Nonstop connectivity from the former Yugoslavia to long-haul markets remains limited; however, the United States stands out as the largest unserved destination from several countries in the region, according to the latest data.
The United States is the largest long-haul market from Bosnia and Herzegovina, with more than 100.000 passengers travelling indirectly between the two countries. New York is the busiest unserved city in the US, followed by Chicago. In 2021, US carrier Eastern Airlines planned to introduce a weekly seasonal summer service between Chicago O’Hare and Sarajevo, scheduled to operate from May 28 to September 3 using a Boeing 767-200. Although tickets were placed on sale, they were withdrawn shortly afterwards, and the route never materialised.
The United States is also Macedonia’s busiest unserved long-haul market, with New York ranking first, followed by Chicago, Miami and Detroit. The busiest routes largely reflect cities and regions in the US with a sizeable Macedonian diaspora. Skopje Airport has previously sought to secure nonstop services to New York. In 2017, it submitted a joint proposal with the Macedonian government for Turkish Airlines to introduce flights to the US via Skopje. At the time, the carrier said it would review the proposal and expressed interest in the potential service.
New York is also Pristina’s busiest unserved long-haul destination, followed by Chicago and Washington. Last year, the American Chamber of Commerce in Kosovo held discussions with representatives from Delta and American Airlines regarding the potential launch of nonstop flights between Pristina and New York. “We are optimistic that, through continued efforts, this important connection, alongside several other strategic routes, will be launched soon”, Pristina Airport’s CEO, Gokhan Ackgoz, told EX-YU Aviation News last year. Pristina was last linked to New York with a scheduled air service in 2009. That year, Scanderbeg Air, a short-lived tour operator contracting Sky King Airlines, operated two weekly flights between the two cities using a Boeing 767-200ER from June to September.
Similarly, the United States is Montenegro’s largest unserved long-haul market, with New York ranking as the busiest destination, followed by Chicago and Detroit. From Slovenia, the US also ranks first, with New York, San Francisco, Chicago and Miami the busiest unserved destinations in the States.
Croatia is already linked to the United States, its largest long-haul market, and also maintains connectivity with Canada and South Korea. China has since emerged as Croatia’s busiest unserved long-haul market, with notable demand also recorded for Japan and Australia. Shanghai and Beijing rank as the busiest unserved city pairs between Croatia and China. In 2017, Beijing Capital Airlines, a subsidiary of Hainan Airlines, planned to launch services between the Chinese and Croatian capitals, however, the proposed operations were later shelved. Last year, the Head of the Croatian National Tourist Board held talks in Beijing with representatives of both Air China and Hainan Airlines over potential flights.
Serbia has in recent years established nonstop links with its busiest long-haul markets, including the United States and China. This will be followed in May by the introduction of flights to its currently largest unserved market, Canada. As a result, Australia emerges as Serbia’s biggest remaining unserved long-haul market, with Sydney ranking as the busiest destination. However, Australia has consistently proven difficult for most European airlines to serve profitably due to a combination of extreme distance, high operating costs and structurally limited yields. Demand between Europe and Australia is heavily leisure-driven and price-sensitive, constraining airlines’ ability to command the high fares required to offset costs. At the same time, intense competition from well-established Middle Eastern and Asian hubs further depresses yields by offering one-stop alternatives with higher frequencies, lower fares and extensive onward connectivity. Other sizeable long-haul markets from Serbia include Thailand, India and Japan.

Not surprising at all. The US diaspora numbers across the region are huge.
ReplyDeleteSarajevo-Chicago would have worked at least seasonally. Eastern Airlines just wasn’t the right operator and the timing was terrible.
ReplyDeleteSkopje trying to get Turkish Airlines to route US flights via Macedonia was always unrealistic. TK has no incentive to complicate its network.
ReplyDeleteHow about money, is that incentive?
DeleteWhat you mean?
DeleteMoney, yes of course, but where is it? Looks like not enough....
DeleteIn a recent interview Krasnja said they are 2_3 years away from regular Los Angeles - Ljubljana charters for NBA games
ReplyDeleteI would say more 20-30 years
DeleteAdmittedly Ljubljana is a type of airport that would get LAX flights before Vienna ones
DeleteI'm surprised by San Francisco being second. Are there Slovenes living there or what?
DeleteBusiness in silicon valley
DeleteLet them wait until Luka leaves Lakers.
