Air Serbia is looking to attract more carriers to launch flights to Belgrade that could feed its network. The airline has confirmed it is in discussions with Etihad Airways to return to the Serbian capital, while there is also interest from Central Asian carriers following the recent introduction of SCAT Airlines’ service from Astana. “These discussions usually take time, as you need to convince them and clearly explain the benefits of flying to Belgrade and of using a secondary, niche hub”, Air Serbia CEO, Jiri Marek, told EX-YU Aviation News.
Royal Jordanian Airlines recently announced it will launch services to Belgrade in April, while Kazakhstan’s SCAT plans to introduce flights from the Serbian capital to Morocco, following the launch of its Astana service. “Discussions with Royal Jordanian took quite a long time, and I’m pleased they ultimately decided to proceed because they recognised the positive demand. The same applies to SCAT. With them, we also want to be a bit creative, as there are certain markets beyond Belgrade that sit at a level where it’s worth trying. Morocco is a good example. If they want to operate the route, we will fully support it, especially since granting fifth-freedom rights is not something that is common”, Mr Marek said.
He noted that Etihad, which flew to Belgrade from 2013 until 2020, is a prime candidate. “Logically, the next one is Etihad, with whom we are already in discussions. They are facing some capacity constraints, but there is clear interest on both sides. With SCAT’s move, you can now see airlines in Central Asia beginning to view Belgrade differently and recognising its potential. For us, any carrier from that region that wants to fly to Belgrade will have our support and full access to our network. These are routes where capacity is already fully utilised on a single daily rotation due to long block times. We have many other markets we would like to open but lack the capacity, so we would prefer someone else to operate them. These markets are predominantly connecting rather than strong point-to-point”, Mr Marek said.
Etihad last served Belgrade in October 2020. In 2019, it carried 114.256 passengers on the Abu Dhabi - Belgrade route, achieving an average annual load factor of 87.2%. The strong performance was partly driven by its partnership with Air Serbia, which fed a significant number of Europe-bound passengers through Belgrade. Although Etihad discontinued the service during the pandemic, the two airlines have since reinstated their comprehensive codeshare agreement. In the post-Covid period, Wizz Air Abu Dhabi launched flights between the UAE and Serbian capitals, but the service was discontinued this summer following the closure of the budget carrier’s Emirati unit. Wizz Air is unable to operate flights between the two countries using its European Air Operator’s Certificate.

Etihad returning would be great for connectivity
ReplyDeleteEtihad is having big fleet issues at the moment. They have launched or are in the process of launching so many routes yet plane deliveries are being delayed. They wet lease GetJet A320s that Air Serbia was using until recently.
ReplyDeleteCould Etihad deploy 787?
DeleteGetjet operates for Etihad? Thats quite bad if you expect to get Etihad's aircraft and service.
Delete^ yes they are wet leasing Get Jet planes as of this winter. Passengers are not happy.
Delete@9.05 they could but better to have daily A320 than 3-4 weekly 787.
DeleteGetjet is used as a working bus to Asia, makes sense and no one should complain
DeleteBEG cannot fill the premium cabins of EY 787s.
DeleteIf you say so. I guess that is why it has the most premium seats annually in ex-Yu.
Delete@09:15 but even that doesnt mean widebody premium can be regularly filled in BG. It remains narrowbody territory which is just fine.
DeleteWell there is QR, FZ, Hainan, Turkish, China Southern and Air Serbia all flying with dedicated proper premium products from BEG. QR and FZ from 2012, Hainan from 2021, China Southern from last year. Turkish I can't remember but I assume from the 2000s.
DeleteTrue dat.
DeleteSome people are really funny with their ridiculous statements.
Well. Etihad planes ( cabins and onboard service ) are no better than GetJet...that company suits them..
DeleteIf Air Serbia can make BEG attractive to airlines that don’t usually look at the Balkans that’s a strategic win.
ReplyDeleteSo far they haven't done that
DeleteAir Serbia should connect this markets to BEG itself.
