Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Loading a JAT DC-9
London, 1971

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • January64
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


AtlasGlobal suspends Belgrade flights amid financial turmoil

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Turkish carrier AtlasGlobal has suspended all operations, including its flights between Istanbul and Belgrade, amid financial problems. The carrier plans to resume services on December 21, although it is unlikely to deliver on its promise. AtlasGlobal maintained four weekly flights between Turkey's largest city and the Serbian capital this winter season. It competed directly against Turkish Airlines’ double daily service from Istanbul and Pegasus Airlines’ four weekly flights from Sabiha Gokcen Airport. AtlasGlobal was a close partner of Air Serbia, with the two airlines having a wide-ranging codeshare agreement in place on each other’s networks. AtlasGlobal boasted domestic flights to a dozen cities in Turkey, as well as international services from Istanbul to the Middle East, Europe and the CIS.

Atlasglobal entered the Serbian market in 2017. Its operations were made possible after Air Serbia discontinued scheduled flights to Turkey. Under the restrictive bilateral Air Service Agreement between the two countries, only a select number of carriers and scheduled flights can be maintained between the two states. In response to AtlasGlobal's simmering financial issues over the past few months, Air Serbia recently concluded a Special Prorate Agreement with Turkish Airlines, signalling the first form of commercial cooperation between the two carriers. Based on the agreement, passengers can purchase Air Serbia tickets from one of its European destinations and fly to Belgrade, from which they can continue with Turkish Airlines to Istanbul and onwards to Antalya, Ankara, Adana, Bodrum, Dalaman, Gaziantep, Gazipasa, Izmir, Kayseri, Trabzon and Konya.

The Serbian Ambassador to Turkey, Zoran Marković, recently said the new deal between Air Serbia and Turkish Airlines would lead to a codeshare agreement in the foreseeable future. “I expect a draft codeshare agreement from Belgrade to be delivered to their Turkish counterparts and for authorities to push for the deal to be expedited. The new agreement envisages an additional flight from Turkey to Serbia. If Turkish Airlines is not interested, Air Serbia is eager to launch an additional flight between the two countries”, Mr Marković said. The elimination of AtlasGlobal on services between Turkey and Serbia allows for frequencies and capacity to be increased by others. Air Serbia, AtlasGlobal, Pegasus Airlines and Turkish Airlines are the only four carriers nominated to perform scheduled flights between the two countries under the Air Service Agreement.




November 27, 2019
Belgrade Feature serbia Winter 2019/2020
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

Anonymous said…
Could this be a chance for Air Serbia to return on this route?
09:02
Anonymous said…
This is bad news for the Serbian government since KK carried thousands of Turkish tourists to Serbia. What happens now? Someone will have to step in and handle the passengers. Will TK and PC get more flights, will TK finally get a widebody or will JU return?
09:02
Anonymous said…
Is Turkish increasing capacity over the next few days to accommodate stranded passengers?
09:03
Anonymous said…
I think JU will return.
09:03
Anonymous said…
It is not so easy getting a slot at IST and resuming services to a country you have completely withdrawn from.
09:04
Anonymous said…
I don't think anyone will be making changes until the airline goes officially under on 21st December.
09:04
Anonymous said…
Today they are sending A321 in the morning and evening. I think that's regular.
09:05
Anonymous said…
Sad :( They were a fantastic airline in terms of service and on board product while their prices were very cheap. They were a good alternative to TK which is often full from BEG.
09:06
Anonymous said…
To me it seems that all the Turkish carriers have very cheap prices from BEG while offering really good service for a 1h15 flight.
09:07
Anonymous said…

Yes it is!
09:08
Anonymous said…
The bilateral between Serbia and Turkey is an utter disaster. I can't believe they negotiated this in the 21st century.
09:08
Anonymous said…
Well now it is clear why Air Serbia started negotiations with TK. Obviously they saw the writing on the wall with KK.
09:08
Anonymous said…
^Ok... if you say so...
09:09
Anonymous said…
JU has not withdrawn completely from Turkey since they run summer charters from BEG and BNX.

