no sense to change cabins on a plane you are using as a reserve until November 2026 when you will return it to the owner and need to return it in the same state you first leased it. So you would have to rip out the seats again and put the old ones in. Use your head a bit.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous13:48

      Strange that Toronto was not elaborated further in that interview esp in light of A330 lease/return decision making no impact on potential launch of seasonal service.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous23:21

      Use my head? I am crazy?? Are you guys understand English at all?? MAREK STATED THAT THEY PLAN TO RETROFIT BOTH ARB AND ARC, NOT ME! Those are Air Serbia plans, not mine. They obviously found cheaper deals for A330 in the meantime and they will not proceed with ARC, but return it to lesor

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous05:58

      Issue with YU-ARC is likely the lessor isn't allowing JU to remove the crew rest area, which takes up cargo space and makes it impossible for JU to standardise the cabin to conform with YU-ARD/E. YU-ARB configuration isn't a drastic difference.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:08

    No mention of Seoul/Tokyo. They seemed like low potential anyways.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      What are you on about? They said these route are long term after they add another route in the US.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:27

      You realize that Seoul and Tokyo can’t be considered seriously as long as Russian airspace is restricted by lessors.

      Seoul might even work with southern route, but Tokyo would be just far away.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:31

      JU could buy an aircraft and fly it over whatever airspace it wishes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:43

      There’s little brand awareness of Serbia in Japan and South Korea. The boat has long sailed on trying to capitalize on regional transfers for their low yielding tourists, too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:08

    5-6 new routes per year is fantastic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      +1 and it looks like we will see more routes dependent on transfer passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:17

      It’s good to see an airline being realistic about route limitations instead of launching 15 destinations just to make headlines,

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:19

      That and that they plan to densify network.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:26

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:10

    I'd be glad if they swapped out ARC for a newer bird, or at least with a unified cabin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:12

    @admin thanks for all these articles from the conference! nice work

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:35

      Fully agree! Great job and many thanks!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:43

      Exactly what I wanted to write too.
      This is real aviation site and not copy/paste of articles as some other do.
      Well done!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:13

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:18

    If they get another A330 to replace Pupin, wonder if they would paint in Pupin livery, expo livery or a new person? :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:22

      Djokovic please!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:27

      It would make most sense to paint it as Pupin again.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:13

      At this time I don't think that the livery is something they even thought about...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:19

    That's an impressive route network.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:48

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:20

    They mention some routes will be extended to year round. Any idea which could it be?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      maybe Croatian cost. SPU or DBV

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:44

      I hope not. No potential there at all during the winter.
      Few people who need SPU or DBV during the winter can fly to TIV or OMO.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:55

      Most will connect through Zagreb or fly to Amsterdam or Frankfurt from the coast

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:10

      Exactly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:24

      ZAG connections isn't ideal and JU could quite easily compete with whatever other hubs are available over the winter season due to O&D demand, decent network via BEG and the ability to operate ATR's on the route. Both DBV and SPU have extra capacity this summer, especially DBV.

      Regionally VAR and OHD would be good candidates. Further out, HAM, GOT and ESB.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:32

      @9:44 There are tourists who would like to visit DBV, but do not like the summer heat, do not like crowds and would prefer the lower season. But if you suggest them to fly to some other airport, they will go somewhere else.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:38

      And you think Air Serbia should provide several weekly flights to the handful of people who want to visit Dubrovnik in November or February?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:11

      Of course that Air Serbia should not do it.

      The weather in DBV and in SPU (actually in Dalmatia) during the winter is awful and not many tourists go there, especially not from Serbia.

      From foreign legacy carriers list only LOT flies to DBV year round and nobody else! Even TK cancelled winter flights to DBV and they have muuuch stronger network out of IST than it has JU out of BEG.
      So during the winter months in DBV there is not possible to see Aegean, Air France, British, Austrian, Brussels, Finnair, Iberia, KLM, Lufthansa, SAS, Swiss...but Air Serbia should fly there especially as JU flies to a nearby TIV airport twice daily.

      I mean really, people, get realistic...

      Absolutely the same situation is in SPU with a difference that only KLM flies year round but LOT doesn't.

      So, JU can find much better winter destination that DBV and SPU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous12:43

      The difference between LOT/KLM and AIr Serbia is that for Air Serbia it is a short flight (slightly more than 1 hour), so perhaps it could schedule twice a week flight, in-between the longer flights. Exactly for those who don't mind the weather.
      Air Serbia rightly identified leasure routes are something the seem to be working better, so why not try Dubrovnik in the colder months. Perhpas not all the time, perhpas just three week (mid-December; first week of January). It would not hurt to schedule 6-8 flights.
      It's not the most common thing, but trust me there is a market for people who prefer colder weather (but still warmer than Scandinavia) and less crowds; people who want to spend Christmas far away from all the Christmas hussle.
      Not to mention that Air Serbia claims to be hub-and-spoke airline, so obviously it would not be just for the Serbians.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous13:16

      It is not the point in the lenght of the flight, but in demand. Demand is obviously not there not only for Serbians, but also for all the nations where their legacy carries do not fly from during winter months.

