Iranian carrier Mahan Air has abruptly suspended its two weekly service between Tehran and Belgrade over increased US pressure on service providers to end their cooperation with the carrier, which it alleges supports terrorism. Mahan Air maintained flights to the Serbian capital with its 299-seat Airbus A340-300 widebody jet. The US Treasury Department recently warned both companies and governments across the world regarding dealings with Mahan Air and sanctioned a Malaysian tour operator for selling the airline's tickets. The new US Ambassador to Germany, Richard Grenell, requested the German government last month to block Mahan Air from flying within German airspace and deny it landing rights in the country. "We know that Mahan Air has been used by the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps as a mode of transport for weapons, resources and fighters, so we’re asking our allies to help us put a stop to it”, Mr Grenell said.
Despite Mahan Air's suspension, the US has not blacklisted other Iranian carriers and both Iran Air and Qeshm Air continue to operate flights to Belgrade. Iran Air recently reaffirmed its commitment to its Belgrade service, launched this March, by putting tickets on sale for the route for the upcoming 2018/19 winter season. The Iranian national carrier will maintain two weekly services from Tehran to the Serbian capital with its 260-seat twin-aisle Airbus A300-600 aircraft. The airline recently noted it would consider either adding extra frequencies to Belgrade in the future or introducing an additional service from a secondary Iranian city such as Isfahan or Shiraz, from which it sees potential for flights. Similarly, Qeshm Air will continue to maintain its two weekly service to Belgrade throughout the winter season.
![]() |
| Iran Air will serve Belgrade this winter with its A300-600 jet |
Serbia and Iran inked a Bilateral Air Service Agreement this June. A spokesperson for the Iran Civil Aviation Organisation, Reza Jafarzadeh, said that Air Serbia will commence flights to Tehran within "the next few months". The airline itself has not commented on the matter. It initially planned to launch services to Teheran by mid-2017, however, the route never materialised. Mr Jafarzadeh added that the visa free regime currently in force between the two countries has had a positive effect on people-to-people exchange and that further growth in tourism is expected in the coming period. Another Iranian carrier, Kish Air, has announced it will launch flights between Shiraz and Belgrade later this year. During the first half of 2018, a total of 8.556 Iranian nationals entered Serbia.


Comments
But lets follow AZ's example, an airline to look up to.
SMFH!
Serbia should've allowed first 2 weekly service to see how it goes and then gradually increase.
There was much much more supply vs demand.
http://www.samchuiphotos.com/W5062/21.JPG
http://www.samchuiphotos.com/W5062/22.JPG
http://www.samchuiphotos.com/W5062/12.JPG
http://www.samchuiphotos.com/W5062/13.JPG
http://www.samchuiphotos.com/W5062/14.JPG
http://www.samchuiphotos.com/W5062/9.JPG
I would say, it is political decision, like it was same about introducing those flights in BEG.
I hope he covers JU one day too.
Will SOF reach 7 million this year?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-08-24/air-france-klm-british-airways-exit-iran-amid-u-s-sanctions
A good indication of load factors is that all three, now two, airlines operate wide bodies on this route, that Iran Air said they were sold out on these flights till late June, that Iran Air has upgraded winter flights to wide bodies, that another Iranian airline wants to start flights (Kish Air) etc. But of course it's probably all politics when it comes to Belgrade. Every airline that has ever started flying to Belgrade and not to another city in the region has done so because of politics. We know the drill.
About Iran, when flights are established then is enough demand, but when flights are cancelled then is politics. Sure..
- Flyubai
- Iran Air
- Qeshm Air
- Arkia
- Israair
- Etihad
- Flyubai
- Iran Air
- Qeshm Air
- Arkia
- Israair
- Qatar Airways
During summer, frequency wise-yes. But the choice of airlines isn't that great:
- Flydubai
- Wayaniya Airways
- Air Arabia
- Qatar Airways
We have "political" route to Teheran because Mahan Air, Iran and Qeshm air are/were flying there
We have "political" route to Tel Aviv because Air Serbia, Arkia and Israir are flying there
We have "political" route to Istanbul because Turkish Airlines, Atlasglobal and Pegasus are flying there
We have "political" route to Stockholm because Air Serbia, Norwegian and Wizz air are flying there
It is terryfying how Serbian politicians are powerful
I agree would be great to see Sam Chui review for example JU to JFK :)
Flydubai
Wayaniya
Air Arabia
Qatar
Nesma
But will Arkia or Israir fly to Belgrade during winter?
No, they are just bringing Serbian tourists to Barcelona and fly them back.
It is the same with Iranians to Belgrade, amigo mío.
Paris, France
Dusseldorf, Germany
Munich, Gemany
Athens, Greece
Barcelona, Spain
Birmingham, United Kingdom?
What makes you think that Egypt or Greece are safer place for serbian tourists than Tehran? Haven"t heard of any caffe gang fight or terrorist attack on tourists in Iran recently, unlike Greece or Egypt, Tounisia...
CDT 2
PSA 2
NYO 2
PFO 3 = TOTAL: 9 weekly
New AQJ + 2 weekly
New BRS - 1 weekly
So basically only 6 weekly are being "lost".
