The Croatian government has authorised the Minister for Sea, Transport and Infrastructure, Oleg Butković, to commence talks with his Japanese counterpart over the establishment of scheduled flights between Zagreb and Tokyo. The two sides will first have to sign a Bilateral Air Service Agreement, which has already been drafted, with Mr Butković expressing hope for negotiations to be swift in order for flights between the two capitals to be launched in the near future. Currently, Japan's largest airline, All Nippon Airways (ANA), operates summer charters from several cities to Dubrovnik. Previously, Zagreb also boasted charters from Tokyo. ANA, a Star Alliance member airline, recently said it was interested in commencing scheduled services to Ljubljana. The initiative for the introduction of regular flights from Japan to Croatia is said to have come from the Japanese side.
The Croatian Minister for Tourism, Gari Cappelli, has said the country is looking to secure flights from Far East Asia in order to better cater for the growing number of tourists from the region. Mr Cappelli singled out South Korea, Japan and China as key markets. Korean Air was recently granted permits to operate up to five weekly scheduled flights between Seoul and Zagreb. "The Ministry's strategic goal is to develop Croatia as a destination which is accessible to various airlines, particularly before and after the height of the summer season. That is why we are turning towards the Asian market, primarily Korea, Japan and China, where we are concentrating a lot of our efforts".
The number of Japanese tourists visiting Croatia has been growing steadily. In 2017, a total of 142.043 holidaymakers from Japan arrived in the country, representing an increase of 17.4% on 2016. The majority of those stayed in Dubrovnik, followed by Zagreb, Plitvice Lakes, Split and Opatija. During the first four months of this year, the number of incoming Japanese visitors stood at 23.000, up 29%. Emirates, which launched flights from Dubai to Zagreb last year, carries a significant portion of Japanese tourists to Croatia. Early next month, a large Japanese business delegation, which will include airline representatives, is set to visit Croatia, where further talks concerning the matter are set to take place.

Comments
It's been two, three years that TK is keeping ZAG as 10 weekly in winter while all other destinations in the region have at least 2 daily flights.
Zagreb needs to look at this from a different angle. They need to re-direct a portion of the Asian traffic from BUD and VIE as they are currently the main gateways to the region.
Serbia has promoted itself in China so well that currently there are twice as many Chinese tourists as Hainan's seats to BEG.
In other words, Croatia must develop demand in such a way that all players benefit, not only those that fly non-stop.
"Tokyo - Zagreb, ANA -Japanese aviation authority request for Tokyo - Zagreb direct flights on a regular basis. Croatian Government needs to respond to Japanese request, if all approved first flights between Tokyo and Zagreb could start in July.
The service will be run by ANA All Nippon Airways on a regular basis, service to be agreed but it would most likely be a twice weekly service over Summer months and once per week in winter months.
The service will be first direct scheduled service between Tokyo and Zagreb and between Japan and Croatia."
Anyone have Japanese arrivals during the slow(er) months? From September to March?
I think you missed the point of that comment.
For example we have seen that since LO and others launched ZAG, LH was the first to suffer and to reduce capacity.
Croatia must make sure the same doesn't happen with those airlines that carry Asian tourists now if JAL or ANA launch flights to ZAG.
If non stop flights happen, Croatia must make sure demand grows enough so that other airlines remain unaffected. That's where BEG did really well.
There are twice as many Chinese in Serbia than Hainan's seats. That's why airlines such as SU, QR, FZ, TK and others do so well and are adding flights like all the time.
slovenes love to travel so maybe it would be easier to fill the planes in both directions.
http://www.exyuaviation.com/2018/04/ana-considering-ljubljana-service.html
http://www.exyuaviation.com/2018/05/ana-and-adria-seek-codeshare.html
I think it is difficult for both LJU and ZAG to have scheduled flights to Japan. I thnk it will be the one or the other.
LH reducting capacity to Croatia? Seriously? Unlike in Serbia, you have to braoaden your view to more than just one airport. LH flies from DBV, SPU, ZAD, PUY and ZAG to bothe MUC and FRA...
Please go back and read the post once again. No one spoke of Croatian airports as a whole but rather of Zagreb where LH mainline is all but withdrawn. Quite a contrast from a few years ago when A321s were a regular sight.
Dok BEG jeste Srbija.
Sad jasnije malo?
