Air Serbia is seeing encouraging initial bookings for its newly announced Belgrade - Miami service, while considering growing its seasonal Toronto operations for 2027. Speaking to EX-YU Aviation News, the airline's CEO, Jiri Marek, said the strong performance of Toronto, particularly the unexpectedly balanced demand in both directions, had helped reinforce the carrier's decision to expand its North American network. The airline is examining the possibility of adding another weekly Toronto service next summer, while Miami is ultimately intended to operate on a year-round basis.
"I think it's still too early to tell, but surprisingly, the bookings are coming. They are coming more or less at a similar speed to Toronto when we announced it. We believe that it will work", Mr Marek said.
The CEO noted that Toronto's performance had played an important role in the decision to expand further in North America, particularly because demand patterns differed from initial expectations. "One of the key indicators for us was the performance of Toronto because a lot of things that happened there were quite different from what was expected and what any industry data was showing. The directionality, which held us back from Toronto for a very long time, actually didn't happen. I would even say there was almost no directionality. The flights were full in both directions, and that's something which is not visible on New York and Chicago. That encouraged us. We have the capacity and the data gives us confidence to test the market potential".
Although Miami is initially scheduled for the summer, Air Serbia intends for it to become a year-round route. "It's planned as year-round. All the new destinations, except Menorca, are planned as year-round. But at the moment we have put them on sale only for the summer because the million-dollar question is where fuel prices will be", Mr Marek explained.
The CEO warned that the continued rise in jet fuel prices, despite earlier expectations of a decline, could necessitate wider changes across the industry. "The majority of airlines that were hedged are seeing those hedges ending. Hedging at these prices is not very logical, which means that we expect ticket prices will need to go up, unfortunately. You can keep current prices for the short or medium term, but in the longer term, there needs to be some structural change".
Meanwhile, Air Serbia is examining the possibility of adding another weekly Toronto service during the summer of 2027, subject to slot availability, although no decision has been made. The route's strong performance has encouraged the airline to consider further opportunities in the North American market, with the carrier focusing on optimising its existing long-haul network rather than immediately expanding its widebody fleet.
Despite its continued long-haul expansion, Air Serbia is not currently planning to enlarge its four-strong Airbus A330-200 fleet. Instead, it intends to focus on optimising utilisation and potentially increasing frequencies across its existing intercontinental network. "We still have capacity on the current network. There might be some further optimisation during the winter if we are able to have some counter-seasonal destinations. If Miami works well, which actually has better seasonality in winter, there can be growth in frequencies", he said.
"We are living in a world which is super volatile in terms of geopolitics and fuel. Nobody knows how things will evolve. We are not worried about demand, but rather how fuel prices and the situation in the industry will evolve. With our current knowledge of the market and costs, we are stable. But if anything changes, we are able to react very quickly", Mr Marek added.
Elsewhere in its long-haul network, Air Serbia is reviewing the future of its Belgrade - Guangzhou service for the 2027 summer season following a substantial contraction in demand between Serbia and China. " We are currently reviewing the long-term performance and future development of the Guangzhou route. It's not related to Miami, and it's not because of fuel. Year to date, up to the end of September, there has been a 26% decline in the total market size between Serbia and China. It's impacting everybody, not only us, but also the two other Chinese carriers", Mr Marek said.
The airline reduced Guangzhou frequencies during the peak summer period in response to weaker demand. "There isn't really clear industry data, research or an answer as to what is behind it, but a 26% year-on-year drop in the market size is significant. We addressed that during the summer by going down to one weekly frequency", he explained.
Despite the decline, there have been some encouraging developments. "October performed very well, but in October you have the Canton Fair, so there is extra demand. We hope that Chinese New Year will again be strong, which is good because it has less seasonality. But next summer is still under question. We haven't taken a final decision yet. We will see how things evolve, but it will be driven by how the market size develops", Mr Marek concluded, in an interview conducted on October 30.



That all sounds reasonable and measured.
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteNice how open and convincing he talks
well that actually contradicts all other players in the market. Ryanair just announced huge cost cutting measures and expects fuel to further rise. Lets see what happens.
DeleteIt does not contradict at all. Had you actually read the article you would see he mentions fuel quite a bit.
Deleteok maybe contradicts it is the wrong word- What I meant is others are talking about cuts in their network because of rising fuel costs- If Mr. Marek says that demand is there, it is at a certain price- if prices have to be increased due to increased fuel prices, demand will also weaken making routes unprofitable even more
DeleteTickets will go up, that’s inevitable. Everything else is going up, clearly
DeleteAirline tickets remain proportionally very cheap. Housing costs are what really fuck people nowadays. Anyone else remember the 80s or 90s?
DeleteHappy to see Toronto performed well
ReplyDeleteInteresting that Toronto has more balanced demand than New York and Chicago.