      Yes, Air Serbia opens some leisure routes, but mostly during the summer. We do not have flights to Antalya or Bodrum during the winter (where the weather is much, much better than in Dalmatia and prices lower) as there is no enough demand and JU should fly to empty DBV or SPU.

      TIV is very close to DBV (60 km), so the handful of passengers who want to enjoy strong winds in Dubrovnik in November could get there pretty easily. But we all know it won't happen as in January or February DBV has approx. 20.000 passengers per month meaning that daily only 670 passengers are flying from DBV including domestic PSO routes within Croatia.
      Each bus station in Serbia has more passengers daily. So much about demand.

      For those who want to spend good time during the winter I recommend winter flights from BEG to Barcelona, Izmir, Larnaca, Lisbon, Athens, Rome, Malaga, Malta, Nice, Porto... or Dubai, Abu Dhabi, Hurghada...

      Air Serbia's management is experienced enough not to make such a mistake.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous13:31

      DBV not, but SPU might work, not for tourists, but Croatians traveling through BEG. Split is second largest city in Cro and catchment area is pretty large and pretty wealthy. 2-3 pw should be ok with ATR that anyway are idle in the winter

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous14:29

      First of all people from Split are not big fans of anything coming from Serbia, so I truly doubt they would fly anywhere via BEG when they already have the option of travelling via ZAG using Star Alliance codeshares.
      At the end of the day they also have during the winter direct OU flights from Split to FRA, MUC, FCO. ZRH...and EW flies directly to HAM, STR, CGN and DUS.

      Air Serbia should concentrate on new leisure markets during the winter (Canary Islands) and new transfer routes with real potential (CLJ).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous15:00

      @anon 14:29
      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous17:37

      Oh, come on! 'People from Split would not fly through Belgrade...' That was being told for people from Zagreb, too. Jesus. Are you for real, some of you?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Vlad18:11

      People here mostly have no idea about the P2P demand that exists between BEG and SPU regardless of season, and it shows. Every single day there are at least 20-30 people that travel between the two cities by illegal car/van transport through Bosnia, and probably 2-3x that by private car. A two-weekly flight in winter is a no-brainer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Anonymous22:49

      What a nonsense! Counting the cars???

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    17. Anonymous05:52

      @14:29

      I think it is safe to say that most of us in both countries don't share the same sentiment. Speaking from personal experience.

      Alot of cross border tourism happens during the winter, especially over the Christmas/New Year period. This is without going into business travel or visiting friends/relatives across the border.

      Another thing that adds to the argument is the fact that JU has a decent European network to funnel transfer pax via BEG. Nobody is mentioning double daily A319/A320 flights, 3 pw on an ATR shouldn't be too difficult to maintain. DBV in particular has shown decent increases over the years and it's season length with JU has grown. This summer we have already seen numerous upgauges in capacity, jumping from the ATR to the A319 due to loads. Worse case scenario, DBV for example could be operated year round with exception to November and February.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    18. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:24

    Naples is already extended into winter. Also, I think Bari has a potential for winter operations.

    As for Florence, it’s a tricky destination. Some days there‘s a full flight, but the other day there’s only a few people on board. I guess that explains the very high ticket fare which can compensate the empty seats.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:28

      Wonder if Florence will stay year-round?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:29

      They did not fly to Naples this winter

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous23:24

      Yes, both Florence and Bologna are year around. We will see about Naples

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous08:57

      Flew to Florence yesterday. It is one loong flight on the ATR. Just above 60 passengers. Wish they had a Sunday evening return instead of Monday evening for a city break.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:32

    I wish they add Helsinki soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:36

      They said they are considering it with Embraer which makes sense.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:27

      HEL seems most likely to be one of the "new" routes for next summer considering more ERJ's are joining the fleet this winter.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:32

      Yes, should be at least 8 Ejets next summer. But, I think Helsinki may start in the winter also

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous23:26

      Also, he said that they are considering more points in Caucasus. Which means we can expect both EVN and GYD

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:20

      Vote for Helsinki! Nice airport, not so much P2P passengers but great for connections.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:45

    @admin,
    Are there going to be any news about future JU FF program?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:46

      At the end of the article it says
      "In the coming days, EX-YU Aviation News will bring you other topics discussed in the interview, including Air Serbia’s fleet strategy, operational results, new frequent flyer program and lounge developments."

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:11

      Ooops, I missed that.
      Sorry and thanks.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  12. Anonymous10:10

    A lot of text from JU staff but in reality little is said that we don't know already. Everything said is very vague and non committing in order to diffuse personal responsibility in the event if things do not materialize. Honestly I would expect more from a dedicated management team!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:13

      What nonsense.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:15

      What do you expect more?

