The resumption of flights between Belgrade and Zadar after more than two decades is unlikely to occur this year due to an ongoing regulatory dispute between Air Serbia and the Croatian Civil Aviation Agency (CCAA). Zadar Airport's General Manager, Irena Ćosić, told the "Zadarski list" daily, "There is a lot of talk of Air Serbia's arrival in Zadar. The Serbian carrier flies to all major airports in Croatia. However, the planned service to Zadar was halted by the airline's CEO Dane Kondić. The reason is an ongoing issue the airline has with the CCAA. Air Serbia is a company from outside the European Union but sells so-called connecting tickets from several cities in Croatia which is against EU regulation. The matter is now in the courts and we were just collateral damage".
In 2014, the CCAA accused Air Serbia of breaching the European Common Aviation Area agreement by operating flights to and from Zagreb to other cities using Belgrade as a transit point. It alleged that under the terms of the European Common Aviation Area Agreement, Serbian companies cannot sell composite tickets from Zagreb to other destinations via Belgrade or vice versa because Serbia is not an EU member. It argued that tickets for various legs of the journey must be sold separately. “Air Serbia can’t, for example, sell a ticket from Zagreb to Moscow, Doha or Brussels via Belgrade as a single ticket. It must be two individual tickets", it said. The accusations came weeks after the airline announced it would launch double daily flights between Belgrade and Zagreb. The CCAA has said Air Serbia is acting as “an unfair competitor” by selling transfer tickets via Belgrade at lower prices, allegedly breaching its agreement with the Croatian aviation regulator. The CCAA has filed “multiple indictment proposals against a foreign airline company for failing to comply with the provisions of the [Croatian] Aviation Act”, the Agency has said. Despite the ongoing dispute, Air Serbia continues to sell tickets to various destinations out of the Croatian capital via Belgrade. The carrier has previously denied any wrongdoing and said it is operating in accordance with European civil aviation regulations.
Talks between Zadar Airport and Air Serbia were launched in 2015 over potential flights. Despite the negotiations, the service was never launched. Last year, Zadar Airport told EX-YU Aviation News that the route failed to materialise "partly because of the cancellation of financial support on behalf of the Croatian Tourist Board". It added, "This service would have been a great opportunity for Zadar because we know the route would have excellent loads. Zadar Airport will continue to negotiate and persist in having a Zadar - Belgrade connection just like other Croatian airports, such as Pula, Zagreb, Split and Dubrovnik". The last scheduled commercial flight between Zadar and Belgrade was operated by JAT Yugoslav Airlines on August 3, 1991. Brač Airport has also been negotiating with Air Serbia for seasonal service from Belgrade over the past year.

Comments
At the end of day this should encourage JU to look for growth opportunities elsewhere, in far more lucrative markets.
So, was TK also penalized by CCAA? How about QR? Will EK be also sued?
like Priština
they suspended the Kiev flights though .. guess because of a shortage on planes :(
It is stupid to say they cannot fly to ZAD just because of that. If they can fly to ZAG, SPU, DBV, PUY, why on earth they can not fly to ZAD by same conditions. That is just excuse for Zadar, and also for Air Serbia which will cut lot of frequencies this summer because of bad financial situation, and for sure will not start new adventure.
On top season they have 31 weekly flights to Croatia. You find that "malicious"?
You have to ask yourself why ?
I can see JU sell those tickets all the time since starting those flights, and even today? So how was JU penalized?
Same think as Serbia allow some charters to Turkey, Tunisia and Egypt for some companies, but did not allow other charters to Turkey and Egypt for some of those who ask for permission.
Hope this clarifies the issue and ends arguments about foreign carriers operating rights in Croatia.
I expected a big jump in transfer passenger from new EK flights, but it appears that passengers can't buy connecting flights, only separate tickets, which is far more expensive.
Strange country Croatia!
What a twisted logic!
Neko nekog obmanjuje ili "omanjuje". What going on?
Rodney.
Kraljevo
If this was a simple case as CCAA claimed, EC would decided it years ago.
Btw, LH already lost case with similar rationalization against ASL.
Is LX flying from ZAG and why is CCAA allowing this for god's sake!?
Applied twisted logic fueled by malice and hate hits a hard fact wall sooner or later.
You haven't really thought this through, did you?
No logic there.
So, first you have to inform yourself and than try to find "teorija zavere".
It is not about EC, but member countries. So, they decide.
LH was not sue JU. That is not true.
1. Biti će osuđena na sudu i platit će odštetu.
2. Morati prekinuti sa tom praksom dok ne uđe u EU.
3. Vrlo vjerojatno će se ovaj presedan uporabiti i na ostale zainteresirane članice EU iz kojih leti Air Serbija i prodaje takve karte, a to su prvenstveno Grčka, Rumunjska, Bugarska, Slovenija, Austrija, Njemačka...
