Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT sales office
in downtown Paris, 1980

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus GP Aviation Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Results 2026 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • March56
  • February77
  • January85
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Belgrade Airport starts year off with growth

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Belgrade Airport handled 600.348 passengers in January, representing an increase of 6.5% year-on-year, or an additional 36.655 travellers. The figure was achieved despite significant disruptions caused by fog and snow at the start of the month, which resulted in the cancellation of a number of flights. The airport is on course for another month of passenger growth in February, with capacity levels projected to increase 10.3%.

Belgrade’s largest airlines by scheduled seat capacity, January 2026


February 18, 2026
Belgrade Newsflash Results 2026 serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous18:06

    9.5 million this year

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:45

      Yes, you wish. It will go far beyond 10 million

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous01:27

      Why the belief the comment at 18:06 was a critique? Dont be so thin-skinned ffs

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:33

      +1
      For BEG to reach 10 million this year it needs a 11.22% increase.
      9.5 million is a very respectable achievement and it needs a 6.6% increase in passenger traffic. It would be tough to achieve that rate during summer but hopefully larger increases in the shoulder season can make up the difference.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  2. Anonymous18:13

    Is there an info how many pax JU carried in January?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:52

      Would be great knowing that. I presume around 300k, 50% of BEG

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  3. Anonymous18:34

    Very bad loading factor representing 600.333 of 810.129!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. EX-YU Aviation18:37

      The airport did not have 810.000 seats in January. As mentioned multiple times, capacity levels constantly change as airlines change frequencies and equipment on a regular basis.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:39

      Even if it had 810.000 seats that is LF of about 74% which is totally okay for January. In this month only couple days in the beginning are good, other days are always bad in terms of demand.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:42

      Airport has record January, posts growth of 6.5% but there is always that one idiot to say "VERY BAD" lol

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:43

      For reference see the article https://www.exyuaviation.com/2025/12/most-ex-yu-capital-airports-to-start.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. EX-YU Aviation18:48

      As mentioned multiple times, capacity levels change, especially in a month which had significant operational disruptions across the continent, resulting in numerous cancelled flights The airport had 800.583 seats.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous18:50

      No internet search is needed to figure out who is using VERY BAD expression to describe JU&BEG. His comments are like fertilizer. It smells bad but the more he, to put it mildly, fertilizes, the bigger BEG and JU grow!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous18:57

      @admin Understand capacity changes, but 10.000 seats less than planned is not so small change. Dou you maybe have data which airline generated the biggest capacity change, and also how many flights were cancelled and that are not influenced by bad weather. Thanks in advance

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous19:06

      10.000 out of 810.000 is just 1.2% less. You are welcome!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous19:20

      If Belgrade airport load factor is so bad I wonder how other airports in the region are doing

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous19:25

      Zagreb had a load factor of 70% in January much worse than belgrade

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous20:13

      Since when is 75% during off season a bad LF? It's around a year round average for some airlines...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous00:50

      Actually, it's far much better than some airlines' year round average

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous04:30

      Maybe it wouldn't be bad to always add what the capacity was like during the month. It would really help us out.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous09:14

      I think that actual pax includes charter pax while scheduled capacity does not, but I'm not sure. Also not much relevant for January...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Reply
  4. Anonymous18:36

    600k in January? Not too bad. For comparison, 10 years ago Belgrade Airport had 290.580 passengers in Jan 2016. Now it's more than double. Congrats BEG!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous04:58

      ZAG had 296.861 passengers this January, less than half of BEG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:31

      Crazy especially since OU had a lot of extra seats on offer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:27

      Zagreb is realistically 10 years behind Belgrade when it comes to passenger numbers. Which is staggering considering where the two were 12 years ago.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:41

      And then you can check it 35 years ago... That's the business dynamics influenced by factors out of market. Don't understand why is that strange or unexpected.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous01:36

      Realistically, it's not realistic to compare BEG and ZAG like that, quantitatively.
      Being 10 years behind in terms of passenger numbers, implies a possibility of someday catching up, and we all know (or should know) that ain't happening due to the larger geographical context.
      Population of Zagreb is 800k. Population of Belgrade is 1.2 million.
      Greater Zagreb, as in the entire urban agglomeration, has 1.08 million people.
      Belgrade has 1.7 million.
      In addition to that, the 2nd largest city in Serbia - Novi Sad, with a population of over 300k, is a stone's throw away from Belgrade. This means; these two cities alone have 2 million people i.e. more than double the entire population of Croatia.
      Couple that with the fact that Serbia itself has got almost double the population of Croatia, with 2 functional international airports, whereas significantly smaller Croatia has 7 of them - 4 or 5 of which are not trivially small. In fact 3 of them have over 3 million annual passengers and when you see this wider context, then...common, what are we even talking about?!

      Now, if we compare BEG and ZAG qualitatively, that's a whole different ball game - one with merit. In that case, I would say: BEG is objectively a better airport. It's a better run airport, functioning as a mini hub, with proper waves in terms of the flight schedule, with the only serious flag carrier in former Yugoslavia...and beyond, with something happening all the time in terms of the works on improving the airport and so on.
      My main point tho is: even in the optimal situation, with Croatia Airlines getting its sh*t together and with a better management, ZAG still wouldn't get even close to BEG. In my opinion.
      With all of these other airports in Croatia and everything else, I think ZAG has a potential for some 10 million annual pax in the next 20 years or so. Maybe.
      On the other hand, BEG has potential for 20 million in the same timeframe. Easy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  5. Anonymous19:36

    @EX-YU Aviation how many passengers Tuzla have in january?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous20:28

    For BEG it is a very promising start!
    Would the 10 Mio mark be reachable in 2026 or 2027 is more realistic?
    It would be interesting if the data are available not only to have the seats that were on offer but also the pax carried by airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous04:32

      Мислим да је 10 милиона још недостижно. Аеродром би морао да генерише раст од око 15% што није реално. Ја лично очекујем између 9.6 и 9.8 милиона.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  7. Anonymous21:23

    ^^ nice to see January getting off to a good start.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous04:33

    Great news is that Royal Jordanian further boosted capacity to BEG. One one day they even plan to send the A321neo. I think they have the A320neo on 6-7 flights until the end of June.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous04:45

      Plus they loaded winter flights into the system.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:18

      JU needs Middle East strategy, they had not so long ago Tel Aviv, Beirut, Cairo, Abu Dhabi, even this Amman in pipeline...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:36

      JU's middle East strategy is to feed TK in IST.
      I don't think it will serve that region other than LCA with its own metal for the foreseeable future.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:40

      RJ is on an expansion mode across Europe!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:31

      They just announced SKG as well. Very good airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT sales office
in downtown Paris, 1970

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Airlines cut and delay flights to EX-YU markets amid Middle East war

Image

Lufthansa to reduce Belgrade service

Image

Air Serbia to launch Brač flights this summer

Image

Air Serbia plans Embraer expansion, seeks turboprop gap filler

Image

Qatar Airways extends Zagreb and Belgrade service suspension

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026