Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May28
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Air Serbia to bring back nine routes as demand returns

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Air Serbia is in the process of restoring nine destinations to its route network as the airline says there have been “changes in demand” which are heading in a “positive direction”. Services from Belgrade to Thessaloniki were restored over the weekend and will be followed by Dubrovnik and Split on May 28, Prague, Sofia, Bucharest and Krasnodar on June 4, St Petersburg on June 8, as well as Milan on June 18. “Having in mind the gradual relaxation of travel restrictions, as well as the approaching peak of the season, we have decided to re-establish flights to certain popular destinations in our network. We are glad that the summer season is coming and, judging by the apparent changes in demand, the situation is developing in a positive direction”, Air Serbia said.

Frequencies to all nine destinations are, for the most part, well below 2019 levels. Flights to Greece’s second largest city will operate seven times per week - twice daily on Mondays and Fridays and once daily on Tuesdays, Saturdays and Sundays. Split will initially return with two weekly rotations, increasing to three from mid-June, while Dubrovnik and Milan will be maintained twice weekly. Air Serbia plans to run three weekly flights to Sofia - twice daily on Mondays and one flight on Fridays, as well as two weekly services to Prague, St Petersburg and Krasnodar. Operations to Bucharest will initially run twice per week before increasing to five weekly rotations by the end of June. The carrier also intends on launching its brand new service to Rostov-on-Don starting June 4. 

Commenting on the return of a number of its routes, Air Serbia’s General Manager for Commercial and Strategy, Jiri Marek, said, “We are pleased that we have the opportunity to enable passengers to plan their summer vacation to popular coastal destinations such as Dubrovnik and Split, for which there is traditionally a lot of interest because of their beauty and proximity. The air connection to the capital of Romania is also very important to us, primarily for economic reasons. Direct flights to the capitals of the Czech Republic and Bulgaria are also very important”. During May, Air Serbia became the largest carrier across all former Yugoslav markets in terms of flights on offer, with the airline maintaining 1.168 operations. It is followed by Croatia Airlines with 1.072, Wizz Air with 794 and Austrian Airlines with 529 flights during the month.


May 26, 2021
Air Serbia Belgrade Covid-19 Newsflash serbia Summer 2021
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Well done Air Serbia!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:07

    Good to see some demand returning.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  3. Anonymous09:07

    I wonder if we may see some more routes return.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous09:09

    I really hope they restore Madrid and Barcelona. Spain has signed an agreement with Serbia allowing all vaccinated Serbian people (with any vaccine) to enter Spain without restrictions.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:11

      Do they accept all vaccines or just the ones approved by EMA?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:15

      All besides Sputnik. Chinese is accepted because it was approved by WHO.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:17

      Great. Thank you :)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:18

      Even PCR test is not required if you fall within that category.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:40

      If they don't start Vueling will benefit.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous10:26

      We must not allow that to happen

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:11

    Nice to see them proactive.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous09:11

    Resuming Thessaloniki daily is a good amount of flights considering the situation

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:31

      First SKG-BEG had 85 passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:31

      Kako 85 kada je prvi let bio na Atr-u?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous12:49

      Не, први је био са А319.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous13:13

      Prvi let je bio u nedelju na Atr-u,a ovo su verovatno podaci za ponedeljak.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous21:02

      Да, понедељак, извињавам се.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  7. Anonymous09:14

    Good effort. Well done

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:14

    How many destinations does Air Serbia fly to now?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      Getting close to 40.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Uros17:06

      Just for curiosity what is maximum number of destinations in JAT era and in current AirSerbia era?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. pozdrav iz Rijeke22:03

      Los Angeles, Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit, Montreal, Toronto,, New York, Algiers, Tripoli, Tunis, Cairo, Beirut, Damascus, Amman, Baghdad, Tehran, Kuwait, Dubai, Calcutta, Bangkok, Kuala Lumpur, Singapore, Beijing, Melbourne, Sydney, Glasgow, Manchester, Birmingham, London, Copenhagen, Gothenburg, Stockholm, Amsterdam, Brussels, Madrid, Barcelona, Malta, Milan, Rome, Venice, Zurich, Paris, Lyon, Vienna, Munich, Stuttgart, Frankfurt, Dusseldorf, Hamburg, Berlin, Warsaw, Prague, Moscow, Kiev, St. Peterburg, Budapest, Sofia, Tirana, Thessaloniki, Athens, Istanbul, Belgrade, Zagreb, Ljubljana, Maribor, Portoroz, Rijeka, Pula, Zadar, Split, Dubrovnik, Osijek, Sarajevo, Mostar, Nis, Pristina, Skopje, Ohrid = 78

