Belgrade Nikola Tesla Airport and Sarajevo Airport have recorded their busiest month since opening their doors five decades ago, with both seeing solid growth throughout July. Belgrade welcomed 589.159 passengers, an increase of 4.3% compared to the same month last year. The figure is also 4% above the airport's previous monthly record, achieved in August 2015, when it handled 574.654 travellers. During July, Belgrade saw its flight operations improve 3% on last year. The airport's busiest 24 hours on record was registered on July 28, when it handled 20.908 passengers. The number was almost surpassed the following day when it saw 20.871 travellers use its services.
In a statement, Belgrade Airport said, "During August, which is traditionally our busiest month of the year, we expect to achieve another historical record in terms of passenger numbers". During the first seven months of the year, the airport welcomed 2.700.849 passengers, which is still down 0.04% on the same period last year, following a mixed performance during the first six months of 2016. The airport will surpass the three million passenger mark during August. "Last year we handled 4.7 million passengers, while we expect to welcome our fifth-millionth passenger by the end of the year", the airport added. Last week, acting General Manager, Saša Vaisavljević, said, "Despite the fact that during the first half of the year our passenger numbers decreased, our growth in the second half will be on the wings of Air Serbia's major network expansion. We expect to see a historic summer with numbers up in both scheduled and charter flights and our five-millionth passenger to be welcomed in early December".
BELGRADE AIRPORT
| Month | PAX | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| JAN | 290.580 | ▼ 5.8 |
| FEB | 266.660 | ▲ 0.5 |
| MAR | 313.174 | ▼ 0.7 |
| APR | 365.335 | ▼ 4.2 |
| MAY | 416.332 | ▲ 2.5 |
| JUN | 460.020 | ▼ 0.3 |
| JUL | 589.159 | ▲ 4.3 |
Sarajevo Airport staged a comeback and registered its busiest month on record in July, with 109.141 passengers handled. It is only the second time Sarajevo has surpassed the 100.000 passenger threshold in a single month, the other being in August of last year. The figure represents an impressive increase of 22.2% compared to the same month in 2015. So far this year, the airport has seen 466.606 travellers pass through its doors, up 5.7%. The historic monthly record is expected to be surpassed during August, which is traditionally the airport's busiest month of the year. The acting General Manager of Sarajevo Airport, Armin Kajmaković, says he is certain 2016 will be remembered as a "turning point" for the airport. "With ambitious projects and innovations, we look forward to keeping up with modern trends. Already in November, travellers can expect the opening of Qatar Airways' service from Doha, and we have also resumed negotiations with the Hungarian airline Wizz Air", Mr Kajmaković notes.
SARAJEVO AIRPORT
| Month | PAX | Change (%) |
|---|---|---|
| JAN | 41.208 | ▼ 5.7 |
| FEB | 42.567 | ▲ 6.7 |
| MAR | 53.438 | ▲ 6.3 |
| APR | 68.085 | ▲ 8.0 |
| MAY | 85.738 | ▲ 7.0 |
| JUN | 66.429 | ▼ 11.3 |
| JUL | 109.141 | ▲ 22.2 |

Comments
"It is only the second time Sarajevo has surpassed the 100.000 passenger threshold in a single month, the other being in August of last year".
I hope an investor comes soon because BEG is a rather ugly airport and it needs someone with money and the know-how to modernize it.
we have departing / arriving / transit pax... how does all that combine into a total (1+1+1 = 3 or some other scheme?)...thanks in advance!
Neznam dali ce da ''da naprave kancelarije u Sava Centru'' ili ne. Jedno je osnovno i tacno. Bez dolaska ivestitora, Beogradski aerodrome NEMA vise stotina miliona dolara da investira u buduci Hub Srbije. Moze da dogradjuje (krpi) parcijalno. Ponovo bez direktnog novca stranog investitora, koji mora da uvecava broj aviona, putnika i kargo saobracaja da bih vratio investirani novac sa profitom. To je ne samo istina. To je izvesno. Drzava I svak dobronameran to ne samo da zna. vec ce podrzavati. Doduse interesne grupe, koje ce gubiti pozicije, beneficije, nece se samnom saglasiti. U jednom nadam se da hoce. To je da bude srecna slava patrona vazduhoplovaca Svetog Ilije. Ta vest o proslavi ove strukovne (I porodicne)slave videosam na medijima i na netu. U velikoj nadi i zelji za razvojem Aerodroma Nikola Tesla. Zajedno sa Aerodromima Srbije. Sa zeljom da svi aerodrome Jugo istocne Evrope nastave razvoj I rast. Rodney & People of Good Will✈+ Kraljevo✈Sydney
This year Zagreb will have some 200.000 more passengers. Very optimistically Split can do 250.000 more this year.
