Skip to main content
  • Home

Search This Site

EX-YU Aviation News

EX-YU Aviation News

  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support
  • Home
  • About
  • Vintage
  • Trip Reports
  • Newsletter
  • Support

EX-YU VINTAGE


JAT office in downtown Sydney 
1979

Labels

ACI Air Adria Airways Adria Airways Switzerland Adria Tehnika Air Croatia Air Montenegro Air Serbia Amelia International Archive files Banja Luka
Belgrade BH Airlines Bihać bosnia and herzegovina Bosnian Wand Airlines Brač Covid-19 croatia croatia airlines Dalmatian Dubrovnik ETF Airways European Coastal Airlines Feature Fleet Fly Air41 Airways FlyBosnia Focus Jat Airways Jat Tehnika jobs Kon Tiki Sky Kosovo Kraljevo Limitless Airways Livery Ljubljana Lošinj low cost airline macedonia Maribor Mat Airways MAT Macedonian Airlines montenegro montenegro airlines mostar MRO New route Newsflash Niš Ohrid Osijek Photo podgorica portorož Pragusa.One Priština Privatisation PROMO Pula Results 2008 Results 2009 Results 2010 Results 2011 Results 2012 Results 2013 Results 2014 Results 2015 Results 2016 Results 2017 Results 2018 Results 2019 Results 2020 Results 2021 Results 2022 Results 2023 Results 2024 Results 2025 Rijeka Ryanair safety sarajevo Sea Air serbia service Skopje Sky Srpska slovenia Smile Air Split Summer 2009 Summer 2010 Summer 2011 Summer 2012 Summer 2013 Summer 2014 Summer 2015 Summer 2016 Summer 2017 Summer 2018 Summer 2019 Summer 2020 Summer 2021 Summer 2022 Summer 2023 Summer 2024 Summer 2025 Summer 2026 tivat ToMontenegro Trade Air Trebinje Trip report Tuzla Užice VLM Airlines Winter 2008/09 Winter 2009/10 Winter 2010/11 Winter 2011/12 Winter 2012/13 Winter 2013/14 Winter 2014/15 Winter 2015/16 Winter 2016/17 Winter 2017/18 Winter 2018/19 Winter 2019/2020 Winter 2020/2021 Winter 2021/2022 Winter 2022/2023 Winter 2023/2024 Winter 2024/2025 Winter 2025/2026 Wizz Air Zadar zagreb
Show more Show less

Archive

  • June17
  • May83
  • April80
  • March80
  • February73
  • January84
  • December81
  • November83
  • October83
  • September79
  • August80
  • July83
  • June76
  • May84
  • April81
  • March77
  • February78
  • January81
  • December83
  • November83
  • October84
  • September84
  • August87
  • July84
  • June80
  • May84
  • April79
  • March84
  • February75
  • January81
  • December79
  • November79
  • October80
  • September81
  • August81
  • July79
  • June79
  • May80
  • April75
  • March84
  • February76
  • January79
  • December83
  • November78
  • October78
  • September79
  • August86
  • July98
  • June99
  • May93
  • April93
  • March92
  • February83
  • January93
  • December94
  • November77
  • October80
  • September79
  • August79
  • July86
  • June84
  • May86
  • April82
  • March95
  • February74
  • January79
  • December82
  • November77
  • October84
  • September80
  • August82
  • July84
  • June75
  • May79
  • April76
  • March75
  • February73
  • January80
  • December80
  • November79
  • October77
  • September73
  • August70
  • July80
  • June75
  • May76
  • April72
  • March75
  • February71
  • January78
  • December74
  • November72
  • October75
  • September69
  • August65
  • July73
  • June73
  • May74
  • April67
  • March72
  • February64
  • January72
  • December73
  • November70
  • October70
  • September70
  • August56
  • July68
  • June72
  • May73
  • April56
  • March31
  • February29
  • January34
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October30
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February29
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December32
  • November31
  • October31
  • September30
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May32
  • April31
  • March31
  • February28
  • January31
  • December31
  • November30
  • October31
  • September31
  • August31
  • July31
  • June30
  • May31
  • April30
  • March32
  • February29
  • January31
  • December30
  • November30
  • October31
  • September30
  • August30
  • July31
  • June31
Show more Show less


Serbian businessman ups Portorož Airport stake

  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps
NEWS FLASH


Serbian millionaire Miodrag Kostić has acquired a further 7.8% stake in Aerodrom Portorož, the operator of Portorož Airport, becoming the single-largest shareholder in the company with a 38.3% stake. The businessman acquired the shares from Istabenz after purchasing a 30% stake from Fraport Slovenia last year. The remaining shareholders are the Piran Municipality (36.2%), Luka Koper (15.2%) and CPK (10.2%). Mr Kostić, who made his fortunes in the sugar industry, previously acquired the Kempinski Hotel in Portorož and is also seeking to buy Marina Portorož. The tycoon's company, the MK Group, previously said, "Portorož has the potential to further develop and increase the number of foreign visitors. That is why we want to develop both the airport and marina. We want to promote Portorož as a high-end destination and it is in our interest to boost the number of flights in order for the airport to work at full capacity". Portorož is the second busiest airport in the country but has no scheduled commercial flights. It handled 25.450 passengers in 2017. The lengthening of the airport's runway is seen as crucial for attracting new airlines.