STN becomes 15 weekly
U2 new EDI, SEN & BRS = all 2 weekly (total 6)
QR will send A321 daily + 4 weekly evening A320 = 11 weekly
FZ - 5 weekly
LO - 2 daily winter compared to 12 weekly last year
Basically some cuts will be compensated by other additions but the SOF growth will definitely not be 35% unless of course Lauda don't decide to arrive :)
I think 6,8 million is achievable.
...and how in the world does that concern you?
There are Serbian tourists going to Barcelona, obviously. There's also some to Tehran and there were before those flights even began. I am one of them. There are agencies selling tours now that weren't before.
I think you'd rather try to check how many Croats there are holidaying in Korea vs. Koreans in HR and i think the ratio is far less favourable.
PSA 2
NYO 2
PFO 3 = TOTAL: 9 weekly
these were not around last winter and were already seasonal and thus not "lost" compared to last winter.
I see Memmingen & Treviso will continue (last winter cut due to pilot shortage) + increases across their network compared to last winter (eg Berlin), overall FR is increasing this winter.
Wizz is sending more a321, will cut (VAR daily will hurt much) some but will increase others (eg TLV to 6x, ALC to 2x, new LIS)
Overall no doom and gloom, I expect a slight growth of 5% tbh
Israel has beaches, bars and common spiritual values with Serbia but not Iran.
Also Belgrade has a synagogue which is what brings so many tourists from Israel. I am sure that Wizzair will soon launch Ovda.
No big drama, although I am quite sure they will need birds for Vienna otherwise, they will lose the battle with Lauda, Vueling and the rest of the hungry sharks.
W6 can't launch any destination from Serbia to Israel (as long as it does not have Serbian AOC) due to bilateral agreement between these two countries.
Belgrade has also the mosque, for your information.
What about trade?
Bring us real numbers (not estimated or crystal ball ones), then we can speak and debate all day long.
Serbia needs Canada, India - countries with money and power and IT people. Open routes to Delhi, Bangalore, Singapore where the IT is, bring specialists and make Belgrade an IT hub.
Okay it's also good to have Teheran but only 2 weekly is more than enough and should be transferred immediately to JU. 6 is just way too much, I am sorry.
Inace, ne zaboravi da se avio saobracaj izmedju Beograda i Teherana dobro razvio, jer su vize ukinute izmedju Srbije i Irana. Sa druge strane u vreme kad je to predlagano Danetu vizni rezim je jos uvek bio na snazi.
Ne kazem da ta linija ne bi bila uspesna da ju je JU otvorio vec da broj putnika ne bi bio ovoliki koliki je danas
And for witch period do you need data? Which numbers do you need? Do you also need numbers for Rwanda or Gabon?
The think that is counting is number of tourists from Iran in Serbia in 2018.
January - 653 tourists - 2308 nights
February - 637 tourists - 2267 nights
March - 2098 tourists - 8503 nights
April - 1072 tourists - 4287 nights
May - 1597 tourists - 4500 nights
June - 2499 tourists - 9853 nights
On stat.gov.rs they don't even have a number to compare to 2017. so it just says for % of growth like -. They do not know the growth cause they didn't count for last year!! Imagine that no hard numbers 3,2,1.
The fact is that 3 carriers are flying and increasing capacity to on the rout and that one of them is pushed out by politics and you can find something abut that on the internet if you are interested which you are not...
http://www.thetower.org/6441-treasury-sanctions-sales-agency-that-works-with-irans-mahan-air-for-terror-support/
In the link you can see that they specifically sad that airports serving this airline will be put on sanctions...
EK to ZAG 5 pw is not too much?
Majority of tourists from Middle East come here for cheap nightlife, booze and shopping. On top of that, for the Iranians it is one of the few destinations they can visit visa-free.
The mosque or the synagogue are completely irrelevant for the Turks, Israelis, Iranians and Arabs visiting, as for many of them Belgrade is a sort of a liberal haven compared to their strict homeland
There are 3 to 4 daily flights year-round to Turkey which is a country of similar population and economical status. So how in Earth 6 weekly to Iran (4 weekly in winter with wide-body) can be too much even when you substract transfer-passengers and lower outbound demand?
As a matter of facts, many routes survive with demand originating mainly on one side, some of them are the most lucrative (i.e charter flights) and one of the regional routes is one of the best examples of that.
You all said lots of demand on Moscow and Red Wings still no flights for sale after 27th October. This is what I am afraid of. It happened a lot in the past with Serbia.
New airlines suddenly a flock of airlines and then 1 year later, adiós.
This is my only point.....
In first 6 months there were 8.556 Iranians enter Serbia + some other nationals (but there is not so much foreigners in Iran to travel). In that time there was 18.720 seats in direct flights from Iran to Serbia. So LF was not that good.
Dear neighbour, then maybe you should come and see yourself. If a group of 100 or more people go into a shopping centre at the same time it sure is full. But I guess you know best. Thank you so much for your concern.
-2-----
IKA-BEG-IKA 08.10-09.40 // 11.10-17.40
-----6-
IKA-BEG 18.00-19.30 // 21.00-03.30
Transfer
O&D
Long-haul
Regional
Political
Economical
Gasto
Charter
Ad hoc
Legacy
LCC
Браво БГ
I am still waiting for Purger to update his widebody table. I do wonder why did not do it.