Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May33
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia registers busiest month on record

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Air Serbia recorded its busiest month this July since its rebranding in October 2013, by handling over 400.000 passengers. The figure represents an increase of 47% on the same month last year, when it welcomed 276.191 travellers on board its aircraft, as well as an improvement of 9% on the pre-pandemic 2019 when it handled 372.839 customers. Its passenger share at Belgrade Airport stood at a high 55% of all travellers. Several destinations saw strong growth compared to the same month last year, while the likes of Madrid, which was restored this summer, immediately reached pre-pandemic traffic levels. However, it should be noted that many destinations were impacted by travel restrictions last year.


Commenting on its performance, Air Serbia’s General Manager for Commercial and Strategy, Boško Rupić, said, “The results we achieved in July are a good indicator that we made correct and timely business decisions when it comes to scheduling for this summer season. Here I primarily refer to the strategic launch of new routes to leisure destinations, including those in Italy and Spain, which were most popular among passengers this summer season. This result is also a consequence of additional growth in charter traffic by approximately 37% this season, compared to 2019”. He added, “We will continue to keep a close eye on market demand and boost our capacities on the most popular routes in our network. We are certain that the stable growth trend will continue in the coming months”.

Air Serbia’s CEO Jiri Marek noted that the airline expects to exceed pre-pandemic figures in all key performance indicators during next year. “We do not want to return to pre-pandemic levels, we want to surpass them in 2023 at the latest. In some segments, we have already achieved this”, Mr Marek said. He added, “In these circumstances, we can no longer adhere to long-term planning. We monitor our network on a daily basis and adjust it for the upcoming few months. As a result of this flexibility, we can react quickly, i.e., increase or decrease capacity. We have enough staff to do so. When it comes to flight cancellations, in July that figure stood below 0.3% of all of our flights, which is significantly less than the majority of other airlines”.



August 09, 2022
Air Serbia Feature Results 2022 serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    Very good result

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    There are some really positive developments coming out of JU lately.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Nemjee09:03

    LCA <3

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:30

      Not surprising. They have 10x weekly to LCA. How many did they have before the pandemic? 3x I believe?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee09:32

      Before covid they used to have daily night flights. Then covid hit and I think last summer they had 5 or 6 with daytime flights for the first time since 2013.
      Let's see what they do this winter and if they managed to position themselves on the island. Hopefully they don't become one of those seasonal carriers down there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:40

      I believe there will be a lot of transfer passengers even during winter, especially from the east.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:03

    Good to see strong demand.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:04

    I wonder how much profit/ loss they have made this quarter?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nemjee09:14

      I am most certain they did not have a loss in this quarter. This is when all carriers make money, problem is the money they lose when winter comes. Seasonality is their biggest problem.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:04

    So we can conclude that BEG also had a very strong month.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      Hoepefully over or close to 700.000 passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:29

      This would mean BEG will surpass 3 million passengers during August.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:48

      You mean July?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:00

      No I mean in August. By the end of June they had 2,142,306 passengers. So it's impossible they reached 3 million in July.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:31

      Damn 2.1 is really not a lot. Hopefully numbers keep on rising

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:34

      Considering Serbian citizens could not travel to EU during first quarter and to Germany until June it's a great result.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous12:08

      It's not a great result but it's an ok one.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:12

      It is a great result as its recovery rate is well above the European average.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous12:15

      Even if they had 700% growth he would say it's not good.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous13:53

      If they had over 400000 passengers and handled 55% of BEG, then BEG had over 730000 passengers in July. That is great result, right?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous13:54

      Yes but keep in mind JU also has flights from Nis and Kraljevo which are included in these 400,000+ passengers

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous15:48

      anon 10.34 Not true Serbian citizens couldn't enter EU during Q1. EU had union-wide regulations for short time in 2020, since then each country has its own set of rules.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:05

    400.000 passengers in just one month. Thats how many passengers LJU had in 6 months.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:06

    It's going to get even busier in August.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:16

      I also think August will surpass July.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:08

    Looking at that list, it's interesting that both ZAG and DBV are there but not SPU. What went wrong there?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      It's growth could be 26%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:09

    Of those 400,000 passengers how many were the charter passengers ? Goodmorning Admin and thanks a lot in advance .

