Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May24
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Banja Luka proposes Air Serbia base

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

The Government of the entity of Republika Srpska in Bosnia and Herzegovina has suggested for Air Serbia to station an aircraft at Banja Luka Airport and open a subsidiary in the city. The Minister for Transport of the entity government, Nedjo Trninić, who recently said that the Serbian carrier's existing three weekly flights between Belgrade and Banja Luka were "unsustainable", noted, "There is potential for flights to Austria and Scandinavian countries. It is our wish for Air Serbia to base an aircraft and open a subsidiary here". Mr Trninić said he held informal discussions with Air Serbia's CEO. The Serbian airline is the only scheduled carrier flying into Bosnia and Herzegovina's second largest city. The carrier's fees at Banja Luka are covered by the airport operator. "We are considering daily flights to Belgrade or to destinations other than Belgrade. That would be very good and we are currently in discussions with Air Serbia", Miroslav Janjić, the General Manager of Banja Luka Airport said.

The only airline ever to have been based in Banja Luka was Air Srpska, jointly established by the airport and JAT Yugoslav Airlines in 1999. The deal helped JAT maintain its aircraft and keep its crew flying in face of international sanctions imposed onto Yugoslavia. With two ATR72s, the airline launched flights to Zurich on January 29, 1999 and had an interline agreement with Swissair. Additional flights were eventually launched and Banja Luka Airport handled record passenger numbers. However, the airline ceased operations in 2003 when JAT was forced to withdraw from the joint venture due to regulations set out in Bosnia and Herzegovina's new aviation law. The government of Republika Srpska set up a new airline, Sky Srpska, in 2007. Over the years the airline signed Memorandums of Understanding with Adria Airways and Jat Airways, while cooperation talks were also held with Montenegro Airlines. The company intended to lease two seventy-seat aircraft. A total of ten weekly flights were planned and an estimated 30.000 passengers to be carried per year. Initially, Sky Srpska was to commence flights to Vienna and Belgrade. Despite 400.000 euros in funding each year, the company was unable to secure aircraft and was formally shut down in 2013.


Air Serbia has not publicly commented on calls to set up a subsidiary or review its operations into Banja Luka. The airline has been an advocate of a hub-spoke model and has previously rejected calls to base an aircraft at Niš Airport. "Air Serbia has a different business model which includes turning Belgrade into a hub, meaning all flights are launched from there", the carrier said in a statement in 2015. The government of the entity of Repblika Srpska recently said it was also in talks with Israeli and Irish carriers to set up flights to Banja Luka, however, the Transport Minister noted, "Low cost carriers are not our future. We are more focused on serious airlines to whom we can offer fair conditions. We must offer passengers both attractive and scheduled routes because the population is large enough for the airport to function properly and develop in the right direction. Low cost airlines are very demanding in terms of subsidies and airports do not benefit from them".
February 05, 2017
Air Serbia Banja Luka bosnia and herzegovina Feature serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:03

    Wishful thinking on Banja Luka's behalf.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:04

    This could actually work if they had spare aircraft lying around which they don't.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      There is always the A330 :D

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Miloš11:18

      :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:07

    It's kind of ironic and sad, both aircraft pictured are the same one - YU-ALP.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      Poor old YU-ALP. Under my count it has changed 6 liveries by now - JAT egg, modified JAT egg, JAT flame, Air Srpska, Jat Aireays and now Air Serbia.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:29

      Might be time to renew the regional fleet!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:40

      It also operated in an all white livery for a while during the 2000s when Jat didn't have the money to paint its planes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous15:31

      Modified Egg? It was delivered with new JAT livery (short stripes and egg).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:08

    Day 2 of "Amazing ideas from Bosnia"
    Coming tomorrow: Trebinje airport new renders

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unknown09:17

      Haha

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:10

    Koja sprdnja... Zalosto, za pocetak nek ih nagovore na 7 pw letova i to im je i vise nego dovoljno

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:12

      Ocigledno nema putnika za 7x nedeljno

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee10:04

      Ако погледамо број путника које је објавила Бања Лука онда се види да је попуњеност током лета око 90%.