Also getting slots at the new airport is easy since there is more than enough room.
09:10
Anonymous said…
I wonder how many pax KK contributed to Air Serbia's network, if any at all. They had codeshares on a lot of routes.
09:10
Anonymous said…
A321 is a regular visitor, they wanted to increase it to A333 but the Directorate turned them down.
09:10
Anonymous said…
Except Pegasus, they offer cheap prices but no onboard product.
09:11
Anonymous said…
Well obviously a lot- they had an extensive codeshare agreement with JU.
09:12
Anonymous said…
JUst allow TK to send B77W and get it over with.
09:12
Anonymous said…
Charters mean nothing. I'm referring to the fact that they no longer have a sales network in Turkey. Charters are flights bought up by Serbian tour operators. They are merely transporting people back and forth. Having your own flights requires different kind of infrastructure in a market.
09:12
Anonymous said…
@ Anon: 9:06- Spot the mistake in your comment ;)
09:12
Anonymous said…
Then you need to be more specific with your phrasing, this is what you wrote and that was not a correct statement.

'...to a country you have completely withdrawn from.'
09:14
Anonymous said…
No chance. That route has been surrendered to the Turks.
09:14
Anonymous said…
Well TK CodeShare will only be Point to Point without any contribution to JU´s network.
09:14
Nemjee said…
Something will have to happen, capacity needs to be compensated since demand is there. Even with ASA restrictions, BEG was (I think) the fourth busiest market from IST to the wider Balkan region. I think BEG and BUD were tied last year.
09:15
Anonymous said…
Not necessarily. JU flies to many cities regionally that TK doesn't - Banja Luka, Tivat, Zadar, Rijeka, Split, Pula...
09:16
Anonymous said…
JU can now introduce Kraljevo - Istanbul :D
09:17
Anonymous said…
+100 but seems to suit the protectionist policies of both countries.
09:18
Anonymous said…
They might change the equipment for tonight. TK does swaps during the day. I remember when they had to cancel the morning flight to BEG because of that Egypt Air incident, they boosted the evening flight to an A330 during the afternoon.
09:19
Anonymous said…
I think someone will definitely step in seeing as Turks are the largest group of international visitors to Serbia.
09:22
Anonymous said…
For another 5 million euros.
09:22
Anonymous said…
:(
09:23
Anonymous said…
That doesn't have to mean much. Air France has about the same number of codeshare routes on JU but somehow I doubt they are transferring a lot of passengers to JU.
09:24
Anonymous said…
It shouldn't impact on Belgrade Airport's numbers too much but I hope a replacement is found.
09:24
Anonymous said…
This is unfortunately not good news.

Even if JU returns to IST Turkish tourists won't be flying with Air Serbia on the way they did it with KK.
When they travel abroad Turks prefer to use their own language from the moment they buy the package till the moment they land back at IST. That was something KK was offereing. JU obviously can't do it and TK does not care so much about tourists.
09:25
Anonymous said…
Prices are low from Belgrade because there are/were 3 airlines flying the route, one of which is low cost. TK isn't so cheap from other markets in the region where they have no competition.
09:25
Nemjee said…
2018 biggest markets from IST

1. ATH - 670.904
2. OTP - 441.980
3. VIE - 429.724
4. BUD - 276.095
5. BEG - 262.017
6. SOF - 198.017
7. SJJ - 194.254
8. TIA - 184.012
9. SKP - 163.791
10. ZAG - 157.032
11. LJU - 154.679
12. PRN - 151.652
13. TGD - 132.087
14. SKG - 131.951
09:27
Anonymous said…
TK should be allowed to use wide body to BEG
09:28
Nemjee said…
I wouldn't really say TK is cheap, they tend to be affordable. There are times when in February they charge €350. Of course, that's because planes are full and they can't add more capacity to the market.
09:29
Nemjee said…
JU also has LCA :D
09:30
Zoki said…
This summer I was flying with KK from Belgrade to Bodrum. It was nice expirience. Stops in Istambul in both dirsctions were less then hour but without any issue even had time to drink something on magnificant airport custom clearence were in minutes. If KK dissapear might be a good idea for JU to make codeshare agreement with Onur air and start flights to IST for example 3 times pw JU and 4 tpw ONUR from BEG and JU combined 4 tpw from Niš and Kraljevo
09:30
Anonymous said…
Very interesting numbers. Thank you.
09:30
Anonymous said…
Who?
JU gave up fighting with TK in IST and I am not sure they want to fight again
TK already sends maximum allowed size of the plane to BEG meaining the capacity is full. Only by introducing wide body plane TK could help in this case but we have here our belowed CAD which did not permit it.
I do not think Pegasus would increase their frequency to BEG
09:31
Anonymous said…
Shocking that OTP is higher than VIE! :O
09:31
Anonymous said…
Unfortunate. KK used to send its A321 to Belgrade quite often too.
09:32
Anonymous said…
Pegasus has an average of 152 pax per flight in 2019 but they can't add flights because of CAD. Its not only TK that is limited ;)

