Tuzla Airport in crisis mode as second airline shuts base in six months


Greek carrier Lumiwings has confirmed the closure of its base in Tuzla after the airline said it failed to secure financial support from the airport. All of the airline’s flights from the city have been discontinued with immediate effect, wiping out a total of 100 flights in March, which would could have carried a total of 14.900 passengers. The airline also becomes the second in under half a year to close its base in the city following Wizz Air's exit last September. Lumiwings had been granted 1.5 million euros by local authorities from the Tuzla Canton government for the upkeep of six routes from late December until late March. Five of them - Esbjerg, Halmstad, Maastricht, Stockholm Skavsta and Saarbrucken - were launched, with services to Istanbul planned to commence next week.

In a statement, Lumiwings said, “Due to the decision of Tuzla International Airport not to support the routes, we are sorry to announce, that all Lumiwings commercial flights to and from Tuzla have been cancelled, starting from February 27 2024 with immediate effect. Tickets that have been purchased will be reimbursed and compensated, in accordance with the regulations in force. We, as Lumiwings, are truly sorry for the inconvenience”. The airline had a 149-seat Boeing 737-700 aircraft stationed in Tuzla. The management of Tuzla Airport claimed only two days ago that the carrier’s aircraft was undergoing maintenance and that flights would resume within days. It has since said the flights have been discontinued due to poor loads.

Tuzla Airport finds itself in a precarious situation once again and is now left with just nine departing flights per week, all of which are operated by Wizz Air. The budget carrier, which closed its base in Tuzla just last September, discontinuing over a dozen routes in the process, now maintains services to Basel, Dortmund and Memmingen. Tuzla Airport will have 15.730 seats on the Wizz Air flights in March, down from a total of 68.418 in March 2023, when both Wizz Air and Ryanair maintained operations from the airport. The latter also discontinued services from Tuzla following a spat over taxes.

Earlier this month, the Tuzla Canton government held a public call for interested carriers to apply to operate flights out of the city in return for subsidies. Under the terms of the tender, a total of nineteen destinations are subject to funding. They include Hahn, Berlin, Saarbrucken, Hamburg, Baden Baden, Nuremberg, Cologne, and Friedrichshafen in Germany, followed by Gothenburg, Stockholm, Halmstad, and Malmo in Sweden, then Esbjerg and Billund in Denmark, Vienna and Salzburg in Austria, Maastricht and Eindhoven in the Netherlands, as well as Istanbul in Turkey. The results of the tender have still not been made public so far, however, a new public call will be held in March.



Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    For 1.5 million every 2 months Tuzla could've wet leased E145 and operate flights themselves

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:03

      I can only manage the disaster of this airport management operating an airline.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:04

      TuzlAir :D lets give them ideas

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:10

      No they couldn't have. Which airports in the world run their own airline??

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:11

      There is always a chance to be the first one in something

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:15

      Lubeck did, now Sundair took over

      Delete
    6. Anonymous09:16

      Yes if you are Heathrow, Schiphol or CDG starting an airline, or if you're Ryanair Lufthansa British Airways etc. taking over an airport. Not if you're Tuzla!! They can't even run a functional car park

      Delete
    7. Anonymous09:20

      +1 @9.16

      Delete
    8. Anonymous09:42

      There was an idea for Trade Air to provide an aircraft and the Tuzla Airport management to run operations. But in the end Trade Air gave up on the idea.

      Delete
    9. Slav.Man10:47

      why blaming Tuzla for this? They had a deal with Lumiwings, the terms were clear. its the airlines fault. they were surely paid the money that was agreed for the route. its their fault for entering into a contract with aircraft thats too big and would have poor load factor.

      Delete
    10. Anonymous10:55

      From what i hear is that the contract was paying out empty seats, and thus it's actually Tuzlas fault for not anticipating poor load factors

      Delete
    11. Anonymous13:42

      @9:10 Red Way was a public-private partnership last year to bring air service to Lincoln, Nebraska in the US. Granted, they went out of business in about two months as well.

      Delete
    12. Anonymous18:46

      They could pay Air Serbia or Croatia Airlines to fly from Tuzla

      Delete
    13. Anonymous19:28

      BEG-TZL looks ridiculously short

      Delete
    14. Anonymous21:02

      They need to invest in minivans. One to Sarajevo, the other to Belgrade. They can keep the third as a spare.

      Delete
    15. Anonymous06:07

      @Anon 9h10
      Altenrhein Airport has it's own airline. So does Mannheim Airport. Just to name two example.

      Delete
  2. Anonymous09:03

    Disaster

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous07:04

      Why? It's there demand?