      Путници су ту али изгледа да Ер Србија нема довољно авиона да појача ову линију.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:07

      Ima putnika ali ocigledno nema profita posto su cene stvarno vise nego pristupacne. Cim je izasao ministar saobracaja i rekao da je liniji ne odrziva.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Nemjee11:15

      Мислим да је лаж да линија није профитабилна. Прво, и Србија и Српска су се одрекле одређених такси.
      Друго, ЈУ ништа не плаћа у BNX док у Београду има посебне услове.
      Треће, лет од 35 минута обавља Атр, то јест један од најекономичнијих ваздухоплова. Повратна карта кошта око 6.898 динара док ЈУ узима 2.864 по путнику, отприлике 1.432 по смеру. Ако у просеку имају 40 путника по лету то значи да им приход износи око 57.280 динара или око 461 евра по смеру.
      Не кажем да праве луде паре али исто тако сумњам да су у губитку.

      Мислим да је неисплативост само изговор. Том логиком лет до Беча исто тако није исплатив имајући у виду да повратна карта кошта око 100 евра, лет траје преко сат времена а VIE је један од скупљих аеродрома у Европи.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:40

      Ajde nadji mi kartu do Beca za 100 eur pa da idemo zajedno ja placam sve. Pa sa tim parama mogu samo posadu da plate

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Nemjee13:50

      Бацио сам поглед на цене за следећи месец и повратна карта кошта 14.853 динара што ти изађе око 119 евра. Ето, извињавам се, омашио сам за 20 евра.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous18:44

      +1

      but i don't think JU is losing money in VIE

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  6. Anonymous09:13

    The minister's comment about LCCs is quite outrageous.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:02

      Yes they are. For LCCs PR services.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:14

      They are outrageous for anyone with even half a brain inside their head.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:20

    Not their strategy.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      Maybe it's time for them to change their strategy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:03

      Well their complete strategy will change in just a few months so I would not be surprised that if RS finances this they might actually launch some other flihts out of Banja Luka.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  8. Rodney Marinkovic09:59

    Ocigledno da Banja Luka ima minimalno dva problema. Prvi je da ambicija Vlade Republike Srpske, ima ambiciju za redovan saobracaj a nema dovoljno putnika... Banja Lucki Aerodrom ima zelju da bude samoodrziv, a Low Cost kompanije nemaju destinacije ni dovoljan broj putnika po letu da bi orzavali redovni saobracaj. U takvim uslovima je tesko praviti biznis. Jer na kraju novac je vodilja, mada oni koji odlucuju ne postavljaju stvari na svoje mesto. Vec prolongiraju dilemu kako dalje...
    Sto verujem, jeste da Republika Srpska treba da ima dva aerodroma. Banja Lucki i Trebinjski. Vrsta i model saobracaja ce biti onoliki koliko ce se biti posveceno, podrzano od politicara koji rade za buducnost saobracaja. U ovom slucaju i vazdusnog.
    Rodney, Kraljevo

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:26

      Trebinje, dobar si hahahaha.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:24

      Bribery and corruption is the major obstacle that constrains BNX. It will be running the airport as long as the current local political parties are in the driving seat. Majority of the people who go to the polls, vote for politicians that are corrupt. They know those politicians are dishonored but still vote for them. Such broken, low-down, despicable and filthy guys are trying to find themselves in all of that. Some others vote for the mentioned because they are as stupid as planks. The most worrying thing is bribery and corruption in the legal system.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  9. Anonymous10:02

    I'm tired of such messages. I would suggest to ExYu not to consider any BNX annoucements anymore until an official statement from a carrier is made. Let's stay serious... even my biggest wish would be that I can finally fly from ZRH to BNX

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  10. Anonymous10:33

    These jokers will do ANYTHING in their power to keep BNX and Republika Srpska in general as a monopoly for JU!
    They will never even try to attract a non Serbian airline, whether it is full service or LCC.
    It is a political decision, nothing more, nothing less.
    They are making a hude damage to the economy of the Republica...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:39

      +1000

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous12:23

      +10 000

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:00

      Exactly - and same political non sense that blocks anything that has to do with Sarajevo , has refused B&H / Turkish in their plans to have couple of flights from BNX , adding Scandinavia and other to , at that time existing, Zurich...contributing like that to failure of B&H as well

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:05

      B&H Airlines failed because of federal politicians and you know that well. B&H flew normally to Zurich from Banja Luka, as well as charters to Tivat. The Sarajevo-Zurich flights survived thanks to the stop in Banja Luka. RS policies can be blamed for many things but not for the failure and mismanagement of B&h airlines.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Reply
  11. Michael11:43

    "Low cost carriers are not our future. We are more focused on serious airlines to whom we can offer fair conditions. We must offer passengers both attractive and scheduled routes because the population is large enough for the airport to function properly and develop in the right direction." BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!
    Despite some folks demanding from Ex-Yu Aviation News to drop Banja Luka announcements, I say; please keep 'em around! Some comedy is always welcome and Banja Luka announcements are pure comedy gold...like Monty Python!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:21