DeleteExtending the season for Toronto flights by starting earlier and ending later would help to increase capacity. Did Air Serbia consider changing this?
DeleteI think it’s a potential problem growing frequencies, due to bilateral
Delete@9.20
DeleteWould rather have three weekly Toronto flights for a shorter season than two weekly spread over a longer one. More choice of travel dates makes a difference.
@9.44
Frequencies can be increased if the Canadian side permits it, despite the bilateral. See below.
Sure. And new bilateral is possible if Canadian side comply
DeleteGetting approval for an extra weekly flight during peak season on a route there is 0 direct competition is much easier than renegotiating an entire bilateral. If it was not possible, they wouldn't not have publicly mentioned it.
DeleteHow are they thinking about adding third Toronto weekly flight when current ASA restricts operations to twice weekly?
ReplyDeleteThat was my question too.
DeleteAccording to bilateral agreement with Canada it is allowed to have max 2 weekly flights.
They could initiate re-negotiation, APP (Ako Prođe, Prođe).
DeleteThe bilateral does limit to two weekly BUT the agreement allows additional flights with approval.
DeleteArticle 9(4) explicitly permits capacity above those in the agreement, subject to approval by both countries’ aviation authorities. It provides for agreement between designated airlines or consultations between the authorities. Article 9(5) clarifies that such increases do not change the underlying bilateral entitlement. A third weekly flight does not require renegotiating the treaty.
^ did not know that. Thank you
DeleteSo they would have to request third weekly flight ahead of each season and who guarantees that Canadians will even approve it
DeleteMaybe they already asked it.
DeleteJAT had a lot of charters lines flying to North America, so there could be your answer. They even had regular slots for the "charter" line
Deletefuel costs seem to be hanging over every decision for next year.
ReplyDeleteNot for FR. They hedged for a lifetime, as per some experts claim
DeleteReally happy to see that North America is doing great for Air Serbia they have really grown in that market the last couple of years. For China it's a bit different, im hoping more demand picks up on the route to Guangzhou if not maybe they could add another route to either Hong Kong or Beijing and of course even though it's not in China, Thailand would be a good option. Regarding their fleet for long haul what they have right now is solid, but looking close to the near future YU-ARB will be 20 years in 2 years. I wonder what their long term plans are with the long haul fleet and if they're planning to get newer generation planes or just get more A332s but younger.
ReplyDeleteHong Kong or Beijing? Did you bother to read that YOY China demand dropped by 26%
DeleteThey did not.
DeleteI did read it. I was just stating that they might be better alternatives to Guangzhou. Maybe not, I just hope that the demand in China grows back up, it's unfortunate it declined by 26%
DeleteBeijing i suspect would be hard to make work is, Hong Kong they would need to go with real frequency to make it work and i don't think their product is competitive enough. So it suspect making sure Shanghai retains profitability is what they will do for the short term.
DeleteSerbia needs strong advertising in China ASAP. Before covid, there were strong commercials on Chinese state TV and Chinese tourist were no. 1 in Serbia. They were coming all prepared with itinerary visiting Belgrade, Novi Sad, Zlatibor, Uvac, Golubac, Palic, Vrnjacka Banja. But also Budva, Sarajevo, Ohrid… we need then back yesterday
DeleteI agree. A lot more promotion and smarter promotion needed.
DeleteSensible to get more out of the existing fleet before taking on another aircraft.
DeleteThe Chinese market is difficult to crack, Chinese visitors to Serbia is effected by their social media with not too many positive stories from people who have visited, and the fact its not really cheap to visit along with security concerns, taxi drivers doing their usual tricks, etc. Word spreads a they start going elsewhere instead.
DeleteMost Chinese travel as part of tour groups with tour guides in busses. They don't use taxis. The main issue is price. Hotels have become expensive. You don't get a lot of value for what a tour operator has to spend and then charge its customers.
DeleteSure, but Serbia is the most they can see from Europe without visas. And that should be exploited as much as possible. And you need advertising for that.
DeleteI expect Guangzhou to be scheduled 1pw next summer. There is EXPO which will generate some traffic.
ReplyDeleteWe will see about Expo, long haul and Air Serbia with new government. Everything is possible and nothing is impossible with them
DeleteSeveral members of the future government have already said that Expo will go ahead and that Serbia needs to meet international contracts it has signed.
DeleteYes the specialised Expo has to continue , the price of pulling out would be huge. What will be interesting will be the accounting and overall impact of this project. Certainly i don't think this event alone will secure Guangzhou's workability. Its either gonna work or it ain't, and that fine. JU is very good and trying and opening new markets.
DeleteSo Toronto surprised them positively, Miami is selling well and Guangzhou is under review. Quite a shift in where the long-haul opportunities seem to be.
ReplyDeleteDon't forget that CAN is the only one where they have direct competition and is currently 4 weekly from BEG which is huge.
