Croatia Airlines will commence its 2017 summer expansion in ten days time with the launch of four new seasonal routes out of its hub in Zagreb. The carrier has recorded strong bookings on its upcoming services to Oslo, Stockholm, Helsinki and Bucharest, offering consumers promotional fares to spur demand. As a result, it recently upped frequencies on services to the Norwegian capital, which it has never served in the past, from the initially planned two weekly flights to three per week. The arrival of Croatia Airlines to Norway will result in Oslo offering fifteen weekly services to various Croatian cities, a total of almost 80.000 seats being available during the summer season schedule.
Zagreb has been one of Stockholm's top unserved routes over the past years. Croatia Airlines previously operated two weekly flights to the Swedish capital, which were maintained during the 1990s with a Boeing 737-200 aircraft, but the route was later suspended. ”In general, the interest for Mediterranean countries has increased heavily among Swedish travellers. Zagreb is also a completely new direct route from Stockholm Arlanda Airport and is also one of the top unserved destinations. We welcome Croatian Airlines' expansion at Stockholm, giving Swedes more opportunity to experience Croatia”, Elizabeth Axtelius, Aviation Business Director at Swedavia, the operator of Arlanda Airport, said. However, the Croatian carrier will face some competition on the route with Norwegian Air Shuttle to launch its own seasonal flights between the two cities this June.
According to recent data, over 18.000 passengers travelled between Zagreb and Finland last year, with Helsinki being the most popular destination, capturing 91% of the traffic. "We are glad that for the first time in Croatia Airlines’ history we have established flights between these two countries. The Finnish market has large potential, and that is why we are offering an attractive product with the best connections to southeast Europe", Croatia Airlines' CEO, Krešimir Kučko, said. On the other hand, some 14.000 passengers travelled between Zagreb and Bucharest in 2016, with strong year-on-year growth. The summer expansion will push Croatia Airlines towards handling over two million passengers this year. Based on traffic flow, other European destinations which have been identified by Zagreb Airport as having the potential to sustain direct flights include Basel, Geneva, Kiev, Riga and Sofia. However, any future expansion by Croatia Airlines would require a more permanent solution to its regional fleet, with the carrier concluding short-term wet-leases for two Bombardier CRJ 1000 aircraft in order to support its growing summer network this year.

Comments
ako je takvo stanje kako opisujete (u sta ne sumnjam), zasto se ne rese viska airbus flote i nabave nekoliko 100 seatera kojima bi bolje pokrili trziste i uvecali broj dnevnih frekvencija.
Expansion or not, OU is in a precarious position. They are facing increased competition n all fronts while their finances keep on worsening. What will happen next year when there are no more slots to be sold?
"The first two jets are scheduled to arrive in Zagreb in 2021, while the other two are due a year later. However, sources claim the carrier is considering an interim lift before the delivery of the A320neos, meaning it could lease aircraft from Airbus prior to 2021. "
http://www.exyuaviation.com/2017/04/croatia-airlines-takes-first-crj-1000.html
Ima li kakva novost ?
ATCO
http://www.aviatica.rs/dreamliner-na-putu-za-beograd/
https://www.flightradar24.com/N2DEER/d54b0c5
O malo smo nervozni :) Ajmo zato po hiljadu i prvi put o famoznim slotovima! Pa ljudi prodali 5 pari slotova pa sta, velika stvar. Ali cirlidersi u nedostatku pravih argumenata o OU koji se siri, ima novije avione a vrlo skoro i (ponovo) bolji ukupni proizvod, uporno nas dave ovde sa prodajom slotova, ne bi li skrenuli paznju sa totalne katastrofe koja je vrlo izgledno pred JU, i prema kojoj je prodaja 5 pari slotova "mala beba"
For years I repeat as parrot that they should have more RJ on fleet. They should build fleet up to
4 A320
6 CRJ-900 or similar
6 Q400
After that they should buy just CRJ.
Nije se lako "rješiti" Airbus flote i nabaviti CRJ. Sve je pitanje matematike, a tu OU baš i nije doma, zar ne?
Luckily there are experts like OU to show them how it should be done
Even with daily flights between Zagreb and Helsinki, during 26 week schedule OU will barely cover potential demand.
16300, imagine there was actually a route between two countries year round and flights were promoted!
Finnair flies to Dubrovnik and Split, 6 months of the year, bringing in 80 000 Finish holidaymakers, so market between the countries is strong, just establishing year round service might take time.
For Zagreb bringing in Finnair, SAS, Air Baltic, EasyJet, FlyBe, Aer Lingus, TAP, Aegean and Alitalia is somewhat a priority. However it might take time for these carriers to return. In case of Alitalia, nobody knows if that airline will be around beyond 2020.
OK, no problem, thank you for cancel our order, can we help you with CRJ order?
Now, really....
