Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May33
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Higher fuel prices lead to €15.2 million loss at Croatia Airlines

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Croatia Airlines has seen its losses widen to 15.2 million euros during the first quarter of the year despite increased revenue, with the carrier blaming higher fuel prices for its lacklustre performance. It represents the airline’s worst first quarter financial result in at least eight years. The loss increased 19% compared to the same period in 2021, while costs soared 61%. Revenue grew 85% on last year but is still down 25% on the pre-pandemic 2019. “Considerable positive steps have been made compared to the first quarter of 2021, however, the increase in fuel prices significantly effects operating costs and the amount of cash outflow. The continuation of the war in Ukraine and the unpredictable nature of the pandemic continue to have a major impact on demand and, consequently, on income”, Croatia Airlines said. It added, “All of these may again raise questions about maintaining liquidity. The company is taking all necessary measures to actively manage liquidity and optimise the business. It continues to implement rigorous cost cutting measures, which is in line with the Croatia Airlines’ post-Covid strategy”.

During the first three months of the year, Croatia Airlines operated 4.149 flights, while sales were three times higher on the same period in 2021. Existing bookings between May and October show a notable recovery and are 2.3 times higher than last year, but still down 54% on the record breaking 2019. “Croatia Airlines has gradually increased its frequencies and renewed certain routes. Passenger behaviour in terms of bookings has changed significantly compared to the pre-pandemic years, with late bookings prevailing during the crisis and such trends continuing in 2022”, the carrier noted. Overall, Croatia Airlines had 939 employees by the end of March of this year.

Croatia Airlines handled 200.721 travellers during the first quarter of the year, up a notable 177.8% on 2021. It added 96.861 passengers. However, the figure is still down 42% on 2019. The carrier welcomed 56.428 travellers on its domestic services, up 122%, while 142.149 passengers flew on international flights, representing an increase of 214%. The remaining 2.144 customers were handled on charter flights, up 36%, although charters accounted for just 1% of total traffic. The airline noted that these operational results were better than anticipated. The carrier’s average cabin load factor stood at 51.4% which is up by 6.6 points on 2021. On domestic services, the figure stood at 49%, An improvement of 13.8 points, while the average load factor on international flights amounted to 51.9%, up 2.2 points. Overall, the airline increased capacity on its international operations by 194% compared to the first quarter of 2021.



April 29, 2022
croatia croatia airlines Feature Results 2022
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:01

    Neat excuse

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:09

      The record year 2019 is a myth... It also ended with substantial losses... Does anyone remember the excuse back then?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous01:07

      It is referring to record year in terms of passenger numbers not financial result.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:01

      Obviosly this result can never be achieved again... The reason is simple... The fleet is of the same size, BUT with ever deterioratng reliability and associated costs the same number of rotations in 24 hours cannot be operated

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  2. Anonymous09:03

    the average load factor on international flights amounted to 51.9%

    This has to be the worst part of the story. How is this even possible? And don't mention covid, as they are quite capable of canceling the flights if they are not preforming (osjek)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      Yes, OU traditionally has a very low average cabin load factor although it improved in the last few years leading up to Covid to around 75%.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:09

      This is sad

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:12

      Do we know LFs of other airlines?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:16

      I think JU was 66% if I am not wrong.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous15:11

      The passenger load factor has nothing to do with earning any money.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:05

    This financial result is worse than in Q1 2020 when Covid hit!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:09

      It is the worst in many years.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:09

    What's going to happen with OU this year?? Not sure government will be allowed to give more funds

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:16

      I think the government will find ways to pump money.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:19

      Yes but the economy isn't performing that well and losses are becoming worse and worse. Every year the loss gets wider. Also now with FR there isn't so much need for OU. Even LH is reducing ZAG-MUC and shifting more flights to OU? Why would they do that if they were making enough money?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:14

      It's the airplanes that are the problem... When the new ones come, all will be well. Especially for those signing the deal and the criminal clique below them...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  5. Anonymous09:13

    Sad

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous09:13

    Even if we take in consideration all the circumstances this is terrible result

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous09:13

    It's the final countdown

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  8. Anonymous09:15

    The problem I belive is they are not taking this airline as business as it is but as an national thing. Profit>routes

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:45

      That has been the issue from the start.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. pozdrav iz Rijeke09:15

    Hahahahahahahaha, what a good morning laugh 😃 Fuel prices, yeah right, what a pathetic excuse for all the crime, corruption, inertness, incompetence, obedience to Mafia and politicians, nepotism.....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:18

