Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT office in downtown Sydney 
1979

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June5
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Croatia Airlines to begin strategic partner search

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


The Croatian Minister for Sea, Transport and Infrastructure, Oleg Butković, announced this morning that Croatia Airlines will begin its search for a strategic partner later this year. Speaking at a buisness summit in Zagreb, Mr Butković said, "Croatia Airlines has undergone the restructuring process and has since improved its finances and launched new routes. However, the only solution for the carrier is to seek a strategic partner. This will be one of the most important topics in our aviation industry in the coming period. The ministry, jointly with Croatia Airlines' management, will begin looking for potential investors this year". Croatia Airlines was put up for sale in 2014, however, no interest was expressed during an international tender. Last year, the carrier's CEO noted that an investor would be required in order for the company to grow faster. By mid-2017, a proposal was drafted for the privatisation process and several airlines across the world had been contacted. However, there has been no progress on the matter since.
May 29, 2018
croatia croatia airlines Newsflash Privatisation
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous10:35

    They should give 4K a call. Maybe they are still looking for failing businesses to invest in.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:41

      Why failing businesses? OU carries 2,1 Million Pax with 12 aircraft why Air Serbia carries 2,5 with 21 aircraft. In that comparison they actually do quite well...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:46

      JU has the Serbian government and Etihad to watch over it so don't worry about them.
      If OU was doing fine they why would they need a strategic partner??

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:52

      He is nor worrying about JU, you are worried about OU, and than when he gives you numbers you punch under the belt. So typical ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:54

      Actually number is not correct since JU handled over 2.5 million passengers last year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:58

      yes, and how much? 2,501?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:12

      A lot more actually.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:24

      It actually carried over 1.6 million. I was just pointing out since you were being precise with the Croatia Airlines figures.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous11:36

      It carried 2,6 million while OU carried 2,1 Million. Tht is 500.000 more passengers in a year with 10 aircraft more. 23% more pax with 75% bigger fleet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous11:37

      http://www.exyuaviation.com/2018/04/ex-yu-airlines-handle-65-million.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. nebojsa popovic11:41

      I do not get the point of above discussion. The difference in fleet size does not mean automatically that JU must have almost double more passengers comparing to OU.

      JU does not have domestic traffic and OU has it.

      Until October 2017 JU was flying to Abu Dhabi and for that rotation JU needed almost 12 hours. During these 12 hours OU could have made many ZAG-DBV-ZAG or ZAG-SPU-ZAG rotations transporting with 1 plane many more passengers than JU could have on one plane flying BEG-AUH-BEG.

      And JU was flying daily to AUH.

      This kind of comparison is surely not the indicator of successful (or not) business

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous11:48

      What some are forgetting to add is that unlike OU in ZAG, JU in BEG is not the only airline to have a base there. Wizz Air carries around 500.000 passengers per year and most of those would have flown on JU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous11:53

      It's comical how every time someone mentions OU there is a horde attacking JU. Quite sad.

      Reality is that OU is a sick company. All delays, cancellations and people leaving the company are symptomatic of a bad state.

      No matter how bad other ex-YU airlines are doing none is experiencing such exodus as OU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous12:32

      ... exodus... at OU people leave voluntarily whereas at other they get kicked out....

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous12:46

      Air Serbia fanboys are nothing compared to the OU fanboys. Maintaining that the company is doing amazing when half of all pilots have left and over 180 flights have been cancelled is seriously crazy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Anonymous12:52

      JU has not cancelled a single flight because of staff shortages. Stop spreading lies. Those flights that have been cancelled were due to poor loads.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Anonymous12:56

      180.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    17. Anonymous13:10

      Really and how many aircraft did JU have to lease from abroad to cover those cancellations like JU did? None.

      All cancellations made by JU were due to bad loads, not fleet or personnel shortages.

      One thing is what you wish and another thing is reality.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    18. Anonymous13:13

      180.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    19. Anonymous13:20

      Any link to that? A link that says that 180 flights were cancelled because of staff shortage? No? Like I said, you are just another hater.