- routes to LED, MPX, LIS and PRG to start earlier in May than last year
- 4 new OU routes to start in May
- 14 new flights (12 on new routes + 2 on old routes) per week on OU
- Monach 5pw flights with A320/321
- CRJ1000 with more capacity instead of some Q400 routes
- more flights on ČSA, LOT, Iberia routes
- bigger planes than last year on some routes like LH to FRA
- Air Transat to start at the end of May (last year in June)
For the rest of the year we'll see. Projected 3.15 million this year, however 3.3 million is quite possible too.
You certainly pay 10.000 Dollars to get to NY via LHR from Zag. Then it pays off and of course there are 30 daily flights between LHR and NYC. EVER wondered why?
Why does that sound odd ? if they wanted to see the back of him, he would've been gone the moment he announced he was leaving - which wasn't the case as he has stayed on for some 4 mths
Why is it that ZAG maintains a monopoly on ground handling, as it is against EU rules which says airports with more than 2M pax must have at least 2 ground handlers ?
This is a big problem for airlines and contributes to extortionate prices on handling.
Croatia is in the EU and is in breach of this regulation. People on here are predicting pax numbers in excess of 3M pax and still only 1 ground handler and no one seems to be saying or doing anything about this ...
OU might start its own ground handling firm soon once it is firmly in the black, however for now this is all done by airport's own company for now. And yes competition is good, and price is bound to fall, but airport is still too small for two players in such small market.
Look at Air Serbia, despite Serbs needing UK visas and there being almost no economic ties between the two countries, LHR remains as one of the top performing routes.
It's usually failing airlines that decide to sell their Heathrow slots. I am sure OU was making money on this route. The thing is that they needed fresh capital and this was the easiest way to get it.
BEG has 3 ground handlers and has had 3 for the past 2 years, when pax numbers were well below 4M
The thing with LHR is that slots are being sold only by the most desperate airlines such as MA, CY, SK, OU... and so on.
Slots are not sold every day because they are valuable so airlines decide to sell them only when they are desperate for money. You mentioned SK, well they were on the verge of bankruptcy and shortly after the sold their slots they immediately upgauged their other flights.
Other London airports might be attractive but LHR is the 'IT' airport.
Upravo to je bilo naglašeno kad se radilo o Croatiji.
4x A320 Neo for London, Paris, Frankfurt, Amsterdam, Brussels, Vienna and Rome.
10x CS100 for all other major European destinations
6x Q400 for regional and domestic routes.
OU Network needs to expand from current:
Amsterdam, Brussels, Copenhagen, Dubrovnik, Frankfurt, London–Heathrow, Munich, Paris–Charles de Gaulle, Pula, Rome–Fiumicino, Sarajevo, Skopje, Split, Vienna, Zadar, Zürich Athens, Barcelona, Bucharest, Brač, Düsseldorf, Helsinki, Lisbon, London-Gatwick, Milan–Malpensa, Oslo–Gardermoen, Prague, Pristina, Saint Petersburg, Stockholm–Arlanda,
By adding, Lyon, Manchester, Edinburgh, Dublin, Valencia, Seville, Marseilles, Bordeaux, Nice, Sofia, Kiev, Hanover, Krakow, Riga, Tallinn and Vilnius. Most of these are seasonal destinations with exception of Dublin and Edinburgh.
This should keep OU quite busy throughout the summer and numbers at Zagreb would go through the roof in very short space of time.
There are 94 companies flying to LHR. I think that is argument which show how many companies find this airport profitable.
Ryanair is LCC which fly to secondary airports and for sure LHR is not secondary airport. But even that is changing (Frankfurt example). For sure that is not an argument, not even for 10 year old kid who knows what is different between LCC and legacy carriers and why Ryanair is flying to Stansted, Luton and Gatwick but not to Heathrow.
OU to Edinburgh, Valencia, Sevile, Marseilles, Bordeaux, Nice, Krakow, Vilnius...?
Now, I am sure you are joking. Thanks for this, in a moment I have impression that you are serious. :-)
Aegean,
Aer Lingus,
Air Algerie,
Air Astana,
Air Malta,
Azerbaijan,
Bulgaria Air,
Egypt Air,
Eurowings,
Finnair,
Flybe,
Icelandair,
LOT,
Middle East,
TAP Portugal,
Turkemnistan,
Uzbekistan,
Vueling...
are not NY or Scandinavia or huge companies.
Samo je steta sto pojedine kompanije sa ovog prostora ignorisu neka trzista koja bi im donela dosta novih putnika.
INN-NS
Why not ????
Did you look at numbers and visitors from all these places ????
We need seasonal destinations if we're to become even bigger destinations. Direct connection is what is needed, if there's no one else. than OU must do it themselves.
All these destinations are larger cities, all exceeding 500k, exception for Tallinn, and Vienna A320 once a day is possibility, perhaps @ busiest time. I know Vienna is only 280km away and many drive there.
Anyhow 4 A320 need to be used on most demanding routes. London, Paris, Amsterdam, Brussels, Frankfurt and perhaps Munich.
You make it sound as if LHR is some club for the rich where 'poorer' members are gradually kicked out.
At the end of the day, OU sold its slots because they needed cash. Personally I think it was a stupid move as they will never get them back. I am sure this winter they will sell the remaining ones after which they will completely withdraw from the London market.