The ambitious redevelopment of Bihać Airport in north-western Bosnia and Herzegovina, initially scheduled to commence last February, has received renewed backing from the Federal government which will provide the necessary funding in order for construction to begin this year. A groundbreaking ceremony was cancelled in 2016 after the government snubbed the project and failed to provide the required funds. However, the Prime Minister of the Federation of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Fadil Novalić, said last week, "The city of Bihać missed out on an initial investment of one million euros because they failed to submit an investment plan. We will provide one million euros for Bihać Airport this year and will inject a further million each subsequent year".
The Mayor of Bihać, Šuhret Fazlić, says construction of the airport's terminal building is likely to begin this year. "We have already formed the public enterprise JP Aerodrom Bihać, which manages the airport, while all property ownership issues have been resolved. We must now conduct a feasibility study, obtain the necessary project documentation and determine how to secure additional funding in order to begin work this year. A public private partnership is also possible", Mr Fazlić said. Turkey's Çelebi Aviation Holding, a ground handling services company, had previously expressed interest to partake in the project. "There is also interest from a Saudi investment fund based in Dubai", Smail Toromanović, the advisor to the Mayor of Bihać, previously said.
Bihać Airport's redevelopment includes the lengthening of the runway from the current 1.200 metres to 2.000 metres, as well as the construction of a new control tower and passenger terminal. "This project is of great importance to the region for the development of both the local tourism industry and economy, even if the airport caters only for charter flights. The land around the airfield is owned by the city, so there are no issues concerning possession rights", Mr Toromanović noted. The Bihać-based Euroing company was responsible for the design of the terminal. Once built, it will become Bosnia and Herzegovina's fifth commercial airport, following Sarajevo, Tuzla, Mostar and Banja Luka, which handled just over 1.230.000 passengers in 2016. Bihać is located near the Croatian border and is the country's eighth largest city.
Wouldn't this money be better spent by investing in Tuzla or Mostar?
ReplyDeleteBoth are being upgraded as we speak. Banja Luka.
DeleteI wanted to say Banja Luka as well.
DeleteWell if the government has extra cash to burn I would rather they set up a small but efficient national airline.
DeleteExtra cash
Deletehahahaha
And "investing" money like this is the reason for the extra money
If they find a private investor to build it then I don't mind but I'm not for wasting public money on such a project.
ReplyDeleteI agree but public money is already being spent through this public enterprise. Same way there was a JP Aerodrom Trebinje.
DeleteSpending money for nothing! It's very hard to understand what they are going to do with this airport. Just spilling money and pay offs.
DeleteAnother ghost airport.
I think 4 functioning commercial airports is enough.
ReplyDeleteNot again. I was hoping they gave up on this.
ReplyDeleteThe design actually looks good. I like it
ReplyDeleteThis airport could serve a part of Croatia too.
ReplyDeleteThis could be problematic. The airport is very close to the boarder meaning aircraft would do most of their approach in Croatia which could be an issue. Look at Osijek as a reference.
DeleteThis terminal would look much better at Banja Luka airport. Wizz/Ryan Air's aircraft in front of it too.
ReplyDeleteUnfortunately,the government prefers to waste money on yet another ghost airport and BNX management is mentally retarded and incapable of attracting anything except Air Serbia.
Sorry for OT, but does anyone know why ALT is in Berlin right now?
ReplyDeletehttp://www.bktvnews.com/info/srbija/drama-na-nebu-avion-er-srbije-hitno-preusmeren/88623
DeleteWhere are other turboprops, why is JU190 late for three hours ?
DeleteThis morning only two ATR, out of six, are operational.
DeleteHow come?
DeleteWhere are the other Atr's?
DeleteJU probably can't afford to fix them.
DeleteI suggest a joint venture with Ponikve, Morava, Trebinje, Niksic, Varazdin airports.
ReplyDeleteWhile it might all look like a joke, Bosnia's geography is such that western Bosnia does actually need an airport. The roads between Bihac to Sarajevo/Tuzla/BL are quite bad. Same as to reach the boarder to got Zagreb or the Croatian coast.
