Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Aviogenex ad
"550.000 foreign tourists in 1985"

Two-phase concession of Belgrade Airport

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport's concession process will take part in two phases, the "Večernje novosti" daily reports. During the first phase, interested subjects will make non-binding offers and sign a confidentiality agreement with the government. Following an assessment of their bids, those with the best offers will be invited to take part in the second phase where binding bids will have to be submitted. The Serbian government is interested in concluding a 25-year concession agreement for the airport rather than an all-out privatisation. A concession would bring a one-off payment of up to 400 million euros, plus an annual fee of eleven million euros to the state. The airport's privatisation advisor will decide on the most suitable sale model within the next two months.
January 12, 2017
Belgrade Newsflash Privatisation serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous12:15

    What about diretct flight from BEG to PEK ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:17

      Announcement is expected soon. Beijing and Shanghai.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:54

      Sure?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  2. Anonymous13:07

    Don't do the same mistake as LJU did with terrible Fraport.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:49

      There's a record number of tourist in Slovenia but PAX numbers are falling. Something is not right here. Fraport did absolutely nothing since they bought the airport. They see Slovenia and Ljubljana as their catchment area for the Frankfurt hub. Ljubljana is now Frankfurts colony.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:28

      The Germans are coming, the Germans are coming!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  3. Anonymous13:22

    I am somewhat perplexed with this binding/non-binding terminology.
    Does that mean that you could present a non-binding offer in which you promise a world and then, when you qualify for the second round, you can present a real offer?
    Or is this a usual way these things work?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:32

      It means that your initial offer can be renegotiated in direct talks during the second round. They did a simmilar thing with Ljubljana. Fraport offered less. When they were presented how much Vinci offered they increased their bid and Vinci was unable to match it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:52

      it is usual procedure. 1st non-binding round serves to see participants plans, strategy and views. and also to filter out some not serious companies and preventing losing time with them in later stages

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Unknown22:53

      This is the most commonly-used procedure to max the offers for a "priceless" infrastructure of a huge state or even regional importance.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  4. Anonymous21:34

    400 million.....somebody is on drugs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Q40007:40

      If they get what they are asking, than there won't be much left for future investment in the airport. I don't believe Zagreb asked for any money up front, just that you had to build terminal x and pay an annual fee.

      If Belgrade is sold for 400 mil... it would be hard to see them than get a new terminal worth another 300-ish million. The money might be tempting but I don't think it will be the best outcome for the future of Belgrade.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Rodney Marinkovic09:49

      Anon Q400, sa vasim tekstom se slazem. Ako vlasnik, u ovom slucaju drzava naplati od koncesionara pomenutih 400 miliona evra, koliko od te sume ce biti ulozeno u prosirenje ifra strukture? Logicno je da politicari ce nastojari da maksimalno novac iskoriste za druge potrebe kroz budzet. Bez investicija drzavni budzet uvek biti kratak. A aerodrom uvek liciti izgledom, funkcionalnoscu, kapacitetom na proslost Drugih prepreka nema. Jer "u koga je casa, u njega je i molitva". Uvek tako je bilo. Pa i u oblasti avija cije.
      Pozdrav iz zimske Srbije.
      Rodney near Airport Morava - Kraljevo.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Aviogenex ad
"550.000 foreign tourists in 1985"

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Air Serbia granted permits for Beijing flights

Image

British Airways to suspend Zagreb service over winter

Image

Air Serbia upgrades capacity on new service

Image

Airlines plan five new subsidised routes from Sarajevo in 2026

Image

Belgrade Airport prepares for new terminal expansion

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025