Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Winter 2025/26 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • May53
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Aer Lingus to start year-round Dubrovnik flights

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Aer Lingus has become the latest carrier to announce plans to serve Dubrovnik throughout the year, as the airport looks to ease its high seasonality. Dubrovnik Airport has confirmed in its monthly publication that the Irish carrier, which maintains seasonal services to the Croatian coastal city, will operate flights from Dublin throughout the winter. Besides carrying local holidaymakers, the airline has seen a significant numbers of transfer passengers on the route throughout the summer, primarily from and to the United States. Furthermore, the winter service will cater for the growing Croatian diaspora in Ireland. As a result, Dubrovnik becomes Aer Lingus’ only year-round destination in the country.

Dubrovnik Airport is gearing up for what is likely to be its busiest winter season on record. Croatia Airlines will extend its summer service to Frankfurt, while Trade Air will continue operating to Rijeka during the winter. Furthermore, Turkish Airlines will maintain its new flights from Istanbul throughout the year. British Airways will continue flying from London Gatwick to Dubrovnik during the winter, however, there will be a partial stoppage in service in November, as well as from mid-January until mid-February. On the other hand, Croatia Airlines will discontinue its flights from Dubrovnik to Rome for the first time since 1994. The route was to be taken over by low cost carrier Vueling, however, no flights have been scheduled so far.

Dubrovnik Airport has previously said it is in talks with Europe's largest low cost airline, Ryanair, over potential year-round flights to the city. The budget carrier has requested for Dubrovnik Airport to reduce its fees and sign a multi-year agreement prior to it starting operations. Following talks with the airline, the Mayor of Dubrovnik, Andro Vlahušić, said the city is prepared to sign an agreement with Ryanair which would be applicable until 2024. Currently, over 85% of all travellers to and from Dubrovnik Airport are handled during the peak summer months. It welcomed 1.438.077 passengers through its doors during the first eight months of the year, an increase of 14.9% compared to the same period in 2015. The 2016/17 winter season begins on October 30 and runs until March 25, 2017.
September 20, 2016
croatia Dubrovnik Feature Winter 2016/17
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous09:03

    wow well done Dubrovnik! Great to see Aer Lingus all year round to ex-Yu.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous09:04

    Interesting that they have quite a few transfer passengers on the route. I assume American holiday makers. Maybe it’s time to start direct seasonal flights from the US to Dubrovnik.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:33

      Sure, because of a few transfer pax. The only question that remains is whether to send a B777ER or B748, and whether the frequency should be 14pw or 10pw.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous09:40

      No but seasonal flights with a B767 or A330 once or twice a week are possible.

      Remember, JAT used to fly seasonally from Dubrovnik to JFK.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous10:13

      JAT had 14 weekly flights from Zagreb to North America, so what is your point?

      JAT time was something else and company was more promotional tool of Yugoslav communist regime than commercial organization.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous10:26

      That is not correct! It was a true national carrier who represented the country. Remember that JAT was among the top 30 airlines in the World featuring a modern fleet and good service. Times have changed of course and JAT needed a restructuring after the sanctions and a new political setup of ExYU. One should also acknowledge that every political party used to milk JAT since the late 80's for cash without re-investing in the company hence the only direction it could go was "South"

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous13:00

      JAT was never a profitable company. At no single point in its history.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous18:12

      Bravo anon at 10.13am ! The truth always eventually emerges. JAT was no more than what you mentioned - a propaganda tool for a discredited regime which thankfully no longer exists. Anyone who thinks that it was somehow such a successful commercial machine that could do no wrong, is sorely mistaken.

      Yes, it may well have been operationally a good airline that was highly regarded and representative of the country whose flag it flew is one thing - but it was never ever a profitable enterprise - like every other public company owned by the communist regime.

      That none of those companies exist today is testament to the fact that they were all living on borrowed time and money - may they all RIP

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Anonymous00:12

      @6:12PM
      Is the free home your parents got a profitable enterprise of the communist regime? Thank you.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Purger01:38

      Ma parents did not get any fee home. Not even credit. I wonder why if everyone got home?

      Maybe because my father and mother did not want to join Communist party! Nooo, that can not be true. They just did not have luck.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous12:35

      What about your educations? o<O

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Reply
  3. Anonymous09:07

    Could Dubrovnik now overtake Split during the winter seeing as Split it mostly deserted October – March?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:08

      It's amazing that Split has done nothing to boost its winter flight offering considering they have a much bigger catchment area than Dubrovnik.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. easyJet15:32

      OU to boost Split - Munich flights - 123457

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous16:54

      That's just a few extra flights per week.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous16:56

      Yes but I doubt they have to pay for it ;)

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous17:16

      Dubrovnik cannot overtake Split. In addition to 3/4 daily flights to Zagreb, there are daily flights to Frankfurt, now Munich and Rome. Plus year round services by Germanwings.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Reply
  4. Anonymous09:07

    Good for DBV!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  5. Anonymous09:08

    Excellent news for Dubrovnik in general, nice to see year round flights since it's really empty during winter time! Congrats!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  6. Anonymous09:11

    Kind of unexpected. Would not have thought they would be even remotely interested considering they give the entire region a wide berth.

