Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT office in downtown Sydney 
1979

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June2
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Croatia Airlines rolls out "hand baggage only" fares

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Croatia Airlines has begun selling tickets intended for passengers travelling with their hand baggage only. The "FlyEasy" fare is available to book for flights from July 27 onwards and is cheaper than those including checked-in baggage. Fare conditions stipulate that each passenger is entitled to one piece of cabin baggage (maximum eight kilograms and 115 cm). Passengers who select the "FlyEasy" fare but also have checked-in luggage will have to pay extra for each bag. The fee is set at thirty euros for the first bag (up to 23 kilograms and 115 cm) each way on international services and 80 kunas (10 - 11 euros) each way on domestic flights. Last year, Adria Airways introduced hand baggage only fares, while Air Serbia also rolled out such pricing for select European destinations.
July 25, 2017
croatia croatia airlines Newsflash
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous16:46

    Great! Finally! :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:05

      Service is reduced to LCC level but without LCC prices. It is better to fly with lowcosters.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous20:16

      Was checking some fares today...about 110 EUR round trip to London and back I would hardly call expensive. It is not 1 or 10 EUR, but really, is 110 EUR for round trip a lot?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:08

      For same dates it would be even lower with Ryan and Wizz for almost the same service.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous21:16

      Neither Ryan or Wizz fly you to LHR though.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous23:14

      OU or any other non-LCC airline wouldn't do that to you:
      http://www.airliners.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=1369309

      Ryanair did it. That is another reason you shouldn't risk flying with them if the price difference is under 20€ or thereabouts.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  2. Anonymous17:04

    Bravo Hrvatska !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous17:15

    That's some real forward-thinking there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:19

      How when every other airline in the region has already done it? It's more like catch up.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  4. Anonymous18:29

    The beginning of the end. They copied W6

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:37

      So did JP and JU. Is it the beginning of the end for them too?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous19:58

      It was until OU did it, hypocrits!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:12

      So has LH, BA, KL, A3, LX, SK, IB and so many other airlines in Europe.
      This is today's market and everyone needs to adjust to it.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  5. Anonymous18:45

    Zasto je kod legacy carriera kilaza rucnog prtljaga ogranicena kad jedna LCC (U2) daje mogucnost neogranicene tezine rucnog prtljaga sve dok je kofer u dozvoljenim merama?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:07

      Hahahahaja...ajd sad malo mozak ukljuci i dodji do zakljucka

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:43

      Vidim ti si ukljucio.
      Jasno je da to rade zbog novca ali kad se u svakom pogledu priblizavaju LCC mogli bi i u ovom

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  6. Anonymous21:42

    VR pri kraju piste?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. JU520 BEGLAX22:04

    Most stupid idea some airliner ever had and with all the lack of inovativity the airlines today hve, they just copy all others

    It causes boarding, deboarding delays and there is no real added value to the airline and passenger

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous00:32

    I would appreciate if someone could explain who (if at all) benefits from all those "hand-baggage only" policies airlines have nowadays. Passengers obviously not, since fares are not any cheaper or definitely not by the amount of checked baggage fees, which in this case (and most other cases) are enormous - 30eur one way.
    I don't see benefits for the airlines either if everyone (or majority) brings hand baggage only. Don't think there are any savings in baggage handling fees for the airline because of the reduced amount of baggage airports have to handle.

    On the other side for everyone involved there are more and more problems caused by the large quantities of hand luggage. To list only few of them:
    - passengers have to carry their luggage all the way through security and the airport and then on a plane fight for the free space in the overhead bins with fellow passengers. I would most of the time prefer to get rid of my luggage at the check-in
    - increased workload and delays at the security check
    - increased workload checking weight and dimensions of the hand luggage at the check-in/gate
    - significant boarding/handling delays if hand luggage has to be checked at the gate and then loaded in cargo compartment due to lack of space in the cabin (regularly happens with LCCs)
    - significant boarding/deboarding delays and increased workload on smaller planes where all the hand luggage has to be put in cargo compartment (Delivery at aircraft procedures)
    - various security concerns since hand luggage is not checked and can't be identified
    - various situations when hand baggage is not perfectly in line with terms and conditions of the airline. Mostly angry and dissapointed passengers as the consequence.
    - not consistent rules at different airports and you never know if your hand luggage is maybe 0.5kg too heavy or few cm to big and you have a problem.

    So, for me not being able to check my luggage it sometimes is a very big deteriorating factor when choosing an airline.

    Hopefully airlines will soon realize that this has all gone to far and is starting to affect turnaround efficiency. And with no benefit for anyone. They will then start promoting a free piece of checked baggage as something others don't offer.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JU520 BEGLAX00:45

      Anonym 1232 am

      +10000
      Fully agree with all yr points
      Airlines are not hvng any benefits. Today plenty of hand luggage is being stopped at the aircraft and hve to be loaded at the same place like checked in bags,causing waiting times after arrivals since those bags hve to be brought to the aurcraft door again
      Complete non sense
      In May I boarded A321 of LX. It took 40 min to complete boarding. After arrival in VIE it took another 30min until ac was empty. Overhead bins were so full that after arrival even a laptop fall out the overhead bin on a passengers head

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. danr09:15

    as someone who travels hand luggage only even long haul (YES!), this makes perfect sense. was never really a fan of 20-30kg bags specially if it's a short stay trip and all you want is to get out of the airport asap. hope air serbia will offer this as well.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:41

      Travelling "hand luggage only" has always been possible if you do not fancy checking your bag or if you are travelling for business etc. But there are only about 20-30 percent of those passengers. For everyone else paying enormous amounts for checked baggage is a pain in the ass.

      And fare prices aren't any cheaper because of that, as they are also not because of cost cuttings on food, beverage, newspapers and other amenities you used to have with legacy carriers.

      Non-LCCs are trying to compete with LCCs but are loosing the game because they still have to maintain robust and expensive organisations which is preventing them to be competitive price wise. And with all those cost cutting policies they are also loosing their last advantages they have in comparison to LCCs.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT office in downtown Sydney 
1979

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Montenegro to launch subsidised PSO flights

Image

IndiGo expands reach into Serbia

Image

Ryanair solidifies EX-YU dominance despite Wizz Air’s recovery

Image

Air Serbia gains access to Trans-Siberian air corridor

Image

Serbia, UK to update air service agreement after 75 years

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025