Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May45
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Niš Airport turns down Ryanair and Montenegro

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
Niš rejects Ryanair and Montenegro Airlines over subsidies

Niš Constantine the Great Airport has turned down both Ryanair and Montenegro Airlines which offered to launch flights to the city in return for subsidies. Niš Airport's Managing Director, Vladica Djurdjanović, says the two carriers approached local authorities with the intention of introducing services over the course of next year. Ryanair is believed to have requested 200.000 euros in subsidies, while Montenegro Airlines proposed a similar incentive model to the one it enjoyed between 2010 and 2013 when it served the city, with the carrier interested in maintaining flights from Tivat instead of Podgorica this time around. However, Mr Djurdjanović says both were turned down. "When we were in discussions with Montenegro Airlines, they asked us - 'how much do you pay' and 'we don't want to pay for anything at the airport'. The same was with Ryanair", the Managing Director notes.

Niš Airport concluded a three-year commercial contract with Wizz Air earlier this year, which saw the low cost airline launch flights from Basel and Malmo to the southeast Serbian city. As a result, the airport charges the carrier just three euros per departing passenger. "We tell other airlines that we have signed a contract with Wizz Air, based on commercial principles, to charge three euros per every departing passenger. We ask for nothing more, so if they agree to these terms, they can fly as well. That's what we told other airlines but they wanted subsidies, like the ones offered in other countries", Mr Djurdjanović says. The airport believes its terms will attract other carriers.

This year will become Niš's busiest, with the airport set to surpass its 2006 passenger record today, despite having no flights for the first half of the year, prior to Wizz Air launching services. During the January - November period, Niš Airport handled 31.346 passengers. It says that while Wizz Air has not announced new routes from Niš for next year, it is hopeful the budget airline will add additional flights from the city during 2016. "We observed the way in which Wizz Air develops its network from a city and it usually starts off with one route. From Niš, two routes were immediately launched which is a good sign. The load factor is very good, there are enough passengers and we expect that Niš will be part of the airline's future development plans. We anticipate new routes, not just from Wizz Air, but other airlines as well", Mr Djurdjanović says.
December 29, 2015
low cost airline montenegro montenegro airlines Niš Results 2015 serbia Wizz Air
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:03

    Hmm don't know what to think really. They shouldn't have turned down Ryanair but then again being a small airport and doing business with them is a risk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:09

    RYAN would do the same as with Zadar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:10

    Nobody is allowed to "interfere" with Air Belgrade!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      Please at least try to read the entire article and why they were turned down.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:32

      Yeah, all the money goes to Air Belgrade, no money left to pay subsidies.

      Simple really..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:38

      How much money does ASL receive every month from BEG airport and from the goverment?
      Why shouldn't the rest of the country also get some of those?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:41

      Actually INI has received quite a lot of money this year to upgrade its terminal and has received a lot of necessary equipment. It will also get money for ILS.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:43

      Nis got 665,000 EUR this year just from the city, plus additional funds from the state.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:54

      In Serbia multi-million subventions goes to and only to Air Serbia from flights from and only from Belgrade.

      In Croatia subventions are result of tenders (with precise conditions) and lot of companies enjoy in those (Ryanair, eaysJet, Croatia, Trade Air, Thomson, Germanwings...). Even more most of the money for that goes to RJK, PUY, BWK, ZAD, SPU, DBV and OSI and nothing to ZAG.

      And there is logic in that. By that way it is not just to support tourism (if not ZAG would get that funds as it is 5th biggest tourist destination in Croatia), but more to support local community (especially in case of OSI, RJK and BWK).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:57

      You obviously didn't read how much money INI got this year.But I have never seen a group of Croatian people so concerned in Serbia and its finances than here.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous09:59

      ¨Actually INI has received quite a lot of money this year to upgrade its terminal¨? Are you serious right now? Nis has recived a lots of crappy old stuff from Belgrade airport,that they'd throw away anyway, but not money to upgrade the terminal building! Nis has the worst airport terminal I´ve seen so far, the time has stopped there in 80s! I was diverted to INI later this year due foggy weather from BEG and you have no idea how crappy is that mate!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous10:00

      It got 665000 euros in cash mate

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous10:04

      Anonymous @ 9:57 AM.
      Why do you assume I am Croatian? Because a good Serb doesn't ask questions, or doesn't laugh at the stupidity of government?