Исто тако, сви хвале туристички промет и раст броја путника а онда Сплит забележио 0% раст а Дубровник свега 5%.
Што се Србије тиче, не заборави да Београд конкурише са TSR, BUD, INI, TZL ... тако има доста/довољно конкуренције.
Уједно, успех Београда није у томе што наводно доминира већ зато што је аеродром отворен за све, од Хаинана до Визера.
ZAG has 5 daily! scheduled flights to FRA.
Mainline? Why differentiate here? LH is LH. But again, ZAG is growing at rate of around 13% annualy ATHOUGH other airports in Croatia are growing at a rates of around 20%. So what is your point? Surely I would also want a 321 of LH in ZAG. One strategy could be of course to limit the growth of DBV and SPU, then we could see A321s 10 times a day in ZAG. But that would of course be foolish ;)
After that they were trying their best to attract as many airlines as humanely possible.
Well, if they limit the growth at DBV passengers would be redirected to TIV or OMO, not ZAG.
PUY would gravitate to VCE and Trieste.
ANA, Korean Air, Emirates, Air Canada Rouge, Air Transat.
LH 3 years ago used to fly with 319 (capacity 144 seats) once a day. Now they fly the CRJ1000 with 100 saets twice a day. THis is almost 40% more seats.
"The company will be a consolidated subsidiary of the JAL Group and plans to operate flights from Narita International Airport to select destinations in Asia, Europe, and the Americas. In the first stages of its establishment, the carrier will operate two Boeing 787-8 aircraft and is targeting to launch commercial flights from the summer of 2020 when Narita Airport plans to complete enhancements to its facilities."
When you scratch the shiny gilding coating, you can see the reasons for being aggressive and desperate.
Balkans need cheap flights to western Europe, not long-haul to Seoul or Narita.
Plus ANA 787 would look pretty at the Zagreb terminal, especially the ones with Starwars specify livery.
I mean even Debrecen will be soon better connected to Europe following today's W6 announcement.
Both!
"ANA 787 would look pretty at the Zagreb terminal"
Thank you, looking pretty at the airport should be a new reason for airlines to start routes to new destinations! Air Serbia A330 would look pretty at SXM, Princess Juliana International Airport, so let's start that route!
People talked dirty about CRL too and today it even has direct flights to HKG.
The point here is ZAG needs to fight for more Euroflights. Come on, no flighs to LGW, seriously????
TLV and BCN seasonal! Excuse me?!
What about the warm, winter destinations??? Egypt, Canary Islands, Morocco....
Japan population: 127 million
FR, UK + BE population: 142 million but again Japan is super important.
Wake up, young man and face reality.
Demand for flights out of Asia is growing fast, and Emirates and Qatar are doing brilliant job, Turkish as well, however we need direct link to Zagreb from Tokyo, Beijing/Shanghai, Seoul and perhaps even Osaka. All these are massive mega cities with over 10 million inhabitants and in case of Tokyo over 30 million.
Lets see, Croatia was visited by 160 000 Chinese visitors last year, Serbia by what 40 000. This year if Serbia gets 60 000 Chinese visitors, my hat off to you. Croatia will have most likely 250 000 Chinese visitors, what lesson can we learn from Serbia, that we should have direct flights with China and perhaps numbers might skyrocket from a very low base.
Chinese carriers and Chinese authorities are negotiating with Croatian Government and once agreement is made, Chinese will come.
This might be next year, might be in 2020. No need to rush thing.
Yes, very likely in 2020, there'll be 500 000 Chinese visitors to Croatia, at least 150 000 to Zagreb, and strong demand for direct flights.
@AnonymousMay 14, 2018 at 10:22 AM
Lufthansa maintains 5 daily flights to Zagreb out of Munich and Frankfurt, OU maintains 5 daily to Frankfurt and Munich, think we can agree the 10 daily flights is more than sufficient for now. Zagreb is also quite close to Munich, only 420km from Zagreb.
Zagreb - Krsko - Zidani Most - Ljubljana, google earth the route, you'll see what a nightmare for train drivers that route is.
WTF are you talking about, for Zagreb priority is to get good connections with legacy carriers, build a strong base and expand accordingly, Wizzair is only welcomed if they pay same landing fees as others do, no exceptions.
Getting connected with Tokyo, Shanghai, Seoul, Beijing, Osaka, far more important than have some low cost scam airline flying daily to Luton or Gatwick.
