Skip to main content
EX-YU Aviation News
Latest aviation news from
the former Yugoslavia
✈
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE

Ljubljana Airport, March 1977

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus GP Aviation Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Results 2026 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 Summer 2027 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • October30
  • September84
  • August82
  • July89
  • June83
  • May86
  • April84
  • March83
  • February77
  • January85
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January30
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less

Pegasus to end Tuzla service as airport reviews Wizz subsidies

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Pegasus Airlines is set to end flights between Istanbul Sabiha Gokcen Airport and Tuzla, with the last service scheduled for October 23. The airline had planned to operate the route once per week throughout the 2026/27 winter season, using a 239-seat Airbus A321 aircraft. Ticket sales for next summer have also been suspended. Pegasus’ exit follows AJet’s withdrawal from the same route in June. With Pegasus; departure, Wizz Air will be the only scheduled airline serving Tuzla during the winter months.

The development comes as Tuzla Airport records a strong recovery in passenger traffic, fuelled primarily by Wizz Air. The airport handled 502.744 passengers during the first three quarters of the year, more than double the 251.332 recorded during the same period in 2025. September alone saw 59.431 passengers. The airport had already matched its full-year 2025 total of 338.132 by mid-July.

The recovery has been supported by a subsidy programme run through the Tuzla Canton Tourist Board, which has a contract with Wizz Air. The programme received some 614.000 euros in funding for 2026. Following negotiations with Wizz Air, the canton ordered an audit to assess whether the subsidy contract was delivering its aims of improving air connectivity and supporting tourism. The government accepted the audit report last month and said its findings would inform adjustments to the subsidy model, with the aim of maintaining air services. It has not published the report’s specific conclusions or any revised contract terms.


October 11, 2026
bosnia and herzegovina Feature low cost airline Tuzla Winter 2026/2027
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Can't say I'm surprised

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:15

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:26

      Pegasus should launch OMO, or SkyAlps could maybe launch Istanbul from OMO. The Turkish authorities seem willing to do special agreements like when they had allowed Air Montenegro to fly between Tuzla and Istanbul.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:34

      if they cannot make it in Tuzla how so in Mostar? because of one bridge?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:15

      Even in winter Mostar is full with visitors from Turkey, currently arriving as day tourists from Sarajevo. So yes, "one bridge" can make the difference. The Pegasus service in Tuzla was anyhow directed to carter people from Tuzla and not bringing ppl from Istanbul to Tuzla

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:15

      People who comment here have 0 idea about Bosnia, but still endlessly comment.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:26

      and people of Bosnia think they need an airport in every city ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:33

      @11:26 you do realise BiH is mountainous making internal travel still quite slow. And that those airports were all built during SFRJ.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous11:48

      regardless

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous17:47

      Anon 10:26
      Sky Alps cannot legally fly OMO-Turkey.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous19:53

      @17:47 They can, if they get a permission. Air Montenegro cannot fly from Tuzla to Istanbul either, but they got an exemption back in 2023/24. The authorities in some EU countries didn't want to issue exemptions though, so the whole Tuzla-Air Montenegro project fell through. Then Lumiwings came, sought for a permission for Tuzla-Istanbul flights as well, but while waiting for that permission, something happened between Tuzla and Lumiwings...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous21:38

      @11:33 To be clear, mountains are a challenge but not a destiny. Switzerland has mountains, Norway has mountains, Japan has mountains, Turkey has mountains. When nature gives you mountains, you still find ways to build roads and railways. The more money you throw at subsidizing micro-airports, the less you have left to build roads and railways. I'm not saying that Bosnia needs high-speed rail and a dense network of highways. But if Switzerland can make do with (essentially) two international airports (Basel's airport is in France), then perhaps Bosnia can too?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous23:50

      Pegasus should Launch flights from Banja Luka. There are a lot Turkish workers in Banja Luka region and also capacity for Tourism and connecting flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous11:39

      @21.38 Amen bro

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:02

    With fuel prices being where they are, the marginal routes are first to go.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:03

    And they were selling tickets for next summer just days ago. Pity

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous09:03

    Why travel to Europe through Istanbul when you can fly with Wizz direct?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:04

      I'm pretty sure this was for P2P passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:16

      Pegasus has a very big network out of SAW.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:07

    So Ajet leaving didn't help

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:17

      Trips to Istanbul are now more expensive than trips in many destinations in Europe.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:45