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:03

    The joys of having a politically appointed management.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous09:08

    "Tuzla Airport will have 15.730 seats on the Wizz Air flights in March, down from a total of 68.418 in March 2023, when both Wizz Air and Ryanair maintained operations from the airport. "

    Sad. A year ago we had Wizz Air base plus Ryanair flights....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      Realistically, Tuzla got both airlines simply because Sarajevo was expensive. Now that circumstances have changed the all fled to the capital.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:12

      Tuzla was Sarajevo North. It's all over now.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous23:19

      And Sarajevo was expensive because it had a development tax that was used for TZL and OMO plus no incentives from the government.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous09:08

    I knew this would end like this.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anonymous09:08

    I doubt anyone responded to that public call, especially when Sarajevo and Mostar are also giving away money for any new route.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      Lumiwings did, but IG airport didn't accept them

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:10

      And that's why they left. Makes sense.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:14

      Money!! Bosnia is not exactly rich with cash

      Delete
    4. Anonymous09:17

      Wouldn't the airport get more money if it had an airline operating? The money comes from the canton, not the airport.

      Delete
  7. Anonymous09:09

    Is there anyone that could be interested in flying to Tuzla?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:10

      I can only see some Turkish LCC as a possibility of launching flights from IST/SAW. Other than that I highly doubt it.

      Delete
    2. Slav.Man10:51

      Tuzla could have been a great opportunity for OU. great for their Dash 8's. As an EU airline they could have set themselves up really well to serve 3 countries.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous22:36

      OU is really missing out by returning all of their Dashes. They could've simply upgraded their Zagreb and Split operations from Dashes to A220s, added a few destinations like Prague and Berlin while using Dashes on lower yield routes like Mostar and Skopje or perhaps even adding a few new destinations that previously couldn't be served due to low demand, with potential transfer pax

      Delete
  8. Anonymous09:13

    I don't get it...Tuzla announces that they made a deal with Lumiwings and few weeks later Tuzla does not pay them agreed amount of money?

    Does it mean Tuzla never intended to pay them to fly there or they simply signed the contract without securing the money for this airline?

    Anyhow, very strange.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:14

      And the airport director made lots of false statements to media. Very bad

      Delete
  9. Anonymous09:13

    What a sad ending. There was so much press coverage of diaspora protesting and begging for something to be done to replace Wizz. I remember even a YouTube tutorial on how to use the Lumiwings website

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:58

      Hope some sort of a replacement can be found.

      Delete
  10. Anonymous09:19

    Sad indeed

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous09:20

    I think they should have thought through the destinations they chose to operate from TZL. But I guess they were selected based on fees.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:23

      I think the destinations were selected to best serve the diaspora.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:56

      Destinations are not the issue but the too high frequency and flights during the lowest months. Even Wizz Air was struggling to keep flying during Jan and Feb despite a very agressive yield management. The diaspora is mostly made of former refugees, not temporary workers like the Polish diaspora for instance. It means, that the demand concentrates on vacation periods only over one week or more stays.

      Operating 2 weekly outside vacation periods was just pure suicide.

      Delete
  12. Anonymous09:24

    I wouldn't be surprised if eventually Wizz discontinues its flights completely too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      Why?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:29

      I don't think they will. They had the perfect opportunity to do so with the neo engine issues but they didn't cut any flights from Tuzla.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous09:41

      Wizz is unpredictable, they could disappear at any time. The airport is in danger of being left with no flights. If the engine situation does not improve, Wizz could be forced to cancel additional flights and Tuzla may be affected in some way.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous00:57

      I think they eventually will leave TZL completely unfortunately.

      Delete
  13. Anonymous09:30

    TZL has continually had one of the worst airport management in the region.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous22:38

      Meanwhile Mostar exists

      Delete
    2. Anonymous00:56

      Mostar had a run of disastrous management teams. But I think the one in place now is trying to turn things around.

      Delete
  14. Anonymous09:32

    They are going to have another tender in first half of March and, wait for it, expect that they will have flights from 1 April if someone applies. They just announced that.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:34

      Not gonna happen.

      Delete
  15. Anonymous09:35

    Management couldn't care less from what I can see

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:40

      I notice that too

      Delete
  16. Anonymous09:39

    Hope that people who purchased tickets will be able to get compensation.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous09:40

    I guess Sarajevo will benefit from this. I assume most Tuzla passengers will now fly via SJJ?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:03

      What is the road infrastructure like between Tuzla and Sarajevo?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:25

      By car

      TZL-SJJ 2h15 min
      TZL-BEG 3h

      And Belgrade's offer is incomparable with Sarajevo.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:31

      Thanks, wasn't aware of the distances.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous10:45

      No one is going to drive to BEG from Tuzla.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous10:57

      It's more 2:50 for SJJ

      Delete
    6. Anonymous11:51

      I am not sure people would not drive from Tuzla to Belgrade.

      Delete
    7. How are things progressing with the construction of the Vc corridor on the Bosnian side? I'm talking about the highway connecting Budapest with the port of Ploce, Croatia via Osijek, Ðakovo, Modriča, Doboj, Zenica, Sarajevo, Mostar.
      Croatia needs to build the final 3km to the Hungarian border, and I know Croatia and Bosnia have already been connected across the border, both in the north towards Odžak and in the south up to Međugorje, with the Zenica - Sarajevo section having been finished within Bosnia.
      Anyhow, once that project is finished, there will be a Tuzla connection to the highway so I imagine the drive time to Sarajevo will be cut by an hour at least. From 2h15min to just over an hour.

