Ljubljana will join United Airlines’ transatlantic network next year in a breakthrough for an airport of its size and non-hub status. The new service, unveiled yesterday as one of ten international destinations being added by the US carrier, gives Ljubljana Airport an opportunity to reverse the long-standing leakage of Slovenian passengers to larger airports in neighbouring countries. At the same time, the airport expects the route to broaden its catchment area beyond Slovenia, drawing travellers from southern Austria, Croatia and the wider Alpine-Adriatic region. United will launch four weekly flights between Newark and Ljubljana on May 12, 2027, using its 231-seat Boeing 767-400ER. United has confirmed to EX-YU Aviation New that the service is planned as a summer seasonal operation until October 30.
Alongside Ljubljana, United’s new destinations include Luxembourg, Marseille, Ibiza, Valencia, Terceira, Olbia, Catania, Toulouse and Okinawa. Most have no competing nonstop United States service, continuing a network strategy that has seen the carrier add secondary European destinations. United has increasingly indicated that it is prepared to stimulate demand for such markets rather than rely solely on existing point-to-point volumes. Patrick Quayle, the airline’s Senior Vice President of Global Network Planning and Alliances, has described some of its less conventional destinations as “undiscovered gems”, noting, “People look to United to tell them where to fly”. Newark is one of United’s largest hubs, enabling the airline to channel Slovenia-bound passengers from across the United States onto a single nonstop flight.
The route will begin with an established flow of passengers between the two countries. Lufthansa and United are already the most widely used airlines by Slovenian travellers heading to the United States, primarily through Frankfurt and Munich. The two carriers are members of the same transatlantic joint venture, allowing them to coordinate commercially across the North Atlantic. Air France/KLM and Delta follow in terms of Slovenia - US connecting traffic, proceeded by Turkish Airlines and LOT. The new route is expected to draw on a mix of higher-spending US leisure visitors, corporate traffic, Slovenian outbound passengers and connections beyond Newark, with 58 of the Boeing 767-400ER’s 231 seats in dedicated premium cabins.
The Newark service will also provide a boost to Ljubljana Airport’s cargo business, with the Boeing 767-400ER offering belly-hold capacity on a market that has no scheduled intercontinental flights. Fraport Slovenija has invested in expanding its air cargo facilities in recent years, while Newark is a major freight gateway for United, accounting for close to 30% of the carrier’s global cargo tonnage and revenue.
Fraport Slovenija Managing Director, Jürgen Deischl, said, “Our sincere appreciation goes to the entire United Airlines team. Their trust in Ljubljana Airport and Slovenia, their professionalism, and the excellent cooperation throughout this journey have been truly exceptional”. He added, “With 200.000 American visitors travelling to Slovenia every year, this new service will offer an even more convenient and comfortable way to reach our beautiful country and the many boutique destinations in the wider Adriatic-region”. Slovenian Tourist Board Director, Maja Pak Olaj, described the announcement as “far more than a new air route”. She said, “The new direct connection will make Slovenia significantly more accessible to American travellers and create new opportunities for destinations and tourism businesses across the country. It also supports our strategic ambition to attract guests who stay longer, explore more and travel beyond the main summer season”.


I think this is the biggest development for LJU since the Adria collapse. Well done
ReplyDeleteI'm puzzled by this route.
DeleteWhy would Fraport allow UA to fly here when we can fly to New York with Lufti via FRA?
Isn't that the reason Fraport bought LJU?
At least that is what some experts have been telling us for years here.
^ So true, LOL!
DeleteI hope that guy is OK after yesterday's news.
Perhaps because it was not Fraport's decision, but a decision od UA where it wants to fly
DeleteRelationship between Fraport (Slovenia) and Lufthansa changed a lot during last year. Also change of CEO has a big impact in Fraport mentality (very positive IMHO).
Deletethat guy should see the list of destinations and airlines from FRA too
Delete@09:38
DeleteNothing can happen in LJU and no airline is allowed to launch new flights unless LH gives its approval.
