Miami will become Air Serbia’s fourth North American destination, with the airline already carrying passengers to Florida through its existing US gateways. “We are not concerned about demand because we have been flying to the United States for more than ten years as Air Serbia. We have seen a lot of indirect flows from Belgrade, but also passengers on our flights using other American gateways to reach Florida”, Mr Arandjelović said. He pointed to the airline’s coverage of Southeast Europe and the former Yugoslav markets, their large overseas communities, and demand between Belgrade and Florida as supporting the new service.
The performance of Toronto, launched in May, has provided further encouragement. “We finished the first year of operations with an 88% load factor. We are really confident when it comes to further development in the North American market”, Mr Arandjelović noted. Asked about the length of the Miami route compared with its existing US services, he added, “It is still shorter than Shanghai and Guangzhou”.
The expansion comes as connecting passengers account for an increasingly significant part of Air Serbia’s business. “The share of connecting passengers Air Serbia transports keeps growing year by year. Almost 50% of the traffic we carry is connecting traffic”, Mr Arandjelović said. However, this growth is placing pressure on Belgrade Airport and the airline’s ability to organise its schedule around connecting banks. “Our home airport was not originally designed to sustain such high levels of traffic in the banks that are the main characteristic of a hub-and-spoke carrier”, he explained.
Although the airline continues to develop its transfer business, it has also adjusted its approach to protect operational reliability. “This year, for example, we have focused more on markets with stronger point-to-point demand rather than continuing to push the connecting side, as we saw that the pressure our network team was putting on operations was high”, Mr Arandjelović said. He added, “Our aim is that a customer who buys a ticket from Amsterdam to Athens can actually arrive in Athens on the same day, on the flight they booked. Sometimes that is not easy. This summer, we also had to take some painful decisions”.
These included removing certain connecting itineraries where recurring delays were creating more difficulties than commercial benefits. Mr Arandjelović singled out Spain as an example of a market where punctuality issues had affected onward connections. “We had to make the painful decision to say, for example, that we could no longer connect one city to another because it was creating more operational issues than benefits”, he said. “Unfortunately, as an airline, we cannot influence the entire ecosystem we operate in”.
The airline’s size also limits its options when passengers miss their connections, particularly during the summer peak. “If you do not have ten daily flights to Barcelona but only two, your options for rebooking passengers are reduced. During the summer peak, even your partners are completely full, and there are no options for rebooking passengers”, Mr Arandjelović explained. “We are very focused on that too: not pushing connections through Belgrade at all costs, because then it starts having a negative effect as well”.
Fuel costs are adding another layer of uncertainty, even as demand remains strong. “Reaching the point where you have to consider cancelling flights that are already over 80% booked, perhaps even for the winter season, just to save on fuel costs is not a great solution”, Mr Arandjelović said. “Air Serbia had another record summer compared with the previous year. This could have been, I think, the best year in our almost 100-year history. We do not see any problems on the demand side, but now it is all about managing costs and our exposure”.
Despite the challenges, Air Serbia intends to continue developing its network, while allowing greater room for operational buffers and changes in market conditions. “Now we are entering a more stable phase of growth, growing responsibly rather than aggressively. This gives us some room to balance the uncertainties we face”, Mr Arandjelović said. “They expect us to fly, but our shareholders also expect us to be responsible in how we manage the company and navigate the crisis”.



Bravo Air Serbia 🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸
ReplyDeleteI like this Bojan guy, smart guy
ReplyDelete+1
Delete“We finished the first year of operations with an 88% load factor."
ReplyDeleteThis is pretty good for YYZ
This is not true! ANALyst and his expert bots clearly stated that YYZ is a loss making destination, politically driven by former president. Please don't believe JU officials, but only fake analyst
DeletePlease stop runing comments with this stuff.
Delete88% is a good start. The question is how evenly that demand held up through the season. If the flights were still filling up towards the end, that makes a stronger case for a third weekly than a couple of packed months in July and August.
DeleteDon't forget that when it comes to YYZ this is as good as it gets. I doubt Canada will approve any additional frequencies.
DeleteOk, then they should stretch the season if they can't increase frequencies. Well done by the way!
Delete@11:45
DeleteIt isn't unheard of that Canada has allowed temporary increases to frequencies that go above those stipulated in the bilateral. Likely there is a limit as to how many extra flights they will allow, 1 extra flight for 2-3 months shouldn't be a problem.
Flights to YYZ are now showing in October to . Last year they ended the season Sep 26.
DeleteWooow 88% LF
ReplyDeleteAlmost 50% connecting traffic is fascianting.
ReplyDeleteIt keeps growing. It was 40% just a year or two ago.
DeleteThey have about the same level of connecting traffic as AF in CDG.
DeleteI am guessing connecting traffic from/to Russia has a lot to do with that strong growth.
DeleteAirlines in small markets have to survive thanks to transfers. Local demand isn't big enough to cover all the operating costs. That's how airlines like airBaltic, Finnair, Icelandair... survive.
DeleteWell not just that. Their regional and wider network is very good.
