Air Serbia outlines fleet plans, to get three ATRs in Q1 2024


Air Serbia will grow its fleet to ten ATR72-600 aircraft during the first quarter of 2024, and is looking at the possibility of adding three additional Airbus A320s and two A330-200s to its fleet. Speaking at the Aviation Day South East Europe conference in Belgrade yesterday, the carrier’s CEO, Jiri Marek, said, “Three ATRs are already contracted and should come in the first quarter of 2024, subject to issues on the market with spare parts, because they will now go through the maintenance check. The situation on the market is going from bad to worse in terms of aircraft availability and supply chain. In 2019 it was already critical in terms of the supply chain and spare parts. Currently, the biggest issue are landing gears and two of our ATRs were previously delayed because of landing gears”.

Commenting on the Airbus fleet, Mr Marek noted, “We are exploring an additional three A320s, but again, the market is very volatile, because contracts for aircraft that were supposed to be returned to lessors are being extended because of problems with neo engines on new aircraft, which will likely last four to five years. The same situation is on the A330 market. We currently have a need for additional units, but I do not want to anticipate when they will arrive. From our perspective, as soon as we conclude the deal they should be here, so we are trying to get them as soon as possible. We will continue to develop the ATR and Airbus fleet”.

The airline recently wet-leased a number of Embraer aircraft from Marathon Airlines, with cooperation with the Greek carrier set to continue. “As you notice, it is not a typical wet-lease. It is going more towards a capacity provider model, which is used in the US. The aircraft are in Air Serbia’s livery and we are currently working on damp-lease options, meaning cabin crew will be from Air Serbia and we are looking at some other functions that we can synchronise in order to make it as seamless towards our own product”, Mr Marek explained.



Comments

  1. Anonymous09:02

    Bravo Air Serbia 🇷🇸🇷🇸🇷🇸

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:43

      Why did they wait so much to get the third and fourth A330 of the situation is going from bad to worse?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:53

      They started the process early this year. I wouldn't say they waited long. In 2022 the market was extremely volatile and no one knew what was going to happen with the virus.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous14:12

      A propos A320neo engine problem, which airlines shoul one avoid in the next 4-5 years? I mean, the problem pertains to those with PW engines only, right?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous14:14

      What you mean they started early this year?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous14:20

      They started talks about third A330 early this year. In February they announced that the A330 would arrive by July but the deal fell through

      Delete
    6. Anonymous14:28

      The point is doesn't matter when start process to obtain new planes, where are much needed new planes now?

      Delete
  2. Anonymous09:02

    JU 5 million pax next year
    BEG 9+ million.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Nemjee09:15

      They have to grow and to provide additional capacity otherwise their competition will profit.

      This morning I was on the KL flight (95% full) and many were transferring to European destinations.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous14:32

      What you mean, as opposed to flying direct from BEG?

      Delete
  3. Anonymous09:04

    Excellent. I am guessing frequencies will be added on routes operated with ATRs.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:06

      I think so too. They were unable to start the Sarajevo night flights they scheduled because of a lack of planes.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:07

      And hopefully they stop using the wet-leased DAT ATR plane.

      Delete
    3. Slav.Man10:35

      hopefull before the new planes arrive they need to look at refurbishing the interior of their current fleet, youre right get rid of the DAT ATR. online there is a review of a the JU A320 flying from IST to BEG and its not good enough for a full service airline and a flag carrier.

      Delete
  4. Anonymous09:07

    That third A330 is long due, seems like they are struggling to find a good deal. Hopefully the plane will arrive in time for summer season.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      There is a rumor that they are in final phase of talks for a former Air Belgium A330. Don't know if it is true.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:34

      Apparently 9 years old, A330 with RR engines operated previously by Air Belgium.

      Delete
  5. Anonymous09:11

    I assume the extra A320s will be replacing A319s? I think some of them have their leases running out next year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:34

      Yes. Some of those A319s were contracted for 10 years

      Delete
  6. Anonymous09:20

    I hope they will eventually add a 3rd daily flight to Ljubljana.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:34

      They should next summer with this extra capacity.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:18

      I think it will be even more than 3 on some days

      Delete
    3. Anonymous14:35

      More than three daily to LJU? You serious?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous16:04

      Yes i am serious. why not?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous16:37

      If these 19 flights this winter prove to be good, then they will definitely increase LJU to 24pw at least during summer.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous17:04

      That would be wild.
      LJU - city with most frequencies by JU.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous19:40

      Well i would use air serbia way more if i could connect to some of their flights. So if they increase to 4 on some days (maybe early morning flight … at 5.30) im sure it would be sold out

      Delete
  7. Anonymous09:22

    So there 3 ATRs that are doming have already been contracted. Anyone know from where they are coming?