DeleteVienna already has Los Angeles flights with Austrian
DeleteKrasnja is well
DeleteKnown for his in-depth knowledge.
Pristina to New York would probably do well in summer
ReplyDeleteAustralia from Serbia is a dream route but totally unrealistic.
ReplyDeleteIt would have to have a stop somewhere. And at that point you may as well fly with flydubai or Qatar.
DeleteThe region is already well connected with one-stop flights which is just fine.
DeleteFor Thailand there is potential even with lots of competition.
Delete@09:06 +1 exactly!
DeleteAustralia is a fantasy route. One-stop via the Gulf is already very convenient. The article also says it would make no sense.
Deletefantasy route only as current systems and business operates today. it would be realistic under the condition of significant improvements. mainly obtaining an A350-900 ULR or the 1000 variant. and JU significantly increasing and densifying its network and time it to fill the aircraft with transfers from the region. or BEG attracting other airlines to improve connection to get those transfer passengers. once or twice a week would be possible.
DeleteWith new A350ULR there will be no need for a stop. Finnair is starting this year, others will follow soon. In a few years, it will be not unrealistic any more
DeleteFinnair is not flying direct to Australia, it makes a stop in Bangkok.
DeleteIt is also important to note that the Finnair flights are just a marketing trick. Finnair is wet leasing aircraft to Qantas. They made a deal for the Bangkok-Melbourne sector to be marketed under the Finnair code rather than QF (both are onewolrd) and now Finnair can say it flies to Australia. Finnair planes are already used by Qantas from Sydney to Singapore and Bangkok.
Delete@Slav Man. Yes it is a fantasy route and aircraft type is least of the issue. Read the article again. It gives some reasons why the route would not work. But there are more.
Delete@10:51 very true.
DeleteI think there is an element of overestimating the region's size, disapora and long term growth when people even begin to dream these fantasy routes..
10:51 So, it’s not Finnair flight, but it’s just Finnair flight number, Finnair plane, Finnair crew, Finnair insurance:-)
DeleteAnyway, route is from Helsinki to Melbourne and that tells a lot, besides Quantas to Britain, British to Australia and Turkish all around. Some fantasy, right?
When you learn the correct spelling of Australia's national airline (you have not learned it for months while writing the same nonsense) I might continue the discussion. Until then, you can dream on your own.
DeleteTwice a week from BEG to SYD via BKK is no brainer for JU
Delete😂 thank goodness none of you run airlines.
DeleteJU says how there is no way for A320neo to make sense in their fleet, but people here are mentioning flights to Australia with A350 🤣
DeleteA JU A330 could easily fly a BEG-BKK-SYD or MEL route. No need for A350. With 5th freedom rights on the BKK- Australia sector it would have excellent load factors on all legs.
DeleteIt could also work as a BEG-DEL-Australia routing.
You already know it will even have excellent load factors on all legs, let alone finances? You know this based on your extensive research and aviation knowledge? Stop el embarrassing yourself
Delete@13:51 please give it a rest with this rubbish, it just makes you look silly
DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteReturn tickets start at 1550, how much can JU realistically charge per a ticket to make that route profitable and for people to fly with them?
DeleteSecond even if they do decide to fly down under they can just try Brisbane when the Olympics come. It will provide a good market and they can test the waters that way.
@10:54. i read the article well. that's why my comment agreed with the article when considering JU and BEG as they stand and operate today. and the changes that would need to happen for it to work. as in case with JFK. JU can fly there profitably now, but it did take 5 years of growth and development of the route and rest of the business and network to now make it profitable.
Delete@10:54 - which is why my comment agreed with the article based on the current operation of both JU and BEG. and then mentioned what would need to change to make it work.
Deleteand @12:48 yes definitely funny and not silly to compare the a320 neo and a350 at all they are totally the same aircraft with the same purpose for JU. well done.
maxi4492 No way to buy return tickets under 2000 euro, even months earlier.
Delete10 years ago, fantasy was to have widebody at BEG and fly to USA, but now it is reality.
You don't understand the point of JU not being able to take A320neo so its impossible to expect A350?
DeleteThe OZ comments are not even fantasy land, just idiotic
DeleteWould be very hard to find anyone that would understand that point. Maybe the brilliant Analiticar? or the geniuses like Jasmin over at OU driving the national airline of the largest air travel market in the YUG to bankruptcy? they the only people that could possibly understand that point.