DeleteWith what aircraft pray tell?
DeleteAir Baltic A220s are ideal!
DeleteHonestly I see them partnering with the likes of Arkia or Israir for TLV service. I guess the operations to TLV are still a risky choice with a limited capacity they have
ReplyDeleteI wonder if there is a chance for El Al mainline to replace Sun d'or on TLV flights.
Delete^ does it make any difference? It is essentially the same company.
DeleteDo both allow for connection flights?
DeleteIs anyone connecting in TLV?
DeleteHighly doubt it. Sun dor is doing well on tbis route but it is all pilgrims and Israeli toruists.
DeleteThe question is can they allow TLV pax to connect to JU flights. And yes TLV is a mini hub for transfers although to very limited markets
DeleteSensible but also shows limits of current fleet planning.
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteWell they don't deny it
Delete"We have many other markets we would like to open but lack the capacity"
So they lack the necessary equipment.
DeleteThey lack strategy. What they have is short-term planning, not one single point on fleet strategy and that's why they are focusing on ATR but suddenly there are some Embraers but suddenly there are some A220s but suddenly ARC is staying, and so on... It's not suddenly, it's complete lack of fleet strategy. They have no idea which planes they'll be flying this time next year. It works for the time being but that's why "we have many other markets we would like to open but lack the capacity"
Delete@09:48
Delete+1000
Embraers can't be compared with ATR and that is obvious. Nobody from JU did it. For A220 they got great deal and these planes are much better than Getjet A320. So, it is very positive move no matter how you try to present it.
Delete@Anon 09:48 and yet somehow they just keep growing their fleet, network and having better results each year since 2019 (except the COVID days of course). They must be doing something right.
DeleteSomething yes, but the fleet not and this specific thread is about fleet. That's exactly why Marek said "we have many other markets we would like to open but lack the capacity". Lack the capacity = we didn't do the fleet thing right.
Delete@15:47 they did the fleet thing far better than OU. Or W6, with ordering 321XLRs only to realize they don't need them, or placing bets on Norway only to lose it all, or to open AUH base only to fail completely. But they don't teach that at zamaschool.
Delete@09:48
DeleteThere is a strategy is you follow what has happened and what is happening.
ATR's were previously by far the worst aircraft in the fleet, the new -600's are fantastic. ATR modernisation was done quickly. It was the easier one to complete being a smaller and a cheaper fleet to modernise.
The next fleet modernisation is currently underway with the A319's and the strategy is to replace them with a mix of Ejets and A320's. This isn't anything new. This phase started only after the ATR fleet was fully modernised and not a little here a little there. YU-APK is out, YU-ATA and YU-APT in. Another A319 will soon leave and another Ejet is in final preparations to become YU-ATD. Another 2 A320's will follow by summer 2026 with more A319's to leave the fleet (YU-APB is next to go). Nothing random happening here.
YU-ARC was a bit of a surprise but if they couldn't find an adequate replacement why send it back?
Fleet planning is not something I would fault with JU.
Those are really good numbers for EY in 2019. Would it be possible to replicate now without the JU stake?
ReplyDeleteGood question
DeletePlease attract a US partner to start flights to BEG 😀
ReplyDeleteJetblue would be nice. Their European team of around 20 just had team building in Belgrade 2 weeks ago.
DeleteHelps that JetBlue's head for Europe is former Air Serbia manager :)
DeleteDo they have aircraft that can reach BEG? And if they do, highly unlikely they would fly from New York. What does that leave? Boston?
DeleteJetblue aint coming to Serbia. Get real people.
DeleteThey should receive the 321XLR next year, it could probably reach BEG from the east coast, but on the way back of loaded and with usual headwinds it will not be feasible or reaching it with only jetA1 vapors in the tanks....
Delete@10.01 no one said it is. We are just talking what could be if they ever did.
DeleteAir Transat starting TIA, why not BEG too?
DeleteIts not feasible from a business perspective quite apart from the restriction issues. No chance Jetblue would try this at all.