4. Srbija će imati velikih problema oko daljih pregovora sa EU.
Ako je Air Serbia u pravu
1. CCAA će platiti odštetu Air Serbiji i sve troškove koji su nastali ovom tužbom CCAA
2. Air Serbia će nastaviti prodavati karte kao i do sada neovisno o ulasku u EU ili ne.
So, first you have to inform yourself and than try to find "teorija zavere".
So please, do what you preach and we'll all be smarter ;)
Anyway, the point is, like many already stated, that this is not against EU rules at all. Turkish does it, Emirates, Etihad, US airlines (I'm talking about EU not only Croatia, since they said "its against EU rules")... so its just petty.
Also, TK carries a lot of pax from Greece to the EU yet Athens doesn't care.
see..they have problems with tickets from Zagreb to Belgrade onto both EU (Brussels) and non EU counties (Moscow, Doha)
Which law is that?
The real reason why JU did not start ZAD and BWK is that their fleet is operating in summer on their max. limits - and it seems whenever they lease an additional aircraft (if they do) it will be allocated on potentially more economical routes. Hence, ZAD and BWK are deemed either not promising enough or too risky.
Additionally, if the forecast would be that great for these routes than JU would start them also without support from the Cro tourist board and independent of a court case which does not influence them on starting P2P routes particularly for tourists.
Should anyone suspect any wrongdoing regarding subventions from country (sic), there is a legal remedy for that, file a complaint and let the EC decide on the issue. Repeating it over and over doesn't make it true.
And even if it were true, laws don't work like "tit for tat". I hope you get that.
So why are the consumer advocacy groups staying silent on this issue ?
In other words, it only intervened when it started flying to ZAG, because OU made an issue of it.
So the CCAA itself, didn't give too much credence to the law. So the "law is not there to obey", it is there for selective use and application - depending on who it will benefit and equally, where it can be applied for punitive purposes
Why is it no problem and FRA-BEG-ZAG is a problem?
Double standards, huge protectionism.
In ZAG OU must be protected one way or another and when JU brings passengers to the coast then this law is not important.
What a hypocrisy!
Check again this statement from the text:
“Air Serbia can’t, for example, sell a ticket from Zagreb to Moscow, Doha or Brussels via Belgrade as a single ticket."
Last time I checked, Moscow and Doha were not in the EU. Maybe CCAA thinks they are. Either way this clearly indicates this is not about a non-EU hub connecting points inside the EU, but much more about cheap excuses to act aggressively. And about the good old chauvinism of course.
The fact that the courts are taking as long as they are (are they EU courts or Croatian ones??) is probably because of the resulted nightmare a negative results for the airlines will cause throughout Europe.
Also, you forgot Croatia's airports together handeled much more pax than BEG
I said BEG vs any Croatian airport. Not BEG vs sum of Croatian airports.
In ZAD example, both JU and ZAD decided to use this story as a reason for not having the speculated flight.
It looks more like logic "as long as they are bringing us the tourists we shall not react but as soon as they start taking passengers from OU we shall remember we have a law" :-)
Btw, do you have any link to support information given above?
U celoj prici ti je jasno ovo "samo 10"
BTW Croatia is one of the most important Markets for Air Serbia with 400 000 passengers each year.
According to what you say, carriers from "full" ECAA countries can sell transfer flights in Serbia but carriers from Serbia cannot sell transfer flights in ECAA countries?
I am sorry but what kind of BS is that? I am not saying it is not true, in fact no BS can surprise me when it comes to the fortress of protectionism and double standards also known as the European Union.
But if this BS is true, and if the EC really bans JU from selling transfer flights to ECAA countries, then Serbia should immediately ban all carriers from ECAA from selling transfer flights in Serbia. Any country would react like that - assuming it is a country, not a 3rd grade colony.
You or that guy tried to be cleaver and asked guy above to inform him self... well ?? Were you "informed" ?? :)
If you said, not EEA member but bla bla bla that would be fine, but don't be a smartass without being sure what you write is correct
What your puny hateful mind fails to realise is that Croatia would be much more affected by this move than Serbia.
It reads more as family feud, with extreme enduring emotions, then like relationship between two separate nation states.
So sad.
Why do you think EC ignores Croatian complaints for four years?
They are hoping that Croatian politicians will come to their senses, so that EC does not have to embarrass them in front of their Balkan "rivals".
http://www.exyuaviation.com/2017/01/ex-yu-airport-race-2016.html
Only JU and OU reported their passanger numbers for 2016 so far as I know
http://www.exyuaviation.com/2017/02/air-serbia-posts-improved-2016-results.html
http://www.exyuaviation.com/2017/03/croatia-airlines-posts-mixed-2016.html
What your puny tiny ignorant head fails to realize, there's plenty of fish in the water.
One minor airline banned from Croatian skies, soon others will take its place.
And Croatia would lose nothing, few less Serbians in Croatia, not biggie, there's more fish in the sea.
How is Air Serbia breaking EU rules? What is Air Serbia doing differently in Croatia than in Germany or any other EU country?
MM
EU ignores Croatia? Really? So, why was your PM so angry when we block your negotiation with EU?