    So this winter Croatia Airlines, Trade Air, Turkish Airlines, British Airways and Aer Lingus.

    Not bad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  7. Anonymous09:14

    Missed opportunity for JU in my opinion. They could have flown to DBV with an ATR maybe twice per week during the winter. They would surely have secured a few point 2 point passengers and could have gotten transfers to the US which will now be going to Aer Lingus.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:42

      It is still questionable who will travel to DBV in winter. IMO EIN are not only after tourists here, but also after the North American diaspora visiting South Dalmatia and even parts of Montenegro/B&H.

      ASL only has the JFK connection and it's probably not enough to keep the DBV flights year-round.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Nemjee09:59

      I don't JU or BEG should even see EI/DUB as their competitors. Not only does EI have a large network throughout the US but Dublin airport is one of the few airports in the world to have US preclearance.

      That said, two weekly flights should be there throughout the year. They could have a 00.30 departure out of BEG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous22:49

      Most of all this is a missed opportunity for Austrian. OS are much more present in ex yu market (than EI), just 1hr away and offer many connections to both Asia and North America. Plain stupid and impossible to understand why they are that passive.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  8. Anonymous09:15

    I wonder how much city of Dubrovnik pays to the airlines for winter operations, in addition to the free of charge services by the airport.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:17

      I agree. Would it have not been better to have invested all of that money maybe in a single LCC maintaining a few routes? Would have brought much more passengers in my opinion.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  9. Anonymous09:21

    This is great. This only goes to prove that DBV is the future number 1 airport in the country!! So far they always lost because of winter but this will change now. :)))

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous10:08

      I think you are getting a bit ahead of yourself. How will they overtake Zagreb?

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:27

      DBV and SPU will hardly ever overtake ZAG simply due to the fact that they have strong summer, yet rather low winter traffic and potenital for that matter. Too seasonal to overate ZAG on yearly level. Mind you, ZAG is also constantly progressing year on year, not that it has falling trend.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Nemjee11:43

      As Croatia's tourism develops the number of passengers at coastal airports will grow. In the next five to ten years, both SPU and DBV could easily handle around 4 million passengers. On the other hand, ZAG will eventually reach its maximum... unless someone starts building a hub.

      ZAG will never be a major tourist Mecca.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Q40012:15

      Nemjee,

      When it come to Zagreb I don't think tourism plays a big part in pax numbers. It's more to do with the traveling needs of the people of Zagreb and the sourounding region. With an improving economy and increased purchasing power as well as increased business based investment, will result in more people flying over time. This is where most of Zagreb's growth will come from and as long as the economy keeps improving than so will pax numbers at Zagreb.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Nemjee12:55

      I am not saying ZAG will no longer grow, it will (up to a certain point). However, each airport has its own catchment area which has its own realistic maximum potential.
      The same would have happened in BEG if we didn't get Air Serbia which is stimulating growth by attracting more and more transfer passengers.

      Same for ZAG. Let's say they grow to 4 million a year. How will they reach five or six million? There simply isn't that much demand for it to grow organically after a certain point.

      Also, what will happen to ZAG if LJU, OSI or BNX pull their act together and start developing? They will all take away a share of ZAG's market.

      That's where DBV and SPU have an advantage. Their growth is tied to the country's tourism industry which shows no sign of slowing down.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous13:21

      Both SPU/DBV will grow, however they will still remain highly seasonal. ZAG on the other hand will also enjoy growth on account of tourism, but will also be able to grow on year round basis through other segments, including business, government related etc (for tourism also noting constantly increasing city stay during non summer monhts). It is very hard to expect that SPU/DBV can actually overtake ZAG. Decrease the difference yes, but overtake hardly.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Nemjee14:04

      Why is it so hard to believe that they could overtake Zagreb? They currently handle less passengers than Corfu or Paphos in Cyprus. They are lagging behind when compared to other airports in their league.

      Let's see.

      Paphos: 2.277.000
      Corfu: 2.438.000
      Chania: 2.702.000
      Dalaman: 4.377.000
      Rhodes: 4.579.000
      Heraklion: 6.057.000

      Zagreb: 2.587.000
      Split: 1.955.000
      Dubrovnik: 1.693.000

      I know a lot of tourists come by bus or car but there is still so much potential among Germans, Swedes, Norwegians, French... all who will take the plane to visit the Croatian coast. All of these will further boost the numbers. Just look at easyJet which is slowly but surely building up its presence. This is a trend that will continue. Split might be slow in winter but they are exploding in summer time, like most airports I listed above.