Brgds from BEG
09:36
Anonymous said…
Someone will step in quickly, no doubt about that. The demand is there. I think TK will be allowed to add an additional daily flight as I somehow doubt JU will not bother with Istanbul anytime soon.
09:36
Anonymous said…
-100
09:37
Anonymous said…
Did Atlasglobal fly anywhere else in the region? I remember at one point they started Sarajevo but that didn't last long.
09:42
Anonymous said…
Figures provided by Nemjee include only Ataturk passengers, Pegasus transported some 66.000 pax during 2018 as well.
09:44
Anonymous said…
Its really not shocking, Turks come for entertainment to Bucharest...all types of it :)
09:45
Anonymous said…
I'm curious as to whether JU would have better luck on the route to IST this time round since it seems to have rationalised its business model and developed a better network and general business strategy. The one weakness that I believe JU has is that the market is heavily Turkey point-of-sale and I wonder how easy it would be for JU to overcome this issue.

In other markets I think JU has held its own against local carriers as well as other transit options such as BEY or TLV for example but given TK's quite aggressive pricing and quite decent on-board product I wonder whether JU could make a niche for itself here and capture transfer passengers heading to IST.
09:46
Anonymous said…
Shame about Air Serbia dropping this route.
09:53
Anonymous said…
no they are not. its the Chinese
09:54
Anonymous said…
Actually the agreement is very much in favor of Turkey. They have 3 nominated to operate this route. Serbia only 1.
09:55
Anonymous said…
They've been having financial problems for the past few months so I'm not surprised. No wonder Air Serbia started cooperating with Turkish Airlines recently.
09:56
Anonymous said…
Best combination would be daily by JU and widebody by TK.
09:57
Anonymous said…
It will benefit JU because they will finally have access to the TK global network out of IST.
09:58
Ix said…
TK sends A330 to OTP on daily basis (plus two more daily flights with narrow bodies). I don't think the reason is as sinister as the last anon suggests - after all Turkish citizens need visas to enter Romania. I believe TK would have the same structure of flights to BEG if that damn bilateral finally got dropped or renewed.

Shame about KK.
09:58
Anonymous said…
Last year Turkish Airlines first wanted to increase capacity by introducing widebody aircraft on evening flights but got rejected by Serbian CAD. Then they applied for an extra 3 weekly flights but got rejected by CAD. Now they could easily introduce a third daily flight with AtlasGlobal gone.
10:02
Anonymous said…
No they didn't. Belgrade was their only scheduled destination in southeastern Europe.
10:03
Ix said…
Maybe Onur Air would give it a try though I doubt it. I wouldn't say TK doesn't care much about tourists. They have agreements with every tour operator that matters in Turkey. Packages to European destinations very often include transfers on TK flights. Now, KK may have been cheaper and so the packages with KK transfers may have been cheaper. It could be more expensive with TK but I don't think tour operators will stop offering them just because KK is gone.
10:04
Anonymous said…
Wonder how the affected passengers on today's KK flights from BEG to IST have been rerouted. TK is probably full on its own.
10:04
Anonymous said…
Istanbul simply doesn't bring money to JU. Too much competition.
10:07
Anonymous said…
Such a shame they haven't been allowed. Would be nice seeing Turkish's A330 on a daily basis in Belgrade.
10:07
Anonymous said…
Considering Air Serbia and Turkish Airlines are mending ties, it is possible that CAD will now allow Turkish to increase frequencies or capacity. Remember this is one of the provisions of the bilateral:

"Under the agreement, each airline must take into consideration how their operations will affect their competitors, while regulators will be able to determine if any increase in capacity or frequencies is justified and in line with market conditions."