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:22

      Charters were very strong. I believe around 5% of passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:10

    What is the average load factor?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:46

      It probably wasn't great if Air Serbia didn't want to share.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:32

      True

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:48

      It has to be pretty good considering their numbers?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:26

      @anon10:48
      Not necessarily. I flew to FCO 10 days ago, plane was half empty, and on the early morning flight no less. It is only one flight, it could be an anomaly, but i still find it quite strange that in peak season the A319 was half empty

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:34

      Serbian citizens no longer have entry restrictions to Italy?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:42

      Yes it is just one flights @anon 11.26 so you really can't conclude anything.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous11:44

      People here were also saying and seething how their market share must be bad yet it is at 55%. They were also seething at the CEO how he isn't renewing the fleet. Then he started renewing the fleet. Then they were seething how long haul routes aren't being launched. Then they announced new long haul routes etc.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous12:10

      Well let's see how the new wunderkind of CEO performs in terms of financials.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous12:13

      Their financials were rather good last year considering the sitiation. Of course there is no way to please you and you will always have to seek out something to spit on.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous15:52

      What's the capacity compared to 2019, maybe we can conclude something on their LF. Do they have more than 9% capacity increase this summer?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous18:30

      I would not be surprised if FCO on JU becomes a seasonal route

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous18:34

      ^ stop writing nonsense

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous02:37

      I will write nonsense for as long as I please.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous06:55

      Guys, Serbia Italy is an extremely seasonal and difficult market. Did you know that this summer JU quietly reduced BEG-MXP? There is simply no demand for so many flights especially when you look at the number of buses that go from Serbia to Italy every day.

      Problem with JU is that they think that all that is needed is to schedule flights. They don't bother with pushing sales and to boost revenue like that. This year they had those bland ads that lasted for 3-4 days maximum and that was about it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:10

    Keep up the good work

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  13. Anonymous09:16

    Good result. Quite surprised.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:17

      I mean surprised by the amount of passengers they handled, not that they had a good result.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  14. Anonymous09:21

    Congrats. The huge demand for holiday flights and healthy local demand really helps them

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  15. Anonymous09:23

    Super! Now they have over 60 destinations

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous09:23

    How many passengers could handle this year?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      Considering they are planning new routes even for this winter it is difficult to predict. I believe they will come close to 2019 levels.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  17. Anonymous09:26

    Nicely done JU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous09:26

    It would be interesting (and more important) to know what were the financial costs to achieve these operational results.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:48

      We will know their financial results for this year in June 2023.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:26

    Encouraging results ahead of long haul expansion.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:27

    Good job, many airlines are in a worse off position than Air Serbia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  21. Anonymous09:29

    Impressive. This is more passengers than some capital city airports in ex-yu have.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      More than most ex-Yu airports actually.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:37

      More than what LJU had in H1.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:48

      Sad for LJU :(

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:53

      No no no, its bravo LJU! Its growing explosively! Its getting new airline with one weekly flight! LJU keeps on winning!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous15:54

      Who's conparing airlines and airports? I mean what's the point.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:54

      *comparing

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous20:29

      @anon 15:54 Try to understand sarcasm. And it is OK to compare.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous01:44

      I don't get this sarcasm and I think that's good news.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous02:17

      If you don't get this sarcasim I don't think it is good news.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  22. Anonymous09:38

    Both BEG and JU are having a good year. I wonder how cargo did.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. maxi449215:19

      Not sure, but it would help if they could find money, willpower and place to convert those old ATR's into freight. Especially since China and Serbia are gonna be linked by two airlines directly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous21:44

