Flydubai will terminate its service from its hub in the United Arab Emirates to Zagreb this January. The flights were initially cancelled from November until late December as a result of “operational reasons” but the service will now be suspended indefinitely. The carrier will maintain flights only during the holiday season between December 27 and January 15, 2017, when its last service is scheduled to take place. Ticket sales have been terminated past this date. The airline planned to operate the route three times per week this winter season prior to its decision to suspend services. Zagreb marks the first destination in the former Yugoslavia to be discontinued by Flydubai. Passengers who have already booked tickets are being informed of the cancellation and offered alternative transport.
Flydubai’s suspension will come just over two years since the route was launched three times per week in December 2014. The airline also provided a bus shuttle service between Zagreb and Ljubljana in order to cater for the Slovenian market as well. It faced no direct competition. The carrier says that despite its Zagreb suspension it remains committed to the European market. As a result, it will continue operating four weekly flights to Belgrade and Sarajevo, as well as two weekly services to Skopje this winter season. The airline is also considering launching flights to Podgorica next year.
As of January 2017, Qatar Airways will become the only carrier connecting Zagreb to the Persian Gulf with nonstop flights. On the other hand, Flydubai will be the second airline to terminate services to the Croatian capital this winter season, following Swiss International Air Lines, which will end its flights from Zurich on October 30. Unlike last winter, the Croatian capital will no longer be served by TAP Portugal which discontinued its service from Lisbon in March. Zagreb Airport’s management has said it will focus on securing new carriers once its new terminal is opened in March next year. So far, Monarch Airlines has announced the launch of its new services from both London Gatwick and Manchester next April.

Comments
Also, SJJ has quite a bit of competition, just look at the number of flights TK and Pegasus offer.
I hope you people understand that it is way better for ZAG to have more airlines and more choice, than to be left at the mercy of DLH.
Because Qatar is an expensive airline with expensive service and tickets. People who want to save some money will go with Lufthansa or whatever the cheaper option is.
As far as the SKP subsidies claim, at this point it's either gross ignorance or trolling. Won't be bothered educating that lot yet again.
Yes, it is 340km away from ZAG but still..most airlines are focusing on it. Also north-eastern Croatians are definitely using the airport too.
OS is suspending DEL but AI is stepping in with their B788. That's how mama Lufty does her business.
So EK is not as strong as some like them to be.
Cheers
Just face it, the market isn't that big. They started with 3/week in OTP and now it's almost double daily.
If anything is pointless then it's your arguments.
Also, they downgraded PRN, SJJ and ZAG but not BEG.
I would say primarily due to so many connections between FRA/MUC and ZAG. This allows passengers from ZAG to catch convenient connection times. With one daily flight ZAG-DOH connections via DOH may take hours of layover - even longer than going back to FRA/MUC and catching a flight there within 80-90 mins.
On top of that add Qatar's prices and there you go.
TK dumping may have some effect but many passengers are simply scared to connect via IST these days. That may change, but not likely for another 3-4 months.
You might not like the alliance argument but it's there for a reason, because it's a damn good one.
Finally, the first time EK is mentioned in at 10.38, that is in your comment.
What ZAG need is Pegasus with some cheap fares to the Middle East.
Competition has never been a good thing.
I hope LJU manages to get FZ especially since the market is higher yielding than the one in ZAG.
Plus more connections to VIE if necessary.
And their prices are higher than BEG. Don't remember 100% but I think what BEG charges 18.50 euro to legacies (service+security) BUD charges >20 euro.
I am sure there are not many people going to BUD from ZAG. Maybe rather some Čakovec inhabitants, if they have to or if it brings a big price saving, though you need to calculate tolls, petrol, parking, your own time for both ways each which - to me - it would always make it much more unattractive.
But why not MBX? This is one of a few routes that actually might work and develop positively from Maribor. No competitions anywhere in the area to the Emirates until Vienna. No flights there from Graz, LJU, ZAG, whole northern Croatia or Hungary till BUD. If they could offer some 4 EUR airport taxes and if LJU is deemed too expansive by FZ, same like ZAG and GRZ then it has real potential. It would attract whole Slovenia, Southern Austria and Northern Croatia which in total are many millions of people.
btw. najbolja konakcija s Bliskog Istoka za ZG je sa TK....i cijenom i brzinom moze konkurirat...i konkurira FlyDubaiu
Does Flydubai offer transfers or are they flying to Australia ?
So airline offers no incentives to Australian or South East, East Asian travelers, only location of their hub in Dubai. And you wonder why it didn't work ??
Also flying trice per week?
Qatar has 10pw out of Doha, extensive network including Australia, South East and East Asia and this is the airline many choose to fly with.
Flydubai had a good go at it, didn't work for them, Emirates might try in few years time, but totally irrelevant, the fact that Korean Air, CapitalBeijing Airline and JAL fly to Zagreb and Croatia, and from 2018/19 most likely on a regular basis, we can say job done.
Would love to see Singapore Airlines in Zagreb to offer alternative to Qatar via Singapore, for Australian and EastAsian visitors, however with BA, KLM, Air France, Lufthansa, Austrian, Iberia and number of other carriers offering superb connections via European Hubs I am not worried.