You do know London is connected with BA and OU, with 4 daily flights on some days, normally twice daily.
I think, you're just jealous, Zagreb is getting all these links to major Asian cities.
http://www.novinite.com/articles/187906/Minister+of+Tourism%3A+I+Hope+for+40%2C000+to+50%2C000+Chinese+Tourists+in+Bulgaria+This+Year
I guess this is all a Balkan mania we have :D
We first saw Serbia and now everybody wants the sweet part...
Tallinn, a much smaller city and EU capital is connected to 4 London airports.
TIA non-EU capital: 3 London airports
KIV - poorest European capital: 2 London airports
So, where is shiny ZAG with 9 weekly LHR flights?
You may opt for Jin Air Tokyo flights or Scoot to Singapore, more than happy for you but you must at least connect vital European airports and trust me, there is room for a lot of work.
Many EU capitals already serve bigger cities' other airports.
London: LHR, LGW, STN, LTN, LCY, SEN
Other major UK: BHX, MAN, EDI, LPL
Paris: CDG, ORY, BVA
Milan: MXP, BGY, LIN
Rome: CIA, FCO
Brussels: BRU, CRL
Netherlands: AMS, EIN
Berlin: TXL, SXF
If nothing similar has YET happened with ZAG US flights doesn't mean it won't happen in the near future. It has nothing to do with cognitive skills, it has to do about a person being positive or negative towards the Topic. Cognitive skills, at the other hand can help recognizing potential successful destination ZAG from both Korea and the US, with roughly 500000 passengers. Those are the facts, other interpretations I rather wouldn't comment. And just btw if you change US for NA, you missed it completely with both Air Canada and Air Transat flying to ZAG almost daily
Tallin is the only airport in Estonia.Tirana is the only airport in Albania.Ukraine is huge country but with almost no LCC 's. All London airports can be reached from Pula, Zadar, Rijeka, Split other croatian airports few hours from ZAG on perfect highways. The same goes for all other LCC european airports you listed. And at the end do you really think in market economy the french concessionaire of ZAG would lose money with legacy longhauls while it could earn money with european LCC 's? I believe it' s quite opposite - growing interest for ZAG from long haul markets primarily Asian, which some people don 't want to accept because they are simply jealous
BA is going double daily, OU flies 5 weekly, on some days it is 3 weekly flights to London, not 4.
Again, Heathrow, heart of London, Piccadilly line vith Oyster card £3.50-5.50 and you're in city center less then 40min.
Standsted - London, 80km, 1h20 min by Train, two hours by Bus, EasyBus or National Express coach, Luton same.
Gatwick - Gatwick express = €20 one way. GFB!!!
You seem to have some strange notions that flying to Luton is better than Heathrow??? Since when ???
Also, connection with other cities will happen, there's no need to rush things. Zagreb just got new terminal, needs to get things sorted before we start with million destinations. I would like to see EasyJet doing Gatwick, Birmingham, Manchester and Edinburgh out of Zagreb, replacing Monarch, who went bankrupt.
Vueling to add Valencia and Seville with Barcelona going year round. And perhaps Transavia France adding Lyon, Marseille and Bordeaux out of Zagreb.
Alitalia to add Rome and perhaps Milan and Czech Airlines to do year round service. BrusselsSN and Swiss as well.
Zagreb would be totally fine with these for time being. Oh adding SAS, Aer Lingus and Finnair, Stockholm, Oslo, Copenhagen, Dublin, Helsinki.
These would do nicely. Hopefully all these happen by 2020 or in 2020. Fingers crossed.
After these, I want to see more carriers form Asia, Africa, North America, South America and so on, we have enough of European airlines as is.
How did they all arrive? On EK to ZAG and then by bus?
Also, we got a flight to PEK, maybe you should learn from us how to do it?
"Wizzair is only welcomed if they pay same landing fees as others do, no exceptions."
That's not true. Emirates, among others, are being financially supported to fly to Zagreb.
"... some low cost scam airline flying daily to Luton..."
Similar argument is being repeated by an expert from Zagreb arguing ZAG needs more legacy airlines and also "soft LCC" airlines like Vueling, Norwegian, Eurowings but NOT ULCC like Wizz and Ryan. However he is likely to support those ULCCs operating from other airports in the region. Are they "scam" if they operate to ZAG but fine when they operate to TZL, SKP or INI?