      So Dane Kondic little airline, with 2,6 milion pax, is a serious airline but Wizz is not? So what If Wizz is LCC? Wizz was not not going down like Jat Airways and Wizz dont need some arabs to work not even Viktor Orban.
      Wizz Air is a very much serious airline, compared with Air Serbia they got ten times more passengers and most of all they can buy their own airplanes without mama Etihad Airways!
      Would the "sumar" Nedjo say that Air Serbia is a more serious airline then Norwegian? Norwegian has flights to 15-20 more cities in USA then great Air Serbia and lets not forget their European network, sadly Banja Luka Airport is a part of politics and the people who runs the airport are a "joke".

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:37

      Polako sacekaj, ovaj model LCC poslovanja na osnovu najavljenih globalnih promena nece biti odrziv tako lako. Kad Luftika napravi cistku za Eurowings tesko ce ostali preziveti

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. easyJet16:25

      @michael How is nowadays a serious airline? Every "serious" airline like BA, LH, SAS and so on inaugurates pieces of low cost model in their concept. To charge baggage, to charge service on air and so on - so I would say every LCC is more serious than any full carrier

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous19:12

      easyJet +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous20:51

      Sto da se daju subvencije pojedinim Kompanijama od kojih na kraju nemate neku veliku korist nego samo jeftinu kartu do mesta ko je dalje udaljeno od vase destinacije i nemate konekcije.
      A ne znam kako mozete nekoga nazivati sumarom samo zato sto imate razlicito misljenje.
      INN-NS

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous21:34

      Of course Air Serbia is a serious airline, they have 20 aircraft. Can't compare with a joke airline like Ryanair, only 380 aircraft.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Michael06:09

      @easyJet I hope you understand that I was quoting their official statement, which is hilarious! I fully agree on LCC. Which is precisely the reason why I find this Banja Luka official statement so funny. :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  12. Anonymous14:20

    I am shocked. The ATR72 has roughly 70 seats and already very "tired" and old. Why don´t they consider Wizz, Adria, Ryanair instead?
    Also, being 190km away from Zagreb might be challenging.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Dejan14:46

      Wizz, Adria, Ryanair are not Air Serbia.
      That is the only problem that BNX management has. They are far more interested in ASL interest than Banja Luka's interest...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:49

      Adria did fly to Banja Luka in 2010. They failed miserably. 5 passengers per flight on avarage. And on top of that they were subsidised.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Dejan15:10

      I fail to see how come BNX market is unable to support LCC when INI, SKP, OHD, PRN, TZL can.
      I don't think that there is something magical about every other airport that makes it attractive to LCCs and only in BNX the economic reality prevails. I think the opposite is happening.
      I think BNX does not want any LCC that would compete with JU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  13. Anonymous14:50

    When will you write about the new, extended runway lighting of Tuzla airport (which finally brought the much needed 550m landing minima and more operational stability in frequent bad weather) to show that someone is in fact working in Bosnia to serve customers instead of dreaming?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:14

      Nobody is denying that the Bosnian federation is not working to improve its air access. It is only the Republika Srpska that is not.
      Sad to say it as I am Serb myself.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous22:57

      +100

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  14. Anonymous20:48

    Moze se iz kombinovati da se leti Petkom i Nedeljom leti za ZRH sto bi moglo biti jako profitabilno.
    I slazem se sa da ne treba Drzava da daje svakim LCC Kompanijama Subvencije ja bi samo ponudio HV za letove za AMS i U2 za letove do ZRH gde se moze dalje Konektovati na mnogo letova a ne kao druge LCC kompanije koje lete do udaljenih mesta sto nije bitno kao prvo.
    INN-NS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:52

      I naravno bi jos dodao OS kao bolji izbor.
      INN-NS

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:38

      Ti ces to kombinovati kad budes vodio neku avio-kompaniju.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  15. Anonymous00:35

    OT: What happened to YU-API? The A319 got stuck in Milano, flight canceled, pax rebooked on A320 tomorrow.

    https://www.flightradar24.com/reg/yu-api

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous02:54

    No any airline will come,

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous04:05

    Banja Luka is not alone:

    https://www.flightradar24.com/airport/csg/arrivals

    Replace CSG with BNX, DL with JU and ATL with BEG

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


Inex-Adria DC-9-33RC
Rapid Change aircraft, 1970s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Riyadh Air launches first recruitment drive in region

Image

Kraljevo Airport registers record passenger growth as it eyes new routes

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025