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous09:22

    Are the incoming ATRs wet lease or dry leases?

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous09:23

    What is the difference between wet-leaase and damp-lease, which is mentioned for the Embraers?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      A damp lease is a type of lease that falls somewhere between a wet lease and a dry lease. The lessor provides the aircraft and some of the crew, usually the cockpit crew, and the lessee provides the rest of the crew, maintenance, and insurance.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:30

      Thank you! Learn something new every day :)

      Delete
    3. Anonymous10:06

      Seems like a good arrangement.

      Delete
  10. Anonymous09:23

    Doubt about the lack of spare parts only. In general it is quite difficult to find decent and newer A320s in Europe, because most of them are on ACMI or operating on behalf of bigger companies. The A330 is quite an old aircraft now and finding a more decent one will also be challenging. If JU is chosing to grow and make BEG a hub, they will need good aircraft. The most logical thing is to opt for the A220 similar to what Croatia Airlines, Bulgaria Air, Cyprus Airways and of course Air Baltic. The A220-300 will be a great fit and will allow them to even expand if Africa if they decide because of its great range. There are no significant issues with the production of the A220 in Canada. The A220 is also quite superior compared to the E2 jet.
    As for the A330, they might consider having 1 A330neo instead of 2 more older A330s. This way they can have an all-Airbus fleet + ATR, which sounds more than reasonable and to stop this "habit" of collecting aircraft from Dan Air, Marathon, etc, etc. Not that this is not a common practice in the industry, but Dan Air for instance is more of an LCC. And you want to offer proper business class as well and not a lousy curtain separating you from economy and with proper seats.
    The A319 should also be history. This is an amazing aircraft but similar to the A330 is quite outdated now. No comments about the ATRs, they are probably the most reliable aircraft and proved to be solid and bold. JU can continue with the ATRs because they are really essential and fit perfectly for the regional routes and late night transfers/early morning to neighbouring countries.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:04

      The A220 is expensive with a lot of engine issues. As for A319, Air Serbia said it will phase these planes out.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:54

      Yes, Air Serbia has already said that the whole A319 fleet will be retired and instead they will keep A320s.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous14:09

      I do not agree with you, they should definitely not get 220s as they are continue to have lots of engine problems and that could create s nightmare for JU summer operation. The Embraer is exactly what they need and they are doing a great job adding more of those into their fleet. Also instead of 220s much better option for them is 321. Speaking of 330s, neons are way too expensive and they should stick to 330-200. Those have proven to be very reliable for them.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous15:51

      Dan Air will leave BEG at the end of October. Marathon will stay.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous16:37

      Dan Air stays through the winter.

      Delete
  11. Anonymous09:35

    This is good because they will should have 10 ATRs at the start of the summer season 2024.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:37

      If there are no issues with the plane and they need spare parts from the list of unavailable spare parts.

      Delete
  12. Anonymous09:37

    Looks like third and fourth A330 may arrive at the same time.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:03

      Highly doubt they will be able to find 2 available A330s at the same time.

      Delete
  13. Anonymous09:44

    And what happened to the A321s?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:03

      Nothing. It was an idea while there were some planes available. Now they are not available.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous10:52

      Adding A321s would be a logical step for JU.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous15:44

      I agree A321 is very needed, however it would be only logical once the majority of their fleet becomes A320. They need to phase out A319s as quickly as they can, and move to A320/A321. Probably what we will see in future is mostly A321 - once route network starts growing and transfers get more and more present.

      Delete
  14. Anonymous09:46

    In retrospect, it probably would have been wise to contract 2 A330s when they got YU-ARB. At the time there was a huge availability of A330s and they were cheap.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:47

      Sorry, I meant when they got YU-ARC.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous09:51

      At that point no one knew what was going to happen on the market because covid was still a big thing. I remember many criticizing them in the comments here for even getting YU-ARC.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous13:46

      That was the moment to get one additional aircraft or more.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous16:43

      Yes, that is what we know now .. anyway, that moment is gone

      Delete
  15. Anonymous10:02

    It will be nice to see a third Air Serbia a330-200

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:17

      It is now becoming a legend. We have been waiting for it for so long.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous16:47

      Looks like you will be waiting a little longer! )))

      Delete
    3. Anonymous18:47

      I think they should consider A350 for JFK line, which is almost always sold out. And maybe it’s easier to acquire it than A330

      Delete
  16. Anonymous10:06

    Air Serbia should utilise their strong ties with Turkish as they are renewing all their fleets and be nice to have some of their planes especially the ones that have the proper business class seat, which would drive some strong revenue for Air Serbia and distinguish them with most European airlines not offering this product. Especially as they look to drive passengers on to their hopefully expanded long haul fleet and destinations.