So if Air Serbia says yes to TK, CAD will give the green light.
10:09
Anonymous said…
TK has an extensive Code Share coverage to Croatia through OU- which is in the same alliance. So no need to add JU.
10:09
Anonymous said…
But I like Turkish's determination :D even though they realize the bilateral doesn't allow them, they keep applying for more flights and seats.
10:10
Anonymous said…
Are you sure? The only codeshare I'm aware of between Turkish Airlines and Croatia Airlines is between Istanbul and Zagreb and Istanbul and Dubrovnik.
10:11
Anonymous said…
I think it was one of their better decisions. Many major European airlines have dropped Istanbul because they are unable to compete against an aggressive Turkish Airlines.
10:13
Anonymous said…
I think that code share between JU and TK would be very good for both companies.

JU would get transfer passengers in the summer to PUY, ZAD, SPU, TIV, BNX and TK would get permission to fly wide body planes to BEG
10:15
Anonymous said…
It just shows how CAD is still stuck in 1960s.
10:16
Anonymous said…
Sorry my bad. I just checked and they indeed codeshare on OU domestic flights. Ignore my comment from above.
10:17
Anonymous said…
I meant that tourists are not the main category of the passengers TK is targeting. They need transfer passengers and they need business passengers. Of course they will not reject any tourist, but they are not specialzed in that field on the way KK was.
10:17
Anonymous said…
But in this case, they are actually acting in line with the agreement that the Turks themselves signed.
10:18
Anonymous said…
Yes, today's flight was meant to be on an A321.
10:21
Anonymous said…
Yes and today's Atlasglobal flights to/from Belgrade was meant to be on an A321 so it was probably full.
10:22
Anonymous said…
BEG would offer more flexibility since there are more flights from IST
10:23
Anonymous said…
There was nothing sinister in my comment. Turks love going out to casinos, night clubs, etc. over there. Bucharest can provide all of that, basically its' cheap etc.
Or you think that OTP is popular because of....?

You should go & hang out with some of them, roll few dices, spin the wheel, buy a drink to a beautiful lady... :)
10:24
Ix said…
That I agree with. On the other hand, if they get the approval to step in and fill in the capacity blank left after KK, they better pay some attention to tourists otherwise they won't be able to fill it.

Btw, 6-7 years ago TK flights to BEG were $140-150 on average and there were always promo fares in February ($95). Today, with so much more capacity, average fare is $170-180 ($200 or more in summer) and the best promo fare you can get in low season is $120-130. The infamous bilateral agreement is probably one of the reasons for this.
10:36
JATBEGMEL said…
I think the terrorist attacks and the failed coup didnt help much either. Pax numbers were affected even in the charter flight due to the events occuring in Turket. If I'm not mistaken, 2017 was a tough year for TK as well when JU last served IST.
10:38
Anonymous said…
two daily to Beg vs two to Zag are more?
10:42
JATBEGMEL said…
@ anonymous 9,31

I dont think JU gave up IST solely for giving up in competing with TK.

The political stability in Turkey wasnt great and travel demand to Turkey took a big dive following terrorist attacks and a failed coup.

I think now with a new code share agreement with TK, JU could easily replace KK.
10:44
Anonymous said…
ZAG is ten weekly in winter, look at the numbers below. Demand is really weak compared to other cities in the region.
10:48
Anonymous said…
TK is very popular as a transfer airline not only to Asia but Europe and North America from Bucharest. On top of that Romanians adore going to IST, even RO flies there, that's how big the market is.
10:50
Anonymous said…
Turkish arrivals to Serbia in September rose by like 70%.
10:50
Anonymous said…
KK was not really efficient as an airline. TK and PC are already enough. Not to mention that there are tens of other carriers in the market.
The Turkish economy is not at its best shape neither.
JU doesn't have planes to fly and TK likely to be restricted.
10:54
JATBEGMEL said…
@ anonymous 9,25

I think this time will be different as TK would be potentially code sharing a JU service. With TK, JU will have better access to the Turkish market than it did on its own.
10:56
Anonymous said…
ZAG is ten, the other are 14. All others cities in ex-yu are 14 in winter. How is demand week? considering the numbers and flights offered. So Zag is actually a stronger performer.
10:59
Anonymous said…
I think that is why TK will be allowed to send a bigger plane tonight and maybe until the end of the year.
11:00
Anonymous said…
How are TK and PC enough if KK was also full? It shows the market is big enough for many players and even more frequencies.
11:01
Anonymous said…
Airlines go where money is and for TK that's Belgrade given the number of passengers and what increases they proposed over the years. Very simple, don't see why they would chose ZAG and OU
11:06
Anonymous said…
@10.50 radio mileva.
official data: nr of turkish tourists in Srbija: I-IX 2019 86946 +2% compared to I-IX 2018.