Not at all. You were not following closely. Air Serbia initiated steps for long haul in 2013. Efforts for Serbia to restore Cat 1 status as a prerequisite. And the whole obession with long haul just continued when JU long haul was forced to stop. It was already functioning in the 70's and 80's and then "mother" Lufti decided to force those passengers via their hubs. They were not going to take it then, and they are still not going to take it. LH managers are just not smart enough to find their interest in that, unlike LOT.
Someone posted Zagreb incentives for new carriers, this is what Emirates is getting, The very same incentives are applied to all new carriers @Zagreb airport.
They might also have struck a PR deal with the HTZ - Hrvatska Turisticka Zajednica. And normally they get a budget of around 50 million kuna per year to advertise Croatia across the globe, majority of the funds are spent in Germany, around half of the entire sum, around quarter of the sum is spent in the UK, and the rest is spent across the world.
No idea if HTZ has any deals with Emirates, however i'd presume they'd have some sort of a deal, perhaps a few million kuna per year to advertise Croatia in Emirates PR program and new destinations program.
I also oppose LCCs as they tend to demand too much from airports, if Wizzair wants to start flying out of Zagreb airport, they know what the incentives are.
If you get more than 60 000 Chinese visitors and 90 000 tourist nights this year, my hat off to you.
Zagreb had 58 000 Chinese visitors last year, and 87000 tourist nights, Croatia had 160 000 Chinese visitors and 236000 tourist nights, or 1.5 factor, sure would be nice to have more, but hey, we just started.
This for me is the biggest risk in Wizzair’s strategy. Eventually what they can get in terms of subsideries will be reduced when airports realise the situation Wizz is in and the obvious over capacity which is coming into the market.
It could be that Zagreb is way too expensive for the amount of traffic it offers. Even Eurowings complained and they are not the ones to usually chase the cheapest deal nor to offer low fares.
Anon 10.35
Where exactly was it mentioned that BA will be going double daily to ZAG? You have been repeating that for at least six months now and nothing came out of it.
People are always going to one or the other extreme. Yes, Zagreb needs an ULCC there and no, it doesn't mean it will chase away other airlines. After all this didn't happen in OTP, ATH, BEG, SOF ... so I don't see why ZAG would be any different. At the end of the day, it's people of Zagreb that are getting ripped off so that French can earn more money. Didn't they raise the charges thrice since taking over?
We are experiencing triple digit growth since September and there is no indication of it slowing down.
That said, I would love to hear why you believe Serbia won't welcome more than 60.000 Chinese tourists?
OTP and SOF being poorer than ZAG already did so much when it comes to aviation.
OTP is already reaching BUD while SOF is expected to surpass 7 million - a bit less than BEG + ZAG combined.
Does ZAG need LCC? Yes.
Is ZAG expensive from Europe? Yes.
Is the Croatian taxpayer feeding the French? Yes.
Also, those flights don't exclude opening other routes, so it's not like they gonna use all the "new-route-credit" for this year.
Hoce ljudi liniju?
Zasto ne...neka lete ako imaju interesa.
Sto hoce LCC?
ZAG je pod koncesijom, SPU/DBV/PUY/ZAD nisu....pa ne vidim nesto opsadu LCCa na tim aerodromima.
Ili LCCi traze nesto sto im ovi nisu voljni (citaj prisiljeni) dati?
Ovo tacno opisuje situaciju u Banja Luci u poslednjih par godina, ili situaciju u Tuzli i Nisu pre pocetka letova Wizzaira. Promet je naglo porastao od kad su im aerodromi dali nize cene. Gradjani, dijaspora pa i turisti sad slave sto imaju mogucnost da lete za manje para. Zasto gradjani Zagreba, turisti i dijaspora ne sme da uziva iste prednosti?
Koji dio tu nije jasan?
Ponuda/potraznja......na meni ke izbor kada, od kuda i s kime.
Sto je tu nejasno?
Aerodromi su nista doli obicne trgovine.
Prodaju svoje proizvode, kreiraju cijenu.
Na meni je da zbrojim i oduzmem te donesem odluku.
Ako je isti proizvod u npr.MZLZ-FT skuplji od istog na BNX, napraviti racunicu i obaviti kupovinu tamo gdje se vise isplati.
Ponavljam pitanje,
sto je tu nejasno?
U cemu je tvoj problem?