DeleteJU is not able to take new gen jet which has 180 seats, and you expect from them to take a new gen jet with 300 seats? Bravo genius.
DeleteAnon 17:09 yes you can, I should really write a trip report and publish it here. Any how, Turkish-Singapore airlines combo from Belgrade to Brisbane is starting at around 1600 and you had promo return Bel-Syd for just over 1000€
DeleteI think Skopje will get seasonal flights to Chicago and NYC soon. Daily to NYC and 5x to ORD. The biggest doubt is if they will go with American or Delta since they have offers from both but only one can fly. And in 2028 Wizz will launch flights to Detroit
ReplyDeleteWow. The rakija must be strong today. I heard Wizz wants to launch daily North Macedonia to Kansas City flights...
DeleteI think he found something a lot stronger than rakija. Those fantasies could not come out of rakija alone
DeleteI wouldn't be so quick to dismiss that.
DeleteWho expected TIA to get Toronto flights? Nobody and yet they did!
^ It's a one weekly flight for few months.
Delete09:51 probably Mastika.
DeleteOh Mastika is goooood! Hahah
Delete@10:33 Albania is far far larger market than N.Macedonia
@'^' totally, its essentially a charter flight.
again @9.06 is not from MK. The other day he posted ryanair will start with 4 aircrafts
DeleteRed bull and rakija mixture....pure alchemy
DeleteI feel like either Ljubljana or Zagreb could easily have like 2 weekly NY flights to cover the area.
ReplyDeleteIn long haul terms two weekly isnt very useful or competative.
DeleteThere is a reason US carriers fly seasonal flights either daily or non at all.
DeleteThe economics of such routes are brutal if you can only support 2-3 frequencies a week.
40 years ago, during "dark ages of communism" , "full of fear and poverty", "behind the Iron curtain", Zagreb had more than 2 DAILY flights to North America : 3 weekly JAT to JFK, 4 weekly Pan Am to JFK, 3 weekly JAT to YMX-YYZ, 3 weekly Air Canada to YYZ, 2 weekly JAT to ORD and weekly JAT to CLE/DTW.
DeleteIf Croatia had real flag carrier instead shameful humiliated LHG feeder, with much more passengers today, both tourists and diaspora, from Croatia and region, minimum the same could be achieved today. Plus something direction Far East. But why should they bother,when they have their "partner airlines " to do it instead and earn money
And yet it hasn't happened. Nor will it.
DeleteYes. As I said, it hasn't happened because they have "partner" airlines which take advantage of the market and because of Mafia that made it possible and keeping status quo. Nothing to argue about, until we change it
DeleteExactly. But there is not other partner that would want a croatian based airline. Business models of 2026 follow in many cases historical links as we see in the case of Croatia and its Habsburg partnership.
DeletePAN AM 1 stop through Germany, right?
DeleteNo, ZAG was the only ex-yu destination which had Pan Am nonstop New York flights on A310. BEG and DBV were with one stop, via FRA or MUC, with plane change there and switch to wide body, while BEG and DBV legs were operated by 737/727. I am not insisting just for fun, wish or dream OU should have started long-haul long ago, but because there are strong reasons for it. Providing huge changes happeh first, of course
DeleteDiaspora demand alone doesn’t build sustainable long haul routes. You need business traffic and cargo as well.
ReplyDelete+1 exactly.
DeleteDiaspora is too seasonal.
DeleteSummer and Christmas period otherwise not enough to make it profitable.
That's why JU cannot maintain yearly stable schedule on JFK and ORD.
"That's why JU cannot maintain yearly stable schedule on JFK and ORD."
DeleteThe nonsense some people write on here. Their schedule is stable.
JFK is stable and good, ORD not so much. China put on sleep right now with uncertain growth options, depending much on administration. JFK only stands out.
DeleteWhy write about things you don't know? ORD numbers are up 20% year on year. Flights are doing very well. Why fabricate things? What do you get out of it?
DeleteI think when 09:23 said- unstable NYC and ORD, he meant the huge fiference in weekly frequency during summer and winter season 7-2 for NYC, and 3-1 for ORD..
DeleteNew York shows up everywhere because it’s the easiest US gateway, but Chicago is probably more important for the Balkans.
ReplyDeleteIf you count diaspora only then yes. Otherwise no. I know many people who travel to New York as tourists or for business purposes. I want to visit New York too. Chicago, not really.