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous03:27

      And this was just off the top of your head right? ;-)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Uros10:05

      Thank you for your this list, but it looks like there are more than 78 destinations on this list and also I could not find Podgorica (ex Titograd) and Tivat on this list.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. pozdrav iz Rijeke18:54

      @Uros
      Absolutely correct. I accidentally omitted TGD and TIV. So, it was 80, not 78. Sorry.

      @An.03.27
      I worked for JAT for 6 years, when JAT flew to all of these destinations on scheduled services. And I was interested in aviation long before I started working, some 10 years, I had collected timetables and had followed development and growth of JAT. And yes, it was just off the top of my head, the best proof is I omitted more than obvious two important domestic destinations, and I also know it is difficult to believe some people keep in their heads what today is kept on digital lists and clouds only

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous04:43

      Thanks bro.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:15

    wow interesting to see Air Serbia had more flights than Wizz Air had from all of ex-Yu.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:27

      More flights than OU too which has a substantial domestic network.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:23

    That is great news!

    One thing everyone is forgetting is that we are all trying to compare ourselves to a year 2019. However, 2019 was an extraordinary year of profits for the entire global aviation. And while that was a great year, it is almost not fair to be always using stats in comparison to 2019. It will take years or never (according to the "great rest" clowns) to match that year again!

    Cheers

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  11. Anonymous09:33

    Are there any hopes about restoring flights from Cacak to Wien and/or Salonica this summer?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JATBEGMEL12:18

      KVO-VIE will be relaunched on 01.10.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:36

    So what about INI subsidised flights. Are they still receiving subsides for those routes even they dont fly them or what is the deal now? I just read yesterday they only fly to HHN so far our of 11 granted routes? Anyone?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:38

      No, they are not receiving subsidies for any routes as they are not operational.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:42

      Any addition to INI network, apart from TIV?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:05

      Salzburg apparently should be coming back. Heard also Podgorica... I know it wasn't on the initial list of 11 cities but its just a rumor

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. JATBEGMEL12:50

      The choice of destinations for the rigged tender was soo well thought out that 1 out of 11 routes are currently operational.

      INI-TIV starts from 16.06

      Nothing else is showing at the moment.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous12:51

      They could hardly predict a global pandemic.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. JATBEGMEL13:44

      And pre pandemic was amazing? BUD didn't last a full season. I dont expect to see all 11 routes operating due to the pandemic, but 1/11 doesn't give the impression of success, considering they are subsidized routes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous14:27

      So they should be spending govt money flying empty planes while most Serbian citizens have been banned from those counties for well over a year now?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous14:37

      They've already received that government money and are not flying from INI other than HHN.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous15:17

      They haven't received all the allocated funds, they received a portion for the flights that were operated.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous16:07

      I think they should considering BVA flights instead one of those routes

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. JATBEGMEL16:19

      As I said earlier, the choice of destinations was poor from the beginning, hence why only 1/11 destinations is operating. Had they planned the tender better, I dont see why another 2-3 destinations wouldn't work. Do you not think CDG and AMS would work from INI for example? Both destinations where JU have codeshare partners that offer a large amount of transfer options.

      Some traffic obviously does exists otherwise JU would not operate them at all. Perhaps not on 100% CLF but enough that with subsidies it breaks even. The whole purpose of those subsidies was so that Nis is better connected for its citizens and potential investments. I dont see how destinations such as SZG, HAN and FKB is benefitial there since they are gastarbeiter routes more suited for one of the ULCC's.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:38

    I had the same idea, but it seems EU airlines will continue flying to Minsk.

