Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT Dubrovnik flight ad, 1970

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus GP Aviation Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Results 2026 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2026/2027 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • February56
  • January85
  • December89
  • November77
  • October84
  • September81
  • August80
  • July85
  • June80
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


PHOTOS: Belgrade Airport rail link on track for spring 2027 launch

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


The construction of a rail link that will connect Belgrade's central railway station and the airport is progressing, with a projected 3.5 million people expected to use the line per year, or 10.000 per day. Work on the 18.3-kilometre railway line are progressing according to schedule, with tracks and sleepers already laid along 4.3 kilometres of the route. Final construction activities on the bridge over the motorway are set to be fully completed within the next month. Between November this year and March next year, nine new electric multiple unit trains, which will be used on the line, are due to be delivered.

Serbia’s Minister for Construction, Transport and Infrastructure, Aleksandra Sofronijević, said, “The construction of this line will allow passengers to reach central Belgrade from Nikola Tesla Airport in just fifteen to twenty minutes, placing Belgrade among the few capitals in this part of Europe with a direct rail link between the airport and the city centre”.

More than 500 people are engaged on the railway construction site each day, including approximately 200 engineers. Construction is scheduled to be completed by the end of the year, after which a testing phase will commence, with the line expected to enter service next spring.






February 20, 2026
Belgrade Newsflash serbia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous13:49

    The key question is how will the train station be connected with the terminal. However, I do not think many people from Belgrade will use this because Prokop is really poorly connected with the rest of the city

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:57

      Novi Beograd station is practically main station, it has higher ridership than Prokop. Considering new bus terminal, they just gave up on trying to fix Prokop.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:12

      How will the tthe terminal building connect to the airport train stop? You can just take a 10 minute walk like most of us do that whenever we travel somwhere . You might have something specisl in your life where the bus and train pick you up at your house, but most of us have to walk from our place with the luggage to the bus and then connect to other bus to the airport. Obviously you never been to one of the airport train stations. For example in CDG, it takes you good 15 minutes walk from any arrivals or departures to get to the train station that is attached to the main terminal.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:34

      Anonymous14:12 you tell them!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Stefan14:35

      Maybe the plan is to expand terminal (Concourse A) towards current cargo terminal. In this case, maybe some entrance can be created, to reduce outside time/distance. Also, there is a bus from Tesla parking that can stop next to future train station, that goes every 10 minutes (at the moment, the nearest stop is by cargo terminal, some 200m walk from future train station).

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous14:37

      It has been discussed and confirmed many times that you can either take a walk or a mini bus that will be shuffling people 500 meters from the train station to the airport terminal. Not an ideal solution, but also not terrible. Lets move on now

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous15:03

      ^^ Poorly planned project indeed. But yep, its here now and we'll have to lump it like so much else badly done.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous15:57

      @14:12
      +1000

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous16:33

      Walking is also not possible cuz there’s literally no sidewalks, or very narrow ones.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous16:34

      Its also bloody hot much of the year

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous16:57

      Yes, on every bigger airport you need to walk to train station but the train station is connected to main building but even more often is part of architectural design. Milano Malpensa, Frankfurt, Munchen, Madrid, Porto and Lisabon etc… the question is not if we need to walk to reach airport but where and how.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous16:59

      It was reported here maybe 6 months ago a statement by the airport where they said they are developing plans for access to the station. Why not just wait and see rather than speculate and already complain?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Anonymous17:05

      ^ They will complain either way. Don't worry. It's a national sport at any point in time in history.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Anonymous17:09

      Walking is not a problem, but where to walk and if the response is sidewalks, question is what to do in august and july or if it is raining...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Anonymous17:11

      Bunch of complainers on here nothing ever works for them and everything is not planned well. I always wonder how perfect is their life at home how they all live in amazing settings. In my opinion this is awesome and will be a great way for me and my family when we need to travel.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Anonymous18:20

      ^^its not complaining for no reason. Its because the government has a terrible record of infrastructure projects. Or do you inhabit some different Serbia? Where things actually work well?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    16. Anonymous21:41

      @Anonymous 14:12
      Have you really just dared to compare BEG to CDG?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    17. Anonymous23:22

      18:20

      You really don't have to use it, if you find it badly managed. You can still use buses, taxis or private cars. Rest of us are delighted to have it and will use it happily ever after

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    18. Reply
  2. Miroslav Smederevo14:01

    10,000 riders a day may be a conservative estimate. Especially if the transportation is free.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:09

      I don't think it will be free. While BG Voz is free, I don't think this line will be part of the urban rail system but will be operated most likely by Srbija Voz, which needs to be paid.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous14:38

      BG Voz is operated by Srbija Voz, and it's free. I heard they said these 9 trainsets will be used to transfer visitors to the Expo but after the exhibition is done, and there is no need for high frequency to the Expo anymore, they will use them on other BG Voz lines too.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous14:38

      It would be madness to make this a free ride. They absolutely have to charge tickets. Otherwise, maintenance would be terrible

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:00

      @14:38
      +1
      Like everywhere in the world. Why should Serbian (Belgrade) taxpayers finance foreigners ride to the airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous16:35