      Grow up, your attitude belongs in the 90's.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous10:05

      For what?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous10:28

      Can you give me source of this 650.000 EUR financial injection?

      And even if that is true, it is less than 1% of what Air Serbia get from Serbia last year to fly exclusively from BEG. Not a one flight per year from INI or Morava.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous10:32

      Pusti majmune koji samo jednu pricu vrte. Oni su iz praistorije.

      Mozda su se zahebali sa RA trebali su mozda da pristanu na ozbiljnu liniju za 200k Jura. Nek lete jednom nedeljno puta 140 putnika to je oko 7000 ljudi mozes da im naplatis toliko raznih usluga na aerodromu samo da pokrijes taj trosak. Plus naplatis od putnika i drzave troskove opsluzivanja aviona. Potrebno je imati i RA u Srbiji

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous10:40

      Will there be any flights from Osijek if there will be no huge support from State? In 2012 thay had 2.000 passengers per year. After support some 30.000.

      ZAD had 39.000 passengers (like INI today) before supporting from State (2001). Today, 14 years later almost 500.000.

      BWK would not have flights at all without State support.

      RJK had 41.000 passenger per year, today with State support that is almost 150.000.

      PUY had 66.000 before support (2000). Today 400.000.

      Same thing with SPU (300% more 15 years) and DBV (400% more in 15 years).

      In that time ZAG without any support have just 100% more passengers in 15 years).

      And that is normal. State should support local community do develop faster than metropolis and to try to make development same in all country. If not we will have just one big city and most of province to day and people to move to capital or out of country.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Anonymous10:52

      To je normalno samo u Hrvatskoj koja je u velikim budzetskim problemima iako je nedavno usla u EU vasi dodaci za letenje su besmisleniji od finansiranja ASLa. Dodaci za letenje iz DBV ne postoje nigde drugo u svetu. I pored svega toga Hrvati ne lete puno uglavnom strani turisti.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Anonymous11:15

      Ma da... pogotovo iz OSI lete stranci. Mislim da je OSI usporediv sa INI.

      Aerodromi u okolici 250 km
      - OSI: Budimpešta, Beograd, Zagreb, Tuzla
      - INI: Sofija, Beograd, Skopje, Priština
      U boljoj poziciji: INI

      Veličina
      - OSI 100.000 stanovnika
      - INI 180.000 stanovnika
      U boljoj poziciji: INI

      Alternativna povezanost:
      - OSI: pruga, autocesta, razvijena bus kompanija
      - INI: pruga, autocesta, razvijena bus kompanija
      U boljoj poziciji: jednako

      No, uz trenutno jednak broj putnika
      - OSI: 5 linija, 3 prijevoznika sa 9 tjednih polazaka
      - INI: 2 linije, 1 prijevoznik sa 5 tjednih polazaka

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    17. Anonymous11:19

      Po kojoj logici su subvencije lokalnoj zajednici radi jedneke razvijenosti svih dijelova države besmislene? U Hrvatskoj postoji niz projekata za razvoj provincije poput

      - fondovi razvoja otoka
      - fondovi za nerazvijene krajeve
      - fondovi za područja stradala u domovinskom ratu (obnova, razminiranje, izgradnja kuća, infrastruktura)
      - fondovi za pomoć loklanim zajednicama (koje nisu nužno nerazvijene, ali imaju malo stanovništva, neke loklane probleme isl.) u oblasti kulture, sporta, turizma, prometne povezanosti, zdravstva...