ReplyDeleteWhy not connect a flight Bihać-Sarajevo as roads quite bad? :)
DeleteBihac-Dortmund by Wizz Air :D
ReplyDeleteFirst airport render in region that doesn't have A380 parked next to the new terminal :)
ReplyDeleteThis one has what looks like a koenigsegg parked in front. :P
DeleteHaha, missed that one. Would be great to drive supercar on bosnian roads :)
DeleteA380 will land at Belgrade Airport in two months ! of course only once.
ReplyDeleteIt's going to be delivered to Etihad Airways from Germany.
DeleteWould it be the first A380 to visit ex YU?
DeleteGreat news, what's the occasion?
DeleteBEG Airport sale to a UAE consortium?
DeleteA380 will visit some other European airports as well before directing to Abu Dhabi. All of that is for promotional reasons.
DeleteIt is great that the municipality has all that money lying around. o.O
ReplyDeleteBiH has enough airports for its size.
ReplyDeleteAgree with other people that Tuzla should have a priority with a terminal like this.
ReplyDeleteSame thing with Kraljevo. Terminal looks great but should have been built in Nis or even as an extension to BEG.
A terminal like this for Tuzla would be fantastic. Also the terminal in Kraljevo and even the one in Uzice looks great.
DeleteI have heard so many stories of Turkish investors wanting to build airports in ex-Yu and nothing ever happens of it. The only exception is Zagreb through ADP.
ReplyDeleteADP is not Turkish, it is French! ;)
DeleteBut TAV is Turkish, which has 15% share in MZLZ.
DeleteThe biggest secret of Zagreb airport is that Etihad will introduce year round Abu Dhabi - Zagreb service with A320.
ReplyDeleteYou will see soon.
Doubt that EY would damage its own loads and JU loads to/from BEG
DeleteBesides flying empty from ZAG.
DeleteA person wrote back in June last year on here that Etihad has started talks with Zagreb.
DeleteAnd it will operate 4 weekly flights. Departure time from Zagreb will be around 11 pm.
DeleteAll information will be soon known.
Now that EK will fly to ZAG,there really is no point in EY launching the service, since EK will most likely grab the most passengers continuing on to Asia or Australia
DeleteDon't think this is the news. :)
DeleteTip zafrkava, nije Etihad :)
DeleteIt's not Etihad, trust me, just be patient... Coming soon :)
DeleteIs it a US carrier?
DeleteEY flights to ZAG will surely damage JU loads on the BEG-ZAG flights.
DeleteAlso BEG's role as a hub for the western Balkans.
Why would EY want to do that?
Don't understand why you just don't come out and say who it is. It's not like they will hunt you down and arrest you if you do.
DeleteThey would damage their own loads on BEG-AUH since their a/c waits the mid-day wave to depart precisely because of that.
DeleteGuys, it is not EY. I don't know who it is but it is not EY. The post is a provocation.
DeleteAt least they managed to make better renders of the project than Tivat and Split :D
ReplyDeleteHey guys, totally OT, but here's my question:
ReplyDeleteWhy does LJU airport (serving Slovenia) serve around 1.5M PAX/year, while Riga airport (Latvia having a population ~2M, similar to Slovenia) serves >5M (!!!) PAX/year?
I don't think there are more tourists to Latvia than there are to Slovenia, and their buying power is lower, so I don't understand where they get all the PAX?
Venice, Wien, Zagreb, Graz... all those airports "destroy" LJU airport.
DeleteSometimes it's worth watching the highway system of a country
DeleteRe/ the highway comment, Vilnius in Lithuania is similar in that it's doing much better than LJU (~3.3M PAX/year with a population of 1.7M), but has considerably better highways (comparable to Slovenia).
DeleteSorry, wrong population stat, is actually 2,9M, but 3.3M PAX/year is still considerably more, even taking into account the larger population...
DeleteLjubljana and Slovenia are close to most things that are interesting to Slovenians - Croatia, Austria, Italy, southern Germany, Switzerland..whether that be business, tourism, education, and so on..these are also countries from where the majority of visitors to Slovenia come. The Baltics on the other hand are further away from western and central Europe
Delete