Air Serbia is facing headwinds and intense competition from low cost carriers (LCCs) that are increasingly moving in on routes which were previously solely operated by the Serbian airline. The latest such development came this week when easyJet announced the introduction of flights between Berlin and Belgrade, directly rivalling the Serbian carrier after losing an important codeshare partner on the service - Air Berlin. In addition, Ryanair, which maintains operations from the German capital to Niš Constantine the Great Airport, has put further pressure on Air Serbia. In 2017 the airline faced no competition on 21 scheduled routes, down from 26 the year before. Similarly, its market share in Belgrade has been eroding over the past few years, standing at just over 50% in 2017. Lately, it has been directly challenged on a number of its services including Amsterdam, Prague, Malta, Larnaca and Tel Aviv.
Air Serbia recently warned that a "flood of low cost carriers" would enter its home market in the near future. “Serbia is not part of the European Union and so we don’t have the degree of openness and competitive environment that other countries who are part of the EU would have. As a result, we don’t have as much low cost carrier penetration in the market. However, the flood of low cost carriers that have waged war on traditional airlines across Europe is on its way to Serbia. It definitely weighs heavily on our thoughts in terms of our future plans”, the airline noted. It has since transitioned into a hybrid full fare - low cost carrier. On the other hand, Europe's largest low cost airline, which maintains operations from Niš Airport, has said the Serbian airline would be unable to effectively compete against LCCs in free market conditions, which would include equal fees and charges at its home base. "What we certainly will soon see, for example, in Serbia, if there is the political will, is a requirement for Air Serbia to be on a level playing field at Belgrade Airport, which it will be unable to do, in our opinion", the budget carrier's Chief Commercial Officer, David O'Brien, said.
The future operator of Belgrade Airport, VINCI, has vowed to cooperate with Air Serbia and support its future development. However, the French concession and construction company will also bring in a number of new customers. It anticipates for Air Serbia to hold a passenger share of between 40% - 46%, which is down on its current figures. In addition, the airline is also facing growing indirect competition from low cost carriers at Niš Airport in the country's south-east. Last year, just over 7% of all passengers departing Constantine the Great Airport hailed either from Belgrade or the northern province of Vojvodina. Meanwhile, Wizz Air will commence operations from Vienna to Niš this November with its 220-seat Airbus A321 aircraft, further challenging both the Serbian and Austrian national carriers which maintain services between Belgrade and Vienna. Air Serbia's former CEO, Dane Kondić, said during his tenure, "The aviation business is evolving and changing. What's relevant today can become irrelevant tomorrow. You have to look what's happening around you and adapt or die". The carrier will be hoping for the former at a time its part-owner, Etihad Airways, is dealing with issues of its own, a new operator is about to take over the running of its home base and low cost carriers see growing opportunities on the market.

Comments
Wizz also crushed itself on Belgrade-Rome.
Contrary to popular belief, LCC is not a universal magic solution and not everyone is so desperate to fly them.
+1000!
Posters were saying that exactly that for years but they were labeled "haters" by trolls.
They thought that metal cutlery, new lounge and 10€ for WiFly would make Balkan passengers pay more for the privilege of flying "the new wings of Europe".
In December Air Serbia had passenger share 42% at BEG, and in January 41%.
Furthermore, I look at some of their White Tariffs and destinations such as Milan, Copenhagen, Larnaca... are between 25.000 and 30.000 which is crazy.
It's one thing to face competition from lowcosts but it's another to make their life easier like JU does.
So for the same service:
easyJet: 77 EUR
Air Serbia 198 EUR
Guess which one people will pick.
it is rather to the fact that most of the flights are very short in duration, so you do not need the full service.
it was introduced to lower JU costs
Those are Tukey (Izmir, Ankara, Istanbul...), Iran (Tabriz, Tehran), Jordan, Kuwait, North Africa to name a few. A330 should be doing flights to Israel.
Instead of, they choose to focus on some phantom 'Ex-Yu' by either laziness or nostalgia which brought them head to head with the low-cost carriers.
A battle they can't win.
I do not claim that the moves of Air Serbia are correct - I only note that they realized their errors in positioning in the market and that they try a variety of tools to better adapt future developments.
Many thanks for the interesting info.
You are making certain professional posters very upset.
All the while our dear Air Serbia acts like a 'guska u magli'.
This agonizing story of JAT/Air Serbia must stop finally.
P.S "guska u magli" lol
By being smarter, offer something unique and or join with others.
What you are suggesting is that Coca Cola should be banned because Cockta could not compete with them.
Wages and national insurance, airport charges, cheap fleet, protection from competition through bilateral agreements.
But don't worry, they will again pull the trick of bankrupting one company while other is being set up (Bul Air). Despite the fact Bulgaria Air is not owned by government, its purpose is not to make profit...
1. O&D will be covered by others, probably cheaper prices due to LCC, more tourists in BG, cheaper flights for the locals
2. Transfers will be gone -> big hit to BEG and its pax numbers
3. Less cheap transfers for the region
4. No flag carrier, what a loss lol
5. Less reasons to brag for the politicians
http://www.exyuaviation.com/2017/11/belgrade-airport-announces-new-overhaul.html
Jel bio jedini u državi?
I jel bankrotirao. Zgazilo ga ko čik u par dana.
I jel propala mađarska avijacija? Budimpešta? Jel nasto kaos?
Колико је Малев имао ваздухоплова у Будимпешти а колико их мају Визер и Рајанер. Колико више плаћају класичне компаније а колико нискобуџетне? Е ајде сада мало се позабави математиком па ћеш видети.
Belgrade-Beirut-Dubai
Belgrade-Larnaca-Dubai
Belgrade-Athens-Tripoli
Belgrade-Larnaca-Tel Aviv
Malev je bio dužan aerodromu Budimpešta kamaru para. LCC plaćaju. Manje, ali plaćaju. Broj putnika se rapidno povećao, stoga je i ukupna masa novaca koji stižu povećana.
Konačno, aerodrom je nakon bankrota Maleva prodan, za više novaca nego što je bio plaćen prije Maleva. Valjda to govori da je model bio uspješan.