      They finance them using the buses. Then again tax payers from towns where trains and buses are but a dream do that for Belgrade through their taxes.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous21:07

      Going from either of the train stations in Frankfurt to Terminal 2 is a nightmare.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous21:29

      @21:07 doesnt make building bad projects elsewhere 'ok' just because others have.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Reply
  3. Anonymous14:34

    Large bookable short and long term parking/garage at Prokop and New Belgrade trains stations would mean a lot and make this whole project usable for people who live here.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  4. Anonymous14:44

    Well done. A positive step in the right direction.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:05

      Although i would love to see the thought process of those who designed this. Hack-job after hack-job.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  5. Anonymous15:25

    What about potential direct line between Novi Sad and airport. As I have seen, they are not building a loop, just a railway directly from Zemun. So, in fact, somebody who is travelling from NS has to come to the Zemum station, change the direction and enter into train fot airport/expo.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:42

      All of that should have been taken into account. In a better planned development the airport should have been a focus for transport allowing for future routings such as Niš-Belgrade-Airport-Novi Sad. Even Belgrade-Airport-Budapest. We see in places like Schiphol or Brussels Airport the importance of intra-city connectivity. However this projected has been rushed in order to facilitate the 'Expo' which will be forgotten rapidly after its over whereas proper, well-planned infrastructure would really help the country.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Anonymous16:33

    Pardon my OCD, but shouldn't tracks be straight? I mean, I know that this is not critical in a low-speed rail, but since you are doing it, shouldn't you do it right? Why have a speed limitation because of kinky tracks, and prevent higher speeds in the future?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous16:37

      The tracks are fine, its a reqlly short distance to the mainline. So on this case i think it is OCD. Its the station location and total lack of long term planning thats the issue many people have.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:37

      The tracks are fine, its a reqlly short distance to the mainline. So on this case i think it is OCD. Its the station location and total lack of long term planning thats the issue many people have.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:37

      They promised 120 kph, I believe. I think tracks will be straight, it's just they aren't finished being fixed, but i'm not rail engineer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  7. Anonymous17:03

    This is really misleading for someone who is not from Belgrade - Belgrade “Center” train station is nowhere near center of Belgrade, regardless whether you consider Slavija, Trg Repubike or even Beograd na vodi as a center of the city. It is not even connected to future metro lines, so basically, you can take taxi at the airport or at Hajd park/old highway, where the train station is actually placed.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:04

      It says "central railway station", which it is.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous17:35

      Wise guy? Article is correct, the substance is the problem.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous17:36

      This is central train station of Belgrade, and that's why it's called Centar, not because it's in city centre.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  8. Anonymous17:11

    The long term problem with the railway is that big area near Dobanovci that was planned for airport development is now cut off...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous17:38

      It's not. Anyway if the airport would develop in that direction they can dig our railway and the roads underground, build the bridge for the planes over it etc.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:29

      All of which is very expensive and should have been thought of now. Yet more examples of the government's disasterous development of the city.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  9. Anonymous19:37

    Prokop will not be a part of future metro system? what kind of geniuses designed all this?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:52

      🫣 the same types that struggle with cobblestones and roundabouts...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous20:54

      Naravno da će biti, samo je pitanje za koliko decenija

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  10. Anonymous20:56

    How many airports in the exyu will have rail link to the city in 2027? Naught, none, zero, nada. That explains some comments.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous20:59

      No, but several have far nice terminals. If you want to get to that silly level. Criticism of bad engineering projects is not criticism of countries or nations. If you cant accept that some things in Belgrade are rubbish then you have very very thin skin or are blind by patriotism. Either way wake up.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous21:49

      "Criticism" on a zama academy level actually doesn't count as a criticism, but as a fun fact. "Nicer" and "bad engineering" qualifications by some zama anonymous ignorants can't and won't be taken into any serious count, but theirselves.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous22:05

      ^^ @21:49 you really are the fool here sir

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous22:25

      Jealousy is toxic. BEG is adding new functionality unmatched in the region. Spin it any way you want, additional 10000 daily users add up to extend airport growth.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous22:36

      Nobody is knocking the idea to build a rail link. Everyone supports that. People are highlighting that yet again projects have been poorly managed and could have been executed far better. In your bizzare (probably blindly patriotic) world if you cant see that well good luck to you.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous22:38

      @22:35 the rail link wont provide 10k new users, rather it will mean potentially fewer car users to the airport.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous23:18

      22:05

      Again, assigning "fool" label by an ignorant doesn't count actually, but surely revealing level of desperation and hopelessness by zama disciples.
      Foolishness is criticising something without proving by counter arguments at any point. Calling something "bad" and not proving it is pathetic, but it is funny to read.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous23:22

      @23:18 you have not given any reasoning why this project is being executed well. Which makes you either foolish or ignorant.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT Dubrovnik flight ad, 1970

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Wizz Air to launch two new Skopje routes

Image

Belgrade Airport to reach 36 gates as expansion progresses

Image

Ryanair outlines Croatia plans amid €3.3 million airline boost

Image

Belgrade’s Aeronautical Museum readies for overhaul

Image

Ryanair to unveil Croatia growth plans next week

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2026