    Maybe it would be interesting for JU to fly to MSQ . Belavia and Air Serbia already have SPA so it would mean B2 could fly these passengers further to their eastern destinations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous09:41

    Seems the Russian market is quite important to them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:43

      It is not surprise at all taking in consideration that political relations are very good, economic ties are growing, Russian market is huge, there is no visa regime etc.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:41

    What were the frequencies to Moscow, St Petersburg and Krasnodar in summer 2019?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:43

      Moscow was 10, St Petersburg 3 and Krasnodar 3.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:45

      So almost pre-pandemic frequencies this summer

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous13:47

      Seems they increase St Petersburg to 4 per week (according to information from beg.aero)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  16. Anonymous09:44

    Good

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous09:45

    I wonder how Oslo is performing?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:46

      Well since they are increasing it to 3 weekly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. JATBEGMEL13:01

      OSL was reported to be one of the better routes in the JU network.

      Third weekly starts 11.06.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  18. Anonymous09:46

    BEG is also slowly recovering.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  19. Anonymous09:47

    I wonder which route is performing best for them now

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:47

    I must say they have brought a lot of routes back quickly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  21. Anonymous09:47

    All EU based airlines have announced that they stopped immediately all flights to Belorussia.
    Plus Belavia is not even allowed to use EU airspace in order to fly to a third country i.e. Serbia, Albania or Montenegro. So it could be a good opportunity for JU but it might upset the EU authorities and it might not worth the negative publicity.

    Just my2cents

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  22. Anonymous09:49

    Not really. They are operating flights normally to some EU cities like Prague, Vienna and Warsaw and are operating normal flights to other destinations overflying EU airspace.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  23. Anonymous09:50

    Helsinki, Rome, Amsterdam, Frankfurt, Barcelona all operating normally today by Belavia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  24. Anonymous09:51

    Great. Keep on growing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Аэrologic09:52

    JU should fly to Ukraine (Lviv, Kiev, Odessa...) cause with Belavia out of the picture there's a huge market left to connect Ukraine and Russia, especially places such as Rostov and Krasnodar, besides the void left by Belavia on Ukraine-EU market.

    - BT is banned from flying over Belarus thus flying to Kiev/Odessa is prohibitive
    - TK has limited presence in Russia
    - The only remaining airline is LO with a huge backtrack

    Belavia had 40 weekly frequencies to Ukraine and six destinations (including two Kiev airports) prior to this hiccup.

    https://bit.ly/3hZMHzr

    Here's an adjacent article on the topic.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  26. Anonymous09:52

    I like their approach and quick reaction also in this case. They even opened new destinations.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  27. Anonymous09:52

    Since EU banned all airlines (it did not say: only EU airlines) flying to/from Belarus from using EU airspace, I would be very interested how Air Serbia would fly to Belarus.

    Only possibility that I can see: From BEG overflying Kosovo, Albania, into Libyan, then Egyptian airspace, then via Turkey and Ukraine to Belarus. Flight time possibly 6 hours instead of 2?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  28. Anonymous09:53

    JU would be an excellent bridge for Minsk to North America/Tivat and could be very profitable. Belgrade should take advantage of it's neutral position and commence the flights asap. If the EU makes an official complaint in a few months then the route can be removed, but in the meantime a LOT of money could be made.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  29. Anonymous09:55

    @9.52 it is not true what you wrote. Belavia is flying normally to many EU cities today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  30. Anonymous09:58

    Guys please check your info once again. There is no EU-wide or Europe-wide ban on Belavia flights or overflights. Only certain countries have banned them - Ukraine, UK, France and Lithuania. They keep flying other destinations, both in EU and those outside EU overflying EU territory.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  31. Anonymous09:59

    Great news! What about Beirut?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:01

      Situation in Lebanon is catastrophic, and that is putting it lightly. Economy has collapsed. Most foreign airlines have suspended flights.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  32. Anonymous09:59

    I'm surprised it took this long to restart Sofia. Serbian citizens were allowed to enter Bulgaria with a negative PCR test since last year.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:00

      SOF is mostly route for transfers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:01

      There is a good highway linking Belgrade to Sofia so you can reach it quite easily

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:42

      @10:00

      That's the surprise part, because SOF was mainly for transfers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  33. Anonymous10:01

    Hopefully this is a sign of things improving

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  34. Anonymous10:04

    Good to see. Let's hope more are to come.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  35. Anonymous10:11

    The point is that EU wants to ban Belavia flying to EU or using EU airspace, but EU does not ban EU airlines flying to MSQ. If some of them cancelled their flights it was their own and not EU decision.