Swiss is returning in April 2017, TAP too, SAS, Alitalia, AerLingus, Finnair, EasyJet, Aegean, all coming to Zagreb in 2017 and 2018, I think we can safely assume things will be ok.
I really think we should learn something from today’s discussion, and that is how we should all love our country and be happy with whatever happens. For example, today we can see that flydubai is leaving because it is the worst airline in the world with no recline seats, cause competition is so good in Zagreb that from now on they will have only Qatar airway flying to the middle east. That Turkish airline reduction in flights is cause of their own incapability and that even thou Swiss and TAP left they will for sure return next summer with bigger and better planes.
So a big lesson for all the nationalities on this forum how we should respect our country.
Thanks for that.
They do 2x daily OTP with A320 and it´s a much much bigger market.
Of course flydubai is the worst airline in the world and Zagreb will be way better without them...
A lot less competition, Zagreb is covered by major EU airlines, Qatar flies to Zagreb 10 times per week, you also have strong Turkish presence with 10 weekly flights, was 14 up to recently.
Flydubai never had a chance, they offer nothing other then position in Dubai as a hub.
Zagreb is covered by all major EU carriers, SAS, Alitialia, Finniar, Aegean and few others still waiting to come in, but it is only matter of time.
Skopje is more of low cost base for Wizz air and not entirely sure of Lufthansa or any other EU carrier fly there, sorry for my ignorance.
Someone mentioned Skopje giving subsidies, I am not sure how much of that is true since it is managed by TAV, hardly possible, however Macedonian Government might be, totally different story here. If Macedonia wants to promote itself as a unspoiled nature reserve in the heart of Balkans, who am I to criticize them, after all it is absolute right for Macedonia to spend money on self promotion. It would be nice if Croatia did bit more of its own PR, instead of relying on Hollywood A listers coming to Croatia and promoting the country.
I mean such promotion is good, but it would be nice if Croatia had bit more of a PR strategy how to attract more visitors in to the continental parts of the country. And sorry John Malkovich won't do (he's parents are from Slavonia and Czech Republic, he has a house in Dalmatia and South of France). FYI
Emirates will not try ZAG, at least not as long as they are working on improving their yields.
I think you're getting ahead of yourself, Lufthansa plays a significant role but there's loads of choices for travelers to Zagreb, Air France, Turkish, BA, KLM, Iberia, Qatar all fly to Zagreb.
Great post! Made my day
As opposed to flying with Air Serbia and their dilapidating ATR 72s older than 99% users of this blog.
Q400s are doing fine btw, OU is quite happy with them and are keeping them for good.
Easily, however growth not might be over 5%.
TAP, Swiss and CSA are coming back to Zagreb in 2017, for FlyDubai they must have had really bad to have had to cancel, if that's the case, I am not worried, sure 180-200 pax per week gone, but increase in other carriers should cover the loss.
TK is in a temporary crisis, because of recent developments in Turkey.
The LH crisis feels chronic.
LH treats smaller Star Alliance companies not as its partners, but as satellites. Croatia has so much potential. I think OU lost a lot of potential holiday market by subjecting its plans to LH general strategy.
Let's also not forget the crash landing in Zurich or when they had to use butter to close the doors.
Also, why do you feel the obsessive need to involve JU in this discussion? Does it pain you that they carry more passengers than OU?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=StTqXEQ2l-Y
@AnonymousSeptember 22, 2016 at 2:15 PM
AnonymousSeptember 22, 2016 at 3:35 PM
What happens with few carriers moving out happens all the time, it won't change, you can make what ever assumption out of it, the fact will remain. Things never remain the same.
Q400 - sales 1,193
ATR-72 - 836
Shows how much you know
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nURVN5F6264
Also Q400 has 134 orders on its order book, how many ATR 72? less than half that, 60.
Q400 - range - 2500km
ATR 72 - range - 1500km
Cappacity: -
Q400 78 pax
ATR72 - 66 pax.
Enough said.
Enough said.
ATR deliveries: 1768
Q400 deliveries: 1193
http://www.atraircraft.com/about-atr/corporate-overview/key-figures.html
Q400 much more expensive to buy, more expensive to operate. It is a model for North America, not very popular in Europe. ATR much better suited for much more densely populated Europe.
+1
Exactly. I was going to write the same. Shows how much anon. 17.31, 17.39 knows.
Also, if/when OU bankrupts then what?
INI summer 2017 schedule is on sale. Nothing new for now.
BTW, FR will fly from Oradea (4th airport) next spring to BGY/GRO. Maybe they can add more ex-YU airports??
It depends what you need the turboprop for! If its longer routes primarily then airlines always go for Q8400. If it's short low pax routes then ATR is more economical and better decision.
No way on earth to generalise!!
Mislim samo da su ti letovi samo za sezonu i da van sezone imaju slabije putnika.
INN-NS
Dakle mene nista ne muci vec samo konstatujem ono sta je ocigledno.
INN-NS
INN-NS
All ATR 72 figures are 863
All Q400 are at 1193, and many more on order.
You're talking nonsense, few incidents with Q400 doesn't make it unsafe, there are nearly 1200 Q400 on the market, bound to have few incidents. As to your nonsense urban and which aircraft is cost effective, please look at fuel consumption of both aircraft and the range.
You are so deluded