At least that's what the expert has been repeating ad nauseam since for ever.
Could he be wrong? 🤔
@09:01 well your comments are one narative that cant be understand. Any one that says that Fraports decisions in last 5 years until 2026 were in favour of ordinary passenger and logical is probably not being able to have constructive debate.
Delete^ Is that you FDS* sufferer? 😆
DeleteSo did Fraport buy LJU to lose money by driving pax away in order to help FRA and LH or they are a business who are trying to make money from their investment???
Which one is it?
* Fraport Derangement Syndrome
@09:57 no not that one but also not a FB 😃
DeleteYou all forget that UA and LH have a TATL revenue sharing agreement as part of their joint venture, so LH will not be impacted by this news at all (except perhaps in terms of operations/LF).
Delete
DeleteActually LH would have been the one carrying the pax via MUC and FRA that are now gonna be flying directly to LJU with UA.
This is a dream come true. I fly from the US to LJU every year. It's so tiring when you have to take at leats 3 flights to get to your final destination. Last time we ended up missing our connecting flight due to weather issues and ended up waiting almost 11 hours for our next flight to LJU. I always thought that ZAG would be the first one to get non-stop UA flights, especially since it's OU's hub and they are both Star Alliance members. Congratulations to LJU and let's hope this lasts more than just one season.
DeleteIt really is a dream come true; been flying to the US almost monthly in the last 2-3 years, and I got used to layovers, sometimes backtracking to IST to ensure just 1 layover; but this really is amazing. I can see it won't be as "cheap" as TK through IST or AZ through FCO from Trieste on their promo fares, but since I need to travel quite "heavy" baggage-wise this will be so much more convenient.
DeleteThe only downside currently is that due to 80% business nature of my trips I would benefit even much more flights between Oct and Mar ;-) I guess there is hoping for a business cooperation boom, which is sadly unlikely!
Two things I'm wondering about. Catering (LJU has no onsite catering) and lounge which is too small to accommodate this one plane)
ReplyDeleteI think it is easier to establish catering, than expand lounge. Around the time of United departure, you also have 3 LH Group departures and TK 321neo/737, which brings total business pax in the lounge to well over 100, without considering additional pax, such as credit card holders, etc.
DeleteYeah it will be impossible with the lounge.
DeleteAs for catering, what happened with LJU catering? They used to have it.
TO ALL COMMENTS :)
Delete- company for catering is already selected
- business lounge expansion project is in process.
- police will probably add more officers (not confirmed yet)
BR #edi
Damn, the new CEO really is doing wonders here.
Delete@09:33: Do you mean Jürgen Deischl? I hope that Ljubljana is recovering.
DeleteYes, Deischl. I don't know if he is the actual reason for all the good changed, but a lot of good things have started to happen since he came.
DeleteUnited was his personal project - so yes, it would never happen with the old management.
DeleteYeah the new one is really good. Great communication, efficient at what he does, etc.
DeleteThank god Bratušek and Stapel are gone
#edi: Tirana will be with Wizz and Berlin with Eurowings? Thanks :)
DeleteHow are they going to expand the lounge?
DeleteEdi will both be next summer? Or is tirana coming sooner?
DeleteThere's a huge terrace, which is unusable if the weather is bad, they can close the part of it.
DeleteCan someone who actually works at the airport explain the planned operations ? Will they use jetbridges or not ? What catering is coming (anon 9.29) ? The plane will obviously block a gate for 3 hours from 6.40 to 9.55
Deleteall roofs at the airport are strong enough to be transformed into terraces. there is also a plan to transform one of the roofs above kiss and fly area into a terrace ... soon more will be known ...
DeleteDon’t forget, United only provide contract lounge access to C class, no cardholders whatsoever.