DeleteTime wise, do the Royal Jordanian flights actually feed any of JU's flights?
ReplyDeleteJU should launch Abh Dhabi now that W6 left.
ReplyDeleteAmen!
DeleteThey planned daily A330 flights but then gave up on it, because it would be a huge risk
DeleteThey didn't plan A330 at all. Even for summer 2020 an A320 was scheduled.
DeleteThey planned flights with A330 this year after Wizzair withdrawal, but the plans never went public
DeleteEtihad or Air Serbia? Although I do remember now some "hint " articles about it here.
DeleteFor several years now each winter, especially in January/February, JU has a huge hole at Middle East, neglecting this good pax stream which reflects on their entire operations, loosing some % of share at BEG only to come back in spring. They should really address this issue cause the writing is on the wall, in caps lock. Wizz withdrawal, at least on the paper, looked like best opportunity in a while.
DeleteJU was going to do it yes. But then saw that if you are sending A330 to AUH you would have a huge risk when it comes to other lh flights
DeleteDefinitely a big opportunity. And have a huge idle capacity A330 during whole year. They can always downgrade to A319/320 if demand is lower on selected dates
DeleteLast chance for QR to do sonething in BEG.
ReplyDeleteQR has a major shortage of single isle aircraft.
DeleteTheir loads are fantastic with 90% on BEG route so I doubt they care too much. Could they do more? Definitely. But ex-Yu in general is hardly a priority market for them especially when they have a major fleet shortage. They have barely introduced any new routes anywhere over the past 5 years.
DeleteWhy QR loads are soo high in BEG, during winter,? People fly P2P, Doha beautiful city break? Noo, everyone is transfering to South East Asia and Australia..And what is Air Serbia doing on its South East Asian route- CAN? Instead of proper planning and catching at least some of that huge amount of tourists, increasing frequency, they even cancel the route for 2 weeks in peak january season..I'm telling you, CAN can be the most profitable route of Air Serbia, just with proper planning and marketing.
DeleteIt's not just about that, I know many have used Qatar to get to Zanzibar which is popular during winter here. As for CAN, it can't become most profitable route of Air Serbia since they can't increase the number of flights as they need... So for profit Air Serbia goes to Tivat and Vienna and for image, yes it's cool flying to CAN...
DeleteThey can increase, because orihinally they were granted 3 flights to CAN before the route was opened with 2w..So increase is possible, off course with reciprocity to China Southern..But AS has code share with CZ on many SE Asian routes and all Australian routes..With proper planning and marketing loads on that route can be over 90% with 6w frequency during winter season ( 3w AS and 3 w CZ), maybe even with 8w, why not? Pax are there, destination is great for hub, so take the pax from Qatar, Turkish, and Emirates/Fly Dubai
DeleteWhy would they do that if they partner and codeshare with Qatar and Turkish too?
Delete@15:49 because AS flys to CAN itself, that's much more income then just selling tickets of other's.If Air Serbia planes are full and if they increase frequency due to transfer pax to onward flights with CZ in CAN, off course that brings much bigger profit then just selling tickets for TK or QR
Delete"We have many other markets we would like to open but lack the capacity, so we would prefer someone else to operate them."
ReplyDeleteHere is an idea... build your capacity, employ more people and benefit yourself on all those opportunities instead of handing it to others
Easier said then done if you are also trying to keep costs down and remain profitable.
DeleteStagnation and indecision always erode profitability in the long run in this business.
DeleteYou snooze, you loose.
If he improved working conditions then people would not be leaving JU and they could grow and expand. Until then they will have to rely on Latvians and Bulgarians.
DeleteHere we go again
Delete50+ million EUR of profit is more than sufficient to invest in planes, people and routes in case the demand is there. Don't want to be all negative, they opened the Caucuses but the window of opportunity is not going to stay open forever.
DeleteYou are forgetting that more than half of that 50 million profit has to be paid back to the state budget each year.