February 27, 2018
Newsflash portorož Privatisation slovenia
  • Get link
  • Facebook
  • X
  • Pinterest
  • Email
  • Whatsapp
  • Telegram
  • Reddit
  • Linkedin
  • Other Apps

Comments

  1. Anonymous14:00

    If Portoroz develops nicely it could also attract customers from Trieste and Istra.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
  2. Anonymous14:22

    It has no room to lenghten the strip

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous14:33

      They can buy the property around. The municipality can move the road and the toll.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous15:01

      Even if, the max they can get out is 1450m. It would be easier if they'd demolish the airport and build it from scratch across the road

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous15:10

      I think Kostic actually bought it to build property, closing the airport to use its land.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Anonymous08:31

      To me on google maps it looks like there is plenty of room for a runway lengthening towards the North, at least 1000m. That would make the airport get a 2km runway which is perfect for A320/737!

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    5. Anonymous09:53

      that is not possible; that area is protected and is where they harvest sea salt

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    6. Anonymous19:57

      Sea salt spiced with a kerosine pr JET A1 flavour.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    7. Reply
  3. Anonymous15:00

    As high-end destination it does not have to have commercial flights. Charter and private taxi obviously functioning great.

    Bravo Slovenia and Serbia! ;-)

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous18:06

      Why bravo? Ordinary workers in the Kempinsky Portoroz are paid peanuts even for the Slovenian standard. Hotel is open just part of the year. Tourism in Portoroz is seasonal. Nothing hight end there. Sea is not so clean in summer, air is full of ozone in summer from afternoon till late evening and dangerous for old, sick, small kids and active healthy people. Place is dirty, full of drunk lower income visitors. Restaurants are overpriced and offering the same crap. It's a nightmare! Hight end are only the prices of everything especially in summer.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous18:11

      Traffic is chaotic too. But at least in Spring and Autumn the nature around is beautiful. Entertainment is ground zero. Noisy no sense no vision not attracting the rich visitors.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Reply
  4. Anonymous15:22

    POW has no potential. The government will never accept the spatial to extend the runway in the protected lanscape.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous15:25

      Correct. It has 0 potential because of the protected areas around and the border on the other side.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Anonymous16:11

      While POW is geographically cursed, I wouldn't say it has zero potential.

      The current airport perimeter limits do allow for runway extension of up to 1,450m which - while not ideal, would allow many smaller aircraft (jet and prop)types to operate with minimal or no payload restriction via RWY33 - RWY15 is a different story.

      If you have a look at some pretty busy airports - such as SDU in Rio (1.323m for the longer runway), it accommodates fully laden 737s and A319s (with upgraded brakes) and standard E-190s. London City is at 1,500m and is a very busy airport handling E190s and CS100s as well as the A318s. The point I'm making is that in POW's case, it serves an area that is destined for the higher end tourist and not massive arrivals, hence smaller and more appropriate (for this market) pax aircraft could relatively easily operate with the possible extension of the runway - which would then require a serious upgrade of the terminal which is old and way too small. So potential is there if they want it.

      POW serves a niche market and could not and does not compete nor compare with LJU, RJK, TRS or PUY nearby.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    3. Anonymous18:17

      Portoroz is not a higher end tourist destination. Would like to be but is not.

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    4. Reply
  5. Anonymous19:37

    Why does rwy33 have that massively displaced threshold?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anonymous21:03

      There is a quite steep hill next to the airport.

      http://slovenia-taxi.si/static/images/dest_imgs/600/307753171125707787.jpg

      Delete
      Replies
        Reply
    2. Reply
  6. Anonymous08:46

    RJK cannot be compared to PUY or LJU. It hardly functions

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
      Reply
Add comment
Load more...

Post a Comment

EX-YU Aviation News does not tolerate insults, excessive swearing, racist, homophobic or any other chauvinist remarks or provocative posts with the intention of creating further arguments. A full list of comment guidelines can be found here. Thank you for your cooperation.

VINTAGE EX-YU


JAT office in downtown Sydney 
1979

POPULAR THIS WEEK

Image

Emirates: No plans for Zagreb or Belgrade service

Image

Royal Jordanian plans Belgrade service

Image

Two North African carriers considering scheduled Belgrade flights

Image

Ljubljana Airport gains momentum as more new routes expected

Image

Air Serbia outlines Europe, Middle East and long-haul plans

Powered by Blogger
© EX-YU Aviation News 2008 - 2025