DeleteAll Goold member has access to lounge. And bunch of priority pass holders (you get it with almost all mid tier CC)
DeleteIncorrect. United don’t pay for Star Gold, 1K, Premier etc to access contract lounges. It’s only Polaris and Global Services.
DeleteFirst of all if the flights really go up to October 30th,that means that there's every bit of chance this goes year-round.
ReplyDeleteSecondly Ljubljana airport NEEDS to extend the lounge. At the current time it can comfortably hold up to about 40 pax, which is just enough for United whereas at the same time both Frankfurt and Istanbul service will ve departing, so the lounge is a problem.
Let's wait and see, but 30.10 is absolutely amazing for Ljubljana... I fully thought it will be a 3 month service
If business class lf will be good + cargo we might see some winter flights
DeleteYou think the airline would make up that the flights will go to 30th of October?
DeleteOf course not, but if the loads are not there they could be reducing it. We have to remember that every other flight that they opened in the region (both Dubrovnik and split) they started 3x weekly with 767-300.
DeleteTotal max business pax at around 10 will be:
DeleteUnited - 40
Lufthansa (MUC/FRA/ZRH) - 18
Turkish - 16(20)
Total: 74(79), not to mention all other flights, Dragon passes etc
I counted a total of 70 seats inside the lounge, that's if all the seats are filled. Virtual tour:
Deletehttps://my.matterport.com/show/?m=D22iaQMzZdb&ss=320&sr=-.21%2C.44&tag=53Ahk1urpyb&pin-pos=-181.04%2C8.04%2C15.56
if you ask me, the easiest way is to extend terrace and current terrace convert into indoor space.
Delete+1, I remember at the start, the check in table for the lounge was on the inside, and then they moved it behind the door
DeleteThis is already planned. The terrace will be closed and probably there will be another terrace as extension. The route itself was launched as seasonable and will be limited to summer season only.
Deleteplan is to have 2 business lounges ...
DeleteLast Anon: I reckon 1 Shengen & 1 non-Shengen?
DeleteI hope the old lounge is opened (now on non-schengen side). The old one is in my opinion even nicer than new one
DeleteFair point that cargo could also be an important thing for this route
ReplyDeleteChina flights seem to he happening sooner rather than later too, daily widebody service would be amazing for Ljubljana!
ReplyDeleteWhy do you think it's happening sooner than later? The numbers of chinese tourists have been declining sadly.
DeleteHow do you know that they are happening even? I mean are you just guessing or what.
DeleteLet's wait and see, my prediction is that the flights will be announced in October
DeleteWhat are those predictions based on? It seems to crazy for LJU to get two widebody long haul operations in a span of a few months.
DeleteLets wait and see, but if anyone told me if I need to select which route would be opened sooner - New York or China, no one would select New York just two days ago. United opening the route will also add credibility to Ljubljana for other airlines, so I expect both China carriers, as well as some European looking at Lju and checking it out. Riyadh Air is a possibility for 2028 start as well
DeleteFantastic addition to Ljubljana! Hopefully we get even more new services next year (some of those constant Easyjet and Wizz rumours in the comments must mean something right?;))
ReplyDeleteBerlin and Tirana are next
DeleteA TIA route will put pressure on JU's prices via BEG which are routinely around 250€.
DeleteIt would be amazing a route that JP served with CRJs to know be flown by A321s
Deleteif you compare prices to Wizz or Ryan eur 250 may be high, but for a legacy not the case imo.
DeleteEven the LCC in high season charge more
doubt somebody uses the 1stop option via BEG when you have two airlines flying this route from TRS
Deleteone way from TRS is 13.99€ (Wizz) and 14.99 (Ryanair) for the whole of September 😂
Delete^ Yes bot W6 and FR do not give you a biscuit! 😉
Delete"Even the LCC in high season charge more"
Deleteobviously not
This is great but as a person who travels alot through Ljubljana airport I wonder if there is enough space in lounges and waiting area at the gates to accommodate this many passengers? I mean Ljubljana is one of the most beautiful and easy to get through airports in my opinion but its not really big and there really isn’t a lot of space at the terminal.