      Well it's easier to blame it on others (fuel) rather than their own incompetence.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:18

      Pozdrav iz rijeke takođe vama. Zasto so ovi glumaci kod Zagreba tako skorumpirani.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:30

      Nonsense excuse. Airlines usually hedge their fuel costs. The current oil price should not reflect Q1 results.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous09:49

      I love reading their reports to see who they will blame for their poor performance besides themselves, of course.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous04:27

      OU management reading this blog are currently googling the definition of 'hedge'.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:16

    Anyone knows the accumulated losses OU made in the past 3 years?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:19

      Around 69 milion $

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:27

      Ann 9:19 Nice

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous09:28

      So this year we might hit the €100 million mark. Congratulations to OU.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:17

    Not surprising but using fuel prices as an excuse... Doesn't OU hedge any of its supplies?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:22

      Not that smart.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:31

      Not many airlines are experienced in using financial instruments to hedge the fuel cost. To give you an example, Ryanair is said to be in the best position this year regarding the fuel prices as they have 80% of their fuel for the next 12 months hedged. This ratio is believed to be around 20% for Wizzair.

      And I don't think any ex-yu airline hedges itself against the fuel price.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:12

      Interesting info. You are probably right. I doubt any of the ex-Yu airlines do fuel hedging.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous17:09

      To add, Ryanair is also hedged with as low as $630/mt according to a Reuters article. Last week the market price for jet fuel was around $1200.

      So, to put it in simple terms, Ryanair is paying only about half of the market price for most of their fuel requirements this year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous15:17

      They also insist on paying at least the list price for anything the buy. Provisions are payed in percentage. Since the taxpayer takes the bill in the end... Who cares.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:25

    Good luck OU and I hope the management does the right thing and finances improve.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      Your hopes are too high.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  13. Anonymous09:25

    Unbelievable :(

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. yes it's me again09:27

    “Higher fuel prices” aka Ryanair?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:29

      Absolutely, they can't officially say it's because of them because then it will show that they can't compete against them. That's something we all know to be true anyway.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  15. Anonymous09:27

    Not looking good

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous09:32

    I was expecting a loss but not this big. I thought things would slowly improve this previous quarter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  17. Anonymous09:33

    At least the passenger numbers are improving. 200,000+ isn't that bad for OU during first quarter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous09:40

    Not a bad result considering the high fuel prices!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:51

      Seriously?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  19. Anonymous09:40

    It's depressing.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous09:40

    LF really low.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  21. Anonymous09:41

    Wonder what their best performing route is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:50

      OSI-ZAG in cooperation with Trade Air.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:50

      Haha

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. pozdrav iz Rijeke09:58

      Hahahaha +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous11:16

      Probably Frankfurt.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous20:10

      In winter none of them make money, at least that's what Kucko claimed.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  22. Anonymous09:41

    Results won't be any better in the second quarter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:04

      True unfortunately.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  23. Anonymous09:45

    If it's any consolation, Finnair lost 132.9 million euros in the first quarter.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:04

      Incomparable considering that Finnair is directly affected by war in Ukraine and is a much larger airline.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:17

      How did LH group airlines perform in Q1?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous01:23

      Lufthansa Group will publish their Q1 results on 5th of May.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  24. Anonymous09:48

    the figures mentioned aren't surprising.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  25. Anonymous09:49

    For Q2 they will blame early Ramadan.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:00

      LOL!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. pozdrav iz Rijeke10:09

      😃 Good one!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  26. Anonymous09:50

    Love them or hate them, I do appreciate that they publish such detailed reports.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  27. Anonymous09:50

    How many employees would be optimal for OU?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:00

      Based on their operations, not more than 700

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  28. Anonymous09:55

    An Airline with state subsidies and prioritized among competition, in a touristy country, to come up with such statistics and blame it on fuel price is just sad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:00

      +1

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. pozdrav iz Rijeke10:05

      You forgot just few "small" things : 4 million diaspora on all continents, ideal geographical position with the entire Balkans and the near East "behind", as source of passengers and cargo, all possible EU deals and open sky agreements where you basically can fly anything you want as much as you want, and labour cheaper compared to the northwest. They have ideal conditions to be the size at least Austrian and earn money at least Trade Air. Why they are not and do not, I wrote at least hundred times