DeleteI hope “considering” another Toronto frequency turns into something concrete soon. People planning summer trips will already be comparing options.
ReplyDeleteHopefully they will extend it to winter timetable. Even 1pw in the dead of the winter would be great for a start
DeleteOnce weekly flights are not competitive however. The trans-Atlantic market is brutal. I think their idea of strengthening and improving frequencies in summer is really good and then slowly expanding the season. Expanding frequencies all round will be a large part of JUs growth going forward not just on longhaul.
DeleteOnce weekly would certainly limit the appeal, especially for shorter trips. But for someone spending several weeks with family, it could still be useful and it works for Chicago. The question is whether there would be enough of those passengers at fares that make winter operations worthwhile.
DeleteChicago improved LF with 1pw, so should be ok with Toronto. At least for a start, until route mature
DeleteMiami in winter could be the bigger opportunity here.
ReplyDeleteOne weekly flight to Guangzhou must be a difficult product to sell to anyone who needs flexibility. But adding flights into a shrinking market hardly makes sense
ReplyDeleteHardly worth it yep.
DeleteThe most sensible part is that they are prepared to adjust.
ReplyDeleteNo fifth A330 for now, but potentially more Toronto and Miami flights. Will be interesting to see the final weekly aircraft schedule next summer.
ReplyDeleteThank you for the info
ReplyDeleteAnd they were saying for so long how Toronto is one directional!
ReplyDeleteIt shows why airlines sometimes have to try a route. Data helps but does not tell the whole story.
DeleteGood problem to have.
DeleteDirect flights generate demand. That’s well known worldwide, except some self proclaimed experts
Delete^ Everyone is a self-proclaimed expert by default.
DeleteHopefully Miami gets promoted properly at both ends
ReplyDeleteI think it helps a lot that JU has an actual office in the US and local team.
DeleteWould be good to hear about business class demand on Toronto too.
ReplyDeleteIt was sold out almost every single day in oth directions.
DeleteHow much does cargo contribute on the Chinese routes when passenger demand is weaker?
ReplyDeleteObviously not enough. At least for Guangzhou.
DeleteThat may be the case but without cargo revenues and yields we can’t really tell how much it contributes. Passenger numbers alone don’t give us the full financial picture of the route.
DeleteProbably CZ take it mostly
DeleteHopefully the focus on frequencies extends to the feeder routes as well. More long-haul seats need connections that work throughout the week.
ReplyDeleteWould be nice to see them work with cruise operators on the Miami route. A flight and cruise package could appeal to people who would never book the two separately.
ReplyDeleteLets me frank. How many passengers per month fly from Serbia to Miami for cruises? do you have the data? They are seriously expensive. The route will work i believe, but a combination of VFR and transfers from Russia etc.
DeleteNobody is suggesting cruises alone would fill the aircraft. It is one segment they could target alongside people visiting friends and relatives, other holidaymakers and transfer passengers. A package could also attract customers from across their regional network, not just Serbia.
DeleteNot just the cruises but Disney can be attractive as well, especially as newly rich need more entertainment for the kids. We will see 😛
DeleteI wonder whether ethnic travel agencies still account for a large share of Toronto bookings. That might explain why the usual market forecasts missed some of the demand.
ReplyDeletePossibly although the booking channel alone wouldn’t explain the more balanced demand. It would be interesting to know how much came from passengers choosing the nonstop over a connection and how much was additional travel encouraged by the new service.
DeleteNow they need a consistent cabin product. On a long flight, passengers will notice differences between the four aircraft.
ReplyDeleteI doubt most long haul passengers on JU fly frequently (expect perhaps in business). But yes making their cabin product as nice as they can financially justify is a good idea.
DeleteYou don’t need to fly frequently to notice whether your seat is comfortable or the entertainment works. Someone buying a ticket after seeing photos of one cabin could reasonably be disappointed to get a substantially different product.
DeleteSome friends and family who traveled Toronto Beograd complained about seats, so on long term might be a serious issue...
DeleteTravelled in both eco and business (except YU-ARC) and no complaints about seats. Lie flat business seats on Etihad pre-owned aircraft are really comfy.
DeleteYou are desperate. They will NOT change cabins. Nobody cares but you. Nobody complains. Cope with it.
Delete@20:24 That is correct they probably wont. But you don't need to address people like that.
DeleteThe missing detail for me is partnerships. Where can you travel on a single ticket beyond Toronto and Miami and with who?
ReplyDeleteQuick google search answers your question.
DeletePartnership with WestJet was put in place a few months back.
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2026/06/air-serbia-to-ink-interline-agreement.html?m=1
For years you can get AC Aeroplan miles on JU flights.
For years, JetBlue has been JU's codeshare partner in the US, while AA greatly expanded its existing interline with JU when ORD was launched.