ReplyDeleteTerminal is ok, I'm worried about the police checkpoint and lunge. As well as passport control for arriving pax. Two out of 3 issues above is on slovenian police so...
DeleteIf the airport continues to expand like it did this year and is going to next year, we are soon gonna run out of space. Hopefully they will realise this soon enough.
DeleteIts not that many passengers as you think. Uniteds -400 has a seating capacity of 231…Wizzair has 239 in its a321neo so and its no problem to service that number of people…The problem lies in 40 business pax..
DeleteWhy is everybody so worried about the lounge? it would be crowded 4x week for let's say 2hrs before UA departure.
DeleteBefore and after that it's business as usual
Even if it is only 4 times per week for only two hours you cannot allow that half of business passengers stay outside because the lounge is overcrowded..For a nice experience you have to make sure things run smooth, especially for high end passengers who notice this kind of mistakes immediately…It also adds to a bad reputation of the airport and the country
DeleteI would say its the only negative comment left :)
DeleteThis is huge and I congratulate LJU. But at the same time I just don't understand how this will work 4 weekly on a widebody.
ReplyDeleteRead the article and you will understand.
DeleteI have read it and it's a good piece but I'm still not convinced. Don't take it as hating on LJU or Slovenia.i think it's an amazing achievement and I hope it works.
DeleteEWR is a massive hub for UA and it gets a LOT of feed from the rest of the US.
DeleteI don't see it returning in 2028
DeleteCalm down.
Delete^ Hew can't. He is really upset since yesterday,
DeleteThis route is so out of nowhere. I love it. Good luck LJU and UA.
ReplyDeleteIt would be cool if Melanija was on the inaugural 😀
ReplyDeleteHaha love it :)
Deleteyikes.
Deletethis would be the uncoolest thing ever to happen
DeleteShe hasn't set foot in Slovenia for years. Which is for the best.
DeleteWhat I am wondering is which gate they will use for this flights…If I am correct, all flights to the us require special security checks before the gates…They could use normal international gates with air bridge B3 but I am not sure if some additional security posts are needed
ReplyDeleteNo you are not correct about special gates needed for US flights.
DeleteNot special gate but additional checking yes
Deletedepends on a country ... when i was flying from paris, only random checking ... when i was flying via serbia there was additional full security check (not sure if its still the case)
DeleteBravo Fraport.
ReplyDeleteSo admin, as confirmed the flights will be from May 14 till October 30th? What would be the the total capacity on the route?
ReplyDeleteA lot!
DeleteWith the flights starting on May 12, there will be 45.276 two-way seats added to the market.
DeleteThat's incredible, thank you!
DeleteThat amount of seats will hopefully drive down prices for flights to the US with ASL.
DeleteThey have gotten much more expensive recently.
^ If you bothered to read the article you would see that "ASL" is not even in the top 5 for transfers from Ljubljana to the US. Why on earth would United's relatively expensive tickets to Ljubljana have an impact on their pricing from BEG to US.
Delete^ Because JU gets a lot of transfer traffic from the Slovenian and Croatian markets for it's flights to JFK and IRD.
DeleteIt obviously does not.
DeleteJU clearly do not pick up much transfer traffic, I do wonder what goes on in peoples heads before they comment on here.
DeleteIt does pick up transfer traffic as it constitutes 40% of its passengers but that does not mean that it has transfers for every single route from everywhere.
DeleteI am yet to read a new route launch to anywhere in ex-Yu where I have not read a comment how "This will hurt JU". Yet they are still here flying 100+ destinations.
Half of all pax on JU transatlantic flights are BEG o&d.
DeleteThe other half are transfers.
i was in NYC 3 times in past few years and air serbia was never a good option for flying out of Ljubljana compared to Airfrance and Lufthansa ... mainly due to the transfer time in Belgrade.
