Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria crew on 
DC-9 (YU-AJT), 1980

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May78
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia gains access to Trans-Siberian air corridor

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Russia’s Federal Air Transport Agency, Rosaviatsiya, has granted Air Serbia approval to operate flights between Belgrade and Shanghai via the Trans-Siberian air corridor upon the request of the Serbian Civil Aviation Directorate. In a filing, the Russian regulator confirmed that the airspace has now been included as an intermediate point between Belgrade and Shnaghai in the bilateral air service agreement between the two countries.

Although the approval was secured in late April, Air Serbia continues to use a southern flight path through Central Asia for its services to Shanghai. The airline previously stated that, due to Belgrade’s geographical location, the southern routing does not significantly increase flight time. Chinese carrier operating from both Beijing and Guangzhou use the Trans-Siberian air corridor on their respective flights to Belgrade.

May 28, 2025
Air Serbia Newsflash serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous15:01

    Bravo JU

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous15:14

    There is no way the southern route is more economical than the northern route. JU probably has no valid permits from the lessor, or just simply does not want to risk it by flying over Russia (if not absolutely necessary, which is the case with Russia bound flights).

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:16

      I doubt he Serbian directorate asked the Russians out of fun and they obviously asked for the permit because Air Serbia asked them to do it. There is probably a plan to start using it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:11

      Did someone said it was? They said it wasn’t such a big difference, due to Belgrade’s geographic location. At no point did they claim it was, in fact, more profitable. It probably just isn’t less profitable by a significant margin.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  3. Anonymous15:31

    Sounds dangerous

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:48

      It does? All Chinese carriers, Emirates, Qatar, Etihad and others use it without issue.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  4. Anonymous15:36

    Shanghai is nowhere near Siberian air space. Maybe this allowance refers to Tokyo or Seoul route

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:47

      Oh my goodness. You do realise the earth is round. The quickest way to Shanghai is to use the Siberian airspace. And if you bothered to read the article, it is exactly for Shanghai, not non existant Tokyo or Seoul which the airline has said will be launched in several years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:08

      @Anon 15:47
      The great-circle route to PVG would also go through Ukraine or Belarus (excluding a small portion of north Belarus), both of which are closed to European aircraft. There is a big detour to route the PVG flights through Russia as they need to go through Poland, Lithuania and Latvia. However, if they take the southern route initially, through Turkey and Kazakhstan, they could rejoin the Siberian corridor there to avoid the northwest China.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous19:05

      Can't fly from Estonia or Latvia to Russia afaik

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous19:11

      ^ absolutely not true. Air Serbia does it daily on flights to Russia, as do Chinese carriers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  5. Anonymous16:47

    If insurance is a problem then use Serbian insurance companies - if they don't want to provide coverage then the government steps in and provides the insurance. If it is a lease issue then either find a lessor willing to fly - it looks like thousands of Flights used by Asia and Middle East companies proves there are those willing to give permission.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:05

      And why would a Serbian insurance company magically charge lower rates for flying over dangerous airspace?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:11

      Since when is the airspace above Siberia dangerous?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous19:18

      1) Azerbaijan plane was shot by trigger happy Russian air defense crew.
      2) Gulf airlines aircraft are regularly stuck in Russia, because if you have some malfunction, it’s hard to get spare parts into Russia because of sanctions.
      These are two major reasons why lessors and insurers don’t like Russia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous21:12

      Зашто не кажете ко је користио радарски одраз азербеџајнског авиона да провуче дрон на територију Русије?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  6. Anonymous17:16

    Why is Air Serbia now flying north of Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan on a route to Shanghai?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:19

      Cause it's shorter

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:58

      Interesting. Why are LH and other airlines using that route and not the one JU is using over Kazakhstan?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous17:18

    What is cost saving in percents north vs south route?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous17:35

    Probably wiser to fly with SCUT

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  9. Anonymous18:48

    Great circle distance, that gives optimal route for flying between two points, actually does not touch Siberian airspace between Belgrade and Shanghai. It just aproaches (from the south) the Mongolia/Russia border, and goes south of Russia/Kazakhstan border. After Kazakhstan ideal path goes through Russia north of Kaspian sea, and then straight to Ukraine and then Romania. Since flying over parts of southern Russia regions and Ukraine is restricted, the real flight path anyway needs to go south over Kaspian sea and then over Azerbaijan and Georgia.

    So this Siberian overfly permit is not for routes between Belgrade and south of China, but would be very useful for Tokyo and Seoul routes, as great circle distance between Belgrade and both of these cities goes well over Siberia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:55

      So the Directorate does not know what it is doing? It applied on behalf of Air Serbia for Shanghai flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:22

      China has Tibet, which is not safe for planes because of lack of emergency airfields, and it has a lot of military restricted areas. These might be reasons why shortest path involve more Siberian airspace than expected.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous08:32

      Great circle distance between Belgrade/Shanghai does not go over Tibet.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous08:45

      Current flightpath, with exception to not flying over Russian Volga-Don region and Ukraine is not to far from ideal path, although it also avoids Mongolian airspace. Maybe to avoid paying one more country overfly. Maybe Siberian permit is also required to gain access to Mongolia flightpaths. The great circle distance is ideal, but flight corridors can not follow every such path perfectly, so it may be the case that if you fly over Mongolia, you also have to take flight corridor that goes slightly over the Siberia. Anyway southern flight corridors are now probably quite congested, so gaining access to northern path, even if slightly off, may be very positive development.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  10. Anonymous19:12

    So many experts in the comments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria crew on 
DC-9 (YU-AJT), 1980

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Air Serbia considering new mid-haul markets

Image

Lufthansa to suspend Skopje service for part of winter

Image

Ryanair solidifies EX-YU dominance despite Wizz Air’s recovery

Image

Belgrade – Germany flights register over 1.1 million passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025