DeleteThe owners usually want their investment back (with some extra % attached) but they are also the ones with final say on future business. I think it would be essentially important for JU's sustainable development to actually own the planes, having in mind our traditional short-sighted approach on the work of previuos governments...
DeleteI agree with you. But we know the reality and that state (especially now) just wants cash. I wonder what would have been if JU took delivery of those A320neos? Could have gone many ways. Part of the order would likely have been differed or cancelled due to Covid, some planes may have been grounded due to engine issues or everything could have been fine and they could have completely renewed their A320 fleet.
DeleteIn the 2020/21 period there where hundreds of A320neos available for sale/lease at reduced prices. Those with access to capital and some forward thinking got them and grew.
DeleteGreek Sky Express did just that with non taken up NEOs and ATRs.
Also launching new route is always a risk. Why not let someone else do the risking, and if it works out, launch the route yourself later?
DeleteIn that case you will have to share route revenue and compete with the airline who is flying the route already.
DeleteBoth RJ and SCAT launched or plan to launch BEG before having a codeshare with JU so what Marek says is nonsense. They don't even sell CZ flights to CAN. He's trying to create an illusion.
ReplyDeleteLike everyone in govrement
DeleteWpuld love to see EY back soon
ReplyDeleteIs Marek the one to decide on fifth freedom rights? Looking forward to the time when people will talk about their field of responsibility only, it will be so refreshing. Regarding these foreign carriers, it could be good for JU's business. Especially Etihad, the rest can't bring some crazy figures but with JU's business model every little helps...
ReplyDeleteYes, the flag carrier does have a say on allowing fifth freedom rights to a certain airline in many countries if those two countries do not have a open sky agreement in place.
DeleteThat's protectionism.
DeleteIt's how it works everywhere in the world. Same way Air Canada often has the final say in blocking many airlines from increasing frequencies to Canada or launching new routes to the country. Last year, Qantas blocked Qatar Airways from introducing another daily flight to all their Australian destinations. It was written that the ministry of transport asked Qantas if Qatar should be given extra frequencies and Qantas said no. In the end, Qatar went and bought Virgin Australia and got Virgin to launch all those flights while Qatar wet leases the planes and crew to them. Basically a Qatar flight :D
DeleteThey don't really need a partner for UAE, they can launch DXB or AUH at any time and feed their own hub instead of EY's hub.
ReplyDelete+1
DeleteI wonder if the recently reported Air Samarkand discussions are tied to this
ReplyDeleteMost likely
DeleteProbably.
DeleteAir Serbia entering one of the alliances would bring partners to BEG,
ReplyDeleteTrue dat!
DeleteAt least he understands that he needs feeding from niche markets. Other thing is that he hasn’t enough capacity for that
ReplyDeleteEthiopian?
ReplyDeleteI think they are a big opportunity (for both sides)
Deleteand they have perfect machine for Belgrade. B 737max with similar distance like ME.
DeleteTrue and Africa flights are missing big time at BEG.
DeleteProbably for a reason..demand
Deletedemand exist...approx 110k pax vv to Subsaharan Africa in 2025 from the region, 3/week with 737 can be filled easely
DeleteFilled profitably? Or you just 'think' so..
DeleteEtihad passengers are the Premium ones, you pay more and you get Premium Service, like Singapore Airlines, maybe even more. Etihad was partially Owner of Air Serbia, then Vucic decided to pay their part, so they can be more Independent. Now, they are looking to Cooperate again, it’s good to work and to deal with Emirates 🇦🇪 and Sheikh Bin Zayed, Vucic friend and his Mentor. Emirates Vision of the Future are Vucic Main Goal, not the EU, so Cooperation with Emirates is very likely always to be happened with a Joy.
ReplyDeleteare you kidding? Have you flown with Etihad recently, in the last 8-9 years?
DeleteFirst time I hear about Emirates vision being more important than EU, what is Serbia actually exporting to UAE and what's the value of that export? And how much is that bigger compared to Serbian export to EU?
DeleteNice photo, looks like ORD to me.
ReplyDelete