DeleteAlso both other airlines offer a better product and numerous daily flights if things go wrong.
Deletei dont get it whats with the big amount of worries of terminal size, Wizzair A321 Neo which is every day on LJU has a bit bigger capacity than B767 ? I think this is the smallest problem
ReplyDeleteI think most of us that traveled through Ljubljana see only one issue and that's the business lounge
Deletewell and passport control ...
DeletePassport control works just fine with TK A321, it will also work with UA.
DeleteIt works fine until you combine TK A321, Wizz A321neo and UA 767 in the span of 1h on Sunday mornings
DeleteCan we just stop for a minute, and congratulate Ljubljana CEO here? From the press release LJU put out a few h ago it almost states that this was his work, and the shift since he arrived here is clear. No more charter hub bullshit, and more talk about real improvements. They will reach 2million pax next year if things keep going the way that they are
ReplyDelete+1
Deleteis that you?
DeleteWith this tempo the new ceo can be one of the best things that can happen to LJU airport after Adria collapse. And yes + 100 on charter hub bullshit :)
DeleteTodays mgt often praises themselves. Fact is, USA benefits from the situation we have since 2022 in Europe, their economy was growing more than ours. Prices in the US are high and in Europe cheaper, some parts much cheaper, so Americans fly out wherever they can. UA figured out that 200K americans were visiting SLO in 2025, so lets fly there, especially since travellers can combine travel with DBV, SPU, VCE or even MXP, FCO or MUC. But we shall see if LJU flights have a sustainable future.
DeleteI am more curious how the mgt will face all the challenges with space and passenger conveniance. This will be the real proof, how capable the new guy is.
I would be curious if this route indeed draws passengers beyond Slovenia. Wonder how this can be measured.
ReplyDeleteIncidental reports a-la "I saw many cars with xy plates" are not representative.
maybe from western Austria and Croatia. Venice has six US destinations at least
DeleteIt will be hard to fill 200 seats whole summer season.
Delete200k Americans are already visiting Slovenia, do you really think they would launch this route without some calculations?
DeleteI think that this route can be highly successful; I'm constantly amazed when travelling back and forth in how many Americans have been or are planning to visit Slovenia. Strangely, I've met 10+ people on separate occassions in random places across the US that have been to cycling trips in Slovenia... Didn't know that was even a thing.
DeleteI think with a bit of activity from the tourist organization, and maybe MAYBE with some activity of some local tourist organizations that would do some extra promoting we could see this developing nicely, and eventually lead to a year-round service. I do hope for some proactive approach from tourism sector in Slovenia on this. I could see the demand being stronger from Slovenia for NYC in winter months, but not sure how many premium seats they would sell to Slovenians at their Polaris prices :-D
Thank you 🇺🇸
ReplyDeleteThank you 🇩🇪
+1
DeleteThis wont last 1 year, mark my words.
ReplyDeleteI sadly agree
DeleteThe biggest challenge for LJU Airport will be space and conveniance for its customers
ReplyDeleteLounge is only at Schengen side. In my eyes they should build a new one in the Non Schengen area
Passport Control? Not sure how it currently works. But if u hve to pass Schengen to enter non Schengen in that limited space area, not really convenient.
Gates? B3? If remote stand they need 7 buses for a full flight
Transfer to LJU: For the individual travellers, they have to make sure that enough public transportation will be available. One bus wont do it. They will need to have the operator be flexible in case of delays, so they have 1-2 buses on ad-hoc. Especially the public transportation could become challenging as I heard several complaints about buses being almost full while passing the airport, so people had to wait, especially on weekends for more than 2h to get to LJU.
Stores and restaurants at the airside area? Not really a big offer...
I am curious what plans LJU Airport has, to face these challenges, if at all. UA is more than just a LCC and has 34 Business passengers and 24 Premium Plus per full flight, which often have the status too to enter the lounges or 231 passengers to be handled at once and in worst case scenario with some other flights is a real challenge. LJU Mgt should not forget, bad quality is soon on Social Media and UA wont like it. USA is one big market with millions to see such videos within no time...