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous11:28

      Indeed. I don't know it all because im not Croatian, but from an objective perspective, Croatian Airline has all ingredients to be at least a self sustaining entity.
      I wouldn't go as far as compare it with Austrian. The latter got 800mln subsidies last year and would have received double even if it meant sustaining the cargo transport alone.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  29. Anonymous10:00

    This is bad. The winter loss is getting bigger to the point that summer profits can no longer cover it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  30. Anonymous10:05

    The impeccable results of the money thrown at BCG for post Covid strategy. Just more money wasted like the numerous privatization advisors they had in the last 5 years.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pozdrav iz Rijeke10:14

      I was saying from the day one BCG was there to split money only, and got spit at by Uhljebs, fan boys and Party bots

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:04

      BCG is not the only one. In 2020 they hired another external advisor to write a document on how they should use state aid

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. pozdrav iz Rijeke03:01

      Pola pije pola Sarcu daje. Bilo bi smijesno da nije tuzno

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  31. Anonymous11:13

    Well let's see how they go in the second and third quarters. That's when they make the most money.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous11:15

      There has to be a plus after quarters 2 and 3 but especially after number 3. If result after third quarter is negative then it's another loss making year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous11:16

      There is no chance they will make a profit this year. You don't have to wait for the quarters.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous21:08

      In the third quarter we will see the result of their shift to Split.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  32. Anonymous11:13

    The load factor is quite worrying.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  33. Anonymous11:14

    I don't see a solution for this company especially since Bajic is staying on board as CEO for another several years, which means the same management team, which means the same issues and same losses.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  34. Anonymous11:17

    With only 12 aircraft, almost 1,000 employees seems excessive. That is what drives their costs up.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  35. Anonymous12:05

    I'm getting sick of my tax money going to this bottomless pit.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:24

      It's worth every penny of taxpayers money. I don't like Ryanair stealing my taxes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. pozdrav iz Rijeke02:51

      Short quiz for ex-yu audience :
      Anonymous 21.24 is :
      1. Uhljeb
      2. Party bot
      3. Limited fanboy
      The winner is getting free membership for ADEZE

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous08:46

      All of the above.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  36. Anonymous14:17

    I treba da propadnu kad se prave pametni

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  37. Anonymous18:02

    What is the passenger yield, based on revenue passenger kilometers?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  38. Anonymous18:05

    Dismiss the management!!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:06

      They just elected current CEO for full term after temporary posting 9 times.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous01:22

      His term as CEO will begin on May 6 and runs until 2027.

      https://www.exyuaviation.com/2022/03/croatia-airlines-gets-full-term-ceo.htm

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  39. Anonymous18:05

    They need to operate more charters.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:56

      In winter?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous01:20

      In winter and summer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  40. Anonymous19:16

    I thought Star Alliance membership is beneficial for OU and the then demised JP.
    OU should really put its acts together if it wants to resist FR and maybe W6 "attacks". Those 2 are now very experienced and know what to do to have a larger market share.......

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  41. Libertas19:22

    So they're saving the inflation excuse for Q2? 🤣

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:56

      I would not be surprised at all haha

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:03

      Oh Libertas, that's absolutely great..
      Good one

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  42. Anonymous20:09

    LH will always be there to help OU.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:06

      I'm not sure if this comment is ironic or delusional.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. pozdrav iz Rijeke02:53

      ADEZE as well

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:06

      With such friends who needs enemies

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  43. Anonymous21:06

    Can someone predict what are realistic and possible outcomes for OU? Please exclude privatization as I don't think that's going to happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous23:41

      Bankruptcy.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous23:55

      I've lost all hope for them

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  44. Anonymous23:56

    I really thought that they would renew their fleet like they announced, launch new routes, have a new strategy... in the end they never had worse results.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  45. Anonymous01:17

    Croatia Airlines Fail

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. pozdrav iz Rijeke03:03

      How dare you? It's Bravo Hrvatska! Always! And Bravo ADEZE! Even more always! No matter how completely f.cked up we are

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  46. Anonymous01:19

    At least they didn't take out any new loans in Q1.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:04

      If one wants to take a loan you need collateral.
      They got nothing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT's inter-city bus service
Belgrade - Niš, 1980s

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Croatia Airlines posts heavy losses and negative equity

Image

Air Serbia to add more A320s to fleet

Image

Air Serbia plans 32-member fleet in 2026, eyes MRO facility

Image

Belgrade Airport city rail link work advances

Image

Middle East Airlines commences Sarajevo operations

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025