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2024/07/jetblue-expands-air-serbia-codeshare.html?m=1
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2023/01/air-serbia-and-american-airlines-expand.html?m=1
If their forecasts were so far off on Toronto, I hope they are looking closely at why. That lesson could be useful for other destinations they have previously ruled out.
ReplyDeleteThe interesting part is that they specifically misjudged the balance between the two directions. A route can have strong total demand and still be difficult if everyone wants to travel the same way at the same time. Toronto apparently turned out better in that respect than they expected.
DeleteI hope Belgrade's transfer facilities keep improving alongside the network. Long haul passengers with several hours between flights need comfortable seating and somewhere quiet.
ReplyDeleteThere could be an opportunity for multi city tickets here. Arrive in New York, travel around the US and return from Miami, all booked through the same airline :)
ReplyDeleteYou mean directly. Because that already exists for passengers from Belgrade utilising other legacy carriers. But yes, Miami is great addition for JU i think.
DeleteThat is so called open jaw ticket; think it is possible per agreement just not sure if JU system allows it to buy…
DeleteOverall, positive news. Since China issues affect all three carriers operating flights between Belgrade and China, they are not specific to Air Serbia. Miami service going year-round will reduce seasonality, and Toronto news are excellent. Hope Air Serbia will grow Toronto service to 3 weekly in 2027.
ReplyDeleteThis CEO is one of Air Serbia's best assets. I wonder if the new government will keep him or of he will be replaced? I also wonder how active the new government will be in supporting the airline as it clearly had a lot of support from the former government (not talking financial support but political support with establishing long-haulroutes etc).
ReplyDeleteI would believe that it is very early days to think about such things. There is a vast amount of unknowns to work out. But a more open, less corrupt government will be welcome indeed.
DeleteAs mentioned in the article, there are no plans to expand widebody fleet and add more long-haul destinations in the short term. Narrowbody plans are steady, additional destinations are sensible and financial figures are strong. Everything points to business continuing to grow esp if fuel costs and geo stability return to normal next year.
DeleteIf Toronto demand is decent why isn’t it being extended to year round? Or at least a longer operating season? I still think MIA won’t be the success people think it is.
ReplyDeleteI like MIA has a very decent chance of success. It has the potential for Russian transfer passengers which is a significant market. I think JU would be very wise to concentrate of ensuring the growth of its existing long-haul network going forward which they seem to be aware of. Once or twice weekly flights are essentially footnotes in the trans-Atlantic market and they know that with their very healthy regional network now they can really concentrate on bums on seats. Looking forward to seeing them in Miami.
DeleteI don’t think there are many Russians getting tourist visas to the United States.
DeleteThere are many Americans of Russian heritage as well Russians with Green Cards. Sunny Isles Beach AKA 'Little Moscow' being one of the areas. But yes, its not possible for Russians to get issue a US visa within Russia at the moment, they need to go to Kazakhstan and the like, or Belgrade...
DeleteWhat do you think about Orlando, as potential destination?
ReplyDeleteBetween 75-80 million tourists every year, ppl from ex-YU in Tampa, St.Pete, Clearwater, Orlando Area.
I am this month in Miami, going there every 3 months.
Thank you!
I do not think that Orlando will work for JU. Miami will cover all of Florida for an airline such as Air Serbia. Don't forget that although you might be going every three months mobility from the EXYU space remains proportionally low.
DeleteIf Toronto did better than expected, why not make it year-round?
ReplyDeleteIt did better than expected in summer but is unlikely to have similar or same demand in winter. Or at least not enough for it to be profitable.
DeleteToronto - Europe in general is very seasonal. Take a look at summer vs winter routes for comparison. If that's not enough to convince you, visit Toronto in February and you will understand why it needs exclusives like Backstreet Boys residency to pull in half a million visitors from all over the world in the middle of the winter.
Delete@20:33 that is very true. Even BA which fly double daily know to put lower capacity 787s during the winter and 777s/A350 in the summer.
DeleteI think JU has lots of scope for Toronto going forward but making it work well in the summer is very important. So far the airline has demonstrated extreme maturity with its network, especially long-haul which is an extremely risky venture.
@20:33 it is the same issue as Chicago.
DeleteI live in Toronto. BA has two daily fights in winter. Air Canada has 4 daily flights to London. KLM maintains two daily flights. Air France and Lufthansa have daily flights. And LOT, Egyptair, and Turkish also maintain their flights through the winter. So, there is demand for flights to Europe in winter. I know I'd use Air Serbia if it were available.
DeleteAlthough those airlines cannot be compares to JU in size in the slightest.
DeleteIdemo dalje...
ReplyDeleteThey should've extended YYZ into fall/winter this year. I know it was their first year, but load were good and once per week would have been fine. Having said that I hope they move next year start earlier then May.
ReplyDelete