The new Macedonian government is considering launching a national carrier after the previous administration gave up on the idea last year. The Macedonian Minister for Transport and Communications, Goran Sugareski, said, "Macedonia absolutely needs a national airline. In order for this project to be realised, we might have to consider a public private partnership, similar to the ones employed by our neighbours. In any case, we will consider all options and find the best possible solution". Despite the necessity for a new national carrier, Mr Sugareski also indicated that the government would continue subsidising low cost carriers, a policy which has attracted the likes of Wizz Air, and generated strong passenger growth in Macedonia. "We are looking at various options, such as Ohrid St Paul the Apostle Airport being served exclusively by low cost airlines. Everything that was successfully implemented [by the previous government], and is in the people's interest, will be maintained".
Last year, the Macedonian Civil Aviation Agency, and the operator of the country's two international airports, TAV, said that the establishment of a planned new national carrier would be unsustainable and that conditions have not been met for its set-up. The comments came over a year after the Macedonian government tasked the Dutch-based InterVistas Consulting Group to compile a detailed traffic forecast, as well as a financial feasibility study, and give its recommendations on whether a new national airline is required. "The initial analysis made by the consultant showed that it is unviable to establish a national airline under current market conditions. The consultant was asked to assess whether it would be sustainable for Macedonia to create a new airline, keeping in mind the cost of hiring staff, fleet investment and licensing", the head of the aviation regulator, Goran Jandreoski, said at the time. He also added that a new study would be conducted in 2017 and that a flag carrier could be set up only if there was a significant surge in the number of people travelling by plane to and from the country.
Macedonia has witnessed some of the most robust passenger growth in Europe over the last few years, with numbers expected to continue rising in 2017 above the European average. However, TAV, previously conceded that the lack of a flag carrier has made it more difficult to establish flights to a number of markets, particularly those that are bounded by rigid bilateral air agreements. "We have invested in airports and Macedonia should invest in its own carrier. Every country should have an airline. I'm sure it will happen soon and, with it, the number of passengers will rise significantly”, the co-founder and CEO of Turkey’s TAV Airports Holding, Sani Sener, said. Neighbouring Albania recently tasked Turkish Airlines to assists in the establishment of a new national carrier in the country, while the Macedonian government has held talks with the Turkish airline over the possible introduction of transatlantic flights via Skopje.

Comments
TK already has the Turkish government meddling in its business, it sure doesn't need the Macedonian one doing the same.
Small countries such as these don't need a national carrier. Wizz Air is doing a mighty fine job.
BS.
"..+ keep giving out subsidies to low costers (which the EU commission has warned them about and will probably have to end sooner or later)."
BS.
We're all very sorry you couldn't do it on your own. You should learn to accept reality and stop spinning half-truths in order to push an obvious failure through for personal gains.
What a stupid statement. Have you put it as a clause into the concession agreement Mr ceo?
+1,000
Couldn't agree more.
Sell seats, but lose money does not = "could work" in my books.
Agreed. The questions is how.
The "Remember 15th of July" billboards with Erdogan image all over city does not agree with you.
:))))))))))))))))))))))))))))))
Please.
Listen, if it were up to TAV, SKP would've had less than half of what Wizz is flying today, and if it weren't for their stinginess, we would've also had Ryanair there. You are free to think otherwise and agree with their PR machinery.
sad! (trump voice)
it is this old fashioned way of not understanding the commercial aviation as a transport business, but as a dick measuring competition.
LCs are crating decent connectivity, bring tourists, are good for gastarbeiters to come more often and improve their spending in macedonia... why play with that? on the other hand, yes TAV wants more connectivity so for sure there is some lobbying, and there is unused potential with some markets, but the price to reach that (forming an entire airline) is just to much
"we must have a national flag carrier!"
sure, it will sound nice for macedonian voters, but what will happen after first annual financial report? more subsidies tricks and start of painful several year process until the carrier is put to sleep?
this national airline, flag carrier type of thing really ticks me off. everybody is in this to make money, nothing else matters. even vučić is slowly realising that, so now you have massive cost cuts in JU and sadly, layoffs.
I like Wizzair, and I fly most with them (at least once per month), but Skopje just need an other player who bases plane/s in the city (Ryan, Easy, Vueling, Eurowings or Transavia).
It's not about registering the aircraft, you need to open a separate company, apply for an operating licence, etc. All of which takes time, resources and more importantly - money. Incompatible with LCC philosophy.
Even UK doesn't have a government-owned national carrier. And compare their economy to the ones of the ex-yu countries.
What's wrong with that? Aren't they allowed to be angry when their tax money is being misplaced?
Their slogan can be: Ride the Alexander.
For the first one there is no precedent in practice, and in addition no theory to prove it is a viable option. Quite the contrary, there are numerous arguments why the contrary is true, some of them being economies of scale and inability to cover overhead, less efficient aircraft and high commercial risk due to thin domestic demand. The burden of proof lies with the narrator in this case. As far as 'respectable' goes, perhaps they meant by West Balkan standards, if you catch my drift.
The second one is an outright lie and spin bordering on PRN management's one.
https://www.ch-aviation.com/portal/news/47615-sofia-airport-confirms-ryanair-claims-about-bulgaria-air
Indirectly subsidized by taxpayers.