      Also, given that DBV is working on improving its winter performance, I am sure SPU will try to do the same.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    8. Anonymous14:53

      Very good comment, Nemjee, thank you. It is hard to admit that ZAG without becoming a hub, won't grow that much in the future. The problem is that they are doing absolutely nothing to turn it into a hub and maybe it is to late for that.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    9. Anonymous15:01

      Absolutely.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    10. Anonymous15:25

      What you don't want to hear is that Zagreb has more tourist even then Dubrovnik!!!! Last year more then 1 million (Dubrovnik, 0,9 million). And number is still growing.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    11. Anonymous15:27

      logic with LJU, OSI and BNX is the same with TIV, OMO, ZAD on SPU and DBV. If TIV, OMO and ZAD grow DBV and SPU will have smaller number of passengers.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    12. Nemjee15:52

      Yes but market dynamics around all these airports are not the same.

      ZAD can have more passengers by bringing in new tourists who haven't been to Croatia before. So their growth can occur without harming SPU. Same with the other coastal airports you mentioned.

      However, if BNX gets Wizz Air then a considerable amount of passengers from Slavonija who used ZAG in the past would have an alternative airport to fly from. Same with OSI.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    13. Nemjee15:53

      In a way, OSI and BNX would have a similar impact on ZAG as INI had on BEG.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    14. Nemjee15:54

      Yes but market dynamics around all these airports are not the same.

      ZAD can have more passengers by bringing in new tourists who haven't been to Croatia before. So their growth can occur without harming SPU. Same with the other coastal airports you mentioned.

      However, if BNX gets Wizz Air then a considerable amount of passengers from Slavonija who used ZAG in the past would have an alternative airport to fly from. Same with OSI.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    15. Reply
  10. Anonymous09:22

    So now chance of Ryan Air coming this winter after all.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:25

      *no not now, sorry

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous10:48

      As far as I'm concerned good riddance. Why should Dubrovnik Airport and taxpayers give money to Ryanair when numerous other LCC offer services from/to Dubrovnik, while during the winter there is a sufficient number of airline and routes. It would be a waste of money and resources.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  11. Anonymous09:25

    They shot them selves in the foot with Rome. Authorities announced Vueling would fly the route, OU got angry, they cancelled the flights and now Vueling isn't coming and there will be no flights to FCO. Dumb.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous09:44

      If the market is there then someone will enter the market. Better to have no one than OU with their extremely high fares and unpredictable operations at DBV.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  12. Anonymous09:39

    Great news. It will be a fantastic year for Dubrovnik.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  13. Tranquilis09:52

    Dubrovnik joins Ohrid as the year-round destination from the isles. Congrats, great news! The more the merrier.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  14. Anonymous10:39

    DBV could reach around 1.9 million this year if not more.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous12:31

      If all of this materliazes it will be an amazing year for Dubrovnik. It already is...

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  15. Anonymous11:24

    Good catch for Dubrovnik.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  16. Anonymous12:10

    LX pushes back its C-series introduction on the BEG route from 12.11 to 10.12. Seems like late deliveries are the reason.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:02

      Not like anyone's looking forward to flying in that sardine tin anyway.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous13:34

      Better seats and toilets than on their A320 fleet!!!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous22:42

      Tin? It's by universes the best cabin experience for pax in jets under 220 seats.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  17. Anonymous12:32

    Pitty about Vueling cancelling plans for BCN and FCO year-round.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  18. Anonymous13:17

    DBV will soon become top 5 in ex-YU, you will see! EI is a good airline and has good connections to America.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous13:24

      It already is in the top 5.

      1. Belgrade
      2 Zagreb
      3. Split
      4. Dubrovnik
      5. Pristina

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:00

      Oh thanks! I didn´t know it =)
      So it will compete directly with Split for 3rd place as I doubt it will reach 2nd or 3rd.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. frishki11:55

      Did you read what you wrote?
      "So it will compete directly with Split for 3rd place as I doubt it will reach 2nd or 3rd."

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  19. Anonymous13:41

    Good news just noticed it in the DBV Airport newsletter too but tickets are not on sale still.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  20. Anonymous14:24

    Have they completed the construction of the new terminal in Dubrovnik?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:50

      I think it's supposed to be built by March next year.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:16

      No, from what I heard it was supposed to be finished in September but opened in March 2017.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  21. easyJet19:51

    No yet flights are able to book while wintertimetable

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous19:59

      EI should announce these flights soon along with a number of new destinations they are planning to start, none of them in ex-YU thoug

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  22. Anonymous22:42

    OT: Jet2 will inaugerate 2 new routes to Croatia in summer 2017:
    STN-DBV 3/7
    STN-PUY 2/7

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  23. Anonymous11:20

    Tako ce dobiti preko DUB jos jednu odlicnu konekciju DBV.
    INN-NS

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  24. Sean M22:43

    Still not able to get confirmation of these flights from Aer Lingus...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


"Qantastic" 
Qantas ad for Belgrade flights, 1975

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

easyJet ups Belgrade operations to fend off Air Serbia

Image

Ex-Air Serbia CEO to lead Mozambique Airlines recovery

Image

Air Serbia and Croatia Airlines within Europe’s top sixty largest

Image

Montenegro to decide who takes over country’s airports next month

Image

Turkish Airlines is Slovenia’s busiest in Q1, Swiss adds most passengers

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025