![]() |
| Ljubljana Airport expects new airlines and destinations next year |
Ljubljana Jože Pučnik Airport, which was recently acquired by Fraport, is anticipating further passenger growth in 2015 with the arrival of new airlines and the launch of additional flights. In a statement, the airport said it expects its busiest customer, Adria Airways, to launch flights from Slovenia's capital to Stockholm and either Madrid or Barcelona next year. Furthermore, the airport stressed the importance for the establishment of direct flights between Ljubljana and northern Germany. “In its endeavours to launch new routes and attract new airlines, Ljubljana Jože Pučnik Airport sees the greatest potential in the north German market”, it said. Earlier in 2014 the airport reported it was negotiating with Wizz Air and easyJet on launching routes to northern Germany, as well as Scandinavia, towards the end of the year. In 2015, Ljubljana Airport will also see the arrival of Swiss International Air Lines, which will launch daily flights from Zurich starting March 29. Furthermore, next summer, Turkish Airlines will boost flights from Istanbul to the Slovenian capital from its existing daily service to ten flights per week. In addition, Air Serbia is also considering increasing its flights from Belgrade.
During the first nine months of the year, Ljubljana Airport handled 1.051.475 passengers, an increase of 1.7% compared to the same period last year. The modest growth is attributed to both Adria and foreign airlines. The result comes despite a dip in the number of operated flights. Jože Pučnik Airport recorded 24.425 arrivals and departures in the first three quarters, down 5.6% on 2013. Cargo tonnage improved 7.3% to 14.049 tonnes. In a statement, the airport said Adria, Turkish Airlines and Air Serbia attributed most to the passenger growth. On the other hand, Air France reduced its number of flights, however, this did not impact on passenger numbers since it increased capacity and recorded a solid load factor. Low cost airlines Wizz Air and easyJet also saw good loads while Finnair’s passenger numbers decreased slightly. The situation in the Middle East had a negative impact on traffic at the airport, as there was a significant fall in the number of passengers from Israel during the summer. Furthermore, Iran Air ceased refuelling at the airport in June 2014. “The forecast network expansion by airlines from Ljubljana give encouragement that the trend of rising passenger numbers will continue”, the airport said.
Meanwhile, Fraport, which recently acquired a 75.5% stake in operator Aerodrom Ljubljana, which manages Slovenia’s busiest airport, has announced the acquisition of the remaining 24.5% share. The German operator will pay 61.75 euros per share. Fraport has already forked out 177.1 million euros for its initial bid. With a complete buyout, the entire deal is set to be worth 234 million euros. The takeover is expected to be completed by the end of November. Fraport has previously said it intends on developing both passenger and cargo traffic at the airport and will act as a long term investor who is not looking for short term benefits.

Comments
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tp1uyp1RUCA
Shame.
It seems that this video, though visually beautul, has been done by those who neither can write in Cyrillic, neither speak proper English.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iC2OTFKUG-o
AT: Carinthia - 0.560 mio
Styria (southern part) - 0.600
IT: Friuli - 1.200
HR: west + Zg - 1.200
Isria -0.200
As for "nation" im sure that it is supposed to mean being serbian while country would mean SERBIA itself.
look for instance what national geographic did: all over belgrade there are commercials saying "devedesete, decenija koja nas je povezala" with bill clinton playing sax as the center image. that is a kind of thing you need to adapt in my opinion.
Well, Serbia finally go the Category 1 status so that's a start. However a new bilateral should be signed even if it is not a prerequisite for the establishment of direct flights between Belgrade and the U.S. The problem is that they can't agree on how to define Kosovo. The FAA doesn't really care and they are willing to use the same terminology as they did with Israel and the Dutch Antilles but it's the State Department that is taking a tough stance on this issue as they want to force Serbia to give up its claims on Kosovo. So this has become a political issue which is unfortunate.
Also, as a general note, it is not a cool thing to mock how well others know a language. I will never make fun of people who don't know English as well as I do, because I do not know our language as well as people who have been educated there. Very few people know both languages at the level of a native speaker, so don't mock someone who is trying to communicate as best as they can.
