Air Serbia is recording strong travel demand for its Aviolet charter flights this summer, with the airline set to operate approximately 600 return charter services to popular destinations during the holiday season, in comparison to roughly 530 last year. Passenger numbers on Air Serbia's dedicated charter brand have grown over the years and now handle over 90.000 passengers annually. The Aviolet network has expanded to 23 cities across five countries this year, including Spain, Greece, Italy, Turkey and Tunisia. The total number of services may increase further as tour operators continue to book additional charter flights to cater to the travel requirements of holidaymakers in Serbia. All flights are maintained with a fleet of three Boeing 737-300 aircraft which have the capacity to seat 144 passengers.
Air Serbia is currently considering future options for Aviolet, which was launched in the summer of 2014. The airline's CEO, Dane Kondić, told EX-YU Aviation News earlier this year, “Aviolet was created as a brand to take advantage of the old aircraft in terms of how we gave them separation to the mainline fleet. We will always be in the charter market, because that is the nature of the outbound Serbian market. While we have those aircraft, they will be branded as Aviolet”. He added, "Aviolet remains a good option for us but the interesting thing is to see if it has legs to do something more than just what it is currently doing".
Air Serbia has previously said it has two options for its remaining B737-300 fleet. Speaking to the "Tango Six" portal earlier this year, Air Serbia's Chief Operations Officer, Declan Keller, noted that the carrier could invest in the jets and thus extend their utilisation for a further four to five years. Such a move would require an engine overhaul and cabin refurbishment. Alternatively, the airline is considering the retirement of two B737s by year's end, according to Mr Keller.


Comments
I guess next summer we will see those Airbuses fly some charter flights.
I think it's a shame Tunis Air didn't get the flights they wanted. BEG's numbers would have been further boosted.
http://m.suvarnabhumiairport.com/img/airline_logo/LBT.png
http://aviolet.rs/
It's too expensive. Who is going to do maintenance, who is going to pay for crew to stay in INI or BNX, who is going to do catering etc.
I always liked the name of Sun Country Airlines, don't know why.
On the other hand, they should really develop a proper sub-brand for charters and politically sensitive destinations (PRN comes to mind) and invest accordingly in fleet and in product.
08.55 Corfu
09.00 Antalya
15.00 Rimini
15.00 Skiathos
Yesterday
05.20 Samos
05.20 Enfidha
10.20 Cephalonia
10.30 Antalya
13.40 Zakynthos
15.00 Palma De Mallorca
15.45 Skiathos
So you see, not so many flights to Turkey
I see QR is sending its A321 to BEG, is the first one?
http://www.exyuaviation.com/2017/06/gulf-airlines-ramp-up-belgrade.html
Just check the link all 4 are flying regularly...
https://www.flightradar24.com/data/aircraft/airserbia-ju-asl
Нема потребе за тако простачким и примитивним начином изражавања.
However, I dont think they will keep the Aviolet brand once they replace the B733, which was created to distance the B733 from the Air Serbia brand.
08.25 VIE OS Q400 (dep 09.37)
08.25 LHR OU A320 (dep 09.23)
08.30 PRG OU Q400 (dep 10.51)
11.40 SPU OU Q400 (est 12.15)
11.40 BWK OU Q400 (est 12.50)
This is really bad. The weather is fine so...
Beduin
- They dont need capacity for 2 x A320, 8 x A319 and 4 x B733. This will only be more problematic once the A320 neos start to enter the fleet.
- 2 B733's returing after this season, and 2 next season falls into place with the A320 neo arrival.
- Money spent in investing into the B733 could be used to add ATR's which it desperately needs, or regional jets which would be a perfect aircraft to expand operations, especially now the massive gap between the ATR and A319. A regional jet would make JU more flexible, where an ATR can or cant be sent, however the A319 too large (PRG, VCE, HAM, VIE). The freed (mainly ATR) would in turn boost destinations such as TIA, SJJ, as well as possibilities on new destinations (INI, BWK, ZAD, OMO)
- A320 neos are scheduled to begin its slow arrival next year. A319's in this case would easily replace the B733 and not surprise JU travellers with the 'Aviolet' product. Maintenance would be cheaper, fuel costs lower, basically operating cost should be cheaper without the additional fleet (B733).
SPLIT OU 650 06:30, kasnio 5 minuta
MUNICH OU 4436 06:45, kasnio 10 minuta
FRANKFURT LH 1405 06:50, kasnio 12 minuta
PRAGUE OK 819 07:00, kasnio 13 minuta
BARCELONA OU 374 07:10, kasnio 8 minuta
FRANKFURT OU 410 07:40, kasnio 26 minuta
VIENNA OU 440 08:10, kasnio 27 minuta
AMSTERDAM OU 450 08:25, kasnio 15 minuta
LONDON OU 490 08:25, kasnio 58 minuta
PRAGUE OU 320 08:30, kasnio 2:20 sati
COPENHAGEN OU 480 08:35 kasnio 18 minuta
VIENNA OS 682 08:59, kasnio 37 minuta
ZURICH OU 462 9:00, kasnio 1:15 sati
PARIS CDG OU 470 09:00, kasnio 15 minuta
FRANKFURT OU 416 09:05, kasnio 14 minuta
ZURICH OU 460 09:05, kasnio 7 minuta
ISTANBUL TK 1054 09:30, kasnio 19 minuta
DOHA QR 216 09:45, kasnio 11 minuta
BARCELONA VY 1281 10:00, kasnio 33 minute
BELGRADE JU 231, 10:05, kasnio 6 minuta
MANCHESTER ZB 3421 10:40, kasno 6 minuta
SPLIT OU 652 10:40, kasnio 1:35 sati
BOL OU 640 11:40, kasnio 1:10 sati
WARSAW LO 612, 12:00, kasnio 10 minuta
SPLIT OU 654 12:10, kasnio 20 minuta
Jedini on time:
STOCKHOLM ARLAND DY 4350 10:30 - jedini on time
Qatar QR218 za Dohu je otkazan (jel to zbog ovog kaosa ili zbog toga što su dali 8 aviona Britishu radi njihovog štrajka?)