+1
DeleteLet's see how long it takes Ljubljana to add United logo to their website...My bet? March 2027
ReplyDeleteAt least it is in their news already (Slo news only)
DeleteLooking at the seat map of the first flight EWR-LJU on May 12 there are already 40 seats in economy, 2 in premium plus and 5 in polaris unavailable for purchase :)
ReplyDeleteThis is probably officials on the inaugural flights. All the other flights are still empty for now, but I don't doubt those will fill up nicely :).
DeleteWhat I find interesting is the amount of negativity surrounding this, objectively speaking, fantastic news. It’s fascinating that majority is searching for problems and are dooming this route from the get-go, instead of celebrating that an airport of this size was evaluated as being fit for such route.
ReplyDeleteand when has that not happene for any other route?
DeleteIt’s not about being negative, but about being realistic—especially when it comes to Slovenia. Slovenia is known for its modesty; it often lacks an open mind toward other perspectives, which means that while this may be enough for a Slovenian, is it enough for the rest of the world? And that keeps getting in Slovenia’s way time and time again—especially when it comes to infrastructure development. Just yesterday in a Slovenian daily newspaper: the Ljubljana Bus Station, built to last 10 years, is still in operation after 80 years. Do you remember the 2023 Nordic World Ski Championships and all the negative reaction across Europe? Hardly any spectators, overpriced hotels of poor quality—so much so that most of the teams and journalists stayed in Austria or Italy. There are many more examples. LJU Airport is the best example. Among the larger airports in the former Yugoslavia, it was one of the last to get a new terminal, even though Slovenia is the wealthiest region in the former Yugoslavia.
DeleteThese UA flights pose a challenge for Ljubljana Airport, because even now, space is very, very tight—especially in the gate areas—particularly when larger aircraft are in use.
I hope this blockbuster UA flight will prompt Slovenia to further accelerate its infrastructure expansion. On the coast, in Kranjska Gora, and also in Bled, there’s still work to be done on hotel quality, and above all, progress must be made with the rail system. Slovenia now has state-of-the-art trains and, starting in late 2027, a state-of-the-art central station in LJU, but train travel times are still far too long. As it stands, the 110-kilometer journey from LJU to Koper takes 2 hours and 40 minutes. A horse-drawn carriage would be faster.... Unfortunately, the highway toward the coast is also very congested, especially during the summer months, which makes it all the more important that progress is finally made on the rail system.
After all, Slovenia may market itself as “green,” but marketing and reality are still two different things.
Criticism isn’t meant to demoralize, but to bring about improvement. That’s something people tend to forget these days.
There are valid points here, but some of the examples need more context.
DeleteThe Ljubljana bus station example is already outdated. The old station closed this week and buses moved to a new temporary terminal while the permanent project awaits the court’s decision on the Alpe Adria Green appeal. In fact, opening a temporary terminal is evidence of the opposite point: the problem is being actively managed rather than simply ignored while the legal process continues.
The airport example is also misleading. Ljubljana substantially modernised its terminal already in 2007/2008, making it one of the earlier major airport terminal upgrades in the former Yugoslav region after the breakup of Yugoslavia. A further major expansion followed in 2021, increasing both space and passenger capacity.
As for the railway, the current situation on the Primorska line also needs context. A large part of the delays is caused by extensive modernisation works taking place along the corridor. The new Divača–Koper second track will soon open and significantly increase capacity. It is also no secret that freight is prioritised on this route. Slovenian Railways have repeatedly pointed out that this is the main rail artery connecting the Port of Koper with its Central European hinterland, so freight traffic naturally has strategic importance.
So yes, Slovenia has historically been slow with some infrastructure projects and passenger journey times are still far from ideal. But saying that nothing is happening ignores the fact that some of the country’s largest transport investments are taking place right now.