Naravno da ADR moze da obavlja kad ce da sluzi LH kroz nemacku ;))
INN-NS
INN-NS
Furthermore, when each country is making a bilateral with the US they have to define the territory they control. Serbia insists that Kosovo is part of Serbia while the US doesn't. Quite simple.
Buddy, I'm a native speaker and what you stated is utter rubbish to say the least. I had some time and watched the Air Serbia video over and over again... you should too.. watch the ad again and you'll see that they say - in proper English, ''to a heart of a city that never stops beating''... there's nothing wrong with this statement... also your latter comment on ''we are inspired by our nation''... nothing wrong there either mate... I'd rather be worried about the grammar and spelling in your comment... that's where embarrassment resides...
Well done Air Serbia... nice one!
Why wouldn't Air Serbia order maybe 10 some regional jets like Embraer 170 or 190, 15 A320neo and 5 B787 or A350? I think that would be a perfect fleet because with Embraer jets they can go to regional destinationas like Sarajevo, Podgorica, Zgreb, Bucharest, Sofia, Budapest etc. and with A320neo they can go to destinations in Europe, Africa and Asia (AUH). With Dreamliners or A350 they could go to ORD, YYZ, JFK, PEK, PVG, SIN etc. Could this work?
INN-NS
INN-NS
This is a textbook case how something taken out of context proves a point by just excluding one single word on purpose or by mistake, probably former.
Na sta tacno mislite i vi ste jedan veliki gospodin =DD
INN-NS
I still think there is a place for regional jets in Air Serbia's fleet. There are some destinations where even a A319 is too large. One destination I can think of where a regional jet could work is perhaps Algeirs. A lot of our people go there to work in the oil industry. There isn't a lot of demand, but I think that it would be high yielding enough to justify a Embraer. Add in some transit passengers, and everything is set to go.
I heard a lot of great things about the Sukhoi Superjet. Apparently Interjet really likes theirs.
Btw slab sam ti ja gospodin i slobodno me ne persiraj, dovoljno sam star, nemoras me jos podsećati. Puno pozdrava sa ove strane Atlantika.
I vama puno pozdrava iz Evrope :)
INN-NS
INN-NS
10 A320 Neo
6 A321 Neo
8-10 Atr 72-600
4 EMB 190
2-4 A350-900XWB
ili
2-4 787-9
Ili 777X
A posle 1-2 A380 ako bi se odrzavao profit konstantno ne placanjem :))
INN-NS
On the lighter side, if I represented (Air) Serbia I'd offer to buy a couple of brand new 787 from US' biggest exporter instead of taking those old A330 after Etihad is done with them. And lease 787's from a US based leasing company until Boeing can deliver them. Wouldn't that be a win-win?
15 A320neo
3 A321neo
10 ATR72
7 A350 (sa 250-270 sedista)
Mada to bi bio malo preveliki skok u floti, a i nema nista od toga dok se ne izgradi Terminal 3, s ovim i ovako ASL jedva izdrzava, vidis koliko kasnjenja i brkanja prtljaga ima
However if you did and are still serious about that 787 comment, here's my sobering response: spanking new 787 would be a lot more "profitable" doing rounds between Belgrade and a bunch of North American destinations than a "free" A330 doing rounds from BEG to say, China. Why China? Because US did not yet allow flights to the USA. Does that put your "profitability experiment" in a different perspective?
Granted, that 787 example was grotesque, but the point is: if you want to fly to the States, you better get serious and ready to jump when they tell you to do so. Some items may understandably seem like a PR suicide for the GoS side, but at least go the extra mile to enthusiastically bend over backwards and show willingness to accommodate any other request from the US side. If you don't keep focus on US interests, those A330's will be flying to PEK only.
eff 25APR15 Brussels – Dubrovnik 1 weekly (Day 6, until 03OCT14. 2nd weekly on Day 2 from 16JUN15)
SN3351 BRU0600 – 0830DBV AR1 2
SN3351 BRU1845 – 2105DBV 319 6
SN3352 DBV0900 – 1140BRU AR1 2
SN3352 DBV2135 – 0005+1BRU 319 6
Cheers.