![]() |
| Charter spat between Turkey and Serbia continues |
Turkish authorities are yet to respond to a permit request lodged by Air Serbia in order for its dedicated charter brand Aviolet to operate leisure flights to the country this summer. It comes after the Serbian Ministry for Construction, Transport and Infrastructure blocked two Turkish charter carriers - Freebird Airlines and Corendon Airlines - from running services to Belgrade. A handful of tour operators affected by the decision have accused the Ministry of protectionist policies and measures. According to the daily “Večernje novosti”, only Turkish Airlines has so far received necessary permits to operate holiday flights between Turkey and Serbia. Its Antalya - Belgrade charters are scheduled to launch once per week from May 23 and will increase to six weekly services from mid-June through to mid-September.
The Serbian Ministry for Construction, Transport and Infrastructure says that a total of 114.680 seats were to be offered on charter flights between the two countries this summer. Of those, 90.096 seats were to be provided by Turkish carriers. However, the Ministry claims that Air Serbia should have the upper hand since it is transporting Serbian holidaymakers. It believes that only if the carrier does not have the necessary capacity or interest should foreign airlines step in. Serbian tour operators claim that Air Serbia does not have the requested capacity to exclusively carry out charters to Turkey. The airline plans to offer 19.584 seats on leisure flights to the country this season if it is issued a permit. “At this point we have 10.000 travellers affected by the Ministry’s decision and it is very uncomforting not knowing what will happen to these passengers”, one of the hardest hit tour operators, Argus Tours, said in a statement. The Serbian Ministry has also blocked Egyptian charter carrier Nesma Airlines from operating flights between Hurghada and Belgrade.
For its part, the Ministry has rejected claims of protectionism. “More often than not the media are trying to portray that the Ministry is protecting Air Serbia which is not true because we do not have another carrier. Out of the 114.000 seats requested between the two countries, only 19.000 are by our airline, which is more than 80% in favour of the Turkish side. When charters are concerned, such a trend must be completely reversed”, Assistant Minister and the former head of security at Belgrade Airport, Zoran Ilić, says. The State Tourist Inspection body, which supervises the implementation and enforcement of laws and other regulations in the tourism sector, says tour operators have the right to conclude agreements with foreign charter carriers and have not acted outside of the law. As EX-YU Aviation News understands, both Corendon Airlines and Nesma Airlines have resubmitted their requests to operate charter flights to Belgrade this summer.

Comments
http://flyingbosnian.blogspot.com/
On the other hand, i really don't see why they turned down Air Cairo since they're operating scheduled flights, unless Air Serbia means to open Cairo itself, which in any case is contraproductive. SM recently added Belgrade to the GDS and i think they're also bringing tourists to Serbia. People should have the choice to fly to Hurghada on their own for a reasonable price without any holiday packages (not being any other air links between the two countries) and in this case i would call it as unhealthy competition from the Serbian side.
Greetings from Egypt.
Pa su zabranili i Dodiku prelet preko Turske sto je toliko smesno , pa kad im neka zemlja pruzi otpor odma se bune nesto.
INN-NS
+1000
Cini mi se da ste rekli da i vi radite za neku Turisticku Agenciju u SRB , kako ste vi resili taj problem :)
INN-NS
JU350 Berlin
JU230 Zagreb
JU182 Tivat
JU172 Podgorica
JU534 Rome
JU344 Stuttgart
JU194 Ljubljana
JU604 Vienna
JU826 Beirut
Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against those planes, but wasn't the fleet replaced because of their fuel consumption (ie. profitability)???
I bet my ass on when AirSerbia didn't get the requested approvals from Zagreb a few months ago, within seconds, you were screaming the same tune as Vucic about EU-protecionism? When the truth as that it took less then 24 hrs to get the permits, although Vucic were bitching 10 days later about the matter.
So here we go again.....the bad Turks are now to be blamed for the protectionism of somebody at the Ministry of Stupidity....
Yep the State is to tell all business in Serbia who and how they are to do. Do not let anybody else live their live as they think. This is why we have a Ministry.
EU? Free movement of capital and workforce?! Just as long as the Ministry of Stupidity allows it....and Serbia benefits from it....