Slovenia is a 22 year EU member, and already 35 years of independence. Look at Western Europe how developped it was in 1980 after parts such as German cities or other places were heavily damaged by the end of 1945. Yes things are going into the right direction, but way too slow. Over the past few decades, the EU has repeatedly reminded Slovenia that EU fundings are available, but that Slovenia lacks projects, that it would also need to co-finance. Slovenia has a problem with infrastructure development; that is well known. They definitely could have done more, though one has to agree that, at least when it comes to hotels, quite a bit has been accomplished over the past 7–8 years. Ljubljana, in particular, will be well-positioned with the two additional hotels in the Emonika project.
DeleteYou have to factor in economies of scale. Slovenia has just over two million inhabitants, so major infrastructure projects have to be financed and maintained by a much smaller user and tax base than in Germany, France or even Austria. That does not excuse slow planning or bureaucracy, but it does make direct comparisons with much larger Western European countries somewhat misleading.
DeleteI don’t think that all the people here get the comments about capacity problems. With the flight departing at 9.00 it means the same time as TK to Istanbul as well as some other flights like Wizz sometimes, Lufthansa to FRA and Munich, sometimes even Finnair, Aegean and Norwegean. It gets really busy at that time and is usually very crowded without this United flight and there will be problems with the lounge being overcrowded aswell as the passport control.
ReplyDeleteAnd this is not negativity, just some concerns that will probably need to be solved. United flights are great additions and will help LJU in many ways.
DeleteI hope the new flight will create the necessary pressure to improve things. And who knows if that UA flight creates now the attention also for other carriers to launch flights to LJU....
DeleteNonsense, we need another 5 Ryanair flights departing at the same time. Sincerely, Fraport haters
DeleteSlovene aviation world is rather catty is seems from the comments.
ReplyDeleteThe UA news was published 24hours ago. And we already have 338 comments.... There are not many aviation blogs out there with so many passionate readers and commentators....
ReplyDeleteMid-May to the end of the Summer timetable seems reasonable for a seasonal service. Ljubljana is not a coastal destination like DBV/SPU and the only comparable seasonal service in the ExYu region is JU BEG-YYZ that starts later and ends earlier. UA made a better choice as late September and October attract passengers looking to avoid peak summer crowds and heat.
ReplyDeleteNew York is amazing in spring and autumn
Delete+1
DeleteAnd so is Slovenia, Kärnten, Friuli-Giuglia and Istria
Primary target is LJU, not EWR/New York. Outbound flow from LJU is listed as third in the text: The new route is expected to draw on a mix of higher-spending US leisure visitors, corporate traffic, Slovenian outbound passengers.
DeleteIts actually also very good news for Belgrade.
ReplyDeletePrefering Ljubljana over Zagreb is a strong indicator for that if Belgrade wouldnt have transatlantic flights they still wouldnt get them with foreign carriers.
Instead of waiting forever Air Serbia started them for themselves.
^Exactly. Without ambition you get nowhere.
DeleteIf there wont be war in Europe or who knows what, I see a bright future for Belgrade. The entire river bank projects promise a lot and will turn Belgrade into an attractive European capital city. Already now it offers quite some attraction, but there is much more to come, so in 10-15 years from now, we will see more longhauls than just the ones of JU and 2 Chinese carriers, again all subject to the political development in Europe. Wishing Belgrade and its citizens all the best for the future.
DeleteGreat news for aviation and touristic sector in Slovenia. LJU is becoming more interesting not only for Slovenians living in Slovenia or in USA but also for people living in neighbouring countries. Not to mentions US citizens, who are the most responsible for UA decision choosing LJU.
ReplyDeleteThis is showing how much (longhaul) potential LJU is really having, probably even more than neighbouring airports. Slovenians should be proud on LJU, no matter the sovereignty over it, expensiveness and other lacks. Will continue flying from there, as long as will be reasonable and achievable for me.
.