Now, with 50.000 more passengers, how long they need to gap 500.000. Also that is if Zagreb will stay on this grow after new terminal (and for sure massive coming of LCC), and if Split can have this huge grow in next 10 years what is very questionable.
Split on the other hand will keep growing as long as tourists keep on arriving. The airport's potential is much greater. However, the only limiting factor is the airport infrastructure. If Rhodes can handle roughly 4 million passengers then SPU can too. No one is saying it will happen tomorrow or next year but it could happen over the next five years.
- 5 new Air Serbia routes (just JFK is more than 10.000 seats per month)
- new Wizzair route (Baden-Baden), Ural (Moscow), LOT (Warshaw that terminate last July), Qeshm (Tehran).
- more frequencies and capacity (Air Serbia, Qatar, Lufthansa...)
- 2 more planes for Air Serbia (CRJ-900 and A330)
- other airports in region haD double digits increase in July (Zagreb, Split, Sarajevo, Skopje, Priština...)
How on earth is this a good result?
P.S There is not Qeshm. They flew one flight in May.
Just with real LCC newcomers there should be 500.000 more passengers in Zagreb in one year (remember BEG huge grow with Wizz based plane).
With more legacy carriers on top of LCC and more Croatia Airlines routes (and they plan to bring some regional jets from 2017, for sure part of that fleet will increase number of flights to ZAG) there could be even 800.000 more passengers in Zagreb in one year.
But you must understand that with so many new routes and frequencies, and double digit grow in region BEG is slowing especially comparing to competition and that should have consequences in near future.
As for Yamal - no, it does not fly to Belgrade and never did.
just my 2cents
But competition get on the feet after huge BEG shock. And they took some of potential Belgrade passengers. Doesn't meter if that is Zagreb with new routes and carriers what is more transit passengers from other parts of exYu, and less passengers on ZAG-BEG route, or if it is SJJ with more P2P passengers or transit passengers via other hubs and less on SJJ-BEG route, or SKP with more P2P passengers and less via SKP-BEG route, or INI with more routes and less passengers via BEG, they all have bigger grow, and BEG grow is much slower.
For example ZAG had 30.800 more passengers in July and BEG 24.530 with much more new routes introduced. Since last August (12 months) BEG lost 72.000 passengers and ZAG gets 168.000 new passengers. See the difference in 240.000 passenger in last 12 months? So gap between ZAG and BEG is much smaller in last one year.
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a357/thezeke/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zpsd5716gg8.jpeg
Also let us compare the growt from 2010 to 2015:
Beg from 2.699.000 to 4.776.000
Zag from 2.071.000 to 2.588.000
Beg has 2.077.000 passengers more but Zag only 517.000 more...
More then a whole Split airport growt!
Curb your tone.
It is true that BEG lost "just" 38.000 passengers (I calculate it again), but still it is 206.000 passengers difference for Zagreb (+168.000 in same period). One should really think and react on that trend.
You can always spin the numbers to work for some theory...
For me the overall picture is more important and that is that Beg is stagnating cause of no development of low cost airlines and to be honest I would prefere for belgrade to lose 500.000 passengers in next 12 months if it means 500.000 passengers for nis and morava... You may say I am a dreamer but 120.000 passengers in Nis this year and 300.000 in 2017 is more important than a loss of 30.000 for belgrade. The whole serbia needs to develope and I would really like for belgrade nis and morava to be like munich and memmingem and not budapest.
If people from serbia can go to budapest and timisoara for cheeper flights than they can go to nis of cacak...
Just my opinion.
Thanks for converation
Landing gear on the right hand side is said to have collapsed upon landing. The aircraft caught fire after pax evacuation. Its windy, dusty and 49C in Dubai. 13 flights diverted to DWC, 4 to SHJ, 2 in AAN, 1 in FJR, BAH and MCT. Pax will be bussed to DXB. Flights from MUC, FCO and BKK bound to DXB returned back to airport of departure.
The airport should re-open at 1700 DXB time, however aircraft will be instructed to hold 2h of fuel to hold and pressure is on to reopen at 2000 DXB time.
Please don't make comments on things your not familiar with. The accident is not crew related. The crew on that flight was returning from a 24h layover, and the flight time is under 4 hours.
Thats correct! misunderstood however when the accident happened some stated it was mid-air collision. but now that the investigation was done. it tells now the true factor
Yes but just because a new terminal opens doesn't mean airlines will rush to launch ZAG flights.
