Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Onboard Aviogenex, 1986

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June41
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia considering Beijing service as Tianjin replacement

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Air Serbia is considering launching flights between Belgrade and Beijing next summer to replace its recently discontinued service to Tianjin. Boško Rupić, the carrier’s General Manager for Commercial and Strategy, said, “Next summer, we anticipate operating fifteen weekly long-haul flights. This includes a daily service to New York, three weekly flights to Chicago, two weekly flights each to Guangzhou and Shanghai, and an additional destination we’re evaluating. This could be an expansion into Beijing or an increase in frequencies on our current China routes”. He added, “We launched Tianjin during the Covid period, which made sense then. This winter, there are already eight weekly flights between Serbia and China, and from January 11, we’ll begin two weekly services between Belgrade and Shanghai”.

Hainan Airlines currently operates two weekly rotations between Beijing Capital Airport and Belgrade with its Airbus A330-300 aircraft. Beijing is also home to Daxing Airport, which was opened in late 2019. Air Serbia will operate its final service to Tianjin today after just under two years of operations. Ticket sales for the route were suspended just over a week ago with little prior warning. Beijing is located just over 100 kilometres from Tianjin with the two cities connect via high-speed rail.

Commenting on the carrier’s new service to Guangzhou, launched on September 30, Mr Rupić said, “Guangzhou has proven as a good performer. Our average cabin load factor on this route through the end of the year now exceeds 75%, which is a solid outcome for a long-haul service, especially considering the typically softer demand during this part of the season. China is a key market for us, and we’re particularly encouraged by the significant number of transfer passengers on this route, with customers traveling from Western Europe to China via Belgrade”.

Air Serbia’s CEO, Jiri Marek, recently emphasized the strong performance of the Guangzhou service. Mr. Marek noted, “The Guangzhou route has delivered exceptional results since its launch, with high load factors and a diverse mix of business and leisure travellers. Serbia has emerged as a popular destination for Chinese tourists, and we look forward to our continued cooperation with the Civil Aviation Administration of China and relevant departments such as the China Tourism and Culture Bureau. Together, we aim to advance the connectivity agreement signed by our two governments in May, strengthening ties between China and Belt and Road countries. Air Serbia has confidence in the resilience of the Chinese economy and the government’s ongoing efforts to promote economic recovery. With China’s economic rebound, we anticipate a thriving future for its civil aviation sector, and through our joint efforts, Air Serbia expects to achieve even greater success in the Chinese market”.



November 04, 2024
Air Serbia Belgrade Feature Results 2024 serbia Summer 2025
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:05

    Can they compete against Hainan?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      They could fly to Daxing

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:14

      ARD and ARE have a much more competitive product.. In fact, they have the same seats as on Hainan's A330s

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:24

      ^ Soon YU-ARC too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:25

      Is YU-ARD now in regular service?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:27

      @09:24
      How soon will that be? Have they talked about their fleet refurbishment schedule?
      Many thanks for any info.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:28

      @9.25
      Yes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:29

      @9.27
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2024/08/air-serbia-eyes-fleet-wide-cabin.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous09:36

      @9.27
      Thanks for the reply. Unfortunately Marek's statement is very vague on the timeframe.
      Also why exactly it will take that long for Pupin to be upgraded?
      "As soon as we have the engineering and design done, which takes six to seven months, YU-ARC [Mihajlo Pupin] will go for a full cabin retrofit and feature the same new cabins."

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous10:30

      Hainan already flies the route, and two weekly flights aren’t going to compete against major carriers with better fleets and reputations.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous10:31

      Honestly, Tianjin made more sense because it's less crowded than Beijing, and we didn’t have to compete with major carriers. Now they’re jumping into a competitive market without a clear plan for how they’ll succeed

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous12:37

      Well LGW is less crowded than LHR but JU flies to LHR. You don't fly to airports that are less crowded cause usually they're less crowded for a reason. The very same reason that now made JU to cancel the route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous16:46

      Bravo Air Serbia, none of European or Chinese carriers are flying to Europe from TSN. Air Serbia from PKX has a possibility of code share with any of three major Chinese carriers. TSN made sense in the past, not anymore!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous16:59

      Reality check: Air Serbia didn't announce launch of Daxing service.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:06

    The route needs to be at least 2 weekly to have any chance. These one weekly flights don't make sense.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      2 or 3 weekly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:15

      Would it not be better to increase CAN and PVG?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:24

      And fly empty? 75% load factor with 2pw

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:26

      ^ a month into a new long haul route in the slowest month of the year is actually quite good.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:27

      75% load factor = empty. Graduate of Vrapce university.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous09:30