      I like that idea.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous02:51

      Are ATRs commonly used for all cargo?
      They seem kinda small. But perhaps they would be good for regional cargo distribution from. BEG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous06:58

      BEG has 2-3 daily cargo flights on turboprops just not on JU. Others are making the most of this market. Air Serbia should make a deal with UPS to take over the cargo from Solinair. They can fly it on the ATR or they can use this extra revenue to boost the route to an A319. But then again this would require their sales and cargo team to be creative and we all know they don't like doing that. Am I right or am I right?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  23. Anonymous09:39

    Not a single day goes by without some good news about JU. Great job Jiri!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  24. Anonymous09:44

    How many passengers did they have for the whole of 2019?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:46

      2.8 million in 2019.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  25. Anonymous09:46

    55% market share? Wow! That's a lot.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:47

      Yes it's a lot. Even bigger than during Covid.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:40

      Be interesting to compare market share of the national airline in Poland, Romania, & Germany for example. Anyone have any idea what LOTs share at WAW is?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:22

      @anonymous 17:40 what's the point of this ? Some airports in these countries are served by 60 or 70 airlines while BEG is served by 22 ! So it is normal for the national carriers in these airports have lower share.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:29

      Considering that Poland has a population 5 times the time of Serbia, it would be catastrophic it wasn't served by more airlines.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous20:26

      @anon 18:22 Dude, it's OK to compare, it really is, even if the country is big.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous07:00

      Before the plandemic, LH market-share used to be close to 70% at FRA. It should be around the same in MUC. TK in IST is probably closer to 80% since they chased away almost all competition.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  26. Anonymous09:48

    they should think about joining an alliance soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:04

      They should have already joined one. They have a lot to gain from being a part of one.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:08

      Oneworld please

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:17

      SkyTeam is the logical one as more than half of their codeshare partners are a member of ST.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:47

      But TAROM is in SkyTeam. So I doubt they would take in another airline from a market just right next to it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. JATBEGMEL11:29

      @10,47

      Having RO next door isn't really a problem. SkyTeam have airlines in Spain, France, Netherlands, Czechia, Italy, pretty much all next to each other.

      @10,08

      Although JU would make for a great addition to oneworld, JU have the worst connectivity to oneworld hubs, which makes a oneworld membership pointless. British visa restrictions makes transiting via LHR not an option (unless transiting to the US, Canada or Australia with respective visas). MAD as the only other oneworld European hub in the JU network is served twice a week and they already have a partner there - Air Europa, which is in SkyTeam.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous11:32

      They are currently most alligned with Skyteam, but i see them as more likely to be courted by OneWorld which has zero presence in thr region and is actively seeking new airlines. Closest airlines are Finnair and BA/IB i think.

      I wouldnt count out Skyteam as well though.
      ASL has one key asset that everyone could use rn, and those are Russia flights, the lack of which impacted Skyteam a lot due to the loss of Aeroflot. They are very weak in eastern Europe, so ASL could be a good pick, though i think ASL longhaul ambitions could clash a little with ones from other airlines in the alliamce.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  27. Anonymous09:48

    Somebody is doing something right.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  28. Anonymous09:51

    Congratulations

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  29. Anonymous09:52

    This is great but still unfortunate they have not resumed several destinations since Covid.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:53

      Cairo and Tel Aviv will be back next summer season.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:04

      Will Helsinki ever come back?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:05

      No, they said that they are ending that route for good.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:14

      Shame. Interesting how Oslo is working out really well for them but Helsinki didn't.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous10:15

      The Serbian diaspora in Finland is almost nonexistent while there is a sizable diaspora in Norway. Also Norway has much more tourists than Finland. More people want to visit it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:55

      And HEL is ultra expensive airport

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous18:32

      That's why they should consider Turku or Oulu

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  30. Anonymous10:02

    I wonder what the all time July record is. It is obviously from JAT era.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  31. Anonymous10:04

    JFK numbers will grow even more when they finally conclude a codeshare with a US airline.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:06