I koji je ovo vrag?
ZAGREB (a ne VIE) OS 682Q (Q????) 08:25, nije poletio????
* za Zagreb iz Zagrebu u 8:25
pretpostavljam da znas da se kasnjenje do 15 minuta u avijaciji ne smatra kasnjenjem
scheduled: 11.35 // actual: 11.42
Departure
scheduled: 12.30 // expected: 14.00
They have been "adapting" for 4 months already and had another 3 months of testing before that.
I have just booked a on-way flight for end of July BEG-FRA via CDG on AF flights (codeshare ASL aircraft) for 150€. Cheapest ASL tickets 271€. Lots of offers from codeshare partners like AB for dumping fares on ASL metal. Even flights sold thorugh Bulgaria Air via SOF to FRA for 170€. So where is the logic to punish own customers and allowing c/share partners to dump fare on OWN flights???? I simply don't get it.
Speaking of industrial action, BA's flight is being operated by Qatar. This could be why the outbound flight has been cancelled.
BEG handled 506.795 passengers in June, so far this year 2.311.921, up from 2.111.342 last year.
If I am not mistaken, that's 9% growth so far.
I am so happy that 5.5 million is becoming a reality.
BWK OU Q400 11.40 // 13.52
LHR BA A320 12.30 // 14.13
MUC LH E95 13.15 // 14.10
CDG AF A318 15.00 // 16.12
Most other flights were around 30 to 60 minutes late.
Even Emirates which has been sitting there for like 3 hours.
ATH JU A320 12.20 // 13.13
ZRH LX A320 14.40 // 15.49
JU to ATH was delayed because of traffic at ZRH while LX arrived late to ZRH from Valencia this morning.
so 2 big delays today.
http://www.index.hr/vijesti/clanak/zapeli-u-becu-satima-cekali-u-avionu-croatia-airlinesa-a-jutros-posadu-da-se-naspava/980207.aspx
Do you know the registration?
9A-CQD
By the way, from the article it says that the hotel and all that was taken care of by OS. Doesn't OU have a station manager in VIE?
If I were Wizz, I would introduce BEG-PRG flights.
In addition, Barcelona Airport, which has a seasonal link to Belgrade operated by Vueling, is seeking year-round flights to the city. In 2015, 14.719 passengers travelled with Vueling between the two cities, while a further 19.570 travellers flew indirectly between Belgrade and Barcelona. A total of 104.936 online ticket searches were made.
http://www.exyuaviation.com/2017/05/wizz-air-begins-belgrade-expnasion.html
2x
06.40-09.10
09.55-12.35
2x
17.00-19.30
20.15-22.55
Thanks for the link and the numbers. That goes to show that the market is there but airlines are ignoring it. I mean BCN is even closer than CDG or AMS.
Plus, I dislike Vueling. They are expensive and always late.
If only someone else would step in.
I think BEG prefers to stick to Germany instead, which is not a bad thing of course.
Beirut is never on time in BEG because the handling agent down there is useless and can't rotate an A320 in time.
BEY is always over 90% full and 100% are connections to CDG and AMS which are usually the first destinations to leave in the morning. Unlike ZAG and OU, JU has a hub system which is much more difficult to maintain.
- Takes an aircraft from its base (BEG) which is lacking aircraft.
- Defeats the purpose of their hub system in BEG.
- No support in INI/BNX (technical etc).
- No catering (water, food, beverages).
- No crew base. JU has an excess of staff as it is so hiring a seperate staff for the new base isnt the smartest of choices.
- There is only soo much JU could offer from both INI and BNX, with LCC seeming to be the best option for these airports, something JU isnt.
Nothing to with JU being 'Belgrade Airlines'. Just as AF is based in CDG, A3 in ATH, TK in IST, SU in SVO, LO in WAW, AZ in FCO, JU is based in BEG. Serbia isnt Germany, Niš isnt Munich. JU should simply restart BEG-INI to fit in its waves in BEG. Would be great if the government would finance it as a PSO route, as with UZC/KVO.
- JU is already looking to lease out 1 A319 in the winter. Lets see how that goes and what becomes of it.
- JU would have a unified product on the Airbus fleet which could easily go between charter and scheduled. The B733 steps in when it needs to.
- Airbus fleet has better fuel efficiency and is cheaper to operate. The B733 is in their ownership, the B733 isnt the cheapest to operate, burns more fuel and would require expensive maintenance to keep it flying.
- Sooner or later the B733's would have to leave the fleet, even if they wanted to or not.
- No known plan has been made for the retirement of the Airbus fleet. A320 neo will take a couple of years to fully enter the fleet.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/12125404/Man-saves-money-on-train-fare-by-flying-from-Sheffield-to-Stansted-via-Berlin.html