      No, but with 3 pw LF would be 50%. Simple mathematics. It takes some time route to mature. What is Vrapce university?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous09:32

      Aha so load factor will never ever increase. It will stay exactly the same as it is in the month of November a month into their new route. Got it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous09:33

      Higher frequencies also means that more passengers will choose to fly with JU instead of opting for flying Hainan or connecting in IST, DXB, DOH etc.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous09:33

      Lol cause the additional flight wouldn't mean additional sales. How stupid is that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous09:37

      @09:33 He is just grasping at straws to justify any decision taken by the airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous10:32

      Well, very small percentage, because you are forgetting two more flights by China Southern. So few percent maximum. Passengers are already well covered on daily basis

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous10:42

      If there is extra demand, CS would already add more flights

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous10:43

      They just started last month. Some of you people..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous10:45

      No no let them be. Tell them they are right and that there is NO demand, planes are EMPTY, the few passengers that fly these routes are paid actors, it's all political, the statistics of Chinese tourists visiting Serbia are made up and like with most flights to Belgrade there is absolutely no interest. Now, they should be ok

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Anonymous12:18

      You forgot that these routs are for Chinese workers only.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Anonymous12:23

      Yes, if all of you weren't blind, you would see that I wrote that new route needs time to mature.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    17. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:07

    Good to see Guangzhou working out.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      And they have to compete against China Southern.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:11

      Maybe there will be CS.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:11

      That's the plan

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:42

      You can t know if CAN is working or not in short operating time.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:14

    Only 15 weekly flights with 4 aircraft? Why so few?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:16

      It will be 15 weekly with 3. It was written months ago that one that is on a power by the hour agreement will mostly be used as a reserve aircraft

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:16

      Lack of crew = long turnover times = fewer flights

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:17

      "Despite recent media reports suggesting an increase in long-haul flight frequencies next summer, EX-YU Aviation News learns the airline plans to maintain its existing schedule as it will to optimise the usage of its A330 fleet,"
      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2024/09/air-serbia-to-optimise-wide-body-fleet.html

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:26

      Having 15 flights with 4 planes is everything but optimization. They could have increased PVG to 3 weekly and still launch another destination with at least 3 weekly flights, and stil have a lot of slack in the schedule. They would need more pilots for that, so that's the problem.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:30

      @Anon 09:17 I think the company PR department needs to look up the meaning of the word optimization.
      They are using it completely wrong. In fact 15 weekly flights from 4 widebody aircraft is the exact opposite of optimization.

      Just my2cents

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:13

      They could have used it to Havana LOL

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Treshnja12:46

      I really cannot believe that someone would keep 8 flights during winter, and 14-15 flights during summer on 3 or 4 planes..It does sound completely incopentent in my opinion..Why did they rent all those planes at first? What would be the utilization % of those planes? They either have to open new route during winter already..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous14:01

      Next winter it seems they could operate 2x CAN, 2x PVG, 2x ORD, 3x JFK. That's only 9 flights a week with a fleet of 4 A330s. Even if they launch Miami 2-3pw that's still extremely low fleet utilization.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Бежи бре!15:33

      Planning for half of widebody fleet sitting idle during winter makes Marek's excuses for not launching Toronto due to seasonality even more laughable. Seasonality is obviously not a concern for other Air Serbia destinations _except_ for Toronto, that one is the only straw that will break the camel's back :)))))

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous16:22

      They said 15 long haul flights, not that those 4 place will fly 15 flights. The difference is huge, as they may be using those plane for chargers or other busy destinations during the summer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous16:55

      Nonsense.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:23

    Not buying that the reason for them stopping Tianjin was related to them starting Guangzhou. Nor am I buying that they discontinued it because of poor sales. If the sales were poor they would not have kept it on sale until just 10 days ago nor would they have scheduled an increase from next summer just a month ago. It implies to me that they indeed have a issue with crew. That's why the suspension was so sudden and immediate.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:26

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:31

      +100
      Both the pilot and cabin crew situation is far, far from ideal at JU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:45

      +101

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Eight20:25

      I've noticed that service is being hit and miss lately. It seems to be because of the cabin crew. Something has profoundly changed in later years. I can't put my finger on what... but it has, slightly and overwhelmingly for the worse. However, I have to admit I have had some pretty awesome flights recently. Hence the high visibility of some of the bad ones.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:31

    Considering the number of European airlines that have suspended Beijing, they could have a look into it. Might get quite a few transfers.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:39

      Exactly! But with a maximum of 2 weekly frequencies these passengers will choose to fly TK or one of the ME3 instead of JU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:40

    “Next summer, we anticipate operating fifteen weekly long-haul flights. This includes a daily service to New York, three weekly flights to Chicago, two weekly flights each to Guangzhou and Shanghai, and an additional destination we’re evaluating."