    Therefore I see no problem that JU starts flying to MSQ and making good money there.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  36. Anonymous10:17

    I think Nice will be announced soon as resuming too.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  37. Anonymous10:17

    Good to see the situation improving.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  38. Anonymous10:17

    They should have brought Cairo back! No entry restrictions for Serbian citizens, good for transferring passengers...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:22

      +100

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:24

      I was thinking exactly the same thing. Cairo (and down the road Helsinki) should be brought back!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:03

      They probably calculated that the yields would be too low.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:37

      It's also a very long rotation. And they need the aircraft.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous11:44

      Agree re the yields at the moment, however it's a good opportunity to establish themselves as a solid transfers choice, now with the limited options at the moment. It'd be a good investment for when things back to normal.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. JATBEGMEL13:04

      There was talk here that CAI was heavy on transfers, particularly to Italy. The long rotation to CAI doesnt allow for many options for transfers via BEG. Im assuming this is why they have delayed returning to CAI.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Slk00:31

      Finland is quite restrictive, even workers from estonia nearby country were banned to cross border... only citizen of finland, locals were allowed to enter. As i know now things not changed very much

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  39. Anonymous10:21

    The ban is coming into effect by Friday.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  40. Anonymous10:22

    JU is slowly rebuilding its network. Of course frequencies are not the same but they reflect reality.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  41. Аэrologic10:35

    Then JU should definitely start Minsk.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  42. Anonymous10:39

    Ponedeljak,petak i nedelja su odlično popunjeni,četvrtak i subota solidno,utorak i sreda su dani kada trebaju da pojačaju broj letova.U nekom trenutku može se pojaviti problem sa flotom jer imaju 4 aviona manje u odnosu na prošlu godinu.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  43. Anonymous10:52

    Аэrologic agree fully.
    JU could be the only realistic option for Belarusians traveling to Europe and Europeans traveling to Minsk other than going through Russia.
    Ukraine is also seriously thinking banning Belavia.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  44. Anonymous11:03

    Good luck. Hope there is more good news soon.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  45. Anonymous11:15

    From what I understood, all of EU space and airlines will be banned. They fly today normally because they announced it will take a brief moment for the legal matters to be sorted for this. That's why they are flying today.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  46. Anonymous11:40

    Each country's national aviation authority must ratify the EU decision and publish the relevant advisory. It takes a few days until all 27 member states do so.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  47. pozdrav iz Rijeke13:33

    Bravo JU, and shame on you OU, for the hundredth time!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  48. Anonymous14:23

    What are the chances of Air Serbia resuming flights JU558 or JU520?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:29

      Nobody cares at this point as we are hoping intra-EU travel gets back to normal ASAP.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:38

      Intra Europe, as Serbia is not in the EU. It will get back to at least 70-80% of 2019 levels in the next 2-3 months if vaccinations and border openings continue as planned. It already happened in the US and will happen between US and Europe, see DBV as an example.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. JATBEGMEL15:28

      I feel that next year we will see YYZ.

      As for LAX, not for a long time. PVG, ORD and PEK are all being talked about. That will keep them busy the next 5 years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  49. JATBEGMEL14:24

    Im surprised JU hasn't returned to KBP, considering 2 airlines have started the route. Or at least went ahead with launching LWO. I can imagine that Ukraine and Belarus would be popular for transfers bound for Montenegro, Albania, Croatia and Greece, possibly LCA.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  50. Anonymous14:30

    @09:53

    "JU would be an excellent bridge for Minsk to North America/Tivat and could be very profitable."

    What are you talking about? JU has one destination in North America called JFK.

    If the timing was right connections could be made for many of JUs flights, not just Tivat.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  51. Anonymous14:51

    Slovenia just agreed to accept Serbian vaccination certificates. Hopefully more people fly and JU boosts LJU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  52. happy cat15:03

    They forget Helsinki 😒

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. sad dog15:07

      They didn't forget, they just deemed it as not viable at this time.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  53. Dee08:42

    Niš to varna and tirana could be winner.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Ljubljana tipped for new Tirana and Las Palmas service

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Two airlines apply for new subsidised flights to Slovenia

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025