    ReplyDelete
  17. Anonymous10:08

    It's clear that Air Serbia is dedicated to developing both their ATR and Airbus fleets, which is a positive sign for the airline's future. It'll be interesting to see how these plans unfold in the coming years.

    ReplyDelete
  18. ilijabgc10:21

    JU should dry-least A320neo instead of A320ceo, they should change few details on its fleet, The A321 which planned to came this summer haven’t News.. Yeah we know that market is very volatile but it’s cool if they buy it by them self

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:22

      First there need to be A320neos on the market, which there are none. Not to mention that many A320neos are grounded because of engine issues.

      Delete
  19. Anonymous10:26

    How about getting some new aircraft?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:43

      They have the youngest fleet in ex-Yu.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:16

      For now

      Delete
    3. Anonymous13:16

      They will certainly have it until 2025. By then they may make an order for new aircraft.

      Delete
  20. Anonymous10:31

    Does anyone know what's going on with SX-RMA. Today again diverted!!!

    ReplyDelete
  21. Anonymous10:51

    Plan is good

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:53

      Let's see about the actual execution.

      Delete
  22. Anonymous10:52

    Hopefully the number of ACMi aircraft in the fleet will also go down.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:05

      I hope so too but I'm highly doubting it.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous11:05

      +1 last anon

      Delete
  23. Anonymous10:52

    Smart move

    ReplyDelete
  24. Anonymous10:53

    And still not a member of an alliance, makes little sense to me.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:04

      They said that they would have more to loose from being an alliance member at this point of their development.

      Delete
  25. Anonymous10:53

    Super 👌

    ReplyDelete
  26. Anonymous11:19

    SX-RMA (E195) just got from Katowice and its first flight after emergency repairs was diverted back to Belgrade this morning....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:12

      On another note, it seems that the third E195 (that was mentioned here on Monday) is in Warsaw already painted in JU livery.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:35

      OY-GDA?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous12:36

      Yes looks like it's that one

      Delete
    4. Anonymous15:25

      Will that one also be in damp lease?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous21:21

      Damp? You mean dry😀👍

      Delete
    6. Anonymous08:35

      No, I meant damp.

      "The aircraft are in Air Serbia’s livery and we are currently working on damp-lease options"

      Delete
  27. Anonymous12:11

    I hope they will add third flight to Paris. Their tickets are ridiculously high so I also hope that they could offer more « normal «  fares to/from CDG if they had more seats on sale.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:13

      Is demand really high on Paris route? I notice Wizz Air is really expensive on Belgrade-Beauvais route too.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous12:13

      They will add third daily for sure, especially with the Olympics coming up.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous15:04

      Especially with AF pulling back from the route, they need the third flight just to make up the lost capacity. Fourth daily on select days would be an essential increase in capacity, especially during the time of the Olympics.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous16:36

      The Olympics in Paris will become a disaster with the situation in the Middle East right now.
      Also the attack on Swedish soccer fans in Brussel is showing that these kind of events are extremely attractive for extremists.

      Delete
    5. Vlad19:45

      Just bought tickets around New Year CDG-BEG and back for €220. Don't consider that particularly expensive for 4+ hours of flying.

      Delete
  28. Anonymous12:25

    Can someone explain why YU-ARC is sometimes at Nice ? (LFMN)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:37

      It has never been to Nice...

      Delete
    2. Anonymous13:16

      Original comment does not make sense

      Delete
    3. Anonymous13:41

      Anon 12:37 : They were already at Nice, last time was in September

      Delete
    4. Anonymous16:16

      YU-ARC goes there for its vacations, I heard it loves the French Riviera.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous20:05

      That’s YU-APC instead of YU-ARC ;)

      Delete
  29. Anonymous13:17

    Nice that they are expanding the fleet. Also would be nice if they took more care of the cabins on board their aircraft and unified the product, especially on the A330s.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:51

      At this rental pace that unification will never happen. I am sure they do not want to spend the extra money to refurbish cabins; the majority of "normal" customers uses them once and probably never again due to their sloppy service and constant delays.