DeleteA seasonal New York route would make sense for several capitals.
DeleteMario is right. It is the reason JU first launched New York even though the diaspora is much larger in Chicago.
DeleteDespite Sep 11, despite enormous growth on the Far East, despite very wrong politics projected in orange lunatic, New York has always been, and will always be, capital of the World. As simple as that.
DeleteAlthough London remains another global capital deapite that countrys bizarre politics of the past decade.
DeleteInteresting how Thailand and Japan show up for Serbia.
ReplyDeleteWell, Thailand is not interesting how shows up, because its been winter gateaway for Serbians for decade already...Just check the amount of Thai visas issued during winter..10 years ago it was over 10 tousand ..Japan is interesting indeed how it showed up
DeleteGood overview. Shows how much potential still exists but also how hard it is to turn that potential into viable routes.
ReplyDeleteExcept for Zagreb and DBV/SPU I dont see anything sustainable in terms of long hauls for the region besides ofc BEG. ZAG could be like BEG the only all year destination in the region from the US, but except for OU, I dont see anynone operating it all year, as US Carriers are quite seasonality driven.
ReplyDeletePRN could of course work in Summer, but I dont see any carrier operating the route.
Let's not forget, all of those unserved market passengers ensure that other lines exist or ar being expanded: Such as to IST, ZRH, FRA, MUC; VIE, AMS or CDG.
+1
Delete+1
DeleteGood comment.
It depends really. BEG has more flights to these hubs today than before the launch of JFK. Many factors count, the market dynamics is the most important…
DeleteThe problem isn’t demand, it’s yields. Too many passengers are chasing the cheapest possible ticket.
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteThe Balkan diaspora keeps these numbers alive but second and third generations travel less.
ReplyDeleteDiaspora traffic peaks in summer and collapses in winter. That’s the real challenge.
DeleteBy third generation they consider themselves American, Canadian or Australian and do not see the point of an expensive trip to visit the old country. It is far more likely that they visit Spain, Italy, or Greece for a vacation if they come to Europe at all rather than our region.
DeleteSad but true.
DeleteJust a reality. A third generation American is hardly 'diaspora' in the real meaning of the word anyway.
DeleteThere’s fresh diaspora leaving Balkans every year, don’t worry about that
Delete@Anon 13:34
DeleteActually that is something to worry. Losing our youngest and brightest people with no end in sight is very worrisome.
@13:34 indeed. Given the awful politics of the region in the past 40years this is not going to be reversed. The region of 2050 will be any empty place indeed
DeleteMiddle Eastern carriers will always undercut European airlines on long-haul pricing to the East.
ReplyDeleteLong-haul flights from smaller markets need government support whether people like it or not.
ReplyDeletehow many of these passengers would actually pay for a nonstop?
ReplyDeleteTrue. Most passengers will always choose the cheapest ticket, not the fastest route.
DeleteThat's why you need enough business class passengers to cover most of the flight's expenses. Cargo helps too.
DeleteChicago probably makes more sense than New York for Sarajevo.
ReplyDeleteIs the A321XLR able to reach the Balkans from the east coast? Might be the only possibility for anything to materialise.
ReplyDeleteI don't think so unfortunately.
DeleteCroatia’s long-haul success is built almost entirely on inbound tourism.
ReplyDeleteThat is better yielding than just outbound diaspora traffic.
DeleteThe region lacks scale. That’s the core issue.
ReplyDeleteThe region lacks plumbing in places too man. There are many core issues lacking...
DeleteWow, didn't know Eastern was resurrected! And, even more, company that bought their brand has moved their HQ to the former TWA HQ Building. VERY nice, wish them luck, and more international flights from STL!
ReplyDeleteThey're merely a charter airline. ''Resurrection'' is quite the stretch
DeleteLong haul routes also need patience.
ReplyDeleteBut seasonality would kill most of these routes before they even mature.
DeleteThe US demand is real but it’s spread across too many small markets.
ReplyDeleteChina-Croatia is WAY overdue.
ReplyDeleteAgree. Especially considering the amount of Chinese tourists in Croatia. It is beyond me that flights have not already been established.
DeleteNonsense. Chinese need visas, otherwise some Chinese operators would fly there already
DeleteIt certainly isn't nonsense. There are more Chinese tourists in Croatia than in Serbia where they don't need visas.