      U takve investicije lokalnim zajednicama spadaju i potpore zrakoplovnim kompanijama.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    18. Anonymous11:21

      OT: In the meanwhile...

      http://www.jutarnji.hr/novi-pleso--prvi-avion-polijece-u-ozujku-2017-/1487027/

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    19. Anonymous11:29

      To AnonymousDecember 29, 2015 at 10:40 AM

      you can't compare Niš with ZAD, BWK,RJK, PUY, SPU and
      DBV.
      Post war coastline is attracting tourists, mostly foreign tourist. It's amother planet compared to Niš opportunites.

      You can compare just Osijek with Niš.
      That's all.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    20. Anonymous11:54

      Pristina kao dostupan aerodrom.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    21. Anonymous12:03

      Anon at 10:40

      I can totally agree. It's a pity that Slovenian government do not realize how important its support for Maribor (MBX) is. I see Marinor as the same case as INI or Morava..

      Haplek

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    22. Anonymous12:41

      Haplek
      come on who will fly to Maribor MBX Graz, Ljubljana, Zagreb, Vienna are near .. This area of Slovenia is so
      depressed, poor with little hope for development. It' in the Eu, near Austria and new member Croatia, getting money from Eu but no improvement. It's a dead horse. Maribor is smaller than Niš and Austrians are not crazy to change Graz or Vienna for Maribor.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    23. Anonymous12:44

      And foreign travellers prefer to fly to better connected airports if they decide to visit Maribor and the area around they don't need to fly there directly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    24. Anonymous14:27

      We're talking charters and P2P...

      Haplek

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    25. Anonymous15:56

      Samo primenite hrvatske recepte i brzo cete ih dostici po standardu.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    26. Anonymous20:30

      Naravno da nemaju iste uvijete BWK, ZAD, SPU, DBV... i INI. Ali ovi primjeri dobro pokazuju


      1. Kako se subvencijama moze potaknuti razvoj prometa. Ovdje je najbolji primjer ZAD koji je godinama stagnirao u kontekstu ZAG, SPU i DBV do subvencija kada je naglo i dvoznamenkastog postotka krenuo gore.

      2. Kako se sebvencijama moze potakniti razvoj provincijskih aerodroma spram centralizacije glavnog grada. Hrvatska je tu cista suprotnost Srbiji.

      3. I da, OSI je komparativan sa INI i Srbija bi se trebala ugledati upravo u taj primjet Hrvatske.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    27. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:20

    Fair enough! We all know Ryanair is mayor LCA in Europe but having them on subsidies and having absolute no profit from them is absolutely unacceptable! Montenegro is not worth my comment! They are ridiculous!
    Hopefully WIZZ will introduce at least 1 new route in 2016, somewhere in Germany.
    Well done for the results!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:21

    Loving Montenegro Airlines' approach :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:28

      Mongs!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:22

    Obviously both airlines went to Skopje after Nis (referring to yesterday's article). So now we know what they are asking SKP for.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. aleksandar09:29

    Vladica Djurdjanović seems like a very good manager. I have seen a few interviews with him on local news channels and he seems very interested in developing airports sustainably, not just spending huge money on subsidies just so he can say "look what I have achieved".

    He must stay the true course. As time goes by, Wizz will surely develop INI into a base. Ryanair could certainly make money in Nis if they accepted the same terms as were agreed upon with Wizz. Those terms are more than fair to both Nis and any airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous10:17

    Now we know for sure that Ryanair is interested in this region. Obviously, SKP and INI would serve, more or less, the same market, so the question is whether FR approached INI or SKP first. If INI turned them down, the logical next step would be to start flights from SKP, however I have a pessimistic view on this matter, as in my opinion FR should have started selling tickets by now...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. aleksandar10:24

      Certainly there is some overlap between SKP and INI, but I think that they are not the same market at all.

      INI could potentially serve most of Central Serbia and even parts of Western Serbia.