Also, since you mentioned BEG, then it's also worth noting that even if passenger numbers exploded, it was during this period that Jat almost went bankrupt since their yield plummeted. Same could happen to OU, especially now when it seems no one wants to buy them.
Furthermore, BEG numbers were primarily boosted by Wizz Air which launched flights and then opened a base.
The situation in Zagreb is a bit different since it has LJU to the north, OSI to the east and ZAD to the west. These are all potential threats that could one day become low-cost bases. If this happens then ZAG won't be able to compete price-wise; especially not if the old terminal is completely converted to a cargo terminal.
So I don't think we will see an additional 800.000 passengers in 2017. Also, every year people here tell us how Zagreb will handle between 500.000 and 1.000.000 new passengers starting from next year. This trend started shortly after Croatia became an EU member state.
Like I already said, ZAG will keep on growing but it has its limits. Coastal airports such as DBV, SPU or PUY have much more long-term potential.
Fatigue is the biggest problem in FZ, not EK. However, there have been crew dissatisfaction in flying hours, it goes both ways with some complaining theyre flying too much and some flying too little.
LCC did not come because there was no space for them. It is not about new and shiny terminal but fact that ZAG will have capacity for growing and for LCC which they did not have with old terminal.
So, trust me, you will see LCC in 2017 to base plane and that would be at least 500.000 on top of 200.000 more passengers ZAG already has each year.
Also, was there no space at the old terminal? Lowcost carriers have their first flight between 05.00 and 06.00 meaning that they would leave before OU's first wave of departures. It also means that their other waves would have been either an hour before or after the rush-hour.
My guess is that the fees weren't as attractive.
What a job ! just sit back and ride on the fortunes of the national carrier
If you strip out the performance of Air Serbia, what have the mgt of the airport actually delivered ?
Nada.
That says everything as to what sort of job BEG airport is doing
06:00 - 11:00
11:30 - 16:30*
17:00* - 22:00
or
07:00 - 12:00
12:30* - 17:30*
18:00 - 23:00
* = problem with slots
But even in last 3 months you can see that BEG if far behind competition.
Is this story true ?
07:15-09:00
12:30-14:30
16:30-18.00
20:30-21.15
LCC dosn't just Zagreb to take care of. It is more tha hart to designe time-table outside those corfue.
07:15-09:00
12:30-14:30
16:30-18:00
20:15-21:15
It is very hard for LCC to design time-table out of that time. Especially that they are not flying only to ZAG and have much bigger system to obey.
- TAP
- easyJet
- Alitalia
- Lufthansa
- Turkish
- Adria
- Wizz
- Germanwings
- FlyDubai
- Etihad Regional
- Swiss
- Ural
05.00 - 09.30
10.00 - 14.30
And even after this they could be quite flexible.
So in a way a lowcost carrier could have based a single aircraft at the airport if they really wanted to. Now, having a second one could have been trickier.
Zagreb is not as crowded as LHR or IST so I am sure they could have worked around it.
I mean, we are talking about a base here. Wizz Air or Ryanair could have launched flights without having a base.
The fact is that ZAIC did not want to put discounts as they don't have capacity for LCC. In same time they try to do the bring as many legacy carriers they can. And did make good job.
Takodje je B92 pisao da je Fraport i jos nekoliko kompanija iz Arapskih Emirata i Kine zaintresovano ali nadam se da ce na kraju biti izabran pravi koncesionar.
INN-NS
So in the end it did boil down to the airport management not wanting to have an LCC. The real question is if they refused to give discounts only for a hub or for regular flights as well? Given the limited number of low cost flights at ZAG I guess it's both.
Now...It'd be nice if Air Serbia would introduce more connections to the Gulf and the Middle East. I don't know how that would be done, or if it's even possible. Maybe Kuwait, or Bahrein, possibly Amman,if not Doha and Dubai. On top of Abu Dhabi, which is easy due to Etihad connection.
Also, Belgrade has profited considerably from the situation in Ukraine and if instability in Turkey continues it might steal a portion of the pax traveling via Istanbul to Western Europe. Zagreb for instance is not even on the map in that respect.
Now...It'd be nice if Air Serbia would introduce more connections to the Gulf and the Middle East. I don't know how that would be done, or if it's even possible. Maybe Kuwait, or Bahrein, possibly Amman,if not Doha and Dubai. On top of Abu Dhabi, which is easy due to Etihad connection.
Also, Belgrade has profited considerably from the situation in Ukraine and if instability in Turkey continues it might steal a portion of the pax traveling via Istanbul to Western Europe. Zagreb for instance is not even on the map in that respect.