Delete"In 2024, 250.475 Chinese tourists visited Croatia, representing a strong increase of 41.3% on the previous year, or an additional 73.042 people. Chinese visitors surpassed those from South Korea, with which Zagreb boasts seasonal summer flights through T’Way Air. The number of arrivals from China is still below pre-pandemic 2019 levels, which amounted to 492.381 visitors. Last year, the largest portion of Chinese tourists in Croatia visited Dubrovnik. It was followed by Split, Zadar and then Zagreb. So far this year, between January and August, the number of Chinese tourists visiting Croatia declined slightly, by 1.8%, however, the number of overnight stays increased by 1.6%."
https://www.exyuaviation.com/2025/09/croatia-holds-talks-with-air-china-and.html
I think those visiting Croatia and Serbia are pretty much the same people
DeleteIt is nonsense. Mainly Chinese tourists in Croatia already live in Western Europe, UK or USA/Canada. Also lot of them are visiting Serbia. Others with visa already arrived to one of larger touristic European centre (Rome, Barcelona, Paris, Venice...) and visiting Croatia internally in Europe for a quick break. Too few of them would come only to Croatia and back, so direct flights are pretty pointless. Otherwise, Chinese carriers would already fly them, as I pointed.
Delete17.40
DeleteChinese individuals living in W. Europe and North America are not counted as Chinese, but according the passport they arrive with- US, German, British or whatever else.
If Chinese citizens visit Croatia as a part of a wider itinerary, there is still no reason to fly back onky from the same city they arrived to- they can arrive to Barcelona and fly back from Zagreb or Dubrovnik. Or they can arrive to Zagreb and fly back from Rome, or wherever else. The problem is not lack of passengers but lack of work, and Mafia interference, on croatian side, to position itself as one of long-haul gateways, and not only for Chinese
@PIR Yes, of course. But living in Britain or USA doesn't mean that they own their passport already. It's cheapest to buy return ticket for long haul, so when you arrive to Barcelona, you return from Barcelona. Surely there is slacking in Croatian tourism, but how come that there are flights from USA or Korea, but not from Chine if demand is strong?
Deletearticle correctly points out that demand alone is not enough. Yield quality, seasonality and competition matter just as much
ReplyDeleteNumbers from Bosnia are for sure higher than mentioned - Bosnian diaspora is mostly using Zagreb and Belgrade airports, travelling with US documents, so not easy to track statistically. Highest portion of Bosnian diaspora in the USA and Canada is from the NW part of Bosnia, and Zagreb airport is much more suitable for them than Sarajevo. Banja Luka airport is mostly LCC airport (with exception of two useless Air Serbia weekly flights to Belgrade), as well as Tuzla and Mostar, so no connectivity available for flights through other European airports.
ReplyDeleteJU should fly twice daily yo BNX to catch the passengers for their flights out of BEG.
DeleteTwice wweekly service is a kind of nonsense.
Not necessarily daily, but three days a week with two daily flights would do. It would satisfy the needs of business travellers and significantly improve connectivity for Banja Luka ....
Deletelove these statements "are for sure higher than mentioned". Please present numbers
DeleteIs there info how much of SJJ/SKP/TGD/... US and China bound travelers are using JU? 100k from Bosnia is not a small number. Too bad that JU still has limited presence in SJJ.
ReplyDeleteJU looks after its bottom line which is why it is profitable. Chasing passengers at low yields from everywhere is not necessarily a priority.
DeleteAnd you think that’s priority for, say, Austrian?
DeleteSJJ is really badly timed to JU's long haul network. Until JU add frequencies to SJJ they won't get much of the demand.
DeleteTGD on the other hand gets quite a bit of the demand to JFK. With TGD expected to go into 24h ops it will likely see JU add extra flights and have excellent connectivity with all JU long haul routes. TIV is also no stranger to alot of JU's long haul transfers as well.
SKP is ok but missing morning/afternoon departures to capture meaningful demand.
Seasonal charter flights to Australia would be nice.
ReplyDeleteThis is not 1986
DeleteJu could partner with an Indian carrier or Qantas for a jv beg-del and del-syd/mel/bne using long range a321 as a competitor to scoot
ReplyDeletePlease tell me you're joking
Delete+1
Delete@13:55 i'm afraid they are just totally ignorant of how airlines work and keep writing rubbish
DeleteSadly i think they think they have valid points..which they do not.