      They are on it
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2022/08/air-serbia-negotiating-codeshare-with.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:08

      Can't come soon enough

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:03

      Dont expect too much from it ..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous18:33

      JU codeshares are useless. Expect extremely expensive fares.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous18:35

      Well I booked a JU codeshare flight with ITA and price was good. Do you have any evidence to what you are writing?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous23:38

      @anon 18:35
      How???? Please share your wisdom with us. When i booked i couldnt get a transfer flight on certain days (even though i could if i booked separately), and had to pay a very expensive ticket

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous01:38

      I used Air Serbia code share flight with Air Europa via Zurich to MAD and with Aeroflot via Moscow to SPB, everything was great. On several occasions however I didn't opt for JU code share deal, but I guess it's usual to have better deals with some airlines and not through entire network. And yes, they have to widen the pool of partners, there are some not so distant destinations with bad or no connection with JU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous07:03

      Look at the fares they offer with SK, AF and so on. Domestic flights in France are selling for €200 one way on a good day. Code-share with TK on BEG-IST is extremely expensive and not competitive and this is unacceptable since JU has a really bad schedule to Istanbul.

      Generally speaking these code-shares are expensive and are rarely competitive. Just look at the interline they have with B6 and AA and then compare the prices to the same destinations with AF, LH, KL and so on.

      No one pays attention at JU to the results of these sales so the team doesn't care. It's more important to come across as if you are doing something rather than to be actually doing some constructive for the airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
  32. Anonymous10:05

    Charter ruels

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:06

      Best way to make easy money.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:01

      That's why most charter airlines go bust after couple of years :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:03

      It's different of you are a scheduled airline operating charters or purely a charter airline. It's also very important what kind of deals you have with tour operators.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  33. Anonymous11:32

    Moscow did not register growth?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:41

      It just shows select flights. And the number of flights from Russia are generally significantly down.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous01:14

      As far as I understood from my friends living in moscow is that they still travel but they use Istanbul or DXB because much greater selection on transfers short waiting times better planes etc...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  34. Anonymous12:41

    Tamko se to radi. Izađu ljudi sa konkretnim brojkama i zapuše usta svima koji gledaju u kristalnu kuglu ili pasulj. U Avgustu bi mogli i do 450000.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:45

      Tamko tamko.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  35. Anonymous15:15

    Congrats on these results! Keep up with good work throughout the whole year :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  36. Anonymous16:18

    Interestingly Air Baltic carried the same number of passengers as Air Serbia in July.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:34

      Did they really?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:26

      What is the point? Another ex yu market?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous19:47

      It is interesting to compare. Are we not allowed to mention other aviation markets at all?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous01:33

      It is interesting. While comparing JU and ZAG doesn't have any (rational) meaning, comparing two airlines is just fine.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous01:36

      I wrote the original comment @16.18. Simply wrote it because I read about it just before entering this page since they published their July result. Considering they have a more than double the fleet of Air Serbia I did find it kind of interesting.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous02:15

      Agreed.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous07:05

      It's an interesting piece of information so please keep on sharing them in the future. Please ignore these haters who just come here to complain and nag, they are looking for a fight.

      Of course it is interesting to compare JU and BT because airBaltic has three bases in RIX, TLL and VNO. All these markets combined have more passengers than BEG, INI and KVO. So the fact JU carried more passengers than BT which is a good regional carrier only goes to show that they are doing something right.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  37. Anonymous12:21

    Market seems to be recovering quite fast. This winter Wizz is boosting AUH to 4, LCA to 2 and FMM to 5 around Christmas.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  38. Anonymous18:35

    I think that charters are at least 10% and could be more than 20% of 400K in July. Days with more than 10 charters are normal in July and August. One charter has 140 pax in one direction and 140 pax in other. It could be 80K from charters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Air Serbia plans 32-member fleet in 2026, eyes MRO facility

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Middle East Airlines commences Sarajevo operations

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025