    That's 14/15. So no MIA on the radar.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:46

      It's 14 but they say they will either increase CAN or PVG or add PEK. So it will be 15

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  8. Anonymous10:01

    What do you guys think? Would they serve Capital or Daxing Airport if they start Beijing?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous10:11

    Nice

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous10:28

    I always thought Tianjin was an interesting choice, but Beijing makes a lot more sense strategically.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous10:29

    This feels like overreach. Air Serbia barely established itself with Tianjin, and now they’re planning for Beijing? The market is saturated with existing carriers like Hainan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:38

      I think it’s a smart shift. Tianjin was a good start, but Beijing has way more potential in the long term. Plus, don't forget that the number of Chinese tourists visiting Serbia keeps growing and growing so demand is there.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:16

      Saturated?

      You call twice per week saturated?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:38

      There are 8 weekly to China from January, not 2 weekly

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:07

      We're talking about Beining.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:56

      * Beijing

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:36

      Sta ste navalili sa Tjansin ili Pekingom kad se, spremaju ljudi za Tokyo.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  12. Anonymous10:39

    Beijing would only strengthen their position in Asia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:37

      Seoul and Singapore even more!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous10:39

    With the strong performance they’re seeing in other China routes, I’m optimistic about Beijing. They’re clearly doing something right if load factors are good.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:31

      They have just cancelled one route, so there are no "other China routes", there's only one operated by JU at the moment.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:33

      And there is another starting 11 January.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:42

      True but the topic was "strong performance of other routes". That one is still not performing so there's only one: Guangzhou, which lasts extremely short to call it strong performance. Even Tianjin was called a strong performing route till recently and look at it now.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  14. Anonymous10:42

    I appreciate Air Serbia's efforts to expand in Asia, but I really think they should be focusing more on North America. There’s a big Serbian diaspora in Canada, and more demand for direct flights to places like Toronto and other US cities. New York and Chicago are a great start, but North America has so much untapped potential. Expanding here could serve the diaspora but also attract some North American tourists to Serbia and handle transfer traffic to more established tourist markets like Greece and Croatia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:40

      Canada is death trap.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:54

      Anon 10:42 They should. As for transfers, Croatia objected to Air Serbia transferring US codeshare passengers. Anon 11:40 what stops you from moving out?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:55

      They can object to whatever they want, the airline carries many transfers to/ from Croatia on their own flights

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Eight20:30

      I believe it was stated why Toronto is not the frontrunner at all cost when it comes to North American expansion. They need more bidirectional transfers. Toronto is "all aboard to Europe" in July and "all aboad back to Canada" in August. Unless they ofset some of the seasonality with additional destinations in the Middle East, it is tricky to imagine them being successful on the route.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous23:58

      How is the US any different. Serbian citizens still need visas for the US too and the two diaspora communities in Ontario and in mid-west US are very culturally connected. You are not thinking about the non-Serbian citizens who perhaps don’t need a visa?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  15. Anonymous11:44

    Nekima izgleda treba nacrtati da je 75% LF minimum, jer sa svakom prodatim kartom u naredna 2 meseca taj procenat raste. Ovo je i više nego dobro.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:29

      Bolje nego dobro, bolje nego dobro...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  16. Anonymous11:59

    One would think something like Chengdu/Urumqi would make more sense than competing with a domestic flagship carrier

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous12:27

    It's easier to do business with West so that's where (Air) Serbia should be looking. Furthermore that's where diaspora&private business streams flow and that's where competition (still) doesn't consider Belgrade. Total China operations will not exceed single JFK route in the near future. It's OK to have them for Chinese diaspora but that's not a priority. Please remember JU still doesn't fly Munich and we are talking about Tianjin. That's not serious.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:35

      The number of visitors from China actually exceeds number of visitors from US

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:23

      Don't know about tourism: Broj dolazaka turista u Srbiji u septembru je u odnosu na septembar prošle godine bio manji za 5,1 odsto, a broj noćenja bio je manji za 12,2 odsto, objavio je danas Republički zavod za statistiku (RZS).
      However, I'm sure the Chinese are coming with organized tours, through their operators and carriers...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:36

      So you picked out one month? Have you actually looked at the number of tourists by country? No

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:49

      In September, number of Chinese tourists grew 77% y-o-y. January-September 71%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Treshnja14:30

      You forgot about Serbian tourists in Asia during winter months...The cheapest and fastest route now for entire Asia is via CAN with China Southern, tickets from Beg around 530 euros round trip to any place in Asia, Jakarta, Bangkok, Manila, Bali, SGN, you name it..800 for SYD, 450 for Tokyo...There are many Serbian tourists in Asia during winter, 10 thousand visit only Thailand during 4 winter months, and where are the rest of destinations..