DeleteSkopje-Chicago will work summer seasonally without any problems, as from last informations between 20 and 30k Macedonians are leaving in Chicago... the rest are in New jersey (most) area, and small portion in Detroit and Miami...
ReplyDeleteNo mate. It wont
Deletetwo weekly is 2-2.4 k pax in one direction monthly, thats easy to achieve in the summer months he is not that wrong
DeletePeople need to understand that launching routes isn't just about having passengers. What matters is if you can make money from it. And a full flight does not guarantee that.
Delete17.07
DeleteDepends which airline we talk about. In Croatia Airlines, for example, they don't care either how many passengers do they have on their flights or how much money they make, or much better to say how much they lose. But then, thinking better, they are not an airline at all, they are Party fraction and money laundering machine
Indeed. Idemo dalje
Delete20 - 30k Macedonians living in Chicago? That is the population of a small town. It would hardly work on a monthly basis (if that even existed), let alone regular weekly or 2x weekly flights.
DeleteOf course there not 20-30k people of North Macedonian heritage in Chicago willing or needing to fly back to Europe on anything like a profitable basis for a direct route. Its total fantasy land nonsense. SK can't yet support flight to Amsterdam let alone Illinois.
DeleteExcept for 100k number for USA-BH passengers, we didn't see other demand presented. Those numbers are rarely available on the internet.
ReplyDeleteWe didn't even see comparison of relative demand from, for example NYC to ZAG vs SJJ vs PRN vs SKP etc. Interesting article to spark conversation but far from enough to estimate what service launches will come next.
I don't think the author was trying to say that any of these routes will launch or ever come. It's just about which is the largest unserved long haul market from each.
DeleteAgreed, author was not trying to say what routes will come next and no one expects that. Over the past decade or so, potential for long-haul routes was mentioned number of times and careful reader would already know New York has been mentioned as top unserved long-haul destination for most ExYu countries. We also know number of passengers between those points are not freely available and don't expect to see them presented here, but it would be interesting to see, if possible, comparison between them. For example, is JFK+EWR demand to SJJ two times larger than to PRN? Is demand higher to SKP or PRN etc.
DeleteI still think JU should launch India flights. I was saying that many times, but some so-called experts always commented that it is stupid idea. Now we can see that there is demand for India flights. With growing work labor from India, flights make sense. Hope to see Japan as well. Tokyo and Delhi (or where ever demand is coming from) would be nice additions to JU route map.
ReplyDeleteYou don't seem to want to understand that you can have passengers but if you don't have yields you can't make the route work. You have been told this many times and told many times why yields on such a route would be low. Jiri Marek said just last year that India can not work for Air Serbia. He explained why. But I guess you know better than him. If it were a profitable route, you would see an Indian carrier launch it.
Delete@17:50 just so wrong on all your views here
DeleteOk, experts. But how come that Marek stated few times that next expansion in Asia will be Tokyo and Seoul? Why is Tokyo realistic, but Mumbai/Delhi isn’t?
DeleteBecause it is different yields, different passenger structure and different competition and pricing.
Deletethe key to exyu seasonal routes are triangle routes or sponsored one weeklies
ReplyDeleteCan someone remind us why JU cannot establish code-share flights to Australia via Shanghai or Guangzhou with one of the Chinese airlines? Are the Chinese just not interested? In terms of the great circle mapper distance, Guangzhou is perfectly competitive with the ME3, and Shanghai is only ~400 km more, which is nontrivial but not necessarily a deal breaker if other variables (such as cargo and the diaspora mild preference to fly with a Serbian-language crew) can make up for the delta
ReplyDeleteJU has a codrshare with Qatar on Australia routes. 90% of Serbian diaspora from Australia flies with QR and they completely dominate Serbian travel market in Australia. No one flies with Chinese airlines to Belgrade and Serbia agencies in Australia do not sell combinations with Chinese airlines.
DeleteJU has a codeshare on China Southern routes to Australia..Comment made by 22:44 that noone flys with Chinese airlines to Belgrade is rediculous...This option has just been recently introduced, jso ust put a good marketing and competitive prices, and "agencies" in Australia will change their preferrence from Qatar to China Southern/Air Serbia instantly..Also I like when its said that AS has "code share" with Qatar on Australian routes, where they actually only sell tickets for the route fully opperated by Qatar, and on the other hand, on AS code share with China Southern, Air Serbia actually flys one leg, which is much more money in its pocket than just selling tickets, you will agree?
Delete