      Delete
  30. Anonymous13:58

    I'm still unsure of his credibility regarding fleet planning but contracts for ATRs being signed already is a good step. They really need to fix the A319/20 fleet shortage though as well as inconsistent products on aircraft that arrived this year. Hopefully the proportion of wet-leased aircraft excluding the Marathon Airlines fleet declines soon.

    ReplyDelete
  31. Anonymous14:47

    Any chance JU will sponsor Serbian Olympic Team in Paris next summer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:26

      Why would they?

      Delete
    2. Anonymous16:35

      They will sponsor them, of course.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous16:49

      Of course???

      Delete
    4. Anonymous17:18

      They didn't sponsor JU at recent FIBA basketball.

      ITA was official sponsor of Italy, with big ITA logo on back of jersey.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous19:58

      JU flew the Serbian basketball players back from Manila. JU will fly them to Paris and back as well.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous02:30

      Bro, I'm talking about sponsorship, marketing, PR, and allbthat stuff.

      Delete
  32. Anonymous15:29

    Why not go for 787-8 or 787-9.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:45

      No thx . Airbus all the way . Took LOT 787 last month, super uncomfortable plane compare to airbus.

      Delete
    2. Anonymous15:48

      Too expensive, different to current fleet, requires training, crews, maintenance etc.

      Delete
    3. ilijabgc16:09

      A330neo or A350 would be the best for JU.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous16:15

      Why they declined those two A350 they were supposed to take?

      Delete
    5. Anonymous16:22

      ^ That was a rumor someone made up in the comments here.

      Delete
    6. Anonymous17:40

      It was not a rumor, and they didnt decline it, the deal fell through. not sure on what grounds.

      Delete
    7. Anonymous17:51

      Since it's not a rumour, give a single source where this was ever mentioned.

      Delete
  33. SX RMA tried to fly to Copenhagen today but gave up and returned to Belgrade.
    The plane is now flying to Katowice

    What`s wrong with that aircraft?It was in Katowice two days ago..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:56

      Nightmare for Marathon, they are giving E70 to AirSerbia at a discount already, and the latest incident will cost them A LOT

      Delete
    2. Anonymous16:56

      That tells you about the quality of work done on it. The entire world has gone bazoook and needs a major reset. Read the other day about fake spare parts being distributed by a London based firm ... that was unheard off 10-20 years ago, today it is the norm.

      Delete
    3. Anonymous17:27

      You don't know the terms of the contract between JU and Marathon, in particular Marathon's liability for delays or cancellations as well as agreed standards as to availability of their aircraft.

      The same way you don't know what repair was agreed between Linetech KTW and JU. Maybe Linetech suggested a more indepth check/repair, but that would take more time or invoved some additional wait for spare parts, and the client decided to take a risk and do a short version of the repair, taking the risks?

      Delete
    4. Anonymous22:36

      It looks brilliant cooperation, we can see that.

      Delete
  34. Anonymous17:22

    What about giving the
    ATR-72 fleet names?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:40

      lets wait for the birthday

      Delete
    2. Anonymous21:19

      Birthday shmerthday

      Delete
    3. Anonymous22:36

      Like Ferguson, John Deer, Volvo, Rakovica, IMT

      Delete
  35. Anonymous21:30

    Maybe as a "capacity provider" they will then finally be offering a business class. I really do not get this restriction on JU...

    I had two downgraded and disgruntled ladies in front of me on Klasjet today. One of them on an expensive ticket from SVO, the other one saying that this happened to her the third time within one month. ( I myself have several outstanding claims from last year for the exact same reason.)

    The kind Klasjet FA apologized and then went on to suggest the two pax to "book their next business class flight with an airline that cares".

    A lot of work ahead for Mr. Marek, if even their own wet-lease partners deem the company to be rotten to the core...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous03:07

      100% verified BS

      Delete
    2. Anonymous06:52

      How did you verify it?

      Delete
    3. Anonymous07:52

      Klasjet AC can not fly to SVO; Russian authorities allowing only SRB registered aircrafts to fly into Russia for JU.

      Delete
    4. Anonymous07:58

      This was on the connecting flight out of BEG.

      Delete
    5. Anonymous09:19

      LO propaganda

      Delete
  36. Anonymous09:18

    Why they dont see in some another aircraft example B737-800NG or B737-8M? The will be good alternative for AirSerbia :)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:48

      because AS have focused on AIRBUS products , thay dont want to have trouble with BOING like these with 737 MAX use to be !

      Delete

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.