Delete@09:12 the big boys (with perhps the exception being BA) have transfer levels of a similar proportion. Icelandair i would guess is even higher. But yeah JU's growth needs transfer because the domeatic market is of course not vast and unlimited. But developing both as they state is very good to see.
DeleteYes but larger players can survive without transfers. Smaller ones can't.
DeleteIf you remove transfers from FI, AY, BT or even JU they will struggle to survive.
Just look how much AY and BT are struggling after losing access to the Russian airspace.
Well larger players are effected by a loss of transfer traffic. Healthy companies learn to adapt which i think JU has clearly become. The clever fleet opinoms underscore the good business acumine because they are remain nimble.
DeleteJU should aim for a similar level of transfer traffic as Qatar or Emirates in the long term, which is upwards of 60%. They're on the right path.
DeleteThe comment about the airport is painful.
Why didn't the concession envision a new terminal with double runways from the begining??!
Because it was done in a different economic environment. The airport
DeleteDoesnt need two runways. But a new terminal in the 2040s i think it does.
Introducing the E90/95 was the smartest decision fleet and network department has made in recent years
DeleteAgreed. The E-Jets are especially useful on routes where a second departure would open up a different set of connections. That can do more for the network than putting a bigger aircraft on the one flight you already have.
Deletehttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GQ-pRB7mRdM
DeleteFrom 2023
The cargo potential is what many of us will also be looking as this route stabilizes.
DeleteI think E90/95 especially saved them in winter.
DeleteDo the new flights to/from SJJ connect onto MIA?
ReplyDeleteI think they do but not on Sundays since the extra flight to SJJ goes in the afternoon, not the morning.
DeleteThursdays the flight connects on the outbound but not on the inbound.
DeleteSundays the flight doesn't connect on the outbound but does on the inbound.
I guess New York will have more connections which is good as people from SJJ will have an alternative to the overpriced OS.
DeleteThursdays, Fridays and Saturdays give better connections now for the outbound JFK due to the new morning SJJ flight. Inbound has no improvement.
DeleteSome pseudo-analysts claim it’s impossible for someone to fly via Belgrade when the starting point is, say, Istanbul, Athens, or Vienna. It makes no sense! 🧐
ReplyDeleteNobody says that.
DeleteI remember reading here too by some commentators multiple times that absolutely no one from Istanbul connects anywhere because there are so many options and flights from Istanbul. It turns out people from Istanbul will fly via wherever if the price is right. It is even one of Air Serbia's top cities for connecting passengers from/to JFK.
DeleteWell just ignore comments like that. Half the comments people make are stupid anyway.
DeleteI'm going from VIE to ZRH, via BEG, 22.11. Schedule and prices were ok, just 1 example.
DeleteInteresting route and yes!, prices between Vienna and Zürich can be literally theft! On that day i see prices of over 500euros one-way direct and 220 via BG or Amsterdam (slightly less nice departure time). Insanely expensive.
DeleteIt's refreshing to read an interview of someone other than Marek. Especially from the network department which had done such a spectacular job in recent years.
ReplyDeleteThey really turned the things around. Mr Bojan Arandjelovic seems to know what he is doing.
Would love to see the top ten connecting city pairs. I bet there are a few on there that would surprise everyone.
ReplyDeleteThey are never going to do that but it would be very cool for avgeeks :D
DeleteI am sure Tivat/Podgorica - Moscow/St.Petersburg was one, and although Russian tourism there will decline in 2027 I'm sure enough people have visas to keep it a popular pair.
DeleteI’d be interested to know how much of that transfer traffic is entirely within Europe.
DeleteIf you have the time you could estimate or guestimate it.
DeleteJu is doing great, more frequences, new destinations, what worries me is that BEG is becoming a bottleneck that won't be easy to solve
ReplyDelete+1
Delete+1
DeleteWell there aint a lot they can do about the airport in the medium term. They will cope.
DeleteThere is still room in the afternoon wave as that's when you have zero Wizz Air flights, they either depart before or after. Then there are no KL or OS flights like in the morning.
DeleteI think morning wave in summer is 100% full. Only thing that helps is that Lufthansa to MUC, Lufthansa to FRA, KLM and all Wizz Air flights except FMM leave very early. Their gates can be used for later JU flights.
To be honest I think building a brand new airport in Dobanovci would have been a much smarter investment than some other things that have been built in the city.
DeleteYou think Serbia could afford that? Because i dont. Greenfield airports are not common and as we see in Poland and Romania very controversial.
DeleteBelgrade can feel half empty and then suddenly every gate in one part of the terminal is boarding at the same time. I wonder how many more flights the airport could handle if JU spread out some of those departures.
DeleteThey do their scheduling very well dont worry.
DeleteWho said anyone is worried? Such a cringe comment
DeleteThe fastest solution would be having more remote stands and bus gates, instead of adding more gates and jet-bridges
DeleteThat could free up contact gates during the peak. You’d need enough buses and staff to handle several aircraft at once, though. If passengers spend ten minutes waiting on board for a bus, that eats into the connection time you were trying to protect.
DeleteWell most planes that use the remote stands are ATRs and those destinations usually leave a bit later. For examples SOF at 13.20, there is more buffer time to wait for transfers. Issue are flights that depart earlier like ATH on some days at 12.20.
