NEWS FLASH
Less than a year after signing a memorandum of cooperation aimed towards merging the two Free Route Airspace areas of SAXFRA (Slovenian Austrian Cross-border Free Route Airspace) and SEAFRA (the South-East Axis Free Route Airspace project involving Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia and Serbia and Montenegro), the South East Common Sky Initiative Free Route Airspace (SECSI FRA) has been successfully implemented. On February 1, the SECSI FRA went operational offering airspace users significant benefits along the South East Axis, by delivering the shortest route options from Central Europe to South Eastern Europe. The benefits gained through the SECSI FRA are substantial. Based on the shortest route assignment potential savings per day are up to 1.940 NM in flight distance, 285 minutes in flight time, a reduction in fuel consumption of 8.000kg and a reduction in CO2 emissions of 25.500kg.
SECSI FRA is expected to deliver potential savings of 600.000 to 700.000 NM in flight distance per year. It will make more options available when determining the user-preferred trajectory. Full cross-border FRA allows airlines to take better advantage of wind or adapt to network disruptions. The better use of FRA options at flight planning level improve predictability and reduce air traffic control workload. This initiative not only works towards achieving the goals of the European Commission regarding the implementation of “Free Route” across Europe but also fulfils airspace user´s requests for having multiple route options available for the same city-pair. The cooperation of SAXFRA and SEAFRA will produce one of the largest cross-border Free Route airspaces in Europe and is a major step towards achieving a common European Free Route Airspace by 2022.


Comments
In fact Serbia wanted to separate aviation issues with Kosovo from the Brussels talks so decisions can be made more quickly and issues resolved more easily so Air Serbia could start flights to Pristina as well. Kosovo side rejected this and said it must be linked to Brussels talks.
if anything is pathetic here it certainly is you. You have no idea what this initiative (which went live last year with two big FRA spaces and merged this Feb) really is and what it means. What is pathetic even more is the fact, that OFFICIAL ICAO designator of Pristina airport is stil LYPR, but some wise guys from Iceland, who was doing the ATC there found a "solution" to the problem which was generated in political circles in Pristina: they gave it Icland's prefix, hence BKPR. Now, if you file flightplan which is going through Serbia and you have there BKPR, it will be rejected, if you file LYPR and you are flying to Pristina, it will be rejected by Kosovo. So take your bullshit somewhere else, someone else has to solve this mess. And regarding SECSI - it was bottom up project, EU just gave the ultimate pan ECAC goal to reduce the delays caused by routing. FRA works just fine. And it has revealed little petty idiotisms from LC carriers - in order to save 2 €, they are capable of creating so stupid FPL, that cause headache to everybody. I presume you are flying for one of them.
Those SAMs that can reach aircraft flying so high have been since the MH17 shutdown treated similarly to WMDs. Their logistics and whereabouts is strictly controlled on the global level. Never once again a group of drunk Cossacks will be able to possess them.
I know you thing it's as easy as changing the destination from BKPR to LYPR. What you have to be aware of is that Serbia published no up-to-date data for PRN airport after 1999, so all the charts don't resemble the actual airport layout or procedures in place. Now, try to convince your average very understanding and very reasonable SAFA inspector you are using a different ICAO code on your flightplan that is on your up-to-date Jeppesen/Lido/Navtech/... charts. Or even worse, try to fly to PRN with SMATSA-created charts, I'm sure it will be a walk in a park. Best and easiest way to lose the AOC in a single flight.
The issue is completely political and it is very sad that SMATSA still issues documents saying PRN is under "temporary control by UNMIK". Seriously? Let's cover our ears and eyes and pretend we live in a different reality.
But I guess Balkan will always be Balkan.
As Serbia is by far the largest CEFTA economy at this point, it's not far fetched to assume other CEFTA states would chose to remain integrated with Serbia, rather than Kosovo, simply having their own economic interests in mind.
So, really, Kosovo's trade embargo against Serbia would be an economic suicide, similar to Brexit.
Also, Kosovo is the party that insisted linking air agreements to political talks in Brussels. You can simply Google that. It is certain that JU is suffering because of it, but it's Kosovo's population that is suffering more - they have much less access to real competition and pay very high fares.