      SKP is also more likely to serve Kosovo.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:37

      Toliko su zainteresovani da lete samo Zadar i Atinu.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:43

      Izvini i Solun je tu.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:47

      @Aleksandar Stojanovic
      Lets say that SKP would serve southern Serbia, up to Nis. As for your comment that INI could serve Central Serbia: it could, but I think that most of the cities that are northern from Nis, are already using BEG. I completely agree with you on the matter of SKP also serving kosovo.

      @anon 10:37
      Well the last few news on this blog are an indicator that FR is interested into expanding in this region. They obviously underestimated this region, and after the W6 success they want a slice from the pie.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:57

      Ako pogledas aerodrome i rute RA shvatices da oni nemaju ideju kuda bi vozili Balkance za razliku od Wizza koji vozi gastose. Balkanci nemaju para za Majorku, Alicante i sl.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  9. Anonymous11:12

    @anon 10:57
    And you think that all gastos routes are already taken? Just take a look at Germany (a country which is served to 6-7 different routes from SKP), you still have Baden-Baden and Weeze airports which would do very well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:48

      Da li ti mislis da makedonci zive po celoj nemackoj?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:23

      Not macedonians, albanians.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:38

      Samo u vecim gradovima. Slicno je po Italiji.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  10. Siks11:40

    My 2 cents:
    YM will sooner rather than later serve INI under current INI subsidy scheme. Why? Since JU does not have INI fitted to its model dominantly due to being in A/C shortage, YM after signing partnership with Etihad, having under-utilized fleet, will do the same as they did with Tuzla...
    If I am INI`s CEO, I will push JU to push YM to do so...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous11:45

    Except Ryanairs load factor is 92% or higher, every single flight is full and why should you pay Ryanair..
    I don't understand how they want to increase the pax number with this way of thinking

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  12. Anonymous12:47

    Ryanair hints it will focus on (South) Eastern Europe but will start with Romania obviously because of its huge market:

    http://m.atwonline.com/airports-routes/ryanair-aims-major-expansion-romania

    Most likely scenario is massive expansion in Romania, perhaps SOF, SKP & TGD. BEG is unlikely due to high airport fees, at least according to Wizzair.

    Lets wait and see!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:39

      They are starting next year in SOF with 2 routes to London-Stansted and to Pisa. They said that this will be only the begining.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:27

      You're right. OTP had 2 sole rotes from STN and DUB and now it will have 10. Fierce competition with Wizz that's for sure!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  13. Anonymous13:01

    Ja opet mislim da je FR mnogo bolje resenje od W6

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:31

      Da te nema, trebalo bi te izmisliti.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:22

      Zašto? Koja je bitna razlika izmedju W6 i FR? Obe su ultra low cost i lete isključivo p2p.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:36

      "Razlika" je u tome što FR traži silni novac da pokrene saobraćaj na malom aerodromu a W6 opet traži neadekvatno nisku aerodromsku taksu od koje aerodrom ne može finansijski opstati. U slučaju FR, keširani novac ide FRu to jest avio-kompaniji a u slučaju W6 taj novac ostaje putnicima.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous17:52

      But if money stays with the passengers, they might buy some other stuff at the airport. Will FR buy food and drinks in the terminal?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous18:26

      An airport can not sustain from "pax might buy some other goods at the airport". Even the pax buy something, it's a minor thing in the airport finances. What is worse, such companies ask for a very low kerosene prices and the landing fees.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous23:44

      So, like ASL in BEG?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  14. Anonymous18:40

    No ILS, no FR, simple as that therefore all "hints" about negotiations with Ryanair are mere wishes (yet).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous22:34

    Is Ural still coming to BEG tomorrow? Can't see them on beg. aero.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:45

      They have moved the first flight to January 3.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous08:57

      Very logic... hahahahahah! Parody...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:01

      The first flight was supposed to operate as a charter anyway and was not for sale.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Kazakhstan’s SCAT Airlines to launch Belgrade service

Image

Air Serbia plans 32-member fleet in 2026, eyes MRO facility

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Turkish Airlines is Slovenia’s busiest in Q1, Swiss adds most passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025