      Something like "we shall be flying to North Pole on 02.01.2028"?

      He mentioned LF on certain rutes and he indicated the problems JU is facing for starting MIA.
      New moment is that they think about maybe getting rid of Pupin...nobody knew here that in 18 months lease contract for that plane will be finished. Also he mentioned that they won't start soon any destination in ME. He said no new frequencies to VLC and that they did not give up from IBZ.
      I like the interview and more is to come.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:33

      Agree with last anon. Actually I think we got the most news from a JU interview lately.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:43

      It is a new info regarding Pupin agreement. As I read this, JU is pursuing a better deal for ARC from the lessor. If there are other birds on the market why they didn't chase them already.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:45

      Of course there are plenty of A330ceo in the market. BUT probably Pupin is the cheapest they can find.
      Presumably it was also the cheapest back in late 2022 when they first leased it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  13. Anonymous10:28

    When will flights to Australia

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:33

      When pigs fly

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:10

      At the same time Qantas flies to Belgrade, come on man!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:56

      https://imgproc.airliners.net/photos/airliners/0/7/1/0150170.jpg?v=v40

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous00:49

      ^ Different time

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:32

      That could work with stop in Singapore, Mumbai or Delhi and 5th freedom rights. Diaspora is huge in Australia

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  14. Anonymous10:42

    The Embraers are clearly a game changers for JU. Not every market can support the A319/320 and this gives them real flexibility. They just need more of them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous10:42

    The YU-ARC lease deadline in 2026 puts real pressure on future long-haul plans. If they want Miami, fleet decisions have to happen now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:36

      It would be pretty stupid to loose 1/4 of long haul fleet in the dawn of Expo. Actually very stupid. A lot of new routes and even more charters will be needed to bring 2-3 million visitors in only 3 months

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous06:04

      I don't think we will see JU return YU-ARC without a replacement. More A330's are becoming available on the market as other airlines modernise their fleet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  16. Anonymous10:42

    Extending the season into the shoulder months is smarter than launching 10 more summer routes. That’s where profitability hides.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:56

      Profitability hides in shoulder months?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  17. Anonymous10:43

    Too bad about Ibiza. Let’s hope 2026 really happens.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:55

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  18. Anonymous11:32

    I strongly hope they include MBX to their network at some point.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:13

      Only if MBX pays for it as OMO does.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:38

      Maybe GRZ is even better idea

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  19. Anonymous12:36

    Personally, I love that TBS is finally coming. :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:54

      Yes, hopefully it sucseeds and we see more new routes from the region.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  20. Anonymous13:05

    If only Ireland and the U.K didn't have visa requirements for Serbian citizens, would've been great to have flight to Manchester and perhaps Dublin?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:56

      Absolutely! Plus much higher frequencies to London. Maybe even EDI seasonally.
      The Visa situation must be resolved. Our government needs to engage the British and Irish government and solve any concerns they might have.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:28

      Frequencies to London cannot grow because of Heathrow slot restrictions, these are on the same level since JAT times.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Vlad18:30

      @Anon 13:56

      The Irish have no concerns regarding Serbian passport holders. They follow the UK visa policy only because they are in a border/customs union with them due to Northern Ireland, so they have no choice. That's why Irish visas for Serbian citizens are free.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous08:54

      Are you sure it's free? In 2023 I had to pay 30 euros for it. Although that might have been the "consulate fee" for issuing the visa.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  21. Anonymous16:44

    Thank you admin for your extensive reports! Ex-YU is really a pinnacle of the aviation blogs in our region.

    To go on topic, it seems that they are more committed to discontinuing YU-ARC lease and possibly looking for a newer aircraft. I would really love to see an A330neo or maybe a 787 instead of another A330-200 but I doubt that it is feasible at this stage.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous21:16

    Once a week YYZ via NYC, once a week ORD, via YYZ, what do you think?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:04

      That cannot make any money, but burn it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  23. Anonymous08:53

    I'm sure they will find a replacement for YU-ARC

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  24. Anonymous08:56

    I like the focus on leisure routes and underserved markets like Tbilisi. It’s clear the airline is balancing point-to-point and transfer traffic very well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Treshnja11:42

    I really loved how Marek brilliantly explained charter story , for all charter enthusiasts and lovers on this forum...Charters are history, maybe still working for a few Turkish and Greek destinations, and that's it...People shift towards individual planning of travel, and that's 21st century..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:54

      I think JU is serving abou 15 different charter destinations every summer. 2 new this year

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Dubrovnik Airport, 1974

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Emirates: No plans for Zagreb or Belgrade service

Image

Ljubljana Airport gains momentum as more new routes expected

Image

Royal Jordanian plans Belgrade service

Image

Two North African carriers considering scheduled Belgrade flights

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025