Delete@09:14
DeleteThe morning wave still has quite a bit of room for growth. LGW has a capacity for 55 movements an hour on a single runway. Lets assume BEG is on the lower side with 38-45 movements an hour. JU's morning wave is spread over 2 hours (6-8am) giving a potential for 76-90 operations. BEG during that period has next to no arrivals. BEG currently has 24 jet bridge gates and 7 remote stand gates - total of 31 gates. Assuming a gate can handle 1 flight an hour, JU could practically double their operations during the morning wave before reaching the limits.
Have in mind that BEG will soon have an additional 4 more gates with potential for more if the idea to add gates on the opposite side of the C gates goes ahead.
^ 57 per hour for Gatwick. Belgrade runway capacity is regarded at 40-43 movements per hour according to Vinci I believe.
DeleteI don't think the runway is a problem especially since there are zero arrivals at that time. It has to do with terminal and parking position restrictions.
DeleteExactly - two totally different issues
DeleteIdemo dalje ...
ReplyDeleteThey may sell fewer connections with a bit more breathing room in the schedule. If that also means fewer missed flights, overnight stays and bags arriving the next day, I can see why they’re doing it.
ReplyDeleteAs someone who only ever flys point to point to Belgrade i can't comment on the trasit process but imagine is fair nicer than many larger hubs. Seems like responsible leadership to be open about making sure things work smoothly. Good sign.
Delete"The airline’s size also limits its options when passengers miss their connections, particularly during the summer peak. “If you do not have ten daily flights to Barcelona but only two, your options for rebooking passengers are reduced."
ReplyDeleteOr if one has twice a week flights. But that will always be the nature of the beast in aviation.
DeleteThis problem with transfers I personally witnessed this summer in BCN due to ground handling stuff strike. Evening flight to Belgrade delayed almost 3 hours. Several passengers with Greek passports who continued on to Thessaloniki i think, lost their flight due to this delay. Nothing to do with JU but Spanish airport.
ReplyDeleteThis will forever be the case. Flying one-stop carries a degree of 'risk' for the passenger, however if the price/routing is right people will of course do it. The risk is mitigated somewhat if you fly with an airline that does have '10 flights a day' to Barcelona but even then the list of daily fuck-ups and missed connections in the summer will be massive. I witnessed dozens of passengers in Munich miss connections to Canada due to passport control having one person on duty, so the room for error is huge in this game.
DeleteInteresting stuff. Good luck JU!
ReplyDeleteAlmost half the passengers are connecting now. I’d like to see what the airport is doing to make the transfer experience more pleasant so people will consider using it again?
ReplyDeleteIts not awful as things thing stand. But yes JU is far better than the airport is.
DeleteToronto’s first season gives them a lot of reason for optimism but I’m wondering whether Miami will book the same way. A family visit to Toronto and a holiday in Florida can mean very different travel dates and budgets.
ReplyDeleteMIA will likely have a different pax structure seeing it's not as diaspora heavy. JU has 3 of MIA's top unserved European routes covered fairly well - SVO, BUD and ATH, while JU is fairly competitive on a fair few feeding routes. MIA will definitely be an interesting route to watch.
Delete50% transfers is really a great number, but it would be interesting to see a percentage of transfers on longhaul flights
ReplyDeleteI honestly still can't believe this. If someone told me just a few years ago Belgrade would have nonstop flights to MIAMI I would say they are nuts.
ReplyDeleteIf you followed the news from four years ago, you would have known. Miami was mentioned as a potential destination almost exactly 4 years ago.
DeleteJust with a bit more enthusiasm, knowledge and dedication from Menzies personnel in Belgrade would greatly help a timely morning departure wave out of Belgrade thus limiting the delays that occur on daily basis. The famous 20-30 min delays out of Belgrade every morning on almost every flight must be avoided in order to get aircrafts back to base on time for the second / third wave.
ReplyDeleteArrival of Air Serbia to Miami is a long awaited dream ! Miami needs more competing flights to Europe . Only mayor airlines dominate the European markets , we need more flights to capitals like Prague, Tirana, Skopje, etc
ReplyDeleteArrival of Air Serbia to Miami is a long awaited dream ! Miami needs more competing flights to Europe . Only mayor airlines dominate the European markets , we need more flights to capitals like Prague, Tirana, Skopje, etc
ReplyDeleteAs the dominant airline at MIA, American airlines only fly to Madrid, Heathrow, Malpensa and Barcelona. Therefore there is next to no chance for a route such a Prague, let alone Tirana or Skopje which have absolutely chance.
DeleteGreat to hear that there are so many transfer passengers in Belgrade, however the transfer desk itself is a real joke where it has 2 -3 desk positions so people are waiting for over 30 minutes to process the transfer. Belgrade airport is a real ugly and non functional mess.
ReplyDeleteLooks like you haven't been to Belgrade airport in a long time. Most passengers don't need transfer desk. Airport is nice and highly functional. Easy to connect as there are no separate terminals, just one connected terminal and is much faster to move around than at many airports of similar size.
Delete