Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May47
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Jat / Airbus talks

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
Jat wants ATR instead of Airbus
The French Minister of State for foreign trade Anne-Marie Idrac has arrived in Belgrade for talks with Serbia’s Ministry for Infrastructure with the aim of resolving Jat’s 12 year old order for 8 Airbus A319s. Idrac, in contrast to statements made by East European Airbus vice president Andreas Kramer, said that Jat Airways can purchase regional aircraft from France in exchange for the 8 Airbuses. “The agreement in 1998 is still in force but is not active due to many reasons. One of the reasons I’m in Belgrade is in order for discussion to begin with the aim of resolving this issue”, Idrac was quoted by the Beta news agency. Idrac added that if Jat were to purchase smaller regional jets it would have to sign a new agreement, although she did not specify with whom.

Serbia’s Minister for Infrastructure, Milutin Mrkonjić, said that Serbia was interested in finalising the dispute between Jat and Airbus. He said that he hopes Airbus will be a new partner in Jat’s fleet renewal process.

Jat is keen on modifying the Airbus order to ATR aircraft. Its previous attempts to do so have been rejected by Airbus. Jat has a mixture of Boeing and ATR aircraft in its fleet. It has never had any Airbus aircraft in its ownership.

February 26, 2010
Fleet Jat Airways serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:30

    But if they would get the deal to change in favor of the ATR's, doesn't that mean that they would be getting only one?
    I am sure that it would mean a lot to JU but I suppose at lease 2 would make sense.
    But even if they were to get one, I am sure it would be flying to Vienna, since apparently JU is losing on that route

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. ANONYMOUS11:38

    SOURCE SOURCE SOURCE SOURCE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous14:27

    @Anonymous

    go and read any serbian newspaper and you will get your info.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. EX-YU Aviation16:18

    @ ANONYMOUS

    As stated in the article - Beta News Agency.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. ANONYMOUS17:57

    ^
    I must have missed it in the first reading - my mistake.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. frequentflyer02:41

    The hold up is simple. JAT paid their money to Airbus, not to EADS, the parent company of Airbus and Aerospatiale. So Airbus (as a separate company) is the one JAT has to deal with.

    This is an important point constantly neglected by JAT.

    And that $23.5m would be worth just over $30m today in real terms, but that may only buy them 2 aircraft when they really need 6.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous10:44

    Doesn't matter if JU is getting 2 aircraft if they really need 6, I think what is important here is for them to just start buying those damn planes!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. peter from sydney11:07

    Can't they just offload the deal to another airline dealing with Airbus?
    Jat - 'Hey airline XYZ, want to take this $23 million dollar deal off our hands for a cool 20% discount?'

    Airline XYZ - 'In these economic times, sure thing!'

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. ANONYMOUS17:23

    ^
    Deposits are non-transferable and Airbus are being complete bastards over this whole issue.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. peter from sydney03:23

    ^ Could Jat not strike a deal in private? By the planes and than on sell them to whichever company they made a deal with?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. frequentflyer13:20

    http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2010/03/04/339052/china-southerns-five-atr-72-500s-on-sale.html

    There's JUs solution to their ageing AT7s... manufactured in 2003, operating mostly longer trips (ie less cycles).

    Doesn't solve the Airbus problem though!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Kazakhstan’s SCAT Airlines to launch Belgrade service

Image

Air Serbia plans 32-member fleet in 2026, eyes MRO facility

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Turkish Airlines is Slovenia’s busiest in Q1, Swiss adds most passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025