      Delete
    8. Anonymous23:21

      It's reasonable to expect you'll be able to drive from Konjic to Sarajevo and from Mostar to the Croatian Border in 5 years but the Prenj Tunnel will take ages, the estimate is ten but it could be 15 with Balkan pace.

      Delete
    9. Anonymous23:21

      Pardon, from Konjic to Svilaj/Croatian border

      Delete
  18. Anonymous09:43

    I think Wizz Air will return with a base once the problems with the neo planes end.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous10:02

    Will they reduce workforce now? I doubt they need many people for 9 flights per week.

    ReplyDelete
  20. Anonymous10:05

    You didn't need to be a genius to know this would happen from the start.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous10:08

    What aircraft type is Wizz operating the Tuzla flights? A320 or A321?

    ReplyDelete
  22. Anonymous10:17

    Sadly it will come to..........Cela Tuzla jednu kravu muzla.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:39

      Well it was like that for the past 10 years.

      Delete
  23. Anonymous10:40

    At least in March we will know Wizz Air's exact loads when the passenger numbers are published :D

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:13

      Ues, this will actually be interesting to see Wizz Akr's LF in Tuzla

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:25

      Oh my, typing on my mobile phone. I will try that again
      Yes, this will actually be interesting to see Wizz Air's LF in Tuzla

      Delete
    3. Anonymous00:56

      We will find out soon

      Delete
  24. Anonymous13:06

    Sad

    ReplyDelete
  25. Anonymous13:07

    It didn't last even two months

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous00:52

      Surprised it lasted that long

      Delete
  26. Anonymous13:09

    I don't understand why they didn't use their E195 instead of the B737-700. It would be much better suited for these flights

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:12

      Becausr it is being used for Italian PSO flights.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:18

      *because

      Delete
    3. Anonymous13:29

      Yes

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:49

      They have the one E195 and one B737-700.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous00:52

      Thank you

      Delete
  27. Anonymous13:12

    Loads would have been better if ticket sales didn't start 2 weeks before flights were launched and in the dead of winter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:15

      Agree. They should have put tickets on sale when they did but for summer 2024 and launched flights on 31 March.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:29

      +1

      Delete
    3. Anonymous00:52

      They wanted the money as soon as possible :)

      Delete
    4. Anonymous11:03

      @00.52 or maybe the airport wanted the flights

      Delete
  28. Anonymous14:53

    "In a statement, Lumiwings said, “Due to the decision of Tuzla International Airport not to support the routes, we are sorry to announce, that all Lumiwings commercial flights to and from Tuzla have been cancelled, starting from February 27 2024 with immediate effect"
    Honestly, this oddly reminds me of Marathon and Air Serbia for some strange reason. Both Greek airlines, both at the same time. Did they even evaluate those airports correctly because they are not really popular? Is it the airport management that went wrong or the money not enough?
    Tuzla and those villages cannot afford to have a full 737. It was again done so quickly.
    BiH also has many airports compared to its population similar to Hrvatska, which is tricky. Yes, okay most if not all of the Balkans are full of mountains and less roads and need airports.
    It will be very interesting to see how the SKP-SJJ route performs also operated by a Greek airline. Just saying. Turkish and Pegasus are performing in a much more profressional way.
    Also, if you chose a small Greek airline why not SkyExpress? They have ATRs and also Airbuses.
    For example, they have almost daily flights in SOF even if FB and A3 fly the route and SKG being a big airport only 4 hours away from SOF.
    Perhaps Tuzla can opt for Middle Eastern destinations. Arabs love BiH. It can also try destinations which aleady work well in other Bosnian airports.
    Sorry, but the chosen destinations were quite weird and so random. Okay, even if they are considered gasto.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:28

      you are comparing A3 with these two airlines we had never heard before???

      Delete
    2. Anonymous00:55

      Tuzla's last Middle East destination was in operation for a grand total of one month and cancelled because of terrible loads.
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2011/08/dubai-tuzla-flights-cancelled.html

      Delete
  29. Anonymous16:27

    If there lucky Wizz adds another city or 2 and thats that. There better off negotiating something like that than looking for another airline.

    ReplyDelete
  30. Anonymous16:31

    This is where a flag carrier would be good but maybe one day lol. Did B&H airlines ever fly out of Tuzla or was it just Sarajevo, Banja Luka and Mostar? A national airline with 2/3 E195s would do the job for BiH. Montenegro has a much smaller population but has a national airline. If the right people were there, it would work in BiH also

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous18:08

    Where will all the passengers that used to fly Wizz just last year to Tuzla go now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:27

      To Sarajevo

      Delete
    2. Anonymous07:06

      Part of them to Belgrade.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous11:02

      neither, you cant move paxes like that. the flights created a market which doesnt exist now

      Delete
  32. Anonymous00:50

    Good thing at least Wizz kept a few routes.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Anonymous00:54

    These lasted shorter than Air Arabia's disastrous Tuzla flights years ago.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.