Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Opening of JAT's new hangar facilities
Belgrade Airport, 1986

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • November25
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


GP Aviation upgrades Ljubljana service

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


GP Aviation has extended its seasonal summer flights between Pristina and Ljubljana into the winter season. The route was downgraded the previous winter but will now continue to operate past October 26, once per week, on Mondays. A total of 3.680 passengers flew between the two cities during the first half of the year.

August 26, 2025
Kosovo Ljubljana Newsflash Priština slovenia Winter 2025/2026
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous13:31

    What were the load factors then?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:45

      These are usually 95%+, going off reports for LJU here

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:49

      Full 95 + ? And thats why handled barely 3680 passengers for 6 months , are you for real dude ? You trying to lie all of us here or ur mathematic is so weak ??

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:02

      ^It says in the text that the route did not operate last winter, so it started at the end of March and I think they fly just once per week.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:10

      @17:49 Are you ok?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous18:22

      He probably blames Fraport for the "low" numbers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous18:52

      Clearly they are as they did absolutely nothing to get proper replacement for TIA, PRN, OTP, while SKP is flying only because it is subsidized.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous19:42

      18:10 yes I am , where did u see 95+ lf ? Did u dream about this or someone tells u ??
      18:52 Yes and because of the subsidies they handled 30k passengers for 6 months with 92% LF , wooooww , does passengers also get money to travel to?? 🤔

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous20:10

      Oh what a coincidence that Wizz launched SKP-LJU in 2023 right when they got subsidies and not in 2019. So if they aren't flying because of subsidies why did they wait for 4 years?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous20:36

      Ok it is subsided route , but what that have with the 92% LF which is huge and 30k pax for 6 months? If some route doesnt work it wont work with subsidies simply do anytning it wont work. SKP-LJU is in demand and it works crazy good. Why Wizz wait so much time time to launch ask them they have better answer, could be plane issue, fresh covid19 impact in early 2023 could be anything. But the route works extremely good with one of the best LF !!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous21:34

      On LJU - PRN route in Jun was LF 87 %.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous21:53

      Thats only for 1 month , we are speaking for continously 6 months this year ;) as I said above you cannot compare SKP route to LJU with PRN , if it was good , their president Vlora will fly from there , not coming to SKP to fly to LJU. By the end of this year will have 60k passengers with average cabim load of 93 possible even 95 !!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous22:15

      This guy is hilarious

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous23:54

      It is hilarious as well as you trying to convience everyone here that PRN route to LJU works better than SKP

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous06:31

      There is need for TIA - LJU flight

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Anonymous14:23

      Anon1749 probably is the butt hurt SKP fan that keeps trying to push the narrative that PRN is inferior to SKP. But the truth is that one needs incentives to grow, the other is growing organically on a much faster pace.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Reply
  2. Anonymous13:45

    Nice

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous14:06

    Finally. They should do at least 2pw. I always fly with them on monday but coming back i always use skopje/wizz

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:08

      How is the service with GP?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:25

      Not the OP but Wizzier than Wizz

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:35

      Anonymous14:08 - horrible ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:55

      I would never seat in their airplane.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  4. Anonymous16:33

    Zag have a same potential, pax from Croatia are traveling through SKP

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:34

      Didn't PRN-ZAG fail after a few weeks last time it was launched some 2 years ago?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:54

      Yes with mywings.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. PIR18:55

      It failed because it was operated by Croatia Airlines. Failure is their second name. Sorry, not the second. First.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous19:43

      😄

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous19:45

      Pozdrav it was operated by Mywings but nice try.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous20:58

      Actually it was in cooperation with OU. OU was responsible for sales while Trade Air was providing the equipment.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous21:11

      No. All this was organized by the virtual carrier mywings, which until recently worked with Trade Air. This flight was also operated under the codes C3/TDR. So Trade Air was renting Dash from OU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  5. Anonymous07:42

    🇸🇮 ❤️ 🇸🇮

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Opening of JAT's new hangar facilities
Belgrade Airport, 1986

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Air Serbia hits four million passengers, prepares next wave of expansion

Image

SCAT Airlines plans Belgrade - Morrocco service

Image

EX-YU airports handle 31.4 million passengers, Croatia fastest-growing

Image

Croatia Airlines says growing losses in line with expectations

Image

Eight EX-YU airports behind pre-pandemic passenger levels

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025