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  18. Anonymous13:36

    How long does it take to educate A320 pilots for A330?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:37

      A330 pilots are not an issue. There was news just 2 months ago how many have been promoted to A330. The issue is that they don't have A320 pilots now. So the A330 pilots which can all also fly A320s are needed on A320s so they can sustain their core operations.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:47

      Why don't they have A320 pilots now? It's not like they suddenly doubled A319/320 fleet, in fact narrowbody Airbus fleet was constant for a long time. Obviously some Airbus pilots retired or left the company, so it boils down to Air Serbia not having enough Airbus pilots.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:50

      Well yes that is the issue. A320-family pilots left the company. And that's why they have a shortage. Starting from the fact that Wizz pilots in Belgrade are paid more.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous14:06

      Really?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:08

      yes, and it is actually notably more

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous14:27

      It's easy to track where pilots moved and if it was to a number of different airlines or simply being poached by one airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous18:06

      Also they keep choosing cadets as they don’t cost as much as experienced pilots. Plus they can keep them in line indoc for eternity since pilots are not payed until they pass a line check which can be up to a year. Told that to a friend of mine and he was 100% sure that I am screwing with him. Show me an experienced pilot who will work for free several months? Outrageous!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  19. Anonymous13:39

    Marek talked about evaluating Beijing for a long time. They had more than enough time to evaluate it. If they wanted to switch from Tianjin to Beijing, Air Serbia would have announced close of one at the same time as opening of another, with passengers with Tianjin tickets being able to rebook on Beijing flights at no charge.

    Air Serbia didn't do this, so it's either another Air Serbia PR failure, or not wanting to launch Beijing at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:17

      Decent point.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous00:00

      100% agree and not left passengers stranded in Tianjin because they could have offered them a return via PKX or PEK.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  20. Miroslav NY14:50

    I think people are missing the point. Tianjin was always a temporary destination. Air Serbia always wanted Beijing but it was not possible earlier.
    There is no need for Air Serbia to provide a reason for cancelling Tianjin. Other airlines certainly don't provide explanations. It was just a business decision.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:20

      Yeah, and who cares about the people who booked Tianjin and now they have to make other arrangements. Often much more expensive,
      and with only two weeks notice.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous20:13

      Do you really think that all those people are going to Tianjin??

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous00:02

      That’s not what the experts here were saying here consistently when I raised the performance of Tianjin. Everyone kept saying how well the route was performing and they found their niche that no other European carrier managed to think of!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous00:03

      And no, no other carrier strands their passengers permanently with 2 weeks notice. One-off perhaps. Look at how much time BA gave when it terminated BEG

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous00:57

      Route being discontinued in this case has nothing to do with perfornance but serious staffing issues, for which management should be held accountable.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  21. Anonymous15:27

    Ju should buy Chinese airplanes for this route. That way it can fly over Russia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:55

      По могућности Ј20 једно 2 ескадриле.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:01

      What planes? Comac?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  22. Anonymous18:44

    It seems that Beijing was just mentioned. I am afraid that Tijanin situation could happen to Guangzhou in two year time. I know that there is competition, however Hong Kong would might work. If that route is politically possible at all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  23. Anonymous01:00

    Opening direct flights to Toronto and Vancouver would be huge for the BEG Nikola Tesla airport. So many Balkan countries citizens live there. BEG airport could be a hub for passengers of entire Balkan (connected flights to Bosnia, Croatia, Greece, Romania, Bulgaria, even Hungary.). For that, AirSerbia needs a bigger airport. And that cost.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  24. Anonymous08:40

    Piloti na A320 imaju preko 400.000 mesečno, kapetani nekih 50% više.
    Wizz plaća oko 2500€, tako da ne- nisu bolje plate u Wizzu

    Ako je neko dobro plaćen u AirSerbiji to su piloti.
    Čak i type rating školovanje ne moraju da plate ako ostanu u kompaniji određeno vreme.
    Wizz oduzima to od plate

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous10:39

    Daxing is a Star Alliance hub. Moreover, it is almost as far from downtown Beijing as is TSN.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Onboard Aviogenex, 1986

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Wizz Air to reopen Tuzla base, launch nine new routes

Image

Zagreb Airport reopens after hours-long closure due to runway incident

Image

Air Albania to launch Ljubljana service

Image

Air Serbia to add more aircraft, looks to 2027 for new orders

Image

Air Serbia readies for loyalty overhaul and lounge launch amid cabin review

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025