      ^
      That's right.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:21

    Mislim da ce se vratiti od aprila u Tuzlu,jer još nisu sredili letove za sledeću sezonu.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:33

      They had flights on sale in April just a few days ago and then removed them.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:59

      Pa ni Sarajevo nema letova u aprilu,pa?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous10:23

    Just get Austrian, Swiss or Eurowings for connections. The amount of money that is given to Wizz Air in subsidies for P2P traffic is too big. I know it's for the diaspora, but you cannot cover the whole diaspora that way. Many diaspora-rich destinations still aren't covered.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:08

      ^ 'Just get Austrian, Swiss or Eurowings for connections', its not so easy. Those airlines have to make money on routes, and subsidies alone are not enough to attract airlines who might be able to send their expensive aircraft to far more lucrative places than Tuzla.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  8. Anonymous10:40

    I opet se oslanjaju na Wizz koji će ih sigurno ošamariti još jednom i povući se možda opet.Jesu li nesposobni ili šta da ne mogu dovesti i druge aviokompanije,ovaj direktor je toliko dosadan stalno ponavlja jedno te isto u krug i priča gluposti.Nek stave na čelo direktora nekog čovjeka koji zna šta da radi.A ne kao ovaj Dževad da ponavlja sve jedno te isto na intervjuima a to je npr:"mi smo stvorili pretpostavke","grade se nova svjetla","otvara se 3.gejt","stalno pregovaramo sa Wizzom i novim partnerima"...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:41

      a na koga da se oslanjuju? Easyjet?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. Anonymous10:41

    "I am sure the management doesn't even know that Pegasus has withdrawn from TZL."

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous11:13

    Quite surprising that Tuzla cannot sustain even a weekly flight to Istanbul. You would think there would be sufficient demand considering the size of the catchment area and the popularity of Turkey among Bosnian travellers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous11:13

    I don't think this is a big loss for Tuzla. One weekly flight on a 239-seat aircraft was never going to be particularly useful for either business travellers or people making connections

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:44

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:42

      and one weekly on a turbo prop would?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  12. Anonymous12:44

    Wizz Air is clearly doing something right in Tuzla. Passenger numbers have doubled and the airport is finally recovering after a few difficult years. Credit where credit is due.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:19

      Exactly. Over 500,000 passengers in nine months is an excellent result. People seem to forget how bad things looked for Tuzla just two years ago. The airport management deserves some recognition..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:09

      Is the airport any improved inside? It was rathe shabby the one time I used it. Admittedly that was 4years ago.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  13. Anonymous14:38

    I am surprised Pegasus didn't arrange a press conference in Tuzla to present a case for keeping the route open and ask for subsidies. Starting a petition for Tuzlaks to express support for Pegasus would not surprise me, given similar developments in the wider region. Passengers demand choice and, with Pegasus leaving, they are left without any choice at TZL airport.

    On the other hand, one may wonder if subsidies of over 600k Euros would be better spent on improving local education and healthcare.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:34

      Subsidising airlines makes sense, if that money comes back multiplied via tourism, diaspora visits etc. That money could then be spent on education, healthcare etc. However, even if it brings tourists and diaspora, how many of those people actually spend money in the Tuzla Canton? It's not a very touristed region. The whole idea behind Wizz Air in Tuzla has been to carry diaspora from all over BiH.

      That's why I think something like Austrian or Swiss would be better (they would primarily carry locals, local diaspora and foreigners actually going to Tuzla), and then just keep Memmingen, Dortmund and Basel/Mulhouse like when Wizz Air didn't have a base.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  14. Anonymous16:12

    So the canton has accepted the audit report but hasn't published any of its findings. If public money is being used to subsidise a private airline, taxpayers deserve to know exactly what they're getting in return.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous22:53

    Why are the audit conclusions not public? It would be interesting to see whether the government considers the subsidy programme successful and what changes it intends to introduce

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous22:54

    It's a shame to lose the Istanbul link, but the priority should be making sure Wizz Air's existing routes remain viable throughout the winter. Another sudden reduction in capacity would be far more damaging than losing one weekly Pegasus flight.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU

Ljubljana Airport, March 1977

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Mixed October for EX-YU capital airports as Wizz Air maintains lead

Image

TRIP REPORT: Air Serbia by airBaltic, Tenerife - Belgrade

Image

Belgrade Airport security blunder causes widespread disruption

Image

EU finds Serbia’s new aviation rules incompatible with ECAA

Image

EX-YU airports handle 29.2 million passengers, Skopje fastest growing

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026