Today marks a year since Air Serbia launched its first transatlantic service between Belgrade and New York with the carrier upbeat on the route’s future prospects. Over the past year, the airline operated 204 flights between the two cities and says it has witnessed strong and growing passenger load factors. “Air Serbia is delighted to be celebrating one year of successful operations to New York, where we began flying on June 23, 2016. Our flight was widely anticipated in Serbia and Southeast Europe for two reasons: it reconnected Serbia to the US with the first Serbian-operated flight since 1992, and it established the only year-round transatlantic air link to the US originating in the region”, an Air Serbia spokesperson told EX-YU Aviation News. They added, “It is especially satisfying to see that the mix of traffic is balanced, with 47% of guests originating from North America and 53% coming from Europe. The reaction from the Serbian diaspora in North America has been exceptionally positive, as predicted, and the service has also been welcomed with open arms by communities from other countries of the former Yugoslavia”.
The airline has worked hard to market the flights in the wider region, with the service proving particularly popular with travelers from Montenegro and Albania. “The flight has captured strong travel demand from countries neighbouring Serbia, with high volumes of connecting traffic from Montenegro, Albania, Greece, Macedonia and Croatia. This has driven the growth of tourism arrivals from America, and we are particularly seeing a large number of holidaymakers who are combining a visit to Belgrade with an onward trip to the Adriatic coast”, Air Serbia said. Over the past twelve months, the Serbian carrier has concluded partnerships with jetBlue, which allows passengers to connect from Belgrade to major cities across the States with one stop in New York, as well as American Airlines, which has opened up travel options for passengers flying to the mid-West and cities which are heavily populated with people who originate from the Balkans, such as Cleveland.
Ethnic travel agents in the United States have said that following an initially slow response by the flying public to the Air Serbia service, bookings and interest have significantly picked up. Travel agency Axioma Travel, which caters to the ethnic market and diaspora from the former Yugoslavia in the US, told EX-YU Aviation News, “Last year’s launch of New York – Belgrade flights was highly anticipated but at the same time met with quite a bit of scepticism. By the time ticket sales started, many potential customers had already purchased tickets on other carriers. Others waited as they were afraid the flights would be late, subject to government approval, and that the on board service would be poor. For its part, Air Serbia was slow to roll out competitive interline agreements to link JFK with points where ethnic customers live”. However, Fedja Stepanovich, the head of Axioma, noted, “Since the start of flights in June of last year, Air Serbia’s sales team worked with the agent community to develop programs and incentives to raise brand awareness, improve interline links, and, most importantly, listen to customers and agents about what was needed to boost sales. News of the impressive on-time record and great on board service quickly spread through the ethnic community and the phones started to ring”. He added, “In the same period this year, Axioma Travel's sales on flight JU500/501 have grown almost tenfold. Customers from cities like Phoenix, Cleveland and Jacksonville for the first time in several decades now have a one-stop flight to Belgrade. And they started to line up to buy the tickets. On many flights this June we have booked forty, fifty or even sixty passengers on a single flight”.
Questions have been raised as to whether Air Serbia can sustain a large investment such as transatlantic operations, however, the airline says the route is a long-term commitment which will take several years before it reaches its full potential. The carrier has also generated revenue on the route from other streams such as cargo. “Air Serbia's cargo operations are performing above all expectations. The airline's uplift capacity to JFK, which is fifteen tonnes per flight on the Airbus A330, is in high demand. We are transporting a wide variety of goods to the US and onwards to Canada and countries in South America, including textiles from Romania, Italy and Turkey, automotive parts and gaming industry machines from Bulgaria, and Serbian fruits and mushrooms, to name a few. From the other direction, there are even regular shipments of cargo from Ecuador and Argentina being sent to the region on board our service from JFK”, the airline said. Going forward, local agents in the US say areas of improvement and opportunity include more progress in interline connections to other US cities, better timed schedules to Sarajevo, Banja Luka and Podgorica and capturing more passengers from Chicago, Los Angeles, Seattle and others that already had established one-stop connections (through Lufthansa, Austrian, Swiss, Turkish Airlines etc) to Belgrade and other cities in the region.


Comments
It's a shame they are unable to sustain regional night flights throughout the year.
And people here said no one would use these flights to Croatia.
Without some facts this is just bajke.
More important will be whether the stakeholders agree if the route is meeting strategic objectives.
You think every airline only flies profitable routes ?
So 204x254 (JU A330 capacity) = 51,816
Kidding, but, that could be an option, maybe to West coast, maybe to Canada
Maybe im wrong.
Er Srbije na destinaciji BEG - JFK - BEG
Rodney
SYDNEY AUSTRALIA 🇦🇺🇷🇸🇺🇸
i would just like to know how much?
any guesses?
a)€5mil/y
b)€10mil/y
c)€15mil/y
d)€20mil/y
Logicno je i normalno bilo pretpostaviti na pocetku otvaranje iste da profitabilnost nece biti velika (vec da ce gubiti novac) medjutim vrlo raduje cinjenica da JU saradjuje sa Jet Blue kao i sa AA u SAD.
Takodje je vrlo ohrabrujuce citati
izvestaje agencija koje govore o porastu traznje za letove ka BEG.
Popunjenost kabine od oko 77% procenata na godisnjoj osnovi je zadovoljavajuci rezultat ali on sam po sebi ne moze biti dovoljan dok se ne zna prihod od tih letova a tu informaciju sve kompanije cuvaju od javnosti.
Ono sto bi definitivno trebalo jos uraditi kako bi ova linija jos bolje funkcionisala je da se jutarnja konekcija ka gradovima regije pojaca kao i otvaranje linije za KBP koja je dobro punila JFK a i da se krene sa agresivnijom kampanjom reklamiranja Srbije u SAD.
Kada se svode racuni za prethodnih 12 meseci ispada da iako ova linija stvara odredjeni gubitak ni izbliza nije toliko losa koliko bi pojedinci zeleli a pogotovo je ohrabrujuce sto ima potencijal da postane profitabilna kako za JU tako i za Srbiju i region u celini.
JFK was mostly full throughout January and December
Great news !
JU112 BEG 0730 SJJ 0825
JU113 SJJ 1025 BEG 1115
- Many regional routes are not possible without long transit times.
- In the winter, a few destinations lose their connectivity with the cancellation of night rotations.
- A shortage on ATR's means that increasing frequencies to these regional routes is not possible, currently.
Interesting enough, AUH connects well with JFK however it is not possible to purchase tickets.
+1000
Ukraine also should be re-established, large number of transfer passengers from there.
https://s16.postimg.org/xv2ugdcyt/BUF_BEG.jpg
Negative comments are comical. For example, based on 2016 data, LF was as high as 94% in August on BEG to JFK flights, but the LF discrepancy between directions was also highest that month. Overall in 2016 LF to BEG was 69% and 74% to JFK, very good for initial few months.
Cargo did great with almost continuous month over month growth (slight drop in Nov) and over 700 metric tons carried. Cargo flow was also asymmetrical, with 66% more cargo flowing to JFK than to BEG.
Solid results and even more important, trending looks good. Please note those are not official Air Serbia numbers, just my calculation based on available data.
Completely agree, however it doesn't stop Air Transat from expanding seasonal operations from same expensive airport to ZAG. If Air Serbia does not have (and will not have for quite some time based on official statements) additional plane for seasonal YYZ, why not do the same thing as with PEK: look for a partner in Canada to operate and hopefully codeshare and feed those flights?
They grew incredibly over the past 3 years - especially in the first 18mths. What they have to do now, is to get to profitability with what they have. Once there, then they should grow.
That is very interesting and if i may add, extremely stupid.