      While you are at it, look at Purger's list of route cancellations by OU because they can't afford to service their planes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    20. Anonymous13:21

      I am referring to OU!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    21. Anonymous14:11

      You should have been more clear! It's confusing!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    22. Reply
  2. Anonymous10:45

    Still six more heathrow slots to sell... then they're in real trouble

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:55

      Actually there are only 4 slots left, not 6.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:21

      And what is left to sale in JU after the entire airline had been sold to Arabs. So interesting people here making selling few slots sounds like a crime yet selling entire company is ok

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:22

      If nothing, it has 9 slots at Heathrow.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:25

      49% is hardly entire company. Plus wasn't Pliva sold to the Asians as well? ;)

      Maybe Agrokor could buy OU. Oh, wait ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:47

      Average salary in Pliva, sold to Israeles, who are hardly Asians is 1100 euro. How much the workers in diapers make in cable-rolling factories in neighbouring country? 200,300 euro? And I had no intention deviating from the aviation, but you started it bro

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:51

      Israelis are still Asians while we are at it.

      The diapers are irrelevant to this discussion as we are talking about Arab investment in JU.

      By the way, your Pliva employees are earning less than JU flight attendants, so much for that. lol

      And btw how much are people making in Agrokor these days?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous13:28

      @AnonymousMay 29, 2018 at 11:47 AM

      It is somewhat higher, 10500 kuna to 11500 kuna, Pliva has lost loads of its staff, however productivity and automation have gone up dramatically. Pliva today employs only ~2500 staff, it used to employ 15000.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  3. Anonymous10:53

    Etihad may be?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous11:16

    Go 4K!! :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Q40011:42

    Why do they need a strategic partner?? Maybe they should try decent management first.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:52

      Impossible because politics will always get in the way. Just look at the CEO selection.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:07

      because it would be much easier to restructure and get the costs right;

      it will be the anonymous, evil and greedy foreigners that do the layoffs and renegotiate contracts.... they can easier threaten them than locals that want to get reelected ...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  6. nebojsa popovic11:52

    It seems that only political deals in Balkans could bring potential investors in Ex-Yu airlines.

    According to the rumours before 2013 Aeroflot was interested in Jat Airways, even Air Baltic purchased documentation for Jat Airways take over, but the result was zero. Then the political deal with EY was made and JU got strategic partner in 2013.

    From the other side we see once per quarter the information that OU wants to find strategic partner and it keeps repeating without any final result. In OU case we also had many rumours saying that Lufthansa, Turkish, Garuda, Aegean and who not are interested in OU, but the result was, like with Jat Airways, zero.

    Either political deal or someone like 4K (who will insist to be paid to take over OU) will be (or not) the future of OU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous12:59

    Amazing. Every single comment about OU is followed by "Air Serbia is worse". Is any criticism of a Croatian business banned in Croatia? Just crazy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:16

      You really have a selective memory. Should we count all the JU fanboys on here?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:18

      At least they saw the light in the end. You still haven't.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  8. Anonymous13:14

    Again and again bla bla bla ....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous14:28

    The only viable solution for OU is to knock at the LH's door, and dock to EW platform. Croatia belongs to Lufthansa group interest zone and looking for any partner solution rather then LH could be a hazardous thing for OU's existance.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous15:55

    What about LOT as a strategic partner? They have Nordica in the Baltics, so they could have Croatia in the West Balkans. LOT is a Star Alliance member and a fellow partner of OU. They grow massively now, so OU could get under their arms and grow together still keeping OU relationship with LHGroup.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous00:27

    "Ja, tajkun" je idealni kupac, tj strategic partner. On pati što nema avio kompaniju i želja mu je da dovede menadžere iz Lufthanse. Savršen spoj, Mišković i Croatia Airlines.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous08:35

      How yes no, kao da Hrvatska nema dovoljno Todorica i ostalih "svojih" tajkuna nego mora da uvozi know-how preko Miskovica, mos'mislit

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:05

      Niko od CRO tajkuna se ne bori da kupi Croatiju a Miskovic i njegovi prijatelji Misa Brkic i Predrag Vujovic misle da znaju kako se vodi avio kompanija.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  12. Anonymous08:21

    Korean could be grat partner :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT office in downtown Sydney 
1979

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines outlines A220-100 deployment

Image

Two North African carriers considering scheduled Belgrade flights

Image

Air Serbia gains access to Trans-Siberian air corridor

Image

Ryanair solidifies EX-YU dominance despite Wizz Air’s recovery

Image

Tuzla issues blitz public call for airline subsidies and new base

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025