1. ) 180-200 seats
2.) affordable fares
3.) convenient timings
4.) availability on requested days
None of above was granted by Air Serbia (Aviolet), because they are in a self created fleet-mess! In a typical Balkan manner, the clients are now suffering the retaliation upon the saying "ako umre moja krava, nek' umre i komsijina".....Btw. charter is charter and most bilaterals do not include chapters about charters as it would be too complicated in a constantly changing environment. The word "charter" is self-explanatory !
cancel schedule flights for AS and fly charter to AYT? :o
Tako i nasi turisti mogu na jezera, reke, banje i planine Avioletom do Nisa, Kraljeva ili Uzica.
This could turn into bigger mess fast.
sta nisu dali Aviogenex novaca za jedan 738?
izgleda, da bi imali dosta posla.
A i imaju preca posla nego da uloze 93.3 MIL USD ili 375000 usd mesecno da daju u AGX.
INN-NS
https://scontent-vie.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-xap1/v/t1.0-9/11205502_417890395084168_3299155494121071337_n.jpg?oh=408649cbe725dfd0fa8c905d3ead789d&oe=55DD4E1B
Some Serbian tourist agencies have no concept of thinking couple of years ahead. Everyone knows that old 737 planes are going out soon. Air Serbia that will only get bigger and more capable over time, you don't need to be a genius to figure out how to align your business with a strategic partner.
You are so finished now when aerologic comes back, with his classic "you don't know who are you messing with" attitude. Quite few times aerologic and inn-sns especially had chauvinistic comments regarding turks here on this forum
http://www.b737.org.uk
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/5/6/2/2637265.jpg
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/6/8/0/2636086.jpg
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/1/5/8/2635851.jpg
http://cdn-www.airliners.net/aviation-photos/photos/9/2/8/2633829.jpg
And many more...
Please please dont spread lies that planes are this full. That would mean ASL would have LF of 95%+ which it does not. INN-NS dont please dont even come into this discussion since you will say this is true of course.
Best part of the lie is that Ljubljana had 128 pax
What's so strange about LJU having 100+ passengers? It's not unheard of.
For example, remember about 7 months ago when the A320 flew to LJU? If I remember correctly it left with 120 and came back with around 140 passengers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fqkpieTq-zA
Firts off, we talked 2 days ago how Podgorica has only a 49% load.
Second, Vienna did not have 124 pax since the route is not doing great actually
Maybe from now on I should make random stats, I bet you will believe in them.
For example, a friend of mine flew on YU-ANJ some days ago from BEG to VIE and they were 109 passengers. That's not bad, no?
http://imgur.com/a/37zFI
I adam se da cete prestati lupati kako VIE ide lose
Pa naravno da je dobar lf.
INN-NS
По свему судећи тај авион што су ти усликали нема више од 60 до 70 путника, то јест попуњеност око 50%.
INN-NS
However, now you also have a lot of ex-VIE pax using BEG as a transit point for cheap flights. Recently met some that bought dirt cheap tickets from VIE via BEG to some onward destinations, last minute.
231 ZAG BEG 733 YU-ANI Y63
182 BEG TIV 733 YU-ANK Y100
183 TIV BEG 733 YU-ANK Y131
194 BEG LJU 733 YU-ANJ Y124-J2
604 BEG VIE 733 YU-AND Y119-J1
605 VIE BEG 733 YU-AND Y57-J1
Any stats for the night flights guys, Beirut and others?
Sounds reasonable, but then again they are allowed to eat left over meals after the meal service, right?
Thank god I dont live in North Korea and I do have the right to freedom of speech. I dont 'troll' the site, neither do I represent an airline/agency/country.
I believe I have the freedom as a citizen of the Republic of Serbia to have a choice in the airline I wish to spend my hard earned money on. No law in the Republic of Serbia forbids me to walk, cycle, take a bus/train/plane to any destination I wish to travel to, biding to the fact I have all documents necessary for travel (passport/visa/cash).
I have been here accused of favoritism towards JU, been asked if I work in JU etc. Your opinion is your opinion, again a freedom of speech. However, some people like yourself seem to abuse that privilege. The whole idea of a forum is to voice your opinion and to discuss the topics put forward, you may agree or disagree or agree to disagree, thats up to you.
I am happy for my national airline for which I regularly fly with from personal CHOICE. However, it is also my CHOICE to be allowed to CHOOSE another carrier.
JU needs to decide on whether they want to continue with charters or not, and if they do to step up the game. They have done a fantastic job on their regular scheduled network, but fail to improve their charter network.
I did put foward a suggestion that since JU is in the EY alliance that EY and partner airlines could add capacity to partner airlines if available, just as the case with JU on the AUH and MCT flights. I didnt see you comment on that!
Also, since you are accusing me of incorrect information, feel free to bring the false information forward.