11:17
Anonymous said…
agree
11:24
Anonymous said…
Bankruptcy
11:59
Anonymous said…
Anon 11.17

You do realize that you are speaking for NINE months while I am speaking about ONE month alone, the month of September.
12:13
Anonymous said…
Both airports in Istanbul welcomed +105 million passengers in 2018. And SAW is going to have its 2nd runway and IST will have its 3rd in 2020 summer, so the capacity will even increase more, it will surpass Frankfurt, Amsterdam and also Paris. Turks and Serbs don't need a visa to travel both countries. JU has to start flying to the new Istanbul airport and CAD let TK to use their 777, 787 or A333. There is always a share in Istanbul's pie!!
12:23
Anonymous said…
Nemjee, where do you get these numbers from?
12:37
Anonymous said…
We need to unilaterally allow TK to fly as many flights with any aircraft
12:45
Anonymous said…
Bucharest region has accumulated a lot of wealth since the EU accession!
People are travelling like crazy to exotic destination, especially Thailand. And they mostly use TK, and then QR.

+ all the business traffic that Bucharest generates.

No suprise here
12:46
Anonymous said…
Istanbul is a massive market in itself, it's one of those cities to which any market can at least fill a daily flight on the A319 or E95. Now when you add other factors the situation can only improve from there. Turkish economy might not be doing that well but don't forget that Istanbul is a whole different animal. It's a world of its own.
13:01
Anonymous said…
There were 12.311 Turkish visitors to Serbia in September which is an increase of 57%. That's roughly 400 passengers a day ... granted they all flew into Belgrade. Add to that number VFR, Serbian tourists to Turkey and transfers and you get close to 600 passengers a day if not more.
13:04
Anonymous said…
Turkish carriers have almost completely handed over the charter traffic to JU, it's only fair they get more flights from IST.
13:04
Anonymous said…
I think they flew to SJJ some years ago. Didn't last long.
13:17
Anonymous said…
Of course it doesn't bring money when they don't even fly there at the moment. Lol
13:58
Anonymous said…
Atlasglobal cited high operational costs at the new Istanbul airport as the reason for suspension of operations. I doubt JU will enjoy the "pie" in potential IST operations.
14:22
Anonymous said…
Given their finances, I think KK would have found OSI too expensive.
14:30
Anonymous said…
I still see A321 from TK tonight, I guess there is no need for extra capacity.
15:11
Anonymous said…
Has it crossed your mind that passengers have been rebooked onto other flights to reach Belgrade?
15:13
Anonymous said…
This opens up opportunity for Morava KVO - Istanbul service. It has to be ATR until new runway is ready.
15:27
Anonymous said…
What other flights? OS doesn't fly to IST and neither does LH from MUC or LX from ZRH. AZ cut IST and there is no Aegean today.
15:37
Anonymous said…
The gazillion other destinations Turkish Airlines flies to from which passengers can connect onto any airline flying to Belgrade. You don't know much about how rebooking works if you think Atlasglobal ticketing staff is waiting for Turkish Airlines to schedule an A330 in the evening so they can start rebooking passengers.
15:48
Парти said…
JU not flying to Istanbul is still a mystery to me. One of The busiest routes from BEG....
If they dont step in now, I dont know when.
15:49
Anonymous said…
Air Serbia is already selling tickets to Istanbul from Belgrade. Bought it through my agent (Omega Travel) in Vancouver. They are also cheaper, CAN$180 - which is about 120 Euros.

I have submitted to my credit card company to cancel my ticket with Atlas (it will take two weeks to prove that the company didn't respond).
01:51
novak said…
Actually, the AirSerbia flights Belgrade - Istanbul are already shown on Google flights! Well (and fast) done! https://flights.app.goo.gl/khuLS
01:53
Post a Comment

VINTAGE EX-YU


Loading a JAT DC-9
London, 1971

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Air Serbia prepares for “very dynamic” 2027, plans specialised charters

Image

Former Yugoslav airports handle 39 million passengers in 2025

Image

Podgorica aims to regain Tirana’s Montenegro passengers

Image

All EX-YU capital airports set for February growth as Wizz dominates

Image

Belgrade Airport registers busiest year on record

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026