Skip to main content
EX-YU Aviation News
Latest aviation news from
the former Yugoslavia
✈
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE

JAT crew presents new uniforms
November 1974

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus GP Aviation Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Results 2026 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 Summer 2027 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • July86
  • June83
  • May86
  • April84
  • March83
  • February77
  • January85
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January30
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less

Wizz Air talks over Serbian operations continue

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Discussions over Wizz Air’s future operations at its Belgrade base are continuing as uncertainty persists over the impact of the country’s amended aviation regulations. The carrier declined to disclose further details or indicate whether progress had been made, noting that there are ongoing talks with relevant authorities and that additional information will be provided once developments can be made public. Wizz Air previously said it would have to decide on the future of its Belgrade base by late September, but would seek to retain as many services as possible if it relocates its based aircraft elsewhere.

July 30, 2026
Belgrade low cost airline Newsflash serbia Wizz Air
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:54

    Here's hoping the base remains.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:07

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:55

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:37

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  2. Anonymous11:11

    Which routes are at risk to be discontinued by this?
    I assume Barcelona, Berlin, Hamburg, Gothenburg, Malmo, Nice, Alicante. They do not base any aircraft in these airports.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:16

      There are alternative plans how most of these will be served. Wait a bit. The base might not close after all.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:53

      Closing the base is not a far fetched idea.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:23

      I could see them launching a number of Polish destinations plus Turin.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous12:40

      Turin would be a nice addition. Not sure about Polish routes, potentially Gdansk because Polish adore making road trips around the Balkans and it offers significant potential for Serbian tourists too. It would be a fun route indeed.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:09

      Guys even if they close their base in BEG they will operate most of the flights as W pattern.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous13:11

      If they have any idea about expanding, they could have launched already Manchester, Bremen, Leipzig, Turin, Genoa, Bilbao, Bergen, Nantes, Gdansk and so many more. But they are able only to copy successfull JU routes. I expect Las Palmas or Lanzarote from winter time table.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:13

      Wizz do not fly to Manchester at all and will not from Serbia. The copying Ju's successful route issue is getting rather dull. Move on.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  3. Anonymous12:44

    As I wrote once, my prediction is the following:
    1. Wizzair keeps the base and the operations, reduce pressure on AirSerbia by launching the same routes. They already profited heavily on this free marketing.
    2.AirSerbia keeps on growing released by the Wizzair pressure.
    3. Both of them continue growing happy to be protected from further competition like Ryanair.
    4. Airport is happy as they maintain growth in the future, steady, but sure thanks to their 2 based airlines.
    5. Government proclaims the great success of them by keeping Wizzair and announce further investments in AirSerbia.
    6. Direktorat ćuti i ne pojavljuje se nigde jer su svoju ulogu odigrali još davno.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:45

      Speaking actively 4 different languages daily, I've mixed up the languages in my comment. Apologies for the point 6.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  4. Anonymous12:53

    Some predictions:
    1. Wizz are forced to close the base which creates significant online anger, especially amongst wealthier and more mobile youth. The government just keeps quiet about it and hopes it will go away. Wizz then increase significantly their presence on the market via third bases or increasing frequencies drastically where possible.

    2. Wizz are forced to close the base and reduce their operation to base minimum. This causes a general lack of confidence for LCC operations in the airport and within a year things are reassessed. JU make some figurative attempts to expand, but are limited by aircraft and nature of their business model.

    3. The government and Wizz make a deal to keep the base and its quietens down very rapidly although Wizz no longer has confidence in cooperation and sees little need to expand its operation on the market.

    4.The government and Wizz make a deal that allows the base to stay and Wizz respond with significant growth in the coming year which triggers another bought of protectionism.

    anyway, its a real shame for the average consumer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:58

      "JU make some figurative attempts to expand, but are limited by aircraft and nature of their business model."

      They added 10 routes this year alone. When someone is detached from reality.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:10

      How many of those 10 are year-round?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:11

      Indeed, however their business model heavily needs transfers. The point is they cannot launch places like Malmo, Eindhoven etc. But yes. JU are good we should not want either to less in the city. No real aviation fan would want that..none.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:17

      @13.10 5 are year-round and 2 are winter seasonal which helps reduce seasonality. Not good enough for you? Not enough for you?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

New comments are not allowed.

VINTAGE EX-YU

JAT crew presents new uniforms
November 1974

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Tivat Airport under fire over queues, diversions and delays

Image

Wizz Air revises EX-YU network as winter season nears

Image

Air Serbia ATR grounded for three months after handling incident

Image

EX-YU passenger traffic to Spain jumps as all markets grow in H1

Image